Josh Levine
Analyst · your question.
Sure, Anthony. So, just taking it in the order that you pose those; so as far as the timing of the RO-APM, there is no update or no change in timing from what we’ve communicated, and what the industry has heard from CMS most recently, which basically puts the – essentially the implementation of the RO-APM model in the January 1, 2000 – calendar 2022 time. And so again, no change to that from what we’ve heard or what we expect. And in the context of is this, what impact would this have on capital purchases? It’s – it would, again, as we’ve talked about in the past, it would lead you to believe that if a facility that knows they’re going to be participating in the model, they’re in a zip code that they’ve – that’s been identified as for inclusion in the model, and then the reimbursement approach. If they are dealing with equipment that is either functioning at capacity, or is not necessarily in a place where they are – as confident as they should be, or could be in delivering high dose SBRT and fractionated or ultra-hyperfractionated treatment regimens, then one would assume that it could be a catalyst for them to want to think about a different mix of equipment. But again, that’s going to vary, it’s going to really probably not possible to paint the entire market with the same brush on this. It’s going to vary from facility-to-facility. And I think so that that’s kind of the answer around the RO-APM is. The other wildcard here, again, is that while, I think we see an optimistic about the evolution of the COVID environment, again, if there are flare ups, or there are things that are beyond the markets control relative to market, facility access or things related to COVID. Those are also impacts, obviously, that could affect the capital, the capital side of equipment market purchases, but again, from where we sit right now, we think this is a relatively improving situation. We don’t see orders cancelling out of the backlog. We see facility access improving for our people, both on the service and the commercial side. And so, knock on wood, it’s, moving directly in the right direction. With that said, there are some markets that obviously are going to continue to be challenged, India would be a good example of it, big opportunity there, but they have more than they can handle right now vis-à-vis the COVID situation. With regards to your question on China and China trends, if you go back to the original quota in the previous five year plan, there were 1,208, Type B devices, and 188 Type A devices identified in the very original quota – on the current licenses issued to date, I’m going to shift to Shig here, I know him, let him answer the details on that one.