Good morning, and welcome to the AECOM Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. I would like to inform all participants, this call is being recorded at the request of AECOM. This broadcast is copyrighted property of AECOM. Any rebroadcast of this information in whole or part without prior written permission of AECOM is prohibited. As a reminder, AECOM is simulcasting this presentation with slides at the Investors section at www.aecom.com. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. I will now turn the call over to Will Gabrielski, Vice President, Investor Relations.

Thank you, operator. I would like to direct your attention to the Safe Harbor statement on page 1 of today's presentation. Today's discussion contains forward-looking statements about future growth and financial outcomes. Actual results may differ significantly from those projected in today's forward-looking statements due to various risks and uncertainties. Please refer to our periodic reports filed with the SEC for more information on our risk factors. Except as required by law, we take no obligation to update our forward-looking statements. We are using certain non-GAAP financial measures in our presentation. The appropriate GAAP financial reconciliations are incorporated into our presentation which is posted on our website. Please note that all percentages refer to year-over-year progress except where otherwise noted. Our discussion of financial results and guidance excludes the impact of acquisition and integration-related expenses, onetime financing charges, the amortization of intangible assets, and financial impacts associated with expected and actual dispositions of non-core businesses and assets unless otherwise noted. Today's discussion of organic growth is on a year-over-year and constant-currency basis. Beginning today's presentation is Mike Burke, AECOM's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, Will. Welcome, everyone. Joining me today are Steve Kadenacy, our President and Chief Operating Officer; and Troy Rudd, our Chief Financial Officer. I will begin with an overview of AECOM's results and discuss the trends across our business. Then, Troy will review our financial performance in greater detail. Steve will conclude with financial guidance before turning the call over for a question-and-answer session. Please turn to slide 3. We began the year with a great deal of momentum across our diverse business and our confidence continues to grow. Since the start of the year, over $200 billion of infrastructure-focused ballot measures were passed in the November elections. In early April, California's legislature approved the $52 billion Road Repair and Accountability Act, and just last week, Congress reached a budget deal that included $21 billion of additional defense spending and fully-funded the FAST Act, which is an important step towards providing long-term certainty for our clients. In addition, a number of key political priorities continued to advance including a $1 trillion domestic infrastructure bill, comprehensive tax reform, and a pro growth regulatory environment and sustained increases in defense spending. Importantly, nearly 70% of our profits are generated from infrastructure and defense markets that are poised to benefit as these initiatives gain traction. It is also becoming clear that our design, build, finance, and operate capabilities; our scale; and key investments in growth are resulting in meaningful advantages. This is apparent in our recent successes on large pursuits such as the San Onofre Nuclear decommissioning project and a new NFL stadium in Los Angeles. In addition, shortly after the quarter ended, we were awarded a $3.6 billion U.S. Air Force contract which is currently under incumbent protest and is expected to be added to our backlog upon resolution. I'm also…

Thanks, Mike. Please turn to slide 6. Revenue in the second quarter increased by 1.1%. Year-to-date, total revenue has also increased. This outcome is a result of momentum across our markets and positive returns on our business development investments. Adjusted EPS was $0.89. This includes $0.33 from the net impact of the reversal of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance that was included in guidance for the year and a slightly higher quarterly tax rate than we expected. After adjusting for the impact of these items, our earnings were ahead of the expectation we set for the quarter. On April 28, we closed our first AECOM Capital property sales sale, which will contribute $0.17 of EPS for to our third quarter and total cash proceeds of approximately $80 million. Please turn to slide 7. Revenue in the DCS segment decreased by 3%. This was comprised of growth in the EMEA and Asia Pacific regions offset by a slight decline in the Americas. We exited the quarter with a record backlog in the Americas, and we are confident in the trajectory of the business as funding from the ballot measures and the FAST Act benefit our markets. The adjusted operating margin of 6.4% was an improvement from the last two previous quarters due to solid execution underlying our business. We also continue to invest in business development to best position ourselves for improving market conditions and opportunities for growth. Please turn to slide 8. Revenue in our Construction Services segment increased by 12%. Building construction revenue increased by 21%, and is on-pace for a third consecutive year of double-digit growth. In addition, power revenue increased by 42% due to the large wins over the past year that are now getting underway and from our strong backlog. The adjusted operating margin was…

Thanks, Troy. Please turn to slide 12. We are up to a strong start to the year with substantial momentum in our pipeline, reflecting the benefits of our business development investments and improving fundamentals across many of the markets that we serve. Importantly, our business performance remains consistent with the operating plan and the guidance we provided at the start of the year. As a result, we are confident in achieving our 2017 adjusted EPS guidance range of $2.80 to $3.20. Our guidance includes revisions to interest expense and tax that offset one another. We anticipate our third quarter adjusted EPS will approximate 25% to 27% of our full-year guidance, which includes $0.17 from AECOM Capital. With that, I will now turn the call over for Q&A. Operator, we are now ready for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. Our first question comes from Andrew Kaplowitz from Citi. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, guys.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Mike, can you give us a little more color on the state of the environment for your MS business. You said last quarter that you thought $17.5 billion of bids will awarded this year, I think you reiterated that bit this quarter. You did win the $3.6 billion award, but you talked about it being under protest from the incumbent and your organic growth has decelerated a bit in the quarter, although it was up sequentially. Ultimately, my question is, when do you think the increase level of MS work will translate into organic growth? Do you have confidence that FY 2018 will be the big revenue growth driver year for MS?

So, I do have great confidence in growth in FY 2018, and let me just give you a little more color on that, Andy. We started off the year saying we had a $50 billion qualified pipeline, we had $25 billion of bids under evaluation with almost $20 billion of those decisions being made in 2017. So, we started off $25 billion of bids and evaluation, $5 billion of those bids have been decided already through the first two quarters, and we won 40% of that, right. So, we added – in Q1 and Q2, we added a little over $2 billion, so we had a 40% win rate on the first $5 billion that was decided, which – as you know, Andy, in this space a 40% hit rate is exceptional. That does not include the $3.6 billion RSS [range support services] win that we had just after the quarter closed in the first week of April. So, on top of that, during Q2, we submitted another $6 billion of bids that are now in evaluation. So we started with $25 billion. We took $5 billion out of there, because we won $2 billion of the $5 billion. We added $6 billion of new bids during the quarter. So, now we have $26 billion in bids under evaluation going into the quarter, and we – as you saw the press release on the $3.6 billion one that was won right at the beginning of the quarter. So, we feel really good about the pipeline. We've invested over $100 million in business development in the last two years alone. We are taking prime positions on these contracts in many cases where, in some cases, we were subcontractors previously, so we're taking a bigger share. We're bidding on bigger projects. We've increased our win rate, and all that leads me to have a very bullish view on growth in FY 2018.

All right, Mike, that's helpful. Last quarter you said your DCS business was still pretty choppy and this quarter's decline in organic revenue seemed to confirm that. What do you think it's going to take to get more consistent DCS organic growth? Do you think the passing of this year's federal spending bill including the FAST Act funds that you mentioned removes the bigger hurdle that was holding spend back? Are there any other catalysts you need to see to really push DCS organic revenue to more consistent growth? And how much can the new California bill really help you and in what timeframe?

Yeah. So, Andy, let's – Steve and I will tag team that question, because I think it is a very important question. So, let's start with the big macro issues that we've been waiting on and how those might contribute to a catalyst here. So, you mentioned the California bill. Certainly that was encouraging. If you think about California – if California were a country, it would be our largest international market, and the fact that they passed a $52 billion infrastructure spending bill last month is very encouraging. You add that to the $120 billion of transportation ballot measures that passed in November in Los Angeles County. This is a market where we are very strong. It's our home market. We have $700-plus million of revenue already in the state. We feel really good about that as a significant catalyst in California. When we look to the recent activities in Washington with the omnibus appropriations bill that passed just last week, FAST Act is now fully authorized at the levels that we've been talking about. There is a new almost $1 billion highway obligation ceiling that was added. And so, all of that gets us quite comfortable that we have catalysts for spending at the California level. At the federal level, we've seen increases in gas tax across the country. We're delighted that President Trump said last week that he was receptive to an increase in the gas tax. The gas tax is a very important component here. It's just one arrow in the quiver. We haven't raised the gas tax since 1993 and every $0.01 increase in the gas tax is about $1.5 billion of revenue dedicated to transportation. So, those are the big macro issues, but maybe Steve can comment on some more of the specifics that are affecting our business.

Yeah. Well, in the Americas, we're winning quite well. So, our book-to-burn was over 1 again. We're seeing a tremendous pipeline. The difference in the pipeline, I would say, relative to prior year is that the projects are more complex, they're larger, and they take a lot more time to get awarded. So, as Mike said in his prepared comments, we haven't seen our clients getting the benefit of the ballot measures or the FAST Act money yet, but it's clear, they're expecting to get it and it's clear they're building that in to their own CapEx planning. So, you're seeing – I mean, you look at P3s alone and integrated delivery, so between P3s and design build, we have $36 billion of CapEx in the pipeline that we're chasing, that these are real opportunities that AECOM Capital, Construction Services, and/or DCS are having pieces of. So, the pipeline is growing dramatically, but they take a long time. I mean, you look here in LA alone with the CONRAC facility at the airport, the ATM – these are long-range projects that take a while to hit the ground. Despite that, we're operating on plan. We're hitting our numbers on the bottom-line. We're pretty close into our expectations on the top line as we ramp into the second half, and we do expect organic growth in the second half.

Okay. That's helpful. And, Steve or Troy, maybe just a very quick follow-up, you obviously amended your credit agreement in the middle of the quarter. Is there anything you can do to give yourself maybe a little more cushion versus your covenants so that you're not having to do that? Just, what can you do to give yourself a little bit more leeway here? We know you're going to generate a lot of cash in the second half of the year, but is there anything more you can do to help yourself out in that sense?

Yeah. So, Andy, I guess, first one on that is, we'll generate the cash that we said we would for the full year. So, even though we were challenged in the second quarter primarily as a result of a payout of a settlement, we still are going to hit our full-year guidance. And as Steve pointed out across the business, we've been delivering against our earnings expectations. So, we had adequate cushion in the quarter, and delivering on cash and delivering on the earnings performance of the business will have us where we want to be.

Thanks, guys.

Thanks, Andy.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Tahira Afzal from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi, there. Congratulations on a good quarter.

Thanks, Tahira.

Thank you.

I guess, if I was to look at some of those other opportunities you have in terms of investments, the 15 active ones you've talked about and maybe the others you're looking down the road, can you talk a little more about how broad-based they are? Could they potentially have the same return profile like what you've seen recently with AECOM Capital?

Yes, Tahira. Certainly, we have 16 investments. They are very broad-based in cities from New Jersey; New York; Washington D.C.; Austin, Texas; Nashville, Tennessee; Los Angeles; Silicon Valley; San Diego, and I'm probably missing – what, oh, in London, Manchester, so wide variety from real estate projects from hotels, residential, rental. We have two more projects that are in the hydroelectric space. And we have a number of bids outstanding in the P3 space. And so, it's fairly broad-based geographically, it's broad-based by market sectors, and we had as we announced a 30% IRR on our first project. That is not counting the profit we earned on the construction revenue. So, there's certainly built-in gains in that portfolio. We have not tried to disclose the total gains that we think might be appropriate. We'll disclose those in our guidance as we move forward. We do have some more gains that we expect throughout this year and we'll update you with our 2008 (sic) [2018] guidance of what we expect, but suffice to say, we are very happy with the progress of AECOM Capital. We are very happy with the returns on our first transaction, and we expect that there to be built-in gains in all of these assets that we currently have.

Got it. Okay. Thank you. And just as a follow-up and I might be pressing my luck here but given the strength you're seeing in all your core markets and really what you potentially could see on the federal services side, do you feel that you are still confident about really looking out into the next year and seeing some revenue growth coming back maybe in the mid-single digits, or you're not at the stage that you can do that? And to the extent you are driving sort of mid-single digit revenue growth, could that be enough, alongside the steady utilization and execution to really start hitting EPS growth, that is growing at a faster clip?

I guess, we do, Tahira. It's – we have been executing I think very well. We've been investing very well in business development opportunities in hot markets. When we look at our markets today, two-thirds of our profits are in markets that are experiencing significant increases in funding; funding like the Fast Act, the $200 billion of ballot measures we talked about, the expected $1 trillion infrastructure plan out of the federal government, the Department of Defense growth. So we are focused in the right markets, we've been investing heavily in growing our backlog which you're seeing. And as we have previously said, our financial targets through 2021 is we expect a 5% compound growth rate in our revenue, we expect a greater than 10% compound growth rate in our earnings per share over that five-year period of time, and we expect to produce cumulative cash flow – free cash flow of $3.5 billion over that five-year period of time. So, we are still very committed to those financial targets that we put out at the beginning of the fiscal year, and I think all the indicators that you're seeing on adding to the backlog, executing better, and getting the noise of the integration behind us as we're turning our attention to growing the business and getting all of the integration work behind us, which is behind us at this point.

Got it. Okay. Thanks very much.

Sure.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Steven Fisher from UBS. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. Steve, you mentioned that you expect organic growth to be positive for the – in the second half. I guess, I'm just wondering how balanced do you think that is going to be across the segments? As we were looking back a quarter or so, I think we were thinking that every one of the segments could be positive contributors for the year. So, how are you thinking about how balanced that could be and are confident that you will be able to deliver overall organic growth for the whole year?

I think it's going to be pretty balanced, Steve. DCS, as I was speaking to when I made those comments, we're expecting to ramp. We're already growing in EMEA and APAC; those businesses are solid. Americas was slightly down in the quarter, but we're expecting to rebound or already growing in transportation and water in the Americas. And then when you look across to CS, we expect organic growth largely driven by a ramp in building construction in the second half; a pretty significant ramp in power, which grew over 40% in the quarter; and stabilizing oil and gas market. MS, the wins in MS are very large wins and bode extremely well for FY 2018. Our modeling for MS for the second half is about flat ramping into 2018.

Okay. And if I could just ask you about cash flow, just to get a sense of your confidence in being able to deliver on the targets for the full year, given the significant back-half weighting. And I guess sort of my question is, I know you can point to historical balances between first half and second half, but your mix is different now than it has been historically. How do you think that changing mix is going to affect the timing and/or the potential volatility around cash flow and collectability and timing of it, and is there anything you can do to kind of ensure that things don't slip?

So Steve, I guess, first of all, we are highly confident in our ability to deliver on the full year result. And as you dig into that little bit, the confidence can be gained by, as you said, our past history. And our past history is driven by the underlying fundamentals of the business. It's a large, diverse portfolio, where people are rewarded to collect and those conditions don't change. So, there isn't something that stands out that drives cash flow – with the exception of one thing which is a tailwind for us, which is AECOM Capital. So, having AECOM Capital closed at the beginning of the quarter creates a significant tailwind in the second half of the year, on top of just the fundamentals of the business which remain unchanged.

And, Steve, just to add on, because you asked about the mix. The mix helps, so if we more than double our MS backlog with an A+ credit rating client, the cash flows are very predictable. And in CS, as you know, our working capital commitments in CS tend to be significantly lower than our DCS business. So, the mix will help.

Okay. That's helpful. Thanks a lot.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jamie Cook from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Jamie Anderson - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Yeah. This is Jamie Anderson on for Jamie Cook. I just want to get a little more color on the $17.5 billion of MS pursuits. Could you guys clarify, on a dollar basis, what percentage of these are re-competes versus new business? And then, when we're thinking about the new competes, I understand that some of those could be where AECOM is switching from a prime to a sub or – excuse me, from a sub to a prime, just, how do you guys think about win rates between new business and re-competes on a dollar-weighted basis, and what does that kind of bode for MS top line into 2018? Thanks.

Sure. So, the $17.5 billion number, I don't think was quite right. So, we have $26 billion of bids under evaluation right now, and we have another $24 billion or so of bids that we are working on submitting, right. So we have $50 billion qualified pipeline; $26 billion have been submitted already, under current evaluation. The hit rate that we've experienced so far, excluding RSS, has been 40%; if you add RSS, it's obviously enormously larger than that. And so, when I look at the wins that we've had so far to-date, they've been predominantly new wins, takeaways from other – almost exclusively takeaways from other companies. If I look at the rest of the bid, there's only one big one – off of the top of my head now, there's only one big one that is a re-compete. And so, what's important about that though, the re-compete, we are re-competing as a prime instead of a sub, so we're re-competing to take a bigger share. But our hit rate is slightly better – typically if I look at historically, slightly better on a re-compete than it is on a new bid, but so far year-to-date, our hit rate on new business has been 40%. So, we're feeling really good about that. Jamie Anderson - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Okay. Great. Thanks so much. I'll hop back in queue.

Sure.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Anna Kaminskaya from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, guys. Sorry to beat a dead horse on MS segment, but just thinking about all the protest and how long it takes, is there a risk of some of the big projects and the backlog growth slipping into 4Q and maybe even to 2018? Kind of, if I think about the cadence of new wins in a big pipeline of MS projects, I mean, how should I think about it 3Q to 4Q and, again, risk of some of the awards slipping into 2018?

Yeah. So, the typical protest period is 100-day period. So, on that RSS one, we announced it a little over a month ago. So, we're 30 days into that 100-day period to give you a sense. And I think, nowadays, you expect more than half of the projects to get protested, it's just natural. And if it's a takeaway from another firm, protesting for 100 days, that means they get another 100 days of revenue. It's fairly typical, and we feel pretty good about the odds of success on protest. Sometimes you go through a technical period, where you resubmit some information to help them with the protest determination, but we feel pretty good about our position and the outcome of those awards. And so, we're still on track to hit a target that we set out at the beginning of the year, which was we were hoping to double our backlog during the year. We started the year with just about $8 billion of backlog in the Management Services segment. That's of course, more than two times our annual revenue run rate. We're expecting to double that this year, and we're on track to do that, finishing the year with $16 billion of backlog in MS. So, all of the investments we've made have been paying off so far, and we don't expect that to change.

Great. And maybe just a follow-up on your power business, I know you're in the early stages of some, like, big construction projects, and unfortunately quite a few of your E&C peers have some execution hiccups. Maybe are you doing anything differently on project control, on sub-contracting labor, just mitigating the risk down the line? And I know, it's a new growth platform for you, for AECOM, so what do you do differently?

Well, we're not doing anything differently than the legacy power team that we acquired with URS did historically, and as you recall, having tracked this space, I can't recall of any combined cycle project hits that this team has taken that they've reported. So, this team is highly tested. They are working in their sweet spot with clients that they know. So, we're relying on our project managers that have delivered for these clients like Alliant, for instance, that we discussed in our prepared comments. We are adhering to the risk procedures that we've always had in that group, which is at a much higher level than fixed price work elsewhere in the company on the design side. It's at a level of detail that is extremely high. And we approach those projects with great care on the contracting side. We don't sign up for deals that we can't manage the risk through. And then we're conservative on how we recognize revenue on these projects. So, we continue to follow that and on these projects they are performing well.

And then just impact to your margin, where can margin go as those projects ramp up, can it be north of 2% this year or kind of how should I think about margin profile in the business, in the construction...

It definitely has a positive impact on the margins, because the margins in the power space run 6-plus percent. And as I mentioned, the mix of power is growing as we had over 40% growth in the quarter and in the second half, we would expect a marginal increase in the margin because of that ramp-up.

Great. Thank you very much.

You're welcome.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Michael Dudas from Vertical Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning, gentlemen.

Good morning.

Regarding your three distinct businesses, as you look ahead, which one or which ones will have better opportunity to show operating leverage to the bottom line as some of these revenue flows and absorptions really start to kick in given your expectation, say, in 2018 and 2019? Do they all kind of contribute evenly or are there are ones that can provide more incremental to the bottom line?

Well I think that all will benefit from a ramp on the top line. MS will benefit significantly, although they're in a space that has a lot of cost plus contracts, so long run, the overall margin also because they're taking prime positions could – will be probably more consistent with where we've guided in the 7% to 8% range. DCS should benefit greatly from leverage but, of course, it's not going to have that kind of dramatic growth that we'll see for instance in the power segment. On the power segment we think next year will be 3 times what it is in FY 2017. So, overall, we're not going to have to increase our core G&A to support these businesses, we have room to ramp and growth in general will benefit our overall margins.

Troy, on your debt that you guys placed in – earlier in the year, remind me on that, how long and what kind of prepayments or what kind of covenant flexibility will be as you guys continue to delever and further want to recapitalize the balance sheet?

Yeah. So, Mike, I think you're referring to the bond offer we did which was is a $1 billion bond offering at 5.125% with a ten-year duration, which puts us to 90% of our debt being fixed rate. It does still leave us the room to pay down $1.2 billion in variable rate debt. So, that's where we sit today and that seems like a good place for us to be at this point in time.

That's what I was getting, and my final question is for Mike, not that you don't have enough macro catalysts but I just saw something in the paper the other day about the LA bid for the Olympics. Any thoughts or update, is there real potential there, and is that something that could be positive benefit those for AECOM if that happens?

So, it would be an enormous benefit. Obviously, we're leading the preparation of the bid package and have been for quite some time. The International Olympic Committee happens to be in Los Angeles this entire week doing their final assessment of our bid. The decision will be made in September of this year at the IOC meeting in Lima, Peru. It's down to us and Parish right now. I don't know, I don't want to handicap here, but I do sit on the board of LA Olympic Committee. So, we're excited about it. It would be a real catalyst for this market and would a very good commercial opportunity for us also. As you know, we have been involved in the last at least dozen Olympic Games, leading the design of the Olympic Village in Rio, in the masterplan for London, we're working on Tokyo 2020 right now also. So, it's an important part of our business.

At least I know where maybe the 2024 Analyst/Investor Day would be held.

Yeah. Exactly.

Thanks, Mike. Appreciate it.

Sure.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Chad Dillard from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon. Can you spend a moment talking about your future bidding prospects in your building construction business and there's been some number of headlines out with – talking about the slowing commercial activity weakening C&I loans, (43:18) and I was just curious whether you're starting to see a pullback from any of your customers in the space at all?

We are not seeing a pullback. The building construction business will have our third consecutive year with double-digit organic growth. In Q2 alone, our contracted backlog increased 6% and we are not only seeing significant growth in our historical dominant market of New York, but we are spreading that out to two markets across the country that are very active. In fact, we started investing in the California market just a few years – just two years ago. We spent a lot of money building up our Construction Service business in that market. We now have $6 billion of projects that we're pursuing in Los Angeles alone, not to mention the significant $2.5 billion construction project for the new NFL stadium here in Los Angeles. We are also – there has been some press reports about a very large project in London and that will be officially decided shortly. It's the tallest residential project in all of Europe. So, we're seeing strength across our traditional core markets, as well as the markets that we're expanding into. We're seeing it in sports. We're seeing it in airports. We're seeing it in commercial construction. We're seeing it in urban infill residential high-rise that matches the urbanization trend that we've been following for quite some time. So, we feel really good about that. It will be, like I said, another year of double-digit organic growth and our backlog is supporting that to continue.

Sounds good. And then just really quickly on the MS segment, you guys posted margins a little bit higher than the, I think, the 7% guide that you originally had at the beginning of the year. Just curious, I mean, were there any onetime items or is that just kind of just steady as she goes?

It was mostly steady as she goes. I believe there were some award fees, but that is somewhat consistent during the year, we had them forecasted in our guidance. They did pop in the quarter.

Great. I'll leave it there. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Brent Thielman from D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead. Brent Edward Thielman - D. A. Davidson & Co.: Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. It strikes me that Design and Consulting margins are still expanding despite the fact this infrastructure work hasn't really come in for you yet. Question, these larger kind of more complex projects you talk about that you're still waiting on, these typically come with much better margin profile than what we see in that segment today?

No, not really. They're competitive and they require as much execution as we've seen in the past. We don't see a lot of volatility other than the operating leverage in the margins as those come to fruition. Brent Edward Thielman - D. A. Davidson & Co.: Okay. That's all I had. Thank you.

You're welcome.

Thank you. Our final question comes from Andrew Wittmann from Robert W. Baird. Please go ahead. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Great. Thanks for taking my question. I heard a comment earlier that you're expecting more gains from AECOM Capital this year. I was just wondering if the $0.20 guidance that you guys laid out for investment gains this year is changed or unchanged?

Just to be clear, $0.20 was the midpoint of the range that we provided, and we're not changing that range. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Okay. And then I guess my second question was on, I guess, cash flow. I think, later this year, the covenant steps down another point. If you could just refresh us what the next date and level is and where do you expect to hit – or where do you expect to be in terms of your leverage at that point, and just, was the financing of receivables a factor in the quarter or did you do any of that or unwind that in a positive or negative direction in the quarter?

So, I'll work backwards. First of all, we still maintain our program where we sell receivables, it's a fairly consistent part of our overall management of AR, and it did provide a headwind during the quarter. And in terms of where we expect to end the year, it's consistent where we said we'd be, we're going to be on a net basis in the low-3s and that's going to be driven by our ability to, as I said earlier in the call, to continue to drive our cash flow to where we have guided, and our earnings being consistent through the remainder of the year. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Okay. Thanks.

Thank you. I will now turn the call back over to CEO, Mike Burke, for closing comments.

Well, thank you, operator. So, first of all, the first half of the year kind of reflects what we believe are the key inflections in our business and markets, and that we've been talking about those for quite some time. But importantly our Management Services business, which is our highest margin business is off to a very strong start in converting that $50 billion of pipelines that we've been talking about for quite some time now, and that is – that didn't just happen. That's the result of two years of bringing together the combined strengths of URS and AECOM investing $100 million in business development and we're seeing the results of that hard work from our team there and our investment. But also, in our infrastructure markets, as I mentioned earlier, we are seeing a number of catalysts from whether it's the $200 billion of ballot measures, whether it's the fully-funded FAST Act, whether it's the new California $52 billion highway bill, these are all real tangible catalysts for increased funding that will help us for many years to come. And I know we've said it in the past, but it's worth repeating here is that almost 70% of our profit is tied to markets benefiting from all these policy initiatives underway, whether it's infrastructure, whether it's defense spending. And it's a great time to be in our business and we're certainly excited about where we are today and how well we're positioned for the future. And we couldn't be more pleased with where we are right now. So, we look forward to seeing many of you over the coming months as we're getting out on the road talking to many of you and we look forward to the continuing dialogue and we'll be talking to you next quarter. So, thank you, again.

Thank you. And thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.