Hello, and welcome to Worthington Steel's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the call over to Melissa Dykstra, VP, Corporate Communications and Investor Relations. You may begin.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, and welcome to Worthington Steel's Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 Earnings Call. On our call today, we have Geoff Gilmore, Worthington Steel's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Tim Adams, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that certain statements made today are forward-looking within the meaning of the 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those suggested. We issued our earnings release yesterday after the market closed. Please refer to it for more details on the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. Unless noted as reported, today's discussion will reference non-GAAP financial measures, which adjust for certain items included in our GAAP results and which are presented on a standalone basis. You can find definitions of each non-GAAP measure and GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations within our earnings release. Today's call is being recorded, and a replay will be available later today on worthingtonseel.com. Now I'll turn it over to Geoff Gilmore.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I'd like to start today's call with a heartfelt thank you to the Worthington Steel team. In a quarter filled with uncertainty and change, our employees showed remarkable flexibility and resilience. I'm proud of all they did this quarter to focus on what they could control, while maintaining a strong commitment to safety and serving our customers. In the third quarter, we generated adjusted EBITDA of $41.9 million compared with $82.8 million in the prior year quarter. Earnings per share came in at $0.27 versus $0.98 per share in the same period last year. Results were impacted by both lower volumes and lower average selling prices. As we expected, many of the headwinds from Q2 continued into the third quarter as customers manage uncertain macroeconomic conditions. However, we saw signs of improvement during the last month of the quarter, and we believe most of the volume improvement at the end of the quarter was due to fundamental demand improvements rather than a buy ahead effort to beat potential steel price increases. Taking a look at our key markets. Our shipments to automotive were down 3% in the third quarter. Given the level of current uncertainty, we are cautiously optimistic about the North American auto market in calendar year 2025. Calendar year 2024 ended the year at 15.4 million units produced, solid given the challenges occurring late in the year, but still below pre-Covid levels. The latest calendar year 2025 forecast are showing flat builds on a year-over-year basis at approximately 15.3 million units produced. However, there's likely some upside to that forecast due to lower interest rates and lower inflation. Our commercial teams continue to aggressively pursue and win new incremental automotive business. Our shipments to the construction market were down on…

Thank you, Geoff, and good morning, everyone. For the third quarter, we are reporting earnings of $13.8 million or $0.27 per share as compared with earnings of $49 million or $0.98 per share in the prior year quarter. There were several unique items that impacted our quarterly results, including the following: the current quarter results include $7.4 million or $0.07 per share of pretax asset impairment charges related to 2 discrete items. The first was for the operational consolidation of our Worthington Samuel Coil Processing toll pickling facility in Cleveland into WSCP's remaining existing facility in Twinsburg, Ohio. The consolidation resulted in an asset impairment of $6.1 million. The second item is the impairment of an in-process research and development intangible acquired in connection with the 2021 TWB Shiloh acquisition. The write-off of the R&D intangible resulted in an impairment charge of $1.3 million. Additionally, we recognized pretax restructuring expenses of $900,000 or $0.01 per share related to a voluntary retirement plan at our tailor-welded blank joint venture. The prior year results included pretax separation expense of $1 million or $0.01 per share. Excluding these unique items, we generated earnings of $0.35 per share in the current quarter compared with $0.99 per share in the prior year quarter. In addition, in the third quarter, we had estimated pretax inventory holding losses of $1.2 million or $0.02 per share compared to estimated pretax inventory holding gains of $19.3 million or $0.29 per share in the prior year quarter, an unfavorable pretax swing of $20.5 million or $0.31 per share. In the third quarter, we reported adjusted EBIT of $25.3 million, which was down $41.6 million from the prior year quarter adjusted EBIT of $66.9 million. This decrease is primarily due to lower gross margin and, to a lesser extent, higher SG&A…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Martin Englert with Seaport Research.

Just wanted to see if you can discuss the impact that you're seeing thus far with the tariff policy. Maybe if you could run through positives and negatives and anything you're hearing from your customers in the supply chain?

Yes, Martin, no problem. First of all, I'd tell you, we would anticipate very little impact on our business. Just maybe you never know where to start in this conversation, probably the easiest place is just looking at š and the tariffs on steel and aluminum, I see little impact on our business. I know you're very well aware of this, but our strategy is we buy steel where we -- our customers are and where we're going to produce there. So very localized. That's been our strategy, will continue to be our strategy going forward. So shouldn't see much interruption at all in the supply chain. I would say the secondary impact of that is simply steel prices. And you're already seeing that there's been a brief jump up in pricing, really probably $250 per ton over the last 6 months or so, up to around $950 whether or not that sustainable is certainly debatable. So not a lot of impact there. Now beyond that, there's reciprocal tariffs, there's a lot that's being discussed right now. And I would tell you again, regardless of the direction it goes, we feel like there's going to be little impact on our earnings. We've dealt with tariffs. We think we have great strategies in place to mitigate. And really the most important thing that we can do right now is stay completely aligned with our customers and our suppliers. But we can't make any knee-jerk reactions or big decisions at this point simply because there's so much uncertainty. So I would say the biggest downfall right now, it is that uncertainty. And it's probably -- I'm laughing a bit, the intellectual strain of trying to keep up and keep the conversations going with the customers so we can get a better understanding of what the rules are going to be going forward. So we'll continue watch it and see how it plays out. But again, I want to assure those listening in, we'll be in good shape regardless and have good plans in place, Martin.

Okay. Understood. I wanted to ask about TWB. I think there was a small charge in there, but I think it was a loss for the quarter, which was somewhat abnormal, I think, if I remember right, they are typically not susceptible or as susceptible to inventory holding gains and losses. So I just wanted to understand what's happening there?

No, there were 2 special charges related to TWB. We wrote off some R&D that we had acquired through the Shiloh acquisition that was part of it. And then they had an early retirement program that they offered to select departments. And that was -- you're seeing the impact of both those charges. I think the early retirement charge was about $900,000, and the in-place R&D that we wrote off was about $1.3 million. And typically, they're not susceptible to inventory holding gains and losses because it's usually a directed buy program related to that. Really, the OEMs tell TWB who they need to buy from.

All right. Stripping out the one-off items for the quarter, fare regarding your expectations of underlying EBITDA -- unit EBITDA in steel and kind of the cadence or trajectory of normalization there? And again, stripping out one-off items, as well as inventory holding gains and losses, I guess what I'm asking for is your best guess based on visibility, whether this takes a quarter, 2 quarters, 4 quarters before things are kind of back to a normalized level on the underlying unit EBITDA.

Yes. I mean that's so much driven by demand, right, and volume and how your fixed costs are covered, right? So I think it's -- and I don't want to punt this, but there's so much uncertainty right now, right, in the market, what is demand going to be for the rest of the year. And I think that's the challenge that everybody is working through right now. I think Geoff made comments in his prepared remarks related to automotive is going to be flattish year-over-year. We think construction is going to pick up in the second half of the year. But all bets are off right now, right? What happens to inflation, what happens to interest rates, what happens to the economy as a whole. Do we tend more towards a recession versus small growth, right? I mean, it could be -- I think we're cautiously optimistic that by the end of the year, we should be at more normalized run rates from a volume perspective. But there's a lot of moving parts.

When you say end of the year, do you mean calendar year?

Yes, I'll say calendar year. Calendar year, yes.

Okay. Any way to parse out the fixed -- unit fixed cost impact potentially that you're seeing maybe using this quarter as an example within steel and because volumes were off pretty substantially year-on-year. Was that a negative $2, $5, $10, $15 a ton headwind?

I don't have any numbers to give you. I think what I would do is I would go back and look at what we've done historically, I'd look at the Form 10, what we put out there. I would look at what we've put out over the last 5 months as -- or 5 quarters as a publicly traded company. I think you can start to get a feel as demand moved around of kind of what the mix is between variable and fixed.

Okay. Any -- I mean, I guess pivoting to the JV there, typically, they do a bit better in a rising steel price environment. Any -- I think it was breakeven, if I remember right, for this quarter, but I would guess that it should step up...

Are you talking about Serviacero?

Yes. Serviacero, yes.

Yes, Serviacero, yes, I think the challenge at Serviacero is they felt the same demand compression that we had in the U.S., they sell a lot of automotive as well down there. I mean the markets are virtually the same as ours, may be slightly different. They do maybe a little bit more clients. But in general, their market is our market. And when automotive is down, it's down here, it's down there as well, because it's a pretty integrated supply chain. I think the other thing you're seeing is the impact of exchange rate movements in the peso. I think that's the other piece that's there. And they may have suffered a little bit of inventory holding losses as well but those other two things far outweighed the demand, really the volume piece and the peso exchange rate really outweighed the inventory holding loss.

The next question comes from Phil Gibbs with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Geoff, you had mentioned that February was reasonably strong, and we did see that in the MSCI data as well. What are you seeing in March thus far, I guess, following February?

Yes, Phil, that's why I made the comment. I felt like what we experienced in February was more just underlying demand and better fundamentals versus any type of pull ahead because we've seen that momentum from February definitely swing into March. So obviously, that's why we're feeling more cautiously optimistic. And specifically, automotive, we saw that demand come back in much stronger in February. And then, Phil, you've heard us talk the last 2 earnings calls, about one of our customers, one of our larger OEMs, which was having some challenges. And fortunately, they've been executing on their plan and been successful bringing inventory down, starting to get back market shares and normalize. So should continue to see a buildup with that customer over the next few months.

And you mentioned in your remarks that construction volumes, I think, specifically were down 20%, obviously, a very difficult comparison and not -- I don't think overall indicative of the demand drop itself in the marketplace. Is there going to be an effort to get some more market share back within construction? Or is it just some of the customers that you're serving at this point?

Good question. I'll start with -- it's a bad comp. It's a tough comp. If you recall, last year, we anticipated the strike at the D3. And so we had an effort to really pursue opportunities, specifically in the construction market. And we're able to win those awards, and obviously, construction made up a big piece of our shipment portfolio that quarter. So that is really the big difference between this year, the difference in construction and last year. I will tell you that we have had more of an effort, though, to answer the second part of your question, to go after more opportunities in that market here over the last couple of months just because we had that larger OEM that was a little bit slower, and we anticipated some holes in the book. That also helped out a bit in February, Phil. And I think you'll see that carry over into March, April and May as well.

Thanks, Geoff. And any color on some of the newer customer awards within automotive? I wouldn't think that they would have been visible and in this quarter and maybe more visible as the year progresses, but maybe some color on the new awards there and whether or not you expect them to be accretive to your margin profile?

Yes. Thanks, Phil. So as we mentioned in our comments, the commercial group has been quite successful, targeting new programs and specifically, automotive. So we have clearly gained share, started to see some of that trickle into shipments in February. And you're right on, we'll continue to see that build up March, April, May and really even into the summer. So yes, over the next 6 months, you'll start to see that making impact on our volume. And then, therefore, hopefully, on our margins. I will tell you the customer that the OEM, particularly that was struggling is high value add. They buy all of our high value-add products. So it's higher-margin business. Some of the automotive, the majority of the automotive we're picking up, though great business, and we appreciate the opportunities are not necessarily as high value add as that business. But overall, going to be meaningful to the bottom line longer term.

The next question comes from John Tumazos with John Tumazos Very Independent Research.

First question, what fraction of the 16 million unit market last year or this year is U.S. made? [Lourenco] on the call said that last year was the first year that had a majority of foreign imports. But I did literature search, I found I had a different statistic, and maybe I just didn't find the right number.

John, I'm sorry. This is Geoff. I don't know that exact number. And I'll say this, and we'll validate it later with you because I do want to give you an answer. I would also doubt that comment that the majority had been foreign shipments or imports in here of the U.S. market, but I will have to validate it.

Yes. I think, John, at the end of the day, right, we don't think of it in -- we think of it in terms of the North American production market, right, because we have operations in Mexico, we have operations in the States, and we have some operations in Canada. We think of it in terms of really holistically North America. So if you would -- comments around -- go ahead.

Let's just say for discussion that it's USD 9 million, $7 million -- or $6 million or something. And Trump puts up a wall. If 16 million units were handed to the U.S. companies on a platter. How much of it could they take? Could they make $1 million more, $2 million more? What's your best guess?

John, I don't have a guess. That's a good call for there -- a good question for their earnings call. I don't know. I don't -- we don't know their capacity. We know ours.

Since I'm not smart enough to figure it out. On a...

I guess, I'm not either.

On Electrical, there was some electricity conference a year or 2 ago where the utility companies said, oh, there's going to be 1% or 2% demand growth. And Elon Musk says, it's going to be over 5%. You used a number of 6% today. What percent growth do you think the electric utility industry is in a position to supply? I don't think they're ready to make 6% more?

Well, I think the 6% that Geoff referred to really is transformer growth, right? So that's a combination of a couple of things, right? That's a combination of new growth in transformers right because of demand, but it's also going back to the grid that is old and brittle, that is most probably 75% of transformers in use today are at their 30-year -- beyond their 30-year useful life. And at the same time, you have what they're doing with respect to grid hardening, which means they're trying to take some of these things underground because of wildfires and hurricanes and a variety of other issues that are out there. So it's the transformer market more so. We don't look at necessarily the electrical demand itself. That's part of it, and that's adding to the demand for transformers but it's really a combination of all those things.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I'll turn the call to Geoff Gilmore, President and CEO, for closing remarks.

I want to thank everybody for their interest in Worthington Steel and joining the call today. Again, I want to stress how just pleased I am with our efforts and how proud I am of the overall team. And we will look forward to sharing more on our progress next quarter. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.