Thank you, and good morning. On the call with me today are Marty Lyons, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Michael Moehn, our Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; as well as other members of the Ameren management team. This call contains time-sensitive data that is accurate only as of the date of today’s live broadcast and redistribution of this broadcast is prohibited. We have posted a presentation on the amereninvestors.com homepage that will be referenced by our speakers. As noted on Page 2 of the presentation, comments made during this conference call may contain statements about future expectations, plans, projections, financial performance and similar matters, which are commonly referred to as forward-looking statements. Please refer to the forward-looking statements section in the news release we issued yesterday as well as our SEC filings for more information about the various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Now here’s Marty, who will start on Page 4.

Thanks, Andrew. Good morning, everyone. I will begin on Page 4. At Ameren, we remain steadfastly committed to our strategic plan, which continues to drive value for our customers, communities and shareholders. Our focus is clear, deliver reliable, affordable energy while making prudent investments in energy infrastructure. In the first quarter of 2025, we made great strides. Key energy infrastructure investments are enhancing the reliability and resiliency of the system for our 2.5 million electric customers and more than 900,000 natural gas customers across our service territory, ensuring they have the energy they need when they need it and facilitating economic growth in the communities we serve. Today, we’ll provide an update on first quarter performance and how execution of our strategic objectives outlined on this slide are translating into tangible benefits for customers, communities and shareholders. Let’s get started with details on our financial progress this quarter, which I will cover on Page 5. Yesterday, we announced first quarter 2025 earnings of $1.07 per share compared to adjusted earnings of $1.02 per share in the first quarter of 2024. The key drivers of these results are outlined on this slide. We continue to expect 2025 diluted earnings per share to be in the range of $4.85 per share and $5.05 per share. Moving to Page 6. On our call in February, I highlighted some of our top priorities for 2025 as we invest strategically to benefit customers, enhance regulatory frameworks and optimize business processes. The Ameren team’s efforts during the first quarter have already begun to yield positive results, as you can see on Page 7. Starting off, ongoing investments continue to improve the reliability, resiliency, safety and efficiency of service for customers while facilitating and contributing to economic growth. And as we look ahead, more will be required.…

Thanks, Marty, and good morning, everyone. Turning now to Page 15 of our presentation. Yesterday, we reported first quarter 2025 earnings of $1.07 per share compared to adjusted earnings of $1.02 per share for the first quarter of 2024. The key factors that drove the increase are highlighted by segment on this page. Our infrastructure investments to strengthen the energy grid and to provide more energy resources to serve our customers continue to be the primary driver of earnings growth across the company. Further, the economic outlook for our service territories remain strong. In fact, over the 12 trailing months ended in March, Ameren Missouri’s total weather-normalized retail sales have increased by approximately 3% compared to the year ago period. We’ve seen continued strategic wins that highlight the strength of our service territory. Notably, Boeing was recently awarded The Next Generation Air Dominance contract by the federal government valued at least $20 billion. Boeing’s ongoing St. Louis campus expansion to support this contract and other defense work is expected to create a significant number of new jobs and manufacturing work and reaffirms their commitment to the St. Louis community. In addition to aerospace, we’re seeing growth in other sectors of our regional economy such as health care, education services and mining. Turning to Page 16, I’ll provide an update on our 2024 Ameren Missouri’s rate review. In April, the Missouri PSC approved a constructive stipulation and agreement for $355 million annual revenue increase. As our fifth consecutive settlement of electric revenue requirements in the state, this agreement continues our strong track record of achieving win-win results for our customers, communities and shareholders. The agreement does not specify certain details, including return on equity, capital structure or rate base. The agreement provides for the continuation of key trackers and riders, including…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jeremy Tonet with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.

Hi good morning.

Good morning, Jeremy. Just wanted to start off with the additions as you laid out there. It seems like a lot of activity percolating. And just wanted to see the $350 million [ph] that you referenced there, I just want to make sure that’s separate from the 2.3 gigawatt referenced? Or I just wanted to kind of clarify that point in the outlook there.

Hey Jeremy, good morning, it’s Michael. So again, I think the incremental change is 1.8 gigawatt to 2.3 gigawatt. So we signed an additional 500 megawatts under construction agreements related to data centers. And so when you think about that 1.8 gigawatts that we had in the fourth quarter of last year, I mean, that was inclusive of that 350 megawatts. So hopefully, that’s clear. So it’s an incremental 500 megawatts between where we were at the fourth quarter.

Okay. Got it. And then just wondering if you could expand a bit more, I guess, as these additions continue how that looks for the need for new generation here compounds, I guess, some of the factors that you laid out earlier, just – any other thoughts would be helpful.

Yes, Jeremy, this is Marty. Again, thanks for joining us. When we think about the 2.3 gigawatts of data center load growth and you think about it in terms of the sales growth that we’ve laid out, it just gives us greater confidence in some of the sales growth estimates that we’ve provided. And when you went back and you look at the slide that we provided, I think it was Slide 9. We show there is an expectation of 5.5% compound annual sales growth in Missouri, and that is foundational, of course, to the resource plan that we filed, but also that resource plan that we filed has the generation that’s capable of supplying up to that 2 gigawatts of low growth by 2030, that’s shown in the green shaded area on that slide. And we think about this 2.3 gigawatts of data center construction agreements, again, just gives us greater confidence with respect to that sales growth. Now what we’re going to be working on here as we mentioned in our prepared remarks is, we’re going to be filing with the commission a rate construct for these large load customers here in the second quarter. And then we’re going to be working to develop service agreements with the hyperscalers that would use and others that would use these data centers. We expect these customers would sign these separate agreements and amongst other things, those agreements would lay out the ramp-up schedule, minimum load obligations and things like that. With that, we’ll get greater clarity in terms of the ramp-up schedule for these data centers. But if you sign 2.3 gigawatts of construction agreements, for example, you could still have at or less than 2 gigawatts of sales by 2032 depending upon the ramp-up schedule. So we’ll get greater clarity over time. But I think the 2.3 gigawatts certainly gives us greater confidence with respect to the sales growth. And of course, our IRP is tied to our plans. Now, I will say that as the interest in data centers grow, as we continue to explore avenues to provide incremental – incremental generation if needed, but feel like the generation plans that we laid out in that IRP would be adequate to serve this 2.3 gigawatts of load as we see it today.

Got it. That’s very helpful there. Thanks. I just wanted to go back to the IRA, if you could, and, there’s a lot of uncertainty at this point. But in the market, there’s a lot of attention on transferability if there were any changes there if that was taken away, I guess, the impacts that might have on your plan or how you think about potential offsets there as needed?

Yes, Jeremy, we’ll kind of tag team that. It’s certainly a really timely question. As you’ve seen in the press, [indiscernible] is expected to start marking up legislation in the next week or so. And Congress as a whole, I know wants to have a bill on the President’s desk by July 4. So a lot of work to be done here in the near term. So we’re going to see in the coming weeks where compromise can be reached on the tax credits and of course, other important provisions that will be in that legislation for our customers. And really, that’s the key here. I think these tax credits are all about being able to build the generation resources our customers need in the near term at an affordable cost. For us, based on that IRP that I just referred to earlier, which as you know, sort of incorporates in all of the above portfolio of resources, calls for more gas, solar, wind, batteries and eventually, nuclear. And so those tech neutral tax credits, they’re estimated to deliver a little over $2 billion of customer bill savings to our customers over the next 10 years based on that IRP. And that value, of course, doesn’t accrue to shareholders. Those credits reduced customer rates. So maintaining the credits as long as we can, let’s say, into the early 2030s, with Safe Harbor provisions and transferability would be really great for our customers. And the transferability you mentioned is really key. We use that provision today to sell the credits as they’re earned and then pass that cash on to customers. And I see it as the credits and the transferability really go hand-in-hand and are really key to that affordability picture. And so that’s what our – that’s what we’ve been advocating for, when I’ve been in D.C., it’s what our industry is advocating for and what others in D.C. are advocating for. And so look, as we look out over the next few weeks, the sausage making may not be pretty. Congress has a lot to balance in terms of their priorities. But I still remain optimistic we’ll get to a reasonable resolution based on the fact that this is really about – all about energy reliability for our customers, energy dominance, if you will, and customer energy prices. And I think that’s really key at the end of the day. But I’ll let Michael chime in further in terms of our specific plans.

Yes. Thanks, Marty, that’s a great overview, and I share Marty’s optimism. This ends up ultimately in a good spot. I think, Jeremy, a couple of things just to keep in mind, I mean, we talked about this before. I mean, we come into this in a position of strength, right? I mean I think our balance sheet is probably one of the stronger in the industry. And so that’s given us a great deal of flexibility. I think as we laid out on our fourth quarter call, we’re averaging about $300 million per year over this five-year plan with respect to credits. And I think the thing that gets a bit nuanced is, I think even in some of the discussions that are going on in D.C., it’s – a lot of this is already associated with projects that are in service or have been safe harbor. And so gets even further nuance down from there. But I mean, you take, for example, 2025, I think we have about, I don’t know, a little less than $300 million worth of credits. So we’ve already realized more than half of that this year, and then we’ll probably realize the rest of that over the next couple of months. But if you kind of go through scenarios and try to parse some of that back, look, I feel good about this. I think it’s manageable at the end of the day, I mean even without those credits. I mean you’re going to end up with higher rate base, obviously. Unfortunately, you’re going to have higher prices for customers. But I do think the cash flow piece is manageable, I think over that kind of 2025 through 2027 time period, kind of where we’re focused on with the rating agencies. We’re at or above that downgrade threshold over that period of time. So we just completed our review with S&P over the last couple of weeks. They again reaffirmed our BBB+ just sit in a really strong position with respect to them. They’re downgrade threshold. Just as a reminder, is 13%. We’ve got quite a bit of cushion over that as well. So again, I feel like we’ve got a lot of flexibility. Again, I share Marty’s optimism. I think this thing lands hopefully in an okay spot. But I think either way, we’re able to work around this in a manageable way.

Got it. Thank you for the thoughts. No one likes the sausage making. Thanks.

All right.

Our next question comes from Julien Dumoulin-Smith with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

Yes, hi, good morning. It’s Brian Russo [ph] on for Julien. How are you?

Great, Brian, Good to have you.

Just to follow up on the transferability question, the $300 million per year of tax credit monetization manageable. How technically, would you offset that? I think you’ve got an FFO to debt target of 17% every year. Could that be done without additional equity to offset the $300 million? Is there another way for you to accomplish that?

Absolutely. I mean, look, again, as I sit here today, what I just said before, I do think this is really manageable. I think even without these credits. And again, it’s – I think you got to get into how much really go away, right? Because I think there is a piece associated with stuff that’s already in service, stuff it’s safe harbor. I really think those probably stay. And even ultimately, if some of that stuff would go away, which seems to be a really draconian way to look at it, I still think it’s manageable without issuing additional equity, again, I think over that three-year period, we’re averaging it right at that downgrade threshold. And look, we continue to advocate with Moody’s, in particular, that downgrade threshold probably should come down too as well. When we look at a couple of our peers, we made some arguments around that, that we think given all the progress that we’ve continued to make regulatorily, legislatively in Missouri, got things stabilized in Illinois that we’re being held to a higher standard, which I think also would give some flexibility. So – but we’ll see where they ultimately go on all of that at the end of the day. But even without that, again, we feel very good about the financing plan that we have in place.

Okay. Great. And then on the PRP with Smart Plan, I mean, how confident are you on the time line that’s proposed and then the total cost of the $16.2 billion, it’s a diversified mix of like you said, renewables, gas and battery tariffs and obviously, a lot of macro uncertainty, the tariffs and supply chain. Just wanted to get your thoughts on your materials or major equipment type of procurement ahead of the ramp-up in spend?

Yes. This is Michael, again, Brian. Yes. Look, we feel great about our plan. I think we’ve talked about this over the past year. So with respect to those two gas turbines that we have in our plan, I mean we took some early action to put contracts in place with respect to the long lead time material and just recognizing the tightness that was getting there in the market. We’ve made payments in excess of $100 million to that supplier to make sure those are secured, feel good about the progress that’s being made there, construction started really on both sides. I think the teams feel very good, not hearing anything from the vendor that causes us any concern at all with respect to those gas turbines. Now we’re turning really our focus to the combined cycle that’s out there in the kind of 2032 time frame. And I think we’ll probably be in a position by the end of this year to have some contracts in place there as well. So that will give us even further confidence. From a renewable standpoint, I think we had a slide in there that talked about 400 megawatts of different projects from a solar perspective. Team has been just super aggressive about getting material on site for all of those projects. I feel very good about avoiding tariffs, most of that – those cells, et cetera, are in the U.S., either on site or they’re in warehouses, et cetera. Construction is well underway. Again, feel very good about what we see over the next few years. We’ll have to continue to kind of work around all these tariff issues. But at the present moment, we feel very good about the construction schedule.

Great. And then just lastly on your Missouri regulatory strategy, a constructive rate case settlement and with accelerating load growth ramping up in 2026 and beyond. And now with SB 4 support, do you see the cadence of your rate case filings changing? And then a follow-on to that would just be kind of the earned returns that you expect in Missouri now. I think historically, it’s been more of a step-up in terms of lag relative to when you get new rates and just curious there.

Yes, you bet. Again, I think the overall settlement, as you just noted, it was constructive. I think I noted in my remarks. I think it’s the fifth one. And so again, I think it’s a win-win for both customers and shareholders. And I think it’s just a reflection of, I think, all the progress that we’ve continued to make both regulatorily and legislatively in Missouri. And then obviously, as Marty went through some of the aspects of Senate Bill 4, again, I think it’s something is incrementally positive to how we think about regulatory lag. Our focus has always been earning as close to that allowed as possible. Mark Birk and the team continue to do a great job there. They’re very mindful of cost, very mindful of the regulatory cycle and getting things in service at the right times. As you noted, I mean, we’ve been on, I’d say, about every kind of two-year cadence. We’re always looking to try to stretch that out as far as we can. But just given the overall kind of super cycle of capital that we’re in, it’s hard to do that even with PISA. You really have to go in and kind of freshen up rates over a couple of years. Look, I think we’ll continue to step back as we – as Marty went through some of the data center opportunities and growth – we’ll evaluate that. I mean it gives us some more flexibility obviously, we want to do that. A lot will depend sort of on the ramp schedules, et cetera, when this stuff comes into place. As long as you can ever stand in Missouri as four years because of the FAC. So at some place between that two- and four-year cycle, but that’s sort of what’s on our mind on how we kind of think about it today.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

You bet.

Our next question comes from Carly Davenport with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning. Thanks so much for taking the questions today. Maybe to start, just as we think about the macro environment and the higher degree of uncertainty, is there anything that you’re seeing or hearing from your customers, particularly on the commercial or industrial side giving any early indications of any potential pockets of slowdown or changes in plans for future load?

Hey, good morning, Carly. This is Michael. No, not at all. I mean I think even I tried to note this in the remarks, if you kind of step back and it’s difficult when you’re kind of looking on a quarter-by-quarter basis. But if you look at the last trailing 12 months, I mean, the overall growth has still been very, very strong. I noted 3%, it’s across all classes. Again, residential up 1%, commercial up a little bit less, and then industrial it’s a strong 2%. So seeing growth in all areas that’s coming off of a strong year, as we noted in 2024, we ended up 2% there as well. Again, I noted the Boeing opportunity, which I think is tremendous for the country, tremendous for St. Louis, State of Missouri in terms of that F-47 being built here. I think it’s got a lot of long-term benefits. Marty noted a number of other industries [indiscernible]. Folks seem to be kind of weathering the storm, if you will, Marty, and anything to add from your perspective?

No, that’s exactly right. I would just say when we look ahead at the sales growth opportunities we have, really, the big thing driving that is this potential data center load hyperscaler interest. And that interest is just continued evidence, obviously, by the 500 megawatts of additional [Technical Difficulty]

Hey sorry, the line cut out there for a second. Sorry, can you guys still hear me?

Yes. We can now, yes.

Hopefully, you can hear us.

Great. I missed the last maybe 10 to 15 seconds, Marty of your kind of...

It was really important.

I know you started out on the data center piece and then I lost you for the last bit there.

Yes. Sorry about that. Yes, I was just underscoring that with respect to – because I know there have been some questions out in the market about the hyperscaler interest in data centers. And I just want to underscore, we’re still having very positive, constructive conversations there and moving forward at a steady pace. It’s underscored by obviously the 500 megawatts of additional construction agreements we had signed. But I know your question was about the overall economy, but when we look at some of the sales growth ahead, obviously, foundational to that is this data center demand is hyperscaler interest. And that continues to be just sort of rock solid in terms of how we’re moving forward with those conversations.

Great. Thank you for running back through that. Appreciate it. And then maybe just a quick follow-up on the broader capital plan. I know you had some high-level comments in the prepared-on tariffs being manageable. Is there any quantification you can provide on the exposure of the overall capital plan to tariffs? And if there’s any particular vertical that maybe is driving that exposure?

You bet. Yes. I mean I think when you kind of step back and look at the overall plan. I mean, just think about it in terms of the $26 billion so Carly, from that, about 65% is labor related, right? So we’re not talking about any tariffs with respect to that at the moment. So 35% is sort of on the material side. And then from there, historically, about 85% or so of that is domestically sourced. I mean the team has really done a nice job over the years developing a kind of a robust, diverse supply chain. So, I feel very, very good about that as we kind of look through where we potentially have some exposure, I think on average, we think over that $26 billion, it could be about 2%. And that’s really before any mitigation and the team will continue to look at it. Most of that’s going to be honestly tied up through some of the battery projects where we haven’t made final decisions yet. The team is kind of working through some final RFP pieces this year. And I think there’s some ability to pivot if we need to, to have some more of that domestically sourced. But also, we may decide to leave it there at the end of the day, if it makes more sense from a reliability standpoint. The quality of the product, et cetera. So again, that 2%, I think, is a very manageable number, I mean, it’s on top of that $26 billion plan that’s over that five years. These are capital projects that we’re talking about. Again, I think we’ll look for ways to try to mitigate that. I don’t want to minimize. Every dollar matters here, right? We don’t want to pass on any more costs than we absolutely have to. So the team will continue to look for ways to pivot and try to bring that down wherever possible. But I think at the highest level, the number is fairly manageable. Hopefully, that gives you some context.

That’s really helpful. Thank you so much for the time.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Paul Fremont with Ladenburg Thalmann. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you very much. I guess is there a cost estimate just on the Castle Bluff 800-megawatt plant now that you procure the turbines?

Yes. I think $900 million is the number that I think we may be disclosed in the end of the fourth quarter. So I still feel good about that estimate even as we’ve kind of gone through and freshened up everything from a contract perspective.

Great. And then if you were to choose to build additional gas fire generation, do you have a sense of what the cost would be and how long it would take for you to line up the equipment?

Well, we do have that other 800-megawatt gas plant that’s in the plan there, the following year. And again, I’ve made some previous comments about this. And again, we have secured the turbines there, we feel good about it. I’d say the costs were a little bit higher, but generally in the range. And more importantly, just feel good about being able to get the project done in that time frame from a reliability standpoint. And then the next one out there is this combined cycle plant, and I alluded to this a couple of minutes ago. I mean the team is in active RFP process and the moment going through and looking at potential turbine vendors, et cetera. And so we’ll have that locked down, I would say, by the end of this year. And so look, obviously, you’re seeing some tightness in the market. We’ll see what that ultimately produces from a cost perspective. but very focused on getting this generation online and the time frame that we’ve laid out there because of all the things that Marty talked about from the data center economic development, just general reliability perspective.

Great. Thank you very much.

You bet.

Our next question comes from David Paz with Wolfe Research. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for the time.

Hey, David.

Hey just, I guess, quickly, just as – and I appreciate the update thorough as always. But as you stand today, do you see your EPS growth in the second half of your planning period towards that upper end of 6% to 8%.

The answer is yes. David, it does. No change there. as we talked about on our year-end call, certainly, we’ve given guidance of 6% to 8% EPS CAGR for 2025 to 2029. In the short-term, we expect to be at or above the midpoint and meaning this year and next year. But as we see some of this load tick up, which we expect to see that load growth in late 2026 and into 2027, as we talked about in February, we have some of this big CapEx that’s in our IRP that Michael just talked about goes into service in 2027, 2028, it goes into rate base. In those periods, yes, we expect to deliver near the upper end of the range in that middle to latter part of that five-year plan. And so – and look, I’m pleased with the performance this quarter. We talked about the additional construction agreements for data centers, which is giving us added confidence with respect to some of that load growth that we’re seeing. I’ll be honest with you, David. I was just pleased overall with the company’s performance here in the first quarter. I think the Ameren team did a great job making progress on a lot of the strategic goals that we had set for ourselves in Q1 and additionally performed very well operationally despite some weather challenges. And obviously, we delivered solid earnings and growth over last year. So real pleased about all that. We covered a lot of that in prepared remarks, so I won’t tick through at all. But the key is that those things, like the IRP filing, like the constructive rate review settlement in Missouri, Senate Bill 4 in Missouri, the financings that our team completed in this quarter, both debt and equity financings the incremental data center construction agreements, all of the ongoing cost management across the company and the business process improvement efforts that we’ve got underway, all of these things give me greater optimism about the future and confidence that we’re going to be able to invest and grow our economies and deliver great value for our customers, communities and shareholders. So as I sit here today, I think we had a very strong quarter and feel very good about the guidance that we provided back in February.

Great. That’s good to hear. Thank you, Marty. Have a good day.

You bet, David.

We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I’d now like to turn the call back over to Marty Lyons for closing comments.

Great. Well, thank you all for joining us today. We look forward to seeing many of you at the AGA Financial Forum, which is coming up in a few weeks. And with that, thank you. Have a great day and a great weekend.

This concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.