Good morning, and thank you for standing by, and welcome to Booz Allen Hamilton's Earnings Call covering First Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 Results. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, there will be an opportunity for questions. I'd now like to turn the call over to Mr. Matt Calderone.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining the call. I would like to begin by introducing Lindsay Joyce. Lindsay has been a trusted advisor and core member of the Booz Allen finance team for nearly a decade. She joined the firm to help me establish our corporate development function and has since had a variety of roles in corporate and business finance. Lindsay is now a Vice President at Booz Allen, leading both Investor Relations and Financial Planning and Analysis. Lindsay, welcome, and over to you.

Thank you. Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Booz Allen's first quarter fiscal year 2025 earnings call. We hope you've had an opportunity to read the press release we issued earlier this morning. We have also provided presentation slides on our website and are now on Slide 2. With me to talk about our business and financial results are Horacio Rozanski, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Matt Calderone, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As shown in the disclaimer on Slide 3, please keep in mind that some of the items we will discuss this morning are forward looking and may relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from forecasted results discussed in our SEC filings and on this call. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements and speak only as of the date made. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. During today's call, we will also discuss some non-GAAP financial measures and other metrics, which we believe provide useful information for investors. We include an explanation of adjustments and other reconciliations of our non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures in our first quarter fiscal year 2025 earnings release and slides. Numbers presented may be rounded and, as such, may vary slightly from those in our public disclosure. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to our Chairman, CEO and President, Horacio Rozanski. We are now on Slide 4.

Thanks, Lindsay. It's great to have you on these calls, and good morning everyone. Matt and I are proud to share with you another quarter of strong momentum and double-digit top-line growth. Today, I'll begin with an overview of the first quarter in the context of our fiscal year and the investment thesis. Then, I'll describe how VoLT strategically positions us for continued growth and helps us attract exceptional talent. And finally, I'll share our priorities for the remainder of the fiscal year before turning it over to Matt for an in-depth look at our first quarter fiscal 2025 results. Beginning with performance, we built significant momentum in the quarter delivering double-digit organic revenue growth. Our bottom-line performance was comparatively softer due to a combination of operational and non-operational factors, which Matt will describe momentarily. Leading indicators for the business remains strong; headcount for the quarter was robust, cash flow was ahead of our own internal expectations, and our 1.72x book-to-bill was excellent. So, when looking at the full picture, we believe we are on track to meet our fiscal year 2025 guidance and achieve the high end of our investment thesis goals. Booz Allen's momentum shows beyond our financials. It is evident in the quality of the work we win, the innovative capabilities we deliver, and the exceptional talent we attract. This is because VoLT is working. VoLT, which stands for Velocity, Leadership and Technology, has put us at the center of the tech transformation taking place across national priority missions. Our ability to help clients utilize dual-use and leading-edge technologies faster and at scale is a powerful differentiator. At this time of historic challenge and change for our nation, Booz Allen is an innovation accelerator. This morning, let me share three examples that demonstrate this. The first is…

Thank you, Horacio. As you noted, Booz Allen continued to build momentum in the first quarter. Our VoLT strategy is working, and our work is increasingly at the center of the government's technology transformation. We are poised to keep growing and to deliver another strong fiscal year. For the quarter, on the positive side, our team once again delivered double-digit organic revenue growth. Cash performance was solid and, most important, our leading indicators were strong. On the demand side, we had key wins that yielded an excellent book-to-bill and record backlog. On the supply side, we continued to add the talent needed to support our growth objectives. Our bottom-line performance, however, was a bit softer than we anticipated. This was due to a number of individually small operational and non-operational factors that added up over the quarter. As we said previously, we managed the business for the full fiscal year. We have both the demand side and supply side momentum, as well as the operating levers available to us to meet our fiscal year 2025 objectives and achieve the top end of our investment thesis. I'll now cover our first quarter results in more detail. Please turn to Slide 6. Total revenue for the quarter grew about 11% year-over-year to $2.9 billion. Organic revenue was up 10.6% year-over-year and revenue excluding billable expenses increased 8.4%. Taking a look at the market breakdown. Our defense business continues to thrive, up 16% from the prior-year quarter. Our defense leaders won both recompetes and takeaway opportunities in missions of true national importance. Our civil business continues to perform well. Total revenue grew 12% year-over-year, and this performance was broad based. As expected, revenue in our intelligence business declined about 3% year-over-year. We continue to expect this business to demonstrate solid growth for the…

Thank you so much. [Operator Instructions] One moment for our first question. And it comes from Mariana Pérez Mora with Bank of America. Please proceed. Mariana Pérez Mora: Good morning, everyone, and a special welcome to Lindsay.

Thanks, Mariana. Good morning. Mariana Pérez Mora: So, my first question -- I have two, one business related and the other one more like technical. The first question is about the PAR acquisition. Could you please describe a little bit about like all the potential that you can unlock from this company's special, like, leading position with WinTAK and TAK, and install base they have, levering that with Booz Allen talent, customer intimacy and reputation, what is the combination of this acquisition and when and what type of synergies we could expect from this?

Thanks for that question, Mariana. We're very happy with the PAR acquisition. It's -- sometimes big innovators come in small packages, and this is one of those cases where we were able to find a company and close a transaction with really a carve out that really focuses on doing some really innovative edge-type work for the warfighter. That fits so well into our entire digital battlespace platform, and what we're trying to do about integrating information and bringing it together from multiple sources using, ultimately, artificial intelligence to filter it and putting in -- and giving the warfighter the information he or she needs at the time that they need it in the place that they need it. And so, this really will help augment and knit together a number of things that we are doing, and so it's very exciting. The basis for this acquisition is not cost reduction. As you said, it's really revenue synergies. And like we've always been saying, this acquisition fits the perspective of strategic acceleration. We're looking for companies that will take what we're doing and allow us to leapfrog both our competitors and our own efforts to be able to move faster and implement VoLT faster. Mariana Pérez Mora: Thank you. And the second one to Matt, what makes you confident that you can achieve the EBITDA margin for the year in this trend? What are the key milestones that you'll be looking throughout the year to make sure that you can, or what efforts are you making sure you put in place to achieve the 11% versus the low-10%s that you print in the quarter?

Hey, Mariana, since I'm on a roll, let me give some context and then I'll turn it over to Matt, if that's okay. The primary view that we have is, of course, we are very happy with the top-line growth in the quarter. We're not as happy with the bottom-line results in this quarter, although as Matt pointed out and he will take you through, this is largely driven by timing and one-offs. So, the underlying profitability of the business remains very strong. What gives us the most confidence is the strong momentum that we see in the business. You see it in our book-to-bill, which is exceptional. You see it in our hiring, which is exceptional. You see it in PAR, which is a great small acquisition for us. And when we put all of that together, we are confident that we can achieve the objectives for FY '25 and then deliver at the top-end of our investment thesis. And I think what's really important is, aside from all of these numbers, we continue to invest in the things that are making VoLT accelerate us, because VoLT is working. We're winning not just a lot of work, but the type of work we want, and I'm sure we'll talk more about that. We're attracting exceptional technical talent that probably wouldn't have happened to Booz Allen five years ago. And we are positioning strategically to keep bringing leading-edge technology to missions of national importance, which is both an accelerator in the near term, but also gives us resiliency at a time of political uncertainty, of budgetary uncertainty, and the like. So against that frame, I'll turn it over to Matt.

Yeah, thanks, Horacio. And just to add to that, Mariana, we've talked about this in the past. We manage the business for EBITDA dollars, not margin. So, our focus is on how do we drive profit dollars up and then margin will increase as a result. But to take you through first, sort of what drove the miss in Q1, profit was impacted by a number of factors, both operational and non-operational that were individually small, but they added up over the quarter. And as Horacio mentioned and I said in the prepared remarks, a significant portion of these were timing related or non-recurring. Just to go deeper, on the operational side, contract-level profitability was a touch soft, but the primary driver was a combination of lower client staff utilization and quite frankly, the pattern of when and how we added client staff over the quarter when they started billing that cost us about 1.5% in revenue ex-billable growth for the quarter on a year-over-year basis and obviously an equivalent amount of profit dollars. And then, on the non-operating side, compared to Q1 last year, we saw higher expenses in a couple of areas, including M&A, busy quarter, legal and regulatory expenses. But that said, our utilization metrics improved over the quarter and continue to trend up. And most important, we have the headcount we need to meet our fiscal year growth aspirations and really set us up well for the outyears as well. So, we're confident we have both the momentum and the operating levers, if needed, to deliver another really strong year on the bottom-line. Mariana Pérez Mora: Thank you very much.

Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from the line of Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies. Please proceed.

Good morning, Horacio, Matt and Lindsay. Thank you so much. So maybe just to continue on that topic, Matt and Horacio, I know you're going to get a lot of questions on this margin. Matt, I don't know if you're willing to quantify that 130-basis-point contraction year-over-year. How much of that was just timing of the hiring and client utilization versus contract structure and M&A fees, et cetera?

Yeah, Sheila, so, as I just said, the timing of when we added staff and they became billable as well as utilization costs about 1.5% on rev ex-billable. So, you can do the math and in terms of what that meant from a profit side. I would say, second, contract-level profitability was a little bit soft and then we probably had an equivalent amount on the non-operating side in terms of these one-time and timing-related activities.

Okay. Sorry if I missed that 1.5%. And then, Horacio, maybe a bigger picture question for you. I think the defense business and civil have been home runs, double-digit growth, lapping difficult comps. So, how are you thinking about the runway of each of those customer segments for the remainder of the year?

Sure. I think the good news about the momentum is that it is really broad based across the portfolio. Our defense business, as I mentioned, won a couple of critical recompetes and really won some exceptionally important new work in the Pacific that we are very excited about, allowing us to bring technology to a set of missions that we care very much about that the country, cares deeply about. So, we see strong momentum, strong performance in our defense business really throughout the year, absent some major disruption, which will be industrywide, nationwide as a result of budgetary pressures in the fall or whatnot. When you go to our civil business, civil, as you said, has had tremendous growth for a long time. I think this is the 10th consecutive quarter of double-digit growth in our civil business. They won one key recompete. We had the extension of our CDM program, which is great news. And they have some critical recompetes in front of them that that they're preparing for. We're well positioned by, and they're all centered around bringing technology to key missions. So, these are places where we can't predict the future, but Booz Allen is very well positioned. And then, our intelligence business, even though in the quarter it showed a decline, actually the underlying momentum in that business is really strong. They won some really important work. This is the last quarter of the sort of the tough comp from last year because of the FocusedFox issue that we've talked about extensively and kind of so -- and we see this business growing over the course of the year. But again, importantly, we have transitioned a lot of this business in the last couple of years, first under Judi Dodson, then under Tom Pfeifer, from delivering excellent intelligence analysis to delivering extraordinary technology that [indiscernible] the accelerated intelligence analysis for the nation. So, again, this is a business that is sourcing critical talent and doing good things. And so, we expect momentum and growth across the entirety of our markets for the year.

Thank you.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. And it comes from the line of Bert Subin with Stifel. Please proceed.

Hey, good morning.

Good morning, Burt.

Good morning.

Hey, Horacio, Matt. So, the bookings in the quarter were, I would say, unusually strong. If you look at the last few years sort of in the 1.0% maybe sort of that range in the first quarter and you were closer to 2.0% in this quarter. Obviously, some good momentum and I imagine, Matt, some of the comments you made around utilization was just sort of, I guess, now you're going to be getting ready to pursue some of that work. As we think about the second quarter, that's typically your strongest booking quarter over 2.0% on quarterly book-to-bill. Was there some pull forward there? Or do you think that momentum just keeps building on the award side?

Thanks for the question, Bert. The way to think about it is there's really strong underlying demand, strong momentum and a good budget right now. And so, based on those fundamentals, you would expect to see a good demand quarter this quarter. Our tactical sales engine is second to none, as you know, and our ability to take advantage when clients have money in their budgets and missions that matter to them, they take advantage of that opportunity to help them do it and to sell hard against it, is something we've done for years. I wouldn't say there was any pull forward. I would say, if anything, there was some stuff left over from the prior year that took longer to realize. I think what the exact number is going to be this year is driven by a number of factors. Even if we win a lot of work, the large contracts tend to get protested, and your guess is as good as ours as to when something comes off protest. But the reality is we have ample demand, we have ample ceiling, and we have the headcount to deliver against our commitments for the year.

Got it. Maybe just a follow-up on that point. You mentioned recompetes earlier Horacio and you said you've seen some pretty good momentum there in terms of winning your recompetes. You highlighted last quarter that this was a higher-than-average recompete year. Can you just give us a sense for where we stand? Are you through some of the larger ones you've been watching, or are those still out in front of you?

Yes and yes, I suppose. There is -- as you know, we've built a portfolio that is really enviable in terms of the work that's there, the quality of the work that's there and how the underlying contracts grow. And when a recompete comes, it's really a recompete plus, because it generally comes with additional scope and significant increase in ceilings. As you said, we've been through some of those very successfully. There's a few of those left on the year that we obviously want to deliver against and we want to win. But importantly, the overall pipeline is really, really healthy. As Matt pointed out, we have a $55 billion pipeline that we're prosecuting actively, and that's up 32% year-over-year. So, the demand condition is really good, is really strong, and we intend to continue to win as much as we can.

Thanks, Horacio, and welcome, Lindsay.

Thank you.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. That comes from the line of Cai von Rumohr with TD Cowen. Please proceed.

Yes. Thank you so much. So, Matt, you kind of explained what the factors were. I guess, I'm kind of interested to know why the factors were. Why did you lose the 1.5%? Because the timing and utilization? Because basically you've been talking about using AI so that you've basically been doing better there until this quarter. And then secondly, you mentioned the regulatory legal M&A expenses. Those are presumably timing. And how should we think as we look at the next quarter? I mean, are we going to see more of this sort of delay, so the second quarter is sort of still a little disappointing, or does it get a big snap back? And thirdly, and I apologize for all these questions, PAR, you said, is accretive, but if you look at their 10-K, it looks like that this business has a gross margin of about 6%. So, how does it become accretive on your numbers? Thanks.

Yeah, thanks, Cai. I'll try to take them in turn, but if I miss one, please bring me back.

All right.

First, just to dig a little deeper into utilization, and Bert mentioned this, it really was a combination of factors, right, both prosecuting and ramping up for a significant proposal pipeline, including some meaningful new wins. We had some one-off contract-related issues, for example, the delay in funding for Ukraine, more people go out on military leave. And honestly, we can run the business a little tighter. We've been in a pretty heavy investment mode. We remain in investment mode, but our market leaders know what they need to do there. And from a perspective of just when we added staff over the course of the quarter, typically inter-quarter numbers don't matter, but it happens -- Q1 last year, we added a lot of staff early in the quarter, and Q1 this year, not just through the PAR acquisition, but even organically when staff started, it was towards the back end. So that adds up to the 1.5%. But as I mentioned in response to another question, utilization has been ticking up. We feel good about where that's headed. On the non-operational side, you're right, a lot of it's one-off or timing related. I don't want to get into Q2, but obviously, we feel very comfortable about our ability to deliver the full fiscal year. And then, on PAR, we've gotten this question quite a bit. Obviously, PAR itself being a public company, they had to disclose how they did -- how they broke out their accounting. I think it will look somewhat different under our model. We're comfortable that it will be very mildly accretive this year, which is not bad in year one of an acquisition. And as Horacio said, over time, we think we have the ability to not just generate incremental revenue, but margin by adding a lot of the AI and digital services we have on top to some of the great stuff they have like the TAK unit that provides information to warfighters at the edge. So, hopefully -- did I catch all three? I think I did.

Yes, you did. Thanks so much, Matt.

All right. Thanks, Cai.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. That comes from the line of Matt Akers with Wells Fargo. Please proceed.

Yes. Hey, good morning, guys. Thank you for the question.

Hey, Matt.

Matt, I wonder if you could comment anymore just on how would you think about modeling the quarters for the rest of the year, because we've got some of these costs going away after Q1. I know you got an easier compare in the intel business. So, I think you commented on the revenue ramp, but just any further color you can provide there?

No, I think we provided the right amount of color and you're thinking about it the right way, Matt. Obviously, we anticipate profit and margins to be moderately ascending over the back -- the remaining three quarters now. And as you mentioned, our comps will change.

Yes, got it. Okay. And I guess any thoughts on free cash flow? A decent start to the year. Last couple of years you haven't been positive in Q1. Just any thoughts on working capital, where that goes from here, or just how you're doing there?

Yeah, we had a good start. I think collections were particularly strong. As we talked about this for the past couple of calls, we aspire to return to free cash flow conversion rate of 100% or greater and run a good vector to get there.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. And it's from the line of Robert Spingarn with Melius Research. Please proceed.

Hi. This is Scott Mikus on for Rob Spingarn. Matt, you mentioned lower contract profitability in the quarter. I was just wondering if you could provide color on that. Was it more concentrated in defense, civil or intel contracts?

No, it was just slightly lower than we anticipated. It was spread across the business, no one factor that we're particularly worried about.

Okay. And then, Horacio, for you, one of the lessons learned from the war in Ukraine is how large quantities of inexpensive drones can have a significant impact on the battlefield. So, when we think about programs like the Air Force's CCA program or the DoD's JADC2 initiative, what do you want Booz's role to be in the digital and connected battle space? And how do you take advantage of the trend where hardware becomes increasingly more commoditized and the value is in the software that drives the hardware?

Scott, we've been on this trend for years and we've been anticipating it. We view ourselves as primary digital player that can bring information together at speed, at scale, to the warfighter from headquarters to the edge. And that is an important role that I believe Booz Allen is uniquely positioned to play because of our relationship with tech companies, because of our track record doing it, because of our own leadership in some leading-edge technologies like AI, like cyber, and because we're making investments. This quarter, we talk about PAR, but we've been talking about investments that we've been making across the board to make all of this work. And even the work that we're doing in space that I described in the prepared remarks fits into this as well. We need to have the ability to persistently look at an environment that's in conflict, to understand and anticipate threats, and to take them on in ways that are effective to the type of threat. As you know, we're doing a lot of work in in the Ukraine that informs and teaches us how to do this better, how to help our clients do this better. That work translates then into the work we're doing in the Indo-Pacific, the work we're doing in CENTCOM, and the work that we're doing across the board in contracts that have to do with readiness and helping our war fighters accelerate their ability to be ready and respond to these kinds of threats.

Thanks for taking the question.

Sure, of course.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. That comes from Noah Poponak with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Hi, good morning.

Hi, Noah.

Good morning.

I was wondering if you might spend a minute on medium- to long-term margins, where you think profitability can go beyond this year? I know you've talked about scale and driving revenue growth above the headcount growth. And I think also you've talked about favorable mix with faster growth in some of the more favorably contracted and higher margin parts of the business. Is that right? Are there offsets to that? And should we be thinking about higher margins over time or stable margins over time?

Why don't I start and then I'm sure Matt will want to add to this. Let me start by saying I'll take us back to the investment thesis. About three years ago, when we gave you our outlook, we said we thought margins were going to be in the mid-10%s to be able to invest in the business and invest in all of these new technologies that were going to drive the next wave of growth, in fact, the underlying strength of the business, the underlying profitability of the business has allowed us to both invest at an even higher level organically than we thought we would, while preserving our balance sheet capacity, and at the same time, deliver margins in the 11% range, which is a full 0.5 point higher than we anticipated. I think over time, the question is, as Matt pointed out, is how quickly can we have EBITDA dollar growth. And that's what we're going to be focused on. There's opportunities in the near term to accelerate that, that we're talking about it for this year, but there's opportunities in the long term, especially as outcome-based contracting and some of the other trends that we are anticipating and preparing for take more hold for overall profitability to continue to accelerate. Now, exactly when that is going to happen, I'm describing some long-term trends to you. I would not want to ascribe that to any given immediate fiscal year. But over the long term, we're very optimistic about Booz Allen's ability to drive above-market profitability growth rates.

Okay.

I agree. I think, you have the basic factors outlined. It's a question of our current contract mix and how does that evolve. We're generating scale in business, how do we use that scale, and then, to what extent can we build more of an outcome based contracting business, and we said that's something we aspire to. A lot of folks in the industry aspire to, but that's going to take a while.

Okay. And with regard to the top-line, I guess, the total organic revenue growth rate in the quarter is kind of the high end of the range for the year. The compares get a little easier through the rest of the year. I guess, what are the risk factors we should be contemplating for? What would take you to the low end now with nine months left in the year?

I can start. I think, obviously, environmentally, we are -- we all need to be very mindful of the fact, we are very mindful of the fact that this is an election year. This is a particularly challenging election environment with -- just in the last two or three weeks, the picture has changed so many times, and I assume it will continue to change or it may not, but it is unpredictable and that tends to have an impact on the way Congress behaves around passing appropriations bills and then continuing resolutions and so forth. And so, we're very mindful of that. We are continuing to monitor it closely and doing all the things we need to do internally to be successful, whether we have a stable budget environment, which would be ideal, or a more unstable one. Beyond that, we continue to work on a number of recompetes that obviously we want to win, and we continue to prosecute a very healthy pipeline, which we hope we will have significant wins in there, which will continue to push and accelerate our business. But if that decelerated, then you would see some impact on that. But on the whole and on the main, while we're cognizant of the risks and not dismissing any of them at all, we're optimistic. We're optimistic about the year, we're optimistic about our momentum, and we're optimistic about what happens even beyond this year.

Okay, great. Thank you so much.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. That comes from the line of David Strauss with Barclays. Please proceed.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. This is actually Josh Korn on for David. So, I just wanted to ask how you expect the cost base to break out as a percent of sales this year as compared to last year, so in other words, COGS, billables, SG&A? Thanks.

Yeah, Dave. I think, as I mentioned, we've been in a pretty heavy investment phase to support, not just growth this year, but into the outyears, part of our commitment to being a compounder as we build this business for the long term. So, we continue to invest in the business. As I mentioned, we have some operating levers available to us as needed to make sure we deliver the full fiscal year. But Q2 for us really is determinant, to go back to the last question, in many years. We got a lot of momentum we built in Q1 on the leading indicator side, little work to do in terms of dropping profit to the bottom-line. But Q2 really will be important for us this year and in terms of in setting us up for next year and we'll sort of adjust our cost basis as appropriate based on what happens.

Okay. Thank you. Just one for me.

Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it's from the line of Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities. Please proceed.

Thank you. I was hoping you could give us some color on the pace of your hiring, if there are any changes there, and any comparable changing trends in billable headcount retention? Maybe touch on AI skills specifically as part of your answer? Thanks.

Hey, Tobey, I can start. Over the last couple of years, we did some really important work. Our COO, Kristine Martin Anderson, led some really important work that allowed us to shorten the cycle of both identifying candidates hiring and then making them billable. That's been an exciting development that has allowed us to lean into this market. This is a good labor market, more strongly. Frankly, the work that we are doing attracts people because this is one of the few places, if not the only place, where you can do all of this work, integrate all of these capabilities, bring AI to the edge against missions of national importance, and that puts us in a great recruiting position. And our attrition is some of the lowest numbers we've seen in many, many years. So, we feel good about where we are. As Matt pointed out, last year, we had more hires in April and fewer in June. This year, we had more hires in June and fewer in April. But we don't manage this business by the month. We manage the business for the year. And our overall headcount growth is on par with what we expected, maybe even a little bit ahead. On the AI front, I think the same story is true. We are -- VoLT is working. We are winning work that is exciting, and it's allowing us to attract talent that in itself, creates its own differentiation. And when you put that together with intellectual capital that Booz Allen has with the track record that we have, it's really a differentiating position.

Yes. Just to give you a couple of numbers to build on that. I was talking to Kristine last night about this, applications to Booz Allen in Q1 were up 33% year-over-year. And attrition, as Horacio said, we keep calling it historically low, but it's now seven consecutive quarters of historically low attrition. So, I think we need to adjust our baseline. It just speaks to the quality of the work we're doing and the quality of our value proposition. I said it before, but it bears repeating, slightly over a third of our hires come from employee referrals and that speaks to the fact that people who are here not just want to stay here, but they want to refer their friends.

Toby? All right. I'm going to go to the next question on the queue. It comes from the line of Louie DiPalma with William Blair. Please proceed.

Horacio, Matt and Lindsay, good morning, and congrats on your 110 year anniversary.

Thanks, Louie.

Thank you, Louie.

Three years ago, you guys had a couple of percentage points of exposure to Afghanistan, which was a headwind during the winddown, if I recall correctly. And Matt, you mentioned how you were recently impacted by a delay in funding to Ukraine. So, along those lines, can you quantify Booz Allen's exposure to Ukraine if funding for that conflict were to dry up with the new administration?

Let me start. I mean, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, we have about 800 people working across European Command, and that's not only Ukraine. That is a very broad-based level of support across the entire mission in the entire continent. As Matt mentioned, when we -- when there was a -- the funding interruption, there may have been about a 100, 150 of our professionals who could not bill to the contract, and then we had to hold until things restarted. I hope that gives you a sense of the exposure against the 35,000-strong footprint. I would view this as almost in the day to day, not as an exceptional level of exposure. But then, let me flip it on its head, which is to also say the work that we're doing in Ukraine in the -- for the United States in the Ukraine conflict is extraordinarily important to the nation in that conflict, but also extraordinarily important for what we're learning, that we're exporting to our missions across the world, and in particular, to IndoPACOM, where, as I've said before, our role, our goal is to be a leading provider of the fusion of information that is going to be required to be able to deter conflict in that theater. So, this is really exciting work. We are very proud of the work. We're very proud of the people we have working there who've made a tremendous difference for the country and who have been working almost literally around the clock now for two years at this level of off tempo. I think more broadly, Booz Allen's positioning against these missions of national importance make us resilient. We believe we're working on things that matter to the country and that transcend administrations and to sort of end where you started. This is, I think, why over 110 years we've successfully worked for so many administrations, we have made a difference to the nation, and we very much want to continue doing so while we grow and deliver exceptional resources to our shareholders.

Thanks, Horacio. I get the sense you're saying that your European Command and theater work is very durable. And along -- on another note, you are obviously one of the largest cybersecurity service providers. And I think, in September, you're holding a Cyber Industry Day. And I was wondering, has there been any increased demand for your services from the CrowdStrike issue as you deal with the intelligence community and the overall DoD and Federal [SIV] (ph)? And also related to cyber, how are your zero trust implementations progressing? Thanks.

Yeah, I'll take this. The specific answer to your question is no, not yet on CrowdStrike. But taking a step back and you'll hear more about this in September, really it's the convergence of the battle space in cyber, we're calling it one battle space, right, across .gov, .com, .mil, a lot of the same threat actors, a lot of the same threat vectors, a lot of the same dynamics, the application of AI to cyber, both on offense and defense that span those three, that's really driving our current growth and where we think growth is headed in this market. So, we believe we're well positioned for this. Certainly, work may come out of it. Nothing has happened to date. In terms of your specific question, your last question, we're really pleased with where we headed on Thunderdome. We're seeing not just technically, but from in terms of client adoption, a lot of positive momentum there.

Yeah, Louie, I'll just round out Matt's answer by saying the power of VoLT is that we have invested across a broad range of technologies and have leading positions, not just in cyber and AI, but in even things like quantum, some aspects of space. And what we're seeing, and we began to talk about it last September, and without stealing our own thunder, we'll probably talk about it more as it relates to cyber next September, that these technologies are really all integrating, coming together. It's AI and cyber, AI and space, and increasingly AI and cyber in space. And Booz Allen's ability to span both these markets, but also these technology sets puts us in a unique position and gives us optimism for the future.

Great. Thanks, Horacio. You don't want to steal your own thunder-dome.

Thank you for that.

And thank you. And that's all the time we have for Q&A today. Thank you all to -- who participated, and I will pass it back to Horacio Rozanski for his final comments.

Thank you. And thank you all for your questions and for joining us this morning. I hope this discussion gave you a deeper understanding of our performance and why we feel confident we will deliver on our near- and long-term goals. Last month, a few of us had the great honor to ring the bell at the New York Stock Exchange, and it was a great moment in our company's long history and it really reflected our enduring presence and enduring impact. We talked about the future and how we're shaping our own future and the foresight and the agility that has kept us relevant and vibrant for 110 years and looking for 110 years more. Ultimately, this event was a testament to our incredible team and to the clients and to the shareholders who have put their trust in Booz Allen to continue to develop exceptional performance, and for that, we are forever grateful. And with that, have a great day and a great rest of the summer.

And thank you all for participating in today's conference. And you may now disconnect.