Welcome to CalAmp’s Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2022 Financial Results Conference Call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today’s conference call, Joel Achramowicz, Managing Director of Shelton Group, CalAmp’s Investor Relations Firm. Joel, you may begin.

Good afternoon, and welcome to CalAmp’s fiscal fourth quarter and full year 2022 financial results conference call. I am Joel Achramowicz, Managing Director of Shelton Group, CalAmp’s Investor Relations firm. With us today are CalAmp’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Jeff Gardner; and Chief Financial Officer, Kurt Binder. Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that this call may contain forward-looking statements. While these forward-looking statements reflect CalAmp’s best current judgment, they are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those implied by these forward-looking projections. These risk factors are discussed in our periodic SEC filings and in the earnings release issued today, which are available on our website. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances. Now Jeff will begin today’s call with a review of the company’s operational highlights and then Kurt will provide a more detailed review of the financial results followed by a question-and-answer session. With that, it’s my great pleasure to turn the call over to CalAmp’s President and CEO, Jeff Gardner. Jeff, please go ahead.

Thank you, Joel, and thanks to all of you for joining us on the call today. We ended our 2022 fiscal year, with software and subscription services revenue of $41.2 million in the fourth quarter, representing a record 60% of our total consolidated revenue of $68.4 million. Total revenue in the quarter was essentially flat with the prior quarter, as the strengthen in our software and subscription services revenue offset a decline in telematics products revenue. This represents the third consecutive quarter our software and subscription services revenue exceeded 50% of total revenue. Our SaaS business remains strong, as we continue to transition an increasing number of our telematics-device-only customers to recurring subscription contracts with our new device management SaaS application, while also securing new logos. In the fourth quarter alone, we converted approximately one-fifth of our eligible device customers to recurring contracts, and we expect to convert the remainder over the coming fiscal year. Our efforts to bring in new subscription business is evidenced by securing of new customers such as ComNet [Phonetic] and Cooltrax, and a recently announced strategic partnership with Noregon, among others. The partnership with US-based Noregon, includes extensive collaboration in remote diagnostics and preventative maintenance. Together, Noregon aims to blend real-time data insights from CalAmp edge computing products, powered by EdgeCore, and the CalAmp telematics cloud platform with predictive algorithms in Noregon’s TripVision remote diagnostic software. CalAmp will also be integrating Noregon’s TripVision with our iOn fleet and asset software application. And our joint customers will gain a comprehensive view of their tractors, trailers and cargo in real time, while also having recourse to advanced vehicle diagnostics to ensure fleet and driver safety. These key features of the solution provide pre-emptive alerts of vehicle issues before critical failures occur, thus preventing costly vehicle downtime that…

Thank you, Jeff. Today, my commentary will include reference to the non-GAAP financial measures of adjusted basis net income, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA margin. A full reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures with the closest corresponding GAAP basis measures is included in the press release announcing our fiscal 2022 fourth quarter and full year earnings that was issued this afternoon. Total revenue in the fourth quarter was $68.4 million, essentially flat from $68.8 million in the prior quarter, and down 17% from at $81.9 million in the same quarter a year ago. For the full year 2022, revenue declined 4% to $295.8 million from $380.6 million in fiscal 2021. The year-over-year declines in both quarterly and annual revenue were attributable to the ongoing global component shortages, limiting our ability to fulfill orders despite backlog remaining at near record levels. Additionally, we are accelerating customer conversions to recurring software subscription arrangements, where in certain instances revenue is recognized over the contract term, rather than recorded all upfront. I will talk more about these new recurring subscription contracts in a minute. International revenue in the quarter totaled $21.3 million or 31% of total revenues and $98.7 million or 33% for the 2022 fiscal year. The revenue breakdown by vertical market for the year included $130.7 million for transportation logistics, $62.6 million from industrial heavy equipment, $60.3 million for connected car, and $42.2 million from government and municipalities. Highlighting the quarter was our software and subscription services business, with revenue increasing 19% year-over-year and 13% sequentially to $41.2 million, representing a record 60% of consolidated revenue. For the full year, our software and subscription services revenue grew 19% to $154.3 million from $129.9 million in the prior year. The year-over-year and sequential growth in this business reflects the success we’ve achieved in converting…

Thank you, Kurt. In summary, we are advancing our transition of CalAmp to occurring software subscription company and we’re making significant progress. Our efforts have been met with increasing success. And we now enter the new year well-positioned with historically high levels of backlog combined with a robust portfolio of solutions and expanding partnership roadmap and a solid cadence of customer conversions to recurring software contracts. With that, I’d like to open the call to your questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from the line of George Notter with Jefferies. Please go ahead. .

Hi, guys. Thanks very much. I guess very interested in the transition to subscription. I assume when you talk about eligible devices and moving a fifth of your customers, I think -- on the telematics side, I think you’re talking about the PULS to CTC transition, is that correct? And then maybe talk about what’s in it for the customers? Are you getting pushback on that transition? What’s that look like for you guys? Thanks.

Yes, George. This is Jeff. Thank you for that question. Yes, exactly. It is transitioning from PULS to DM CTC for our customers. And there are many advantages which we’ve spent a great deal of time going over with our customers everything from improved security, to their ability to update devices over the air in much higher volumes than they’re able to do today. It just gives them much better device management capabilities. If you think about what we’re doing here is shifting from a 15-year old software product to one that is built on all the latest software, which has tremendous capability going forward, and will allow them to really provide the kind of insights to their customers that they would otherwise not be able to do. So while it is a transition for the customers, they’ve been on PULS for a long time, at the end of the day, I’ve been very pleased that once we go out and spend time with the customers that how excited they were. Just last week, I was on the phone with one of our largest customers, who was -- their technical folks were tremendously excited about the potential of the new product and how that fit into their roadmap going forward. So I think that our sales team is doing that the hard work to convince them of the advantages of our new products, CTC DM, and our customers are migrating well ahead of our expectations. I’m very pleased with what we’ve been able to do. If you think about our business, for the last five or six years, we’ve talked about really transitioning to a software business and now it’s exciting because we’re actually seeing it happen. And so fair to say, with all these transitions, we’ve been successful to date 100% in converting our customers over to the new service and we have an ambitious schedule in the next quarter and as I mentioned on the call, expect to fully complete this with very little customer loss throughout the fiscal year 2023.

And George to the other question you asked regarding eligible customers, you are correct. When we define the MRM telematics customers, these are our device customers that we’ve historically sold telematics devices to, they are the customers that we’re targeting to move over and that’s the universe of customers that we’ve defined one-fifth have transferred over in the fourth quarter.

Do you know how many devices that represents that the universe with an installed base of eligible devices?

I don’t know the number of devices. I can tell you that we have about -- we estimate 60 to 65 of our customers in this space that we’re looking to target to move over and of that number of customers, we were successful at somewhere between 13 and 15 in core in the fourth quarter.

Got it. Okay, all right. Great. Thank you very much.

You’re welcome.

Thank you, Mr. Notter. The next question comes from the line of Scott Searle with ROTH Capital. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. Hey, guys, maybe to attack the telematics side of the equation was a rough quarter with certainly component availability issues. I’m wondering if you could dig in a little bit deeper. What did you leave on the table unable to ship because of component availability? I’m not sure if I heard a gross margin number, but kind of looking at the overall blended gross margin for the company, I would have thought it would have been higher if the telematics gross margins had been in the same ballpark. So can you help us out on that front? And I think you also indicated that you expect Caterpillar to bounce back to normalized levels. I just want to clarify that and what you kind of think normalized levels are? And then had a follow up or two.

Sure, I’ll take that. So, hi Scott, how are you. A couple of things to highlight. So first off, we did disclose that in terms of our overall backlog, when you include both our RPO, our remaining performance obligations, with our device backlog, our total backlog in aggregate was about $285 million, which, as we mentioned, is extremely healthy backlog. On the device side, that’s about $80 million to $85 million of potential revenue. So we believe that we had plenty of additional demand to ship against but unfortunately, the supply was not there for us. So in terms of what we left on the table, it’s hard to quantify, although I can just say that, we believe that the overall device backlog is very healthy right now and it’s because of a number of reasons. Obviously, we’ve talked about the 3G to 4G upgrade cycle but a lot of our customers are anxious to get more product and we’re doing everything we possibly can. In particular Caterpillar, or I should say, our largest customer, the fourth quarter revenue was about $7 million to $8 million and when you look at our historical quarters that typically run somewhere between $13 million and as high as say, $17 million, $18 million a quarter. So we were down from historical levels, albeit that was again driven principally because of supply constraints. The backlog there for Caterpillar continues to be very healthy and we anticipate that we will rebound to more relevant levels when you look at our historical levels.

Okay. I had, Kurt, just a follow up so --

Go ahead.

I’m sorry. Is there a timeline associated with that recovery current, Kurt? And then I think you’re going to answer the gross margin question.

Yeah, well, timelines, Scott, is heavily predicated on what’s happening in the supply chain. We do or I should say, we’re cautiously optimistic that things will start to rebound a bit with the supply chain at some point during fiscal 2023 but it’s hard to say exactly when. What I was going to respond to with your other question regarding gross margin, our gross margin has been in the 41% range here, as of late. Given the backdrop of what’s happening with inflation, component costs, fuel costs, labor costs, we feel like that’s a pretty good gross margin, relative to this backlog. Now, that being said, as we mentioned, I believe in the third quarter, we did institute a program to pass on a number of the cost increases. That program went effective during the fourth quarter, and has been continuing. We expect to see some return on that effort, more so in the first half of fiscal 2023, as those price increases pass on through to our customers.

Gotcha. And if I could follow up on the -- sorry, go ahead.

Go ahead, Scott.

No, no, I’m sorry. I was going to roll into another question, so I’d love to get your thoughts.

Yeah, just a few things to add to what Kurt said. Fair to say, as Kurt mentioned, we came nowhere close to fulfilling our demand. I will say that our team is doing an excellent job providing transparency with our customers. It is a difficult time, but we’re on the phone with them every day. As these customers are managed through important network initiatives like 3G to 4G conversion, we’re doing our best to get them products so that they can continue to manage their business effectively. So as hard as it is to believe or say, we are doing a very nice job maintaining good relationships with our customers in a very difficult time. And when I look at the business overall, we’re not unique in this regard; we’re seeing very few, if any, canceled orders as a result of this. So we’re very enthusiastic about the backlog and committed to working with our customers every day. Kurt and I and all the executives here along with our sales teams are spending much of our time communicating with our customers, working with our suppliers to do the very best job possible. On Caterpillar, more of the same. Caterpillar is buying everything that we can build. We’re working with them very closely. We’ve had very good conversations with Caterpillar to work together with vendors and suppliers to improve the supply as necessary. And so when Kurt says, getting back to normal levels, the demand is there for Caterpillar, they’re still managing very effectively the 3G, the 4G transition, our quality is very good there and our relationship with them is very strong.

Okay. Very helpful. Thank you. And if I could just follow up on the software subscription and services side, it was a big sequential step up in the quarter. As you indicated, it looks like there’s a lot of PULS conversions going on over there. Are there any one-time benefits that occurred in there, either a one-time software sale or something else to call out to note. And then in terms of that mix, it’s sounds like it’s in the ballpark of around 100,000 connected devices added during the quarter of subscriptions, how much of that was from that that one-fifth conversion of the PULS base? Thanks so much.

Well, I’ll start and let Kurt add in some color on that. But I wouldn’t say that there’s not a lot of one time, as we’re negotiating these agreements with our customers, these MFAs over enterprise agreements, we’re negotiating three-year commitments with these customers. So longer-term commitments that includes a bundled solution, that includes the device plus software. So this is solid revenue. It’s one of the reasons our RPO grew so nicely, so not much in terms of one-time. I think we’re pretty happy that we were able to get to 20% of our customers’ embedded base in the quarter, and you can expect more of that throughout 2023.

And Scott got to your last question regarding the subscribers, yes, we added just north of 100,000 subscribers, and I would say a good portion of those were attributable to these customers that we converted over to the to the subscription based model.

Great, thanks so much, guys.

Sure, thank you.

.:

Great. Thanks for taking my question. Just to follow up, I know you’ve not given specific guidance, but just thematically how should we think about telematics systems revenue in fiscal ‘23, if you’re successful with the MRM conversion? Does that MRM hardware line theoretically go to zero exiting the year and all that revenue then comes into your subscription services line? Just any color to think about how we should model the hardware business over the course of ‘22 would be helpful, just directionally.

Yeah, Mike, thanks for the question. So, within our telematics products reporting unit, we have a combination of customers, when you look at our legacy customer description, the MRM telematics customers as well as our OEM customers, including our largest OEM customer. So as we convert the base of our customers over to software and subscription services, the majority of the legacy MRM telematics device customers, we do expect to move into our software subscription services reporting unit, and to be engaged in multi-years, typically three-year contracts, whereby they are carrying our device-enabled solutions, which includes the device plus access to our platform, through our device management CTC services. In addition to that, what we’ve been doing with these customers, is working to get longer-term commitments out three years, whereby we have greater visibility to procure the necessary devices to deliver on those services. And so the multi-year contracts have the benefit not only of moving them into software and subscription services, but also to give us that visibility so we can better manage our supply chain in the future, so that’s a huge advantage to us. But in terms of your question around how that trends in the business, we do not believe that our entire telematics products business will go to zero. We expected there will be a base of customers that will remain as device customers. Those device customers will most likely be in the form of like high volume OEM customers who purchase devices that are highly configured to a particular use case and are done so such that the development of those devices make them somewhat sticky. So I would expect that over time, yes, that telematics products business will decline, as we cannibalize it moving it into software and subscription services, but it will eventually get to a baseline level where it’s primarily servicing these larger OEM customers.

And I think from a business perspective, something that we’ve been trying to accomplish for some time is to put ourselves in a position where all future purchases with CalAmp, with the exception of our large OEM customers will include a multi-year subscription, and it feels good to be there. We feel confident about continuing this throughout the year, and ultimately feel better about when you look at our RPO and our SaaS growth, hopefully, investors are getting a good feel that we’re moving towards more of a recurring revenue business, which is what they’re looking for us to do. So we’re feeling good about making progress. That is really the most important part of our transformation.

That’s tough [Phonetic]. I just tried to understand the mechanics of the model between the two divisions. And then for gross margin trends between the two businesses, how should we think about that or should we just kind of think this 41% level is a good level to stay at over the intermediate term as a combined company?

No, I think there in the short run, we’re seeing some component cost increases. We’re trying to offset those a bit delayed because we pass on price increases a couple of quarters after we see increases in the base, so we’re trying to keep up with that. But ultimately, Mike, what we’re trying to do, and the whole reason that we’re moving to the software, recurring business revenue, is that that revenue is definitely more profitable. And our software businesses tend to be 50% and above compared to historically our telematic devices revenue more in the low 40s. So over time, as you see us progress, now we’re up to 60%, we expect that to continue to increase, you should see a similar move in our margins going forward.

Understood. Make sense. Thanks for taking my questions.

Sure.

Thank you, Mr. Walkley. Our next question comes from a line of Mike Latimore with Northland Capital. Please go ahead.

Hi, this is Aditya on behalf of Mike Latimore. Could you tell me has the war in Ukraine kind of affected any of your international revenue? Has the demand in Europe slowed down because of the war?

No, we haven’t seen any significant effects. There’s some tertiary impact from the Ukraine suppliers but it’s not a big part of our business. So we’re much more focused -- our supply chain is pretty diversified. If you think about CalAmp three years ago, we’re primarily relying on China, now we have four or five locations, mostly in Asia, one in Mexico that are providing our supplies. So very little impact from Ukraine. We’re paying a lot of attention to that today but, today, it’s not cost us any significant problems.

All right. Could you also give some color on the sales cycle, has the inflation or any of the macro concerns elongated the sales cycle?

No, I think with our sales cycle, yes. I mean, I guess, to be fair, yes, in some regards. We’re spending a lot of time with our customers talking to them about component prices, etc. And we have passed on PPV, or price increases, that requires our sales team to do extra effort. I don’t think it’s kept them away from moving forward with our MSA, as you saw that we made great progress on that in the quarter. So I feel like, going forward, the sales cycle with the MSA and the focus on software going forward requires a bit more expertise. It’s a more complicated solution sell but our team is navigating it nicely, and gaining confidence every day, as we continue with this solution selling methodology.

All right. All right. Fine. Thank you.

You’re welcome.

Thank you, Mr. Latimore. Our next question comes from one of Orin Hirschman with AIGH Investment Partners. Please go ahead.

Hi, how are you?

Great.

In terms of being able to project out -- hi, in terms of being able to project on recurring and really it is not giving guidance, but what’s the difficulty in terms of projecting on the recurring part of your business? Is that being components of -- components supplies also shortchanging that part of the business in terms of transitioning over customers? Is that the difficulty in projecting it? Wouldn’t there be some base level projection that you kind of know that much of it?

Well, it’s a common -- a couple of things there, Orin. I think the first off is, as you can imagine, there is a challenge just forecasting out the conversion of telematics device customers over to software and subscription services contract. We do have a roadmap of when we anticipate customers will convert, but the sales process and the discussions, they are a bit more complicated and take some time and so we want to make sure that we work through those matters with our customers and they’re comfortable with making that conversion. The second thing is that, as you know, our solution is a device-enabled solution, so the actual delivery and activation of our solution does require the shipment of devices. We have been working very hard to ensure that the allocations of our devices to our subscription-based customers are good, are healthy, but that still has an impact on our ability to forecast in the future. So there are a couple of complexities here that we’re just managing through, which is limiting our ability to give guidance at this time; however, we do hope to get through the supply chain challenges and resume back to giving guidance towards the latter half of this fiscal year.

And all that aside, Orin, I would say that when I look at our quarter and where we stand today, and Kurt mentioned in his script that we have $285 million of backlog plus RPO outstanding and that should give investors a clear view that we are doing a really nice job driving our customers to committing to revenue going forward. And it should drive more consistent revenue over the coming quarters and years. So I feel really good about that and I think as the supply chain improves, we’re going to get more and more visibility. On average, that aside, we’re getting much more of our business, 60% today recurring revenue, which will make that easier and more straightforward for investors to understand going forward.

So a couple of couple of quick follow ups. So, are we want to read from this that your recurring would have been even higher, if you would have had more device, physical devices, available?

Absolutely.

Okay. And just, obviously, there’s a natural layering in throughout the quarter of devices going live and revenue wreck. Is it fair to assume that there are some -- even if you ship no new devices, there’s going to be sequential uptick in terms of recurring, even with no new devices going live. Obviously, that’s not a fair assumption but just to the make the point.

Yeah, well, that’s the or the benefit of the subscription model, we do have not only future looking commitments from our customers to these MSA arrangements to activate additional device-enabled solutions, but the install base in and of itself provides an added layer of revenue, so you would expect that installed base to help build for revenue growth as well as to help in enhancing our overall gross margin. So the answer -- the short answer to this question is, yes, but our goal really is to continue to move forward on converting a larger and larger portion of that base of telematics device customers over and we plan to do that over the next three to four quarters.

And the last question, just on the side of the business just, is there any ARPU calculation or something that would give us a flavor for how successful you’re being on the conversion?

Well, we don’t publish any ARPU information at this time. We have indicated in the past that when you look at our business, the ARPU fluctuates depending on the type of solution we’re providing, when you’re providing a fully integrated solution, which includes the application, the platform and also our device-enabled firmware software that has a higher ARPU versus customers that are just procuring or utilizing our baseline device management service. So depending on mix, the ARPU will fluctuate, but at this point in time, we haven’t given any ARPU guidance, and we’ll be looking at evaluating that in the medium to long term.

Okay. And my last question is, your hopefully that component shortages will begin to abate sometime during this year. I guess my question is, can you tell -- we’ve heard from a number of companies that component shortages were abating on as lockdown started in China. Can you -- do you have a feel, even a qualitative feel of what’s related to still truly shortage of components versus things that had been ramping but got stopped in the new tracks because of the lockdown.

It’s very hard to say. As Jeff mentioned, we have contract manufacturers that do the final phase of assembly in locations outside of China. However, a lot of our downstream components that accumulate up into the bump are dependent of coming out of China from different manufacturers. So it’s very difficult to say where or why the lockdown in China, how it’s impacting our product. We do know that in certain areas, things are easing, but because of the continued struggles around the pandemic, especially in certain areas of China, it continues to be a challenge for us. So we’re watching it very closely. We’re taking measures to try to circumvent these situation, but it’s difficult to say what’s causing each layer of the supply chain challenge.

Okay. [Multiple Speakers].

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Currently, there are no additional questions waiting in queue. I would like to pass the conference back to Jeff Gardner, for any closing remarks. Excuse me. I do apologize. We do have a question from a line of Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi, good afternoon and good evening. Kurt, I wonder if you could just put a finer point on what the subscription business might look like in 12 months once the transition is complete. So, this quarter, you folks added 46,000 subscribers, and that’s based on 20% transition. So essentially 12 months from now, should we be thinking about a 1.2 million subscriber base and revenue rate that’s -- run rate that’s commensurately higher for the subscription business compared to today? Is that a reasonable rough framework without getting into the unit economics you mentioned, you’ve been wanting to get into in prior discussions?

Yeah, hey, Jerry, how are you? Yes. So to answer your question, so we do see that the software and subscription services business continuing to grow. We were extremely pleased with the fact that in the fourth quarter, we were able to get our software and subscription revenue to 60% of our overall consolidated revenue. In our medium to long term model, that was a key metric for us and so although the full year concentration of SaaS was only about 50% to 52%, our goal is to get that number to 60% over the next couple of quarters. With that in mind, and given the success we’re experiencing with converting our base of customers, we do believe that reaching a target of somewhere between 1.2 million and 1.5 million subscribers is very reasonable and obviously, that will help us to drive that revenue, not only in the upcoming fiscal year, but obviously into the future, because most of these contracts are 36-month contracts with renewal provisions that extended out close to 60 months. So extremely pleased with the success for the quarter and we think that it’s going to be a good foundation to grow off on into fiscal 2023.

And Jerry, this is Jeff. [Multiple Speakers] that we’re going to be focused on this conversion for the next couple of quarters but we’re also continuing to invest in our sales pace -- sales force. Subsequent to the conversion and really what we’re looking at and what gets us most excited about the future is that we’re going to be focused on organic sales growth in the 10% to 15% range. In fiscal year 2023, you’ll see us add over 30 sales reps to our sales force across the globe. We’re going to also add resources in product and marketing that’s going to allow us to realize that 15% growth rate in terms of organic growth year-over-year. Even with that, given our transformation, we’re going to keep our overall headcount relatively flat but I think it’s important for investors to know that we’re really investing in the important areas of sales, marketing, and product.

And Jeff, just to expand on Kurt’s comment of 1.2 million to 1.5 million subscribers, so the bridge to 1.2 is pretty clear. What gets you from 1.2 to 1.5? Is it new platform wins? Can you just expand on what would get you towards the high end of the range that Kurt just laid up?

Yes, it is absolutely the conversion of the base, which easily gets us to 1.2, hopefully a little more. And then what our team is pivoting to is much more focused on new logos. We brought in a new Chief Marketing Officer this year. The sales reps that I just mentioned, we’re going all in terms of we like where our product is going to be, we like what’s going on in the transportation logistics space, I think there’s a lot going on. Digital convergence during COVID really pushed this board for many of our customers, and they’re very hungry for these insights that we can deliver. So all of that’s coming together with this transformation that’s going on at CalAmp that’s going to really deliver the kind of recurring revenue and growth that our customers have long been or that our investors have long been looking for.

Got it. And maybe one last one, assuming a three year payback for a subscription versus the one-time sale that we’ve seen for MRM historically, that ratio would suggest about $25 million of lower MRM sales once the conversion is complete. I realize that that math is not perfect, but I’m wondering if you could comment on that, relative to the $75 million run rate of the MRM product line today. Thanks.

Yeah, Jerry, I don’t know, if I’m prepared to kind of talk to the exact revenue figures you’re referring to. I mean, all I would say is that we do have a strong base of customers in that telematics device space. We’ve been servicing them for anywhere from five to 10 years. There’s probably a population of 60 of them that were really strong customers of ours. We believe we can move them into the subscription area in those subscription arrangements, that is incremental revenue, and that revenue will be a lot more sticky, given that it’s in a three-year contract range. That being said, as we mentioned, our largest customer in the OEM space is still a very good customer, great relationship. You’re familiar with them. Historically, we’ve had good revenue generated from them and our plan is to get back to those historical levels of revenue with them and grow it from there. So that’s our focus right now.

Okay. Thanks.

You’re welcome.

Thank you, Mr. Revich. I would now like to pass the conference back to Jeff Gardner for any closing remarks.

Yeah, thank you, Bethany, and for joining us all today on the call. We appreciate the interest from our investors. Kurt and I will be participating in the Oppenheimer Emerging Growth Conference on May 10. This will be a virtual event. If you’d like to request a meeting, please contact your Oppenheimer representative or our IR firm Shelton Group. Very pleased with the quarter, especially grateful for the excellent efforts of our team. It’s been a really challenging year and I’m proud of every single employee at CalAmp putting forth the effort to do the best job possible to take care of our customers this year. Really excited about the future. So we look forward to reporting our progress on our next quarters call. Operator, you may now disconnect the call.

Thank you. That concludes today’s conference call. I hope you all enjoy the rest of your day. You may now disconnect your lines.