Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us on today's conference call to discuss the financial results for Asana, Inc. First Quarter Fiscal Year 2026. With me on today's call are Dustin Moskovitz, Asana cofounder and CEO, Anne Raimondi, our chief operating officer and head of business, and Sonalee Parekh, our chief financial officer. Today's call will include forward-looking statements, including statements regarding expected release and benefits of our product offerings, including AI Studio, and our expectation for revenue to be generated by AI Studio, our retention and expansion opportunities, our expectation for our financial outlook including our revised full-year guidance, strategic plans and our market position and growth opportunities, and our capital allocation strategy, including our stock repurchase programs. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that may cause our actual results to be materially different from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Please refer to our filings with the SEC, including our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly report on Form 10-Q, for additional information on risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that may cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in such statements. In addition, during today's call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are in addition to and not a substitute for or superior to measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures and a discussion of the limitation of using non-GAAP measures versus the closest GAAP equivalents are available in our earnings release, which is posted on our Investor Relations website at investor.asana.com. And with that, I'd like to turn the call over to Dustin.

Thank you all for joining us on the call today. Q1 was a milestone quarter. We achieved non-GAAP profitability for the first time and AI Studio reached general availability in Q1, surpassing $1 million in ARR, demonstrating powerful early momentum. This progress fuels our journey to sustained profitable growth and positions Asana as the definitive platform for human and AI coordination. Q1 total revenues were up 9% year over year, exceeding the top end of our guidance. Non-GAAP operating margins improved more than 1,300 basis points year over year, from an operating loss margin of 9% to an operating income margin of 4%. That is a significant milestone for the company as we reach non-GAAP profitability for the first time. Adjusted free cash flow margin also improved more than 700 basis points year over year, with free cash flow margin at 5% for the quarter. Once again, our non-tech verticals grew faster than overall growth for the quarter and grew mid-teens year over year. Some of our fastest-growing verticals this quarter included manufacturing and energy, media and entertainment, and financial services. We continue to make progress in our enterprise customer acquisition. Our $100,000 and over customers grew 20% year over year, consistent with last quarter. A landmark achievement last month was closing the largest deal in Asana's history with one of the largest employers in the world. This three-year $100 million-plus contract renewal is a testament to Asana's unique ability to power complex, cross-functional execution at an enterprise scale. The growth within this customer showcases a powerful combination of organic adoption and intentional expansion, driven by our close partnership with the enterprise engineering teams to demonstrate ongoing value. After a rigorous evaluation, Asana was selected as its company-wide standard for project, task, work, and goal management, making Asana foundational to…

At the foundation of AI Studio is our AI-powered workflow automation engine.

Built to automate the repeatable workflows across your business. The Smart Workflow Gallery packages these best practice automations into prebuilt AI workflows any team can deploy in minutes. AI teammates sit on top as more flexible agents. They keep multistep work moving with minimal guidance, leveraging prior contacts, our work graph, and fine-grained permissions. For instance, a product lead can assign an AI teammate to implement a feature. It can write code using the quad code API, initiate and participate in review and approval workflows, generate and apply fixes in response to feedback, merge the update, and ask another dedicated AI teammate to get started on customer support material. All while posting live status updates in Asana showing its progress. By evolving these capabilities into a persistent coworker, we deepen human-AI coordination and unlock usage-based revenue streams beyond seat licenses, further strengthening our leadership in AI-powered work management. We're fundamentally repositioning Asana as the platform for human and AI coordination, marking a powerful new chapter in our company narrative. As AI becomes integral to how work gets done, the need for a system that coordinates work between people and AI at scale is paramount. This is more than just a technological shift; it's a redefinition of teamwork itself. We believe Asana is uniquely equipped to lead this charge. Our work graph data model provides the essential structured context, the map of an organization's work, goals, and processes, that AI needs to be truly effective in a collaborative environment. This combined with our deep expertise in fostering human coordination allows us to build AI solutions that don't just automate tasks but enhance clarity, alignment, and accountability across entire organizations. This is the generational opportunity we're seizing: to define the future of how humans and AI achieve great things together. As we look to the future in regards to the CEO search, we're seeing strong interest in considering candidates carefully. We'll be patient to find the absolute right leader to guide Asana through this next phase of growth. I'm fully committed to driving our strategy as CEO until my successor is in place, and I'm incredibly excited to partner with our future CEO on our product and AI strategy as we work together to establish Asana as the leader in this generational opportunity. Our key priorities for fiscal year 2026 are centered on setting Asana up for long-term profitable growth. These include driving customer health, accelerating customer acquisition, and delivering increasing customer value through product innovation, particularly with AI. With that context, let me turn it over to Anne to discuss our go-to-market momentum, key initiatives, and customer wins.

Thanks, Dustin. The strategic investments we've made along with the reallocation of resources towards higher leverage areas are driving incremental impact. We continue to make progress in scaling our enterprise motion. The number of customer net adds from the $100k plus cohorts grew 20% year over year, same as last quarter. Our strategic multiyear renewal with one of the largest employers in the world is a testament to our differentiation in the enterprise as the collaborative work management platform best positioned to work at global enterprise scale. With hundreds of thousands of active users, teams are driving material impact across functions, which has translated into significant labor cost savings by eliminating manual work and meaningful improvements in employee productivity. Powered by our work graph, Asana connects goals, workflows, and data across silos, while our enterprise-grade AI accelerates execution by automating processes and surfacing real-time insights at scale. International markets remain a key strength for our business, driven by growing global demand for our platform, especially in EMEA and Japan. As organizations worldwide recognize the value of Asana in improving coordination and driving productivity, our international revenue grew 11% year over year. To date, we haven't seen a material change in the demand environment in any of our segments or regions as compared to the last several quarters. However, we are beginning to see some increased buyer scrutiny and elongation in decisions related to broader consolidation or software stack transformation efforts. That said, the pipeline remains healthy. We're seeing strong demand generated across our diverse pipeline generation channels. Where initial investments, including our optimization of paid media, are driving greater leverage. Let me discuss the progress on our three strategic growth priorities: customer acquisition, customer health, and customer value. First, customer acquisition. New business remains strong, and our investment in vertically focused go-to-market teams and driving adoption of vertical-specific product use cases is resulting in strong growth in our non-tech verticals, which grew once again in the mid-teens, accounting for over 70% of our business. We're seeing particular strength in financial services, manufacturing, and media and entertainment. A few customer examples in our strategic verticals I want to highlight are Buzzuto, which is a diversified real estate company specializing in multifamily residential communities across the United States. They expanded their use of Asana in a three-year deal. Asana will enable their nationally dispersed workforce to more efficiently manage projects and streamline workflows for property setups, maximize throughput, and reduce time to market. Additionally, they have invested in AI Studio to optimize work and automate various manual tasks, further enhancing operational efficiency.

We had a great expansion deal in financial services.

One of the largest credit unions in the world deepened their partnership in a three-year expansion deal. The organization is using Asana in their core work across the real estate lending and contact center operations. Most importantly, after careful evaluation, the procurement team classified Asana as essential software that provides unique value for its cost. Their competitive analysis and ROI assessment showed that Asana effectively addresses their specific needs that no other solution can match, making us worth maintaining in their software portfolio. While tech continues to drag on our overall growth, we saw another quarter of stabilization of ARR in this vertical and strong demand for AI Studio from technology customers. Expanding our presence with the channel is a key growth and NRR expansion driver. Since the relaunch of our partner program in March, we are making great progress with the channel. Deals with partners attached have exceeded our expectations and grew double digits year over year. Of our top five deals this quarter, three were partner-led. We saw especially good traction in APAC and EMEA. Almost 40% of our APAC deals have partners attached, and we are seeing great digital transformation deals brought forth by our partners. Partners are critical to our growth and scaling of AI Studio, and they also see it as a meaningful growth opportunity. We already have certified partners selling and supporting AI Studio. Moving to customer health, we've put renewed focus on addressing churn and downgrades, particularly with small monthly customers, which represents a disproportionate share of overall churn. We have a new chief customer officer in place to lead our retention efforts across segments, bringing greater executive focus and accountability to customer retention. We are enhancing early life cycle engagement with targeted onboarding to accelerate early engagement and tailored interventions based on…

Thanks, Anne. Let me highlight the financial results for the first quarter and then comment more on the outlook. Q1 revenues came in at $187.3 million, up 9% year over year, which exceeded the midpoint of our guidance by 1%. We have 24,297 core customers, or customers spending $5,000 or more on an annualized basis. Revenues from core customers grew 10% year over year. This cohort represented 75% of our revenues in Q1. We have 728 customers spending $100,000 or more on an annualized basis, and this customer cohort grew at 20% year over year. As a reminder, we define these customer cohorts based on annualized GAAP revenues in a given quarter. Our overall dollar-based net retention rate was 95%. Core customer NRR was 96%, and among customers spending $100,000 or more, NRR was 95%. As a reminder, our NRR is a trailing four-quarter average and, therefore, a lagging indicator of more recent trends. Our in-quarter NRR was stable, and we saw improvement in logo churn across all cohorts.

However,

while our in-quarter NRR was stable for the third consecutive quarter, we expect net retention in Q2 to be pressured. This is due to a combination of continued downgrade pressure, particularly in our enterprise and middle market segments and the technology vertical. While our $100 million-plus renewal, which we highlighted in our earnings today, materially increases our remaining performance obligations, providing greater visibility into fiscal year 2027 and fiscal year 2028, it represents a modest ACV downgrade as compared to our prior contract. This will negatively weigh on our Q2 NRR, especially in our $100,000 cohort, as well as impacting the stability we have experienced over the past couple of quarters in our tech vertical. We are confident in long-term NRR improvement given the investments we have made in our customer success teams, AI Studio, and add-on strategy. Our work to better align price to value, and focus on improving customer health. However, in the near term, NRR will remain a headwind, which results in strong new business momentum and scaling contribution from add-ons and the channel being less prominently reflected in our overall revenue growth. Now moving to profitability, where I will be discussing our non-GAAP results. We continue to be extremely focused on driving efficiency and productivity throughout our business, maximizing the operating leverage we enjoy from our strong gross margins, which held steady at approximately 90%. We expect to maintain these levels of gross margin in fiscal year 2026 while expanding sequential operating margin as we continue to scale. R&D expenses were $48.9 million, or 26% of revenue, down 11% year over year. Sales and marketing expenses were $83.7 million, or 45% of revenue, down 5.5% year over year. G&A expenses were $27.7 million, or 15% of revenue, up 2.2% year over year. As a result of…

Now moving to guidance.

For Q2 fiscal 2026, we expect revenues of $192 to $194 million, representing 7% to 8% growth year over year. We expect non-GAAP operating income of $8 million to $10 million, representing an operating margin of 4% to 5%. And we expect non-GAAP net income per share of 4¢ to 5¢, assuming diluted weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 243 million. For the full year, we are updating our revenue guidance to $775 million to $790 million, representing 7% to 9% year over year growth. This range reflects two planning scenarios. The upper half assumes continued execution within a stable macro, consistent with our Q4 view. The lower half anticipates elongated sales cycles, increased budget scrutiny, and a more cautious procurement environment, particularly with tech and enterprise customers. We continue to monitor the impact of economic uncertainty on buying and renewal activity. As Anne highlighted, while we have not seen a material change in the demand environment, we are observing early signs of increased buyer scrutiny and downgrade activity, particularly in our enterprise and corporate customer bases. While these early signs alone do not change our previous outlook, we do recognize that there is a growing macroeconomic risk and thus are reflecting this risk by expanding our guidance range. We are raising our full-year non-GAAP operating margin guidance to at least 5.5% for the full year, up from our prior guidance of at least 5%, and continue to expect sequential improvement throughout the year. In addition, we expect net income per share of 22¢, assuming diluted weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 243 million. I want to highlight that if the macro environment were to deteriorate, we have multiple levers we can pull which we believe would allow us to preserve profitability at the level of our guide without compromising the investments we have made and are making to drive revenue growth acceleration. As we shared last quarter, Dustin, Anne, and I remain focused on executing a long-term strategy to drive long-term growth acceleration while meaningfully expanding profitability. We are defining how humans and AI coordinate work at scale, and we see a massive greenfield opportunity ahead of us. We believe we have the right strategy in place to capitalize on this opportunity. And with that, operator, ready for questions.

Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press 11 on your telephone. To remove yourself from the queue, you may press 11 again. You will be limited to one question and one follow-up to allow everyone the opportunity to participate. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster.

Our first question comes from the line of Matt Bullock of Bank of America. Please go ahead, Matt.

Great. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to start on AI Studio. Great to see cross that $1 million ARR threshold. Dustin, maybe if you could just help us think about the breakdown of that $1 million ARR. What does that consist of? Which types of customers and use cases are driving strong uptake? Then maybe walk us through some of the potential upside scenarios for the back half of fiscal 2026. Thanks.

Yeah. Thanks. That's a great question. So the $1 million ARR really represents a great sort of diversity and distribution of customers. We have a good number of examples from every region and across different segments as well. So I feel really good about that. And this is entirely comprised right now of the AI Studio Pro platform fees. So part of the upside in the future will come from potentially getting into the incremental consumption, and we are still seeing great patterns over time with customers continuing to use more and more credits month after month and gain confidence in the system. As well as seeing the newer cohorts of customers. A lot of the customers have joined in the past two months they're starting out faster and consuming more credits out the gate. Part of the reason for that is the launch of the Smart Workflow Gallery. Just came out a few weeks ago, but it'll it lets you deploy both AI Studio and if you're not in AI Studio, you can have it without AI, prebuilt templates. And we're seeing you do have Studio turned on, that is working as intended. We're seeing a lot of those get installed. And drive credit usages as well. And then, two more catalysts that I think provide upside throughout the year. We're launching the Plus SKU, which is gonna be a lower-priced, more affordable SKU. I think later this week, actually, for sales to start selling and to become self-serve later in the summer. That will open us up more to the SMB market and help customers, you know, get started when they need more than what's available in Basic and less than what's needed in Pro. And then also, AI teammates, which is a little bit of a new part of the AI roadmap for fiscal year 2026, but I think it's gonna be a big factor in H2 and will help a lot more end users get the benefits of AI because it doesn't require building workflows or being part, you know, getting into the automation builder at all. It really is as easy to use as working with normal human teammates. So we don't know how well Plus and teammates will do, but we're seeing all the right things from what we have in market today and, you know, have a lot more that will launch throughout the year.

Super helpful. Thanks, Dustin. And just a quick follow-up for Sonalee, if I could. I wanted to ask about the $100 million contract renewal. I believe you mentioned that was in the tech vertical, but are there any other details you can share about that renewal process? Maybe help us think about the change and quantifying the change in ACV there. And then is there anything you can share on how much AI Studio is embedded in that renewal? Thanks.

Sure. Absolutely. So you're right. It was in our tech vertical, that renewal. I just want to highlight again, it was the largest deal in Asana's history, so $100 million TCV over three years. The renewal slipped out of Q1 and into early Q2, which is why I shared pro forma balance sheet metrics around RPO and CRPO. And whilst it was a significant expansion in TCV versus the previous contract, there was actually a modest downgrade on an ACV basis, so that will actually impact you heard me call this out in prepared remarks, that will impact our overall net retention, particularly from Q2 as we look across the rest of the year. And as you correctly assumed, yes, it will weigh on the tech vertical, which up to now and over the past couple of quarters had been showing signs of stability. So, you know, with this multiyear deal, we feel like it was a trade-off we were willing to make in terms of the slight ACV downgrade because we now have much greater visibility into fiscal year '27 and '28, given the significant increase in RPO that that actually drives. In terms of the contribution to AI Studio specifically from that renewal, there's nothing factored in in the guide right now. That is potential upside. I think it's worth me just handing over to Anne, just to talk a little bit more about that renewal and the landmark deal and why they chose to work with Asana.

Yeah. Thanks, Sonalee. Yeah. Happy to add more there. What we're really excited about is the long-term commitment from this leading global enterprise customer. It really allows us to deepen our strategic partnership with them and continue to innovate with this very exceptional company. Some things that I'm particularly excited about, you know, they ran a really rigorous process to choose us and have now a long-term commitment. I think the other thing that we're really excited about is the use cases across this organization can serve as inspiration for other enterprise customers. It also shows off our strength in scalability, security, our vision, and compliance at the highest levels. Some of the really diverse business-critical use cases across their business units and functions that we're very excited about and continue to expand. So everything from change management and global logistics, managing complex work for new product and new device launches, to developing operational benchmarks for process improvement and managing client workflows for their large global accounts team. And then altogether, they are also doing cross-functional goal setting, reporting, project and portfolio status update management, across several hundred thousand employees. So it's exciting to continue to build this relationship. And now as Sonalee said, have visibility over the next three years on our ability to deliver value but then also deliver upside.

Thank you. Our next question from the line of Alan Burkowski of Scotiabank. Please go ahead, Alan.

Hey, thanks so much for taking the question. Wanna ask another question on AI Studio, but more from an ROI perspective. Dustin, it's exciting that you're seeing instances of AI Studio ARR exceeding seat-based ARR. At the same time, there are many agents that SaaS companies are selling, which I would imagine makes it a bit harder for customers to see the ROI to justify why to pay more for AI Studio. Are your top learnings thus far in selling it? And can you update us on your confidence to have a whale that you mentioned last quarter on AI Studio that are spending 6 or 7 figures on it by the end of the year?

Yeah. So this is Dustin. I'll try and unpack those questions. I may need a little bit of clarification. Can you say more about the agents we're competing with? Why do you think they're paying more with Asana? Or, maybe I'll just try and project and that message just felt like a lot of software companies are trying to monetize AI agents, which I can imagine makes it a little harder for customers to see through that.

To see through that. I mean, I think that the distinction with Asana is that they're more successful in deploying these. So you know, I think what you get when you have standalone agents in another system is partially you need a lot of behavior change, but the bigger issue that I've seen in practice is that you need them to be able to take on an entire workflow and kind of replace an entire person. And because of that, you're not as successful as often. And so customers are turning to Asana because they see that they can take on part of a workflow that can be done by AI and sort of hand back and forth with a human or multiple humans that are on the team, and that lets them be successful in a lot more areas. And as a consequence, across more use cases. So a lot of the agents that other vendors are putting out are more specialized, especially to support. And we can do versions of that, but the types of examples that we were giving with request intake and campaign management and developing assets, that diversity of use cases works much more on a platform like Asana that can handle all of that. In terms of customers that are paying more than their seat licenses right now, all of the customers are paying the same for these pro packages. And so that is largely a function of the fact that they don't have many seats. But some of them are still getting enough value out of Pro that they are buying this larger package, and it's worth what they're paying for the seats. What I'd love to see is for that to happen in even bigger accounts. So to have studio revenue eclipsing,…

Awesome. That's really helpful. And then, Sonalee, just a quick follow-up for you. You share how you're thinking about revenue from tech customers as part of the updated fiscal 2026 guidance. And also what you're estimating in terms of impact from FX versus before?

Yeah. Sure. So just firstly, to clarify, on Q1, the impact from FX was actually very minimal. It was a couple of hundred thousand dollars. We don't really tend to call that out, especially if it's not material, but I think a couple of other people had that question. So it was very de minimis. In terms of how we're thinking about the tech vertical, obviously, we called out this large renewal being in the tech vertical. So, it will continue to have an impact on what we had been seeing in our tech vertical in terms of recovery. But the actual year-over-year revenue growth in our tech vertical was fairly stable this quarter as it had been in the last couple of quarters. And we don't tend to break out tech versus non-tech on a forward basis in terms of how we're guiding. But what I would say is that non-tech is still growing, which is close to it's about between 25-30% of our business. Today is tech, and non-tech is the rest. That's growing in the mid-teens and still healthily growing in the mid-teens. So I would say expect apart from that downgrade that we've called out specifically in the renewal, the rest of the tech vertical, we would expect to be fairly stable.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Steve Enders of Citi. Your question, please, Steve.

Okay. Great. Thanks for taking the questions here. Guess I just want to maybe follow-up on some of the pressure you're seeing in the macro side of it. I think you called out downgrades on enterprise and mid-market. And if I remember it in the past, it seemed like it's primarily centered on the tech side. So I guess I just want to understand. Is this maybe new pressure that you're seeing in those segments being impacted across other verticals? Or can you just maybe clarify, you know, what exactly it is that you are seeing within the enterprise and mid-market front right now?

Hi, Steve. It's Anne. I'm happy to take that. I think what we just started to see early was, you know, some customer budget pressures, there's still some ongoing workforce reductions, and then consolidation of tools under centralized IT management. Where we saw this in particular was in enterprise and the Americas region, which for us has a disproportionate share of tech. But we're actively working to mitigate a lot of the churn and contraction through all our investments in additional customer success management coverage, identifying at-risk customers earlier, introducing our new, you know, more flexible pricing, and then in particular, I think where we feel like the mitigation is gonna come on contract in churn is with AI Studio and our foundational service plans. Those really do two things. One, with AI Studio, higher value business impacting workflows. And adoption. And then with the foundational service plans, what the customers are really getting is, you know, ongoing onboarding support services and the ability to get faster. So I think and, you know, additional products that they're buying for us. So while we're seeing some of the, you know, early signs, I think we've things in place to help mitigate it over the long term.

Okay. Great. That's helpful. And then, I guess, I just clarify on the revenue guide and I guess, the lowered, I guess, low end of it. And I appreciate some of the commentary around kinda what's been assumed. But I do want to ask on I guess, we think about the lowered aspect of it specifically in that scenario, just how scrubbed would you say that that scenario is? Or maybe kind of what I guess, how much negativity is being assumed on that low-end guide?

Sure. So the low end of the guide is definitely taken into account, you know, being much more prudent. It reflects not just the trends that Anne called out just now, around what we're seeing, but it actually reflects additional risk. And additional macro pressure, which we have not seen yet. But we wanted to provide a guidance range that at the high end is reflecting what we see today. And then at the low end incorporates a potential worsening. Given there is a lot more uncertainty out there today than when I last guided, which was in March with our Q4 earnings. So we're comfortable with the range we provided, and we feel like it covers a wide range of outcomes, but certainly, the low end factors in a more bearish view on net retention from where we are today and the macro worsening.

Hopefully, that's clear.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Josh Baer of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead, Josh.

Great. Thank you for the question. If we do make adjustment on the deferred and pull that into Q1, I think billings growth was around 5%, which was below the history here, just wanted to see how Q1 billings really performed versus your internal plan. And then the follow-up would be just anything to call out as we navigate billings for the rest of the year as far as seasonality or with regard to other renewals or dynamics over the next several quarters?

Yeah. So you get an A plus on your math. Pro forma, that's exactly what it was. So, it was about 5% in Q1. And Q1 is seasonally lower for us in billings growth typically, and you'll even see that in the trends last year. And that's because of the timing of our multiyear deal renewals. And they tend to accelerate into the second half of the year. And given the downgrade pressure that we're seeing and that Anne called out in enterprise, which tend to be annual and multiyear deals, and upfront billing that weighs our billings naturally. But what I would say is on the other side, on the flip side, we're continuing to see strengths in our SMB business, which is offsetting some of that pressure. And if you think about full-year billings, it should be in line with our guided revenue growth range.

Okay. Great. That's helpful. And I'm just wondering, you mentioned Sonalee, you mentioned a trade-off with regard to the large deal. Is that in, like, thinking about volume discounting in return for the longer duration on that contract?

Yeah. So I talked about a modest ACV downgrade, so what we get from them annually, but we felt like that was definitely worth the trade-off given, you know, Anne talked about the strategic importance of this deal. And the other thing is we're in there now. We're in there for the next three years, and there's, you know, someone earlier asked a really great question about is AI Studio in that deal. No. It's not today. Our FSPs in that deal not today. So these are all potential areas of upside. And, you know, again, we would do kind of deal again. So, yes, it was definitely worth the trade-off. And, you know, it's a long-term commitment and we love the visibility it provides for fiscal 2027 and '28. We think it's a real validation of our leadership position in this category and our ability to scale. You know, they wanted to work with us.

Yeah. I'll just add on, since Sonalee said the magic word. We're really excited too. Announce that today we are named as one of the just two years in the Forrester Q1 collaborative work management wave. So I think that that only reinforces that we have a special position in enterprise here.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Taylor McGinnis of UBS. Please go ahead, Taylor.

Yes. Hi. Thanks so much for taking my question. I just wanted to press on NRR. So it sounds like in-period NRR in Q2 is expected to come down both from the $100 million renewal coming in on the ACV side and then also an uptick in potential downgrade activity given some of what we're seeing in the macro. So sounds like, can you just unpack that a little bit more for us? Like, when you think through those two potential impacts, like, any way to help us, you know, quantify and think about what the trajectory of NRR could look like from here?

Yeah. So, no problem, Taylor. So in-quarter NRR for this quarter was actually stable. And the rolling April, which as you know, is an average of the trailing last four quarters, that actually went down in this current quarter. And that was really due to the composition of the cohort. So Q1 of fiscal 2025 actually had a relatively higher NRR. So as that quarter dropped out of the calculation, the average declined. But as we look forward, and I think that's what you're more interested in, yes, this renewal with this large enterprise tech customer will factor into or will weigh down on our net retention from Q2 and for the rest of the year. And the only thing I would say there is that, you know, if you look at our in-quarter $100,000 plus cohort of customers, that actually improved this quarter and in-quarter, which is really encouraging. And the other thing I would say is that, you know, what we're seeing from the logo side of things, we're actually seeing logo churn. So customers are choosing to stay with us even if they downgrade seats. And I think that, you know, what makes us feel really good about that is that those are upsells in future quarters. So I think when we think about our NRR as we go forward, Q2 to Q4 is likely to be pressured because of this deal that we've called out. And, also, because of the enterprise trends that Anne called out. But some of the things we're doing on AI Studio are multiproduct approach, some of the add-ons that we have coming in the second half of the year, will help to mitigate some of that pressure.

Perfect. Thanks. And then my second question is just you talked about some of the levers that you have in the business. Potentially, if we start to see a slowdown in growth from some of the uncertainty out there. You saw good upside to operating margins this quarter. So can you just maybe comment on you had the rift last quarter, how much of like the upside that we saw was savings from that? Versus maybe other sources of cost saving and efficiencies you're seeing in the business. And if we do see that scenario of a slowdown, maybe you could just talk through some of the potential sources of upside on the margin line.

Sure. So thanks. We're really proud of what we've done on both the operating margin and free cash flow margin side of the business. 1,300 basis points year over year improvement. And those cost actions that you referred to that we took at the end of last year they were factored into the guidance. And, of course, they ramp throughout the year. So they help to drive that quarter over quarter or sequential margin expansion story. And that's from actions we've already taken. So you get that margin expansion without doing anything incremental. And we've guided to at least 5%, implying that there was upside at the time. And now of course, today, we raised that guide to at least 5.5%. And, you know, there will be a continued focus from Dustin and myself and the entire team around driving efficiency and looking for incremental savings opportunities. When you ask about specific areas, we think that there's more leverage we can drive from increased productivity around our go-to-market and marketing spend and then additional work on vendor rationalization. And, you know, you've heard us talk about the geographic mix of our workforce. And we do that actually via attrition for the most part. And, you know, we feel that over time, we can get much closer to where industry benchmarks are for a company of our size and scale and growth profile. So there's a lot more to go here. We're super happy with the progress we've made. And you should consider margin expansion on a multi-quarter and multi-year basis to continue.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Lucky Schreiner of D. A. Davidson. Please go ahead, Lucky.

Great. Thanks for taking my question. Just one from me. It was interesting to hear about the leading HR company initially planning to reduce seats, but after AI Studio expanded their plan, maybe taking that a step further, how do you view consolidation trending in the work management space here? And does AI Studio act as a potential catalyst for larger customers to consolidate onto Asana? Thanks.

Yeah. Lucky, thank you for that question. I think what we're seeing is we certainly feel like there's a couple of opportunities for consolidation. One is even just point solutions. So by having work workflows all on Asana, there's things as straightforward as translation and localization workflows that might be done by customers with point solutions right now that are very easy to move on to Asana. And so those point solutions that might do, you know, basic intake flows or even ticketing, the benefit of consolidating onto Asana is one, the reliability of the data that customers are working with the context on which team, which department, which tasks, which portfolios, all of that is in Asana. Plus all the benefits that have always been on Asana, which is cross-team collaboration. So we're certainly seeing that. And then I think your question around consolidation of work management, again, I think the benefit of everybody working on the same platform as well as our ability to give customers the choice on which models I think, has been really powerful and differentiated. The transparency on how the AI Studio workflows are working behind the scenes. So we certainly look for more consolidation opportunities, but we're already starting to see those point solutions be replaced by workflows on Asana.

Makes sense. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Walravens of Citizens Bank. Please go ahead, Patrick.

Oh, great. Thank you. Dustin, I want to take the conversation up a level if it's alright with you. I would love to hear your thoughts on the future of work for young humans. So we all know that last week, Dario at Anthropic made the comment about 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs may be being eliminated and unemployment spiking. I know you give these matters a lot of thought, so I'd love to hear your perspective sort of high level, you know, for our society, and then maybe where Asana might have a role to play.

Yeah. Thanks. Great question. You know, I think my perspective is mainly just that, you know, AI is real and we're not really prepared for it. And I think that that was, you know, mostly what Dario was going for is he's trying to, he's not trying to, you know, solve the problem from his seat as a CEO in one company, but trying to get the attention of society and get the attention of government on it. And, you know, personally, I think part of that equation will need to be some redistribution of wealth, which is not very conducive to the current political environment. But I think that would be the ideal kind of solution because I think it will be very, very tough to transition the working population into a new way of working. And in a lot of cases, it won't make the most economic sense. So I think the real solution we need there is higher level than what individuals can do. The best advice I have heard for individuals and for young people I it was either on the Dorkish podcast or on Hard Fork, but one of the guests saying, you know, think more about, you know, what you would want to, you know, do in the world without paying as much attention to how hard it is to build. Because maybe that part will be easy later. Sure. And so more focus on the skills that are less around, you know, business management and building a company and more around, you know, whatever the specialty is that you want to go into. That made some sense to me, but I don't pretend to have all the answers in my pocket on this one. I think it's a really big issue. I think change will happen faster than most people believe. And I agree with Dario that we shouldn't sugarcoat it. I think it will be difficult. And I hope that Asana has a role to play in making it as smooth as possible for organizations and for employees, making it easy to use these new tools, and have them be a companion. You know, at least for the time before you know, there's massive job displacement, I think it will be an enhancement and will make people's lives easier. We'll just give people more leverage in their work. And we can be part of that. We can be part of making it safe. We can be part of making it secure, and we can help organizations get from here to a radically different future.

Thank you, Dustin.

Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference back to Eva Leung for closing remarks. Madam?

Thank you for joining our call today. If you have any questions, feel free to call or email me. We'll be on the road at BofA Conference tomorrow and Bayer Conference on Thursday, and DA Davidson next week. Looking forward to seeing you there. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.