Thank you for standing by. My name is Janine, and I will be your operator for today's call. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Corteva, Inc. 2024Q4 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star one on your touch-tone phone. And to withdraw your question, please press star one again. I will now turn the call over to Kim Booth, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and welcome to Corteva, Inc.'s fourth quarter and full year 2024 earnings conference call. Our prepared remarks today will be led by Chuck Magro, Chief Executive Officer, and David Johnson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Additionally, Judd O'Connor, Executive Vice President, Seed Business Unit, and Robert King, Executive Vice President, Crop Protection Business Unit, will join the Q&A session. We have prepared presentation slides to supplement our remarks during this call, which are posted on the Investor Relations section of the Corteva website and through the link to our webcast. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements, which are our expectations about the future. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could materially differ from these statements due to these risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed on this call and in the risk factors section of our reports filed with the SEC. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. Please note in today's presentation, we'll be making references to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures can be found in our earnings press release and related schedules, along with our supplemental financial summary slide deck, available on our Investor Relations website. It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Chuck.

Thanks, Kim. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us. I hope your year is off to a great start. There are several key points I'd like to share with you today, including a perspective on our Q4 results, an overview of current market fundamentals, with a closer look at what that might mean for us in 2025, and how to connect all of that to our 2027 financial framework. That outlines our path to sustained value creation over the next three years. Let me start by saying we finished 2024 almost exactly as we thought we would. The Ag fundamentals have continued to improve, more so than over the past two years. So our 2025 guidance reflects that. Our portfolio of advanced seed and crop protection technologies is in high demand, and we feel good about our path to delivering the 2027 financial framework which we announced in November. Coupled with productivity and cost improvement initiatives, a central pillar of our business strategy, we delivered 20% operating EBITDA margins for the first time in 2024. All while maintaining operating EBITDA which ended up being about flat year over year in less than ideal market conditions. To ensure we had good momentum coming into 2025, it was important that we finish the year strong. Which we did. Particularly in crop protection where we drove double-digit organic sales growth and 800 basis points of margin improvement in the fourth quarter. Which was largely attributable to demand for our technology in Brazil. Our seed business consistently delivered in 2024, with Pioneer maintaining its rank as the number one corn and soybean brand in the US. We gained corn market share in North America, coupled with solid pricing. This was quite an accomplishment given the reduction in corn planted area. In Enlist E3…

Thanks, Chuck, and welcome everyone to the call. Let's start on Slide seven, which provides the financial results for the fourth quarter and full year. Briefly touching on the fourth quarter, organic sales were up 13% compared to the prior year with seed up 16%, and crop protection up 11%. Pricing for the core was down 4% as expected largely driven by competitive pressure in Brazil, in both seed and crop protection. Pricing was positive in every region excluding Latin America. Fourth quarter volume was up 17% over the prior year. Seed volumes were up 19% driven by an expected increase in Brazil's safrinha corn area. Crop protection volumes were up 16% led by Latin America and EMEA. Volume of crop protection new products were up more than 20% in the quarter compared to the prior year. Full year 2024 organic sales were up 1% versus the prior year. With higher volume partially offset by lower price. Seed organic sales were up 4% for the year, with pricing up 3% with gains across the portfolio. Volume was up 1% with planted area increases in Brazil corn and North America soybean. Offsetting lower corn planted area in North America, EMEA, and Asia Pacific. Crop Protection organic sales were down 2% versus the prior year. With volume gains offset by price decline. Full year price was down 5% largely driven by competitive market dynamics in Latin America. Crop protection volume was up 3% with gains in Latin America and Asia Pacific partially offset by declines in EMEA, driven by residual destocking and unfavorable weather. In North America, driven by just-in-time purchasing behavior. Operating EBITDA of approximately $3.4 billion for the full year 2024 is essentially flat versus the prior year. With an operating EBITDA margin of 20% or more than 30 basis…

While crop protection prices are beginning to stabilize,

we still expect prices to be down low single digits for the year in 2025. We're expecting volume growth in both seed and crop protection. Seed volume gains are expected to be driven by more corn acres in North America, and share gains in key markets. Crop protection volume is expected to be up mid-single digits driven by demand for new products and biologicals, which are expected to outperform the rest of the portfolio. We expect approximately $50 million improvement in net royalty expense driven by increased out-licensing income, as we continue to ramp up the licensing of Concessa E3 soybeans, and Paracort and Enlist corn. We are on track to deliver approximately $400 million of net cost improvements in 2025 driven by lower seed commodity costs, crop protection raw material deflation, and productivity gains including benefits from crop protection footprint optimization.

SG&A and R&D as a percentage of sales

are expected to be relatively flat with 2024 levels. Implying a modest increase in spend. Like many US-based reporting companies, we are expecting a larger currency headwind now than we previously forecasted. The currency headwind is largely driven by the Brazilian real, Turkish lira, and Canadian dollar. A stronger US dollar is expected to translate to a low single-digit headwind on net sales and approximately $275 million headwind on operating EBITDA. Together, this translates to approximately 10% operating EBITDA growth at the midpoint. And 100 to 150 basis points of margin expansion. Regarding the timing of sales and earnings in 2025, we're expecting about 60% of sales and roughly 80% of EBITDA to be delivered in the first half of the year. We also expect to see a timing difference between the first two quarters versus the prior year. This is largely due to the timing of seed deliveries in Latin America and EMEA after both regions delivered record volume in the fourth quarter of 2024. For the first quarter of 2025, we're assuming a normal delivery pattern in the Northern Hemisphere which could shift significantly between the first and second quarters depending on weather conditions. Let's go to slide eleven. Which presents the factors which could drive the guidance to the lower and upper end of the range. As seen on the previous slide, our current forecast includes a significant currency headwind to operating EBITDA. We will continue to look for opportunities to mitigate additional through pricing and other means. If the dollar continues to strengthen, we expect there would be some additional headwind. Assumed in the midpoint, is relatively flat global planted area, with increased corn area in North America, low single-digit increase in Brazil safrinha, and relatively flat area in other regions. A big question is how…

Thanks, David. Let's move on to your questions. I would like to remind you that our cautions on forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures apply to both our prepared remarks and the following Q&A. Operator, please provide the Q&A instructions.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. I would like to remind everyone to limit yourselves to one question only. Should you have a question, should you wish to withdraw, please press star one again. If you are using a speakerphone, please state the handset before pressing any keys. Our first question comes from the line of Christopher Parkinson from Wolfe Research. Go ahead.

Great. Thank you so much. You know, a lot's changed since November outside of FX. Specifically new seed business. You know, we're looking at corn acres likely being up versus probably flattish back then. It seems like you have an opportunity a further opportunity, quite frankly, on the versus two four g debacle. PowerCore seems to be doing well pricing. I mean, we could keep going, but just how should we think about these potential positives as they're evolving into the season versus what you've been highlighting as a risk on FX side as we just try to triangulate the midpoint of your guidance and how you see things evolving. Thank you so much.

Morning, Chris. Well, how about we do this? We'll talk about our assumption for guide. I'll give you some views on the market and then David can walk you through the upsides and downsides. At least how we're thinking about them today. So you're right. From a fundamentals perspective, the market has turned more positive certainly in the last three months. We've always in the last couple of years, we've seen very good demand for crops. 2024 was another record. We're expecting very good demand in 2025. I think crop prices are following that trend. You can see it especially in corn and soybeans where they're off their bottoms and showing I'd say, some modest strength. And the stocks-to-use ratios, especially for corn, is the tightest we've seen in some time. That's why we're calling, I think, this year, the year of corn because we just think that the market is calling for a more planted area when it comes to corn. Farmer margins are improving. They're not great by any stretch, but they are much better than they were last year. And that comment is for US farmers and for Brazilian farmers. And then just one other comment. You sent through the CP industry. It's a different state what we're in right now. The last couple of years have been very challenging, and I'd say disproportionately imbalanced when it comes to inventories in the channel. And things are feeling a lot better in that regard where we have more balanced inventories around the world. There's still pockets. We're still expecting downward pressure in price. Especially in the first half of the year. But the CP industry is continuing its recovery. So all of that was factored into sort of our midpoint and how we're thinking about guide. And, David, maybe you can now talk a little bit about the upsides and downsides.

Yeah, Chris. So thank you very much for the question. Yeah. I think we outlined them. Pretty decently on slide eleven. You know, as we feel we have a balanced outlook for currency at this point in time. However, if there is a situation where the weaker US dollar then we would see some upside. I think for us, probably, you know, one of the big pluses and minuses is well, it's just the CP industry in general, which we talked about. We expect some low single-digit negative pricing in the CP business this year in 2025. Which is a pretty significant improvement over what we saw in 2024. But that to me is one of the key lookouts for this year. Also have a net $400 million of improvement due to self-help actions. You know, that takes execution and so on and so forth with the teams. We feel, again, that's balanced. So think when you look at the total 10% you know, midpoint EBITDA growth, we feel like at this point, it's a balanced set of assumptions.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Vincent Andrews from Morgan Stanley. Go ahead.

Hi, everyone. When I look at Q4, what stands out to me is it looks like the production cost in crop chem or crop protection came in a lot lower than certainly we were expecting, and I'm wondering if it was a lot lower than what you guided. You don't really guide by segment. At the same time, you know, it looks like the seed production costs were reported a lot higher than what we were expecting. And so I'm just wondering if you can speak to sort of where you are in CP from a lower raw material cost perspective and if you are indeed run rating better than you thought, you know, three, five months ago, and if there are any implications, to 2025 from that, and, likewise, I assume in seed, know, I know we know you were working through some higher cost inventory, and so that's just temporal and, hopefully, will run its course. But I just would like to get some commentary around where you are ex 2024 on the cost side of the equation.

Okay. Good morning, Vincent. So let me give you some opening comments then I'll turn it over to both Robert and Judd to talk specifics. So you're right when it comes to CP. As you probably remember, we've got a multiyear plan where we're really looking at structural improvements, asset footprint, really doing things differently when it comes to CP driving significant productivity gains. Recall that as a publicly traded company back in 2019, we inherited our footprint. And we've been on a very long journey here to optimize and take structural costs out. And Robert King and his team have done a really good job. And I'd say we are trending a little ahead of a plan there, and he can give you some specifics. The other side of this is seed. And we had telegraphed this before a couple of times that we had some very high-cost inventory in Latin America. Really because of lower yields and quality issues back in 2023. And we made a deliberate set of decisions to clear the decks for 2025. And we've done that, and that obviously shows up in our 2024 results. But to give you just a bit more color, Robert, why don't you start with where you're at in the cost reduction program. Then we'll pitch it over to Judd.

Good. Thanks, Chuck. Vincent, we finished out the year to answer your question about where we expected to be on our journey to our 2027 commitments, looking at the cost takeout and the footprint reductions we talked about, everything is on track. For the full year. For 2025, you know, we're gonna take out another $200 million in if you recall it, Investor Day in November, we committed to a $300 million run rate by 2027 at least. And so we are marching towards that. Think about raw material deflation. And it came in for the year, you know, right about $100 million, which is what we had expected. And we said last time we talked, and that will continue into the next year. We have a good line of sight that it is all baked into what we've guided towards. And so we think it continues to move forward, continuing to get better. Things will slow at a lower rate than what we've seen in the past. But everything's moving in the direction of goodness from a cost management standpoint there.

Judd?

Yeah, Vincent. Thank you. And I think Chuck wrapped it up pretty well. If you look across the world, we had price gains in every region with the exception of Latin America in the fourth quarter. Latin America, we had extremely competitive markets. That continued in the fourth quarter. Also had some remaining high-cost inventory that we had to work through. I think we've talked about that in a number of cases in the past. For 2025, the good news is both get better. We've got a COGS position in Brazil in particular that's going to materially improve. And we see a pricing opportunity as we go into 2025. So it feels like we've worked through what was a challenging 2024, and we've got a good path in 2025 in the plan.

Our next question comes from the line of Joel Jackson from BMO Capital.

Good morning, everyone. Could you talk about the cadence of the earnings and earnings growth across the years? It's about 10% across the year. Can you help us figure how that's gonna look Q1 or quarterly or first half, second half? Thanks.

Yes, Joel. This is David. I'll take that one. I think we'll look at it more first second half because as you know, given weather and what have you, we could have a pretty significant change between March and April. So when we look at it right now, we would expect to be up slightly in the first half versus the first half of 2024, and a little bit better, I would say, year-over-year comparison than back half of the year. And some of that's driven by exactly what Judd just said regarding the Brazil seed cost position and so on and so forth. So we would expect to see a pretty, I would say, a better improvement there in the fourth quarter for seed. NCP, as you know, we talked about low single-digit pricing. We would say that that would be a little bit low single-digit negative pricing. I should say. That's a little bit more towards the first half of the year. Flattening out in the back half of the year. So you add that altogether, the first half would be up slightly. And then we would see the second half being higher as a percentage of improvement year over year.

Our next question comes from the line of Kevin McCarthy from Vertical Research. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thank you, and good morning. Your crop protection EBITDA margins increased 800 basis points year over year, which was quite a bit more than we would have anticipated. So can you maybe rank order some of the key drivers of that? I think you made a comment that you were pleased with technology uptake in Brazil. So just maybe a little more context around what drove margins. And also, I'm curious as to whether there were any positive or negative timing-related considerations in either of your segments. Thank you.

Yeah. Thanks, Kevin. This is Robert. I'll jump into that one. So Q4 was a really strong quarter for us. And for the overall crop protection business, it was a record quarter as you called out. In Brazil, they had a really good quarter, especially when you compare it to the previous year and a year-over-year comp. And that is part of the part of the large numbers you're seeing, but not to minimize the effort that the teams put in there. The drivers came from the usual suspects that we've talked about, biologicals, new products, in those areas, and some spinosin sales as well. It fell just in line with our key drivers to growth. And that's really what drove a lot of the margin increase on a year-over-year basis as compared to the prior year. The additional I would say is fungicide insecticide experienced some solid growth in Q4. And that's an area that typically has higher margins as compared to herbicides as well. So our mix helped out there also. And then finally, I'll land on cost. Earlier in the call, we mentioned on that, but in Q4, we took $170 million of cost out on a year-over-year basis. So that is moving in the right direction as well. So all of these things came together to deliver a really solid quarter and give us some momentum moving into 2025. Hope that helps.

Our next question comes from the line of Josh Spector from UBS. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. I wanna come back to the question around 2025 guidance. So, you know, when you go through all the puts to take you left out or at least your bridge, FX is really the only major change in there. But you didn't lower the high and low end by $100 million. You lowered the top end by $200 million. You didn't touch the bottom end. So kinda two pieces here is one, why is the top end cut $200 million and not $100 million then at the lower end, are you baking in some of the positives we talked about around corn specifically that helps offset some of that? Thanks.

Alright. This is David again. I'll take that question. And typically, one of the reasons you know, we took the $200 off the top is we do narrow our guide because this will be our where our information we gave out last year was more of our initial perspective of the year, which was a wider guide than we typically give. And then at the midpoint then, we did take out $100 million as you mentioned. It is all FX. Actually, FX is $125 million. We made up $25 million there and a little bit of the base change between the $3.76 and the $3.8 billion. In other areas. So slightly improvement in price and slight improvement in volume. So that's where we ended up on the midpoint. On the lower end, we kept the lower end. I mean, I think as we put in our upsides and downsides, really, the downsides would be a further strengthening of the US dollar, difference in planted acres and then you know, our perspective on the CP market as to what that might roll out over time in 2025, particularly around pricing and volume.

And, Josh, maybe just a couple other thoughts for you. So when we rolled out that wider range, it was a first look. It was a while ago. But you recall, I think we had messaged that we would need to see the CP market return to growth. And what we're calling for right now, you know, three months later, is a flattish CP market. So that was certainly a consideration. If we start to see the market rebound in CP, then we would obviously reflect that going forward. And then the other interesting thing for me when I just look at it, currency is a big number. $275 million. If you add that to the $3.7 the way we guided it. You know, you're into a healthy range there that is not too dissimilar to the number we were providing just a while back. So I think that it's really almost binary where we lowered the midpoint simply because of currency, and we were feeling that. But the top end of that range we would need to see the global crop protection market return to growth.

Our next question comes from the line of David Begleiter from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning. Chuck, you look at equity values, there's a widening gap between seed and crop protection assets. Met you're now almost 70% seeds. Would it could it ever make sense for you guys to separate out crop protection from seeds to enhance the equity value? Thank you.

Yeah. Good morning, David. Look, we look at almost everything under the sun when it comes to do we create long-term value creation. Nothing is off the table. We're constantly looking at our portfolio. We're constantly looking externally at how to use the balance sheet and the cash flow we're generating. And so I wouldn't take anything off the table. However, if you think about how the company is built, right, we're built around a farmer, a global farmer. And they need an integrated set of tools. Especially when you look at how our R&D is completely integrated and working together and then how we go to market around the world. All of those there's significant I'd say, synergies and leverage we get. We're one of the only companies, if you think about how Corteva, Inc. is built, that can bring a full acre solution starting with seed and then a crop protection and biological package now around that. And I think you're starting to see the value of that integrated offering in markets where we're working with farmers directly now. So you know what? As a CEO, I would never take anything off the table. But when I look at the journey that we're on, I have a lot of confidence that the long-term value creation that we've laid through all the way from R&D to how we built our channels to market and the technology we're bringing farmers an integrated offering is gonna be a powerful set of choices, I think, for farmers.

Our next question comes from the line of Steve Byrne from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Yes. Good morning. This is Salvador Keanu filling in for Steve. I want to go back to the guidance and within the set of assumptions, we don't really see anything about the outlook for dicamba and what upside you could have there from Enlist. And, you know, we are already in February. Fieldwork in the south should start in a month or so. So what is your latest view given there haven't been any registration so far? The supply chain should have stocked at least for their early herbicides. And is this something that is in your guidance or could be something that could be outside?

Hi, Steve. Yeah. This is Judd. And relative to dicamba, I think one from a label perspective and, you know, trying to speculate any at all. I think it's too early to call. If you look at where we're at today, we don't have any new information. But our order book for E3 is very, very healthy. We have seen orders come in from the south, which is kind of a long-term dicamba holdout with the soy cotton rotation there. Growers have held on to the technology longer there than they have in, you know, other parts of the market. Our E3 products should perform extremely well. Both from a weed control perspective, our Z series soybeans and the germplasm network sending through licensees as well as through our own brands. Is leading in the market. So that feels good. But we don't have any upside built into the plan for any assumptions around dicamba. We've got, you know, 65%, as Chuck mentioned earlier, market penetration at this point with no upsides for dicamba built into the 2025 plan.

Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Cunningham from Citi. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. This is Rachel Leon for Patrick. You've noticed just-in-time purchasing behavior for the past several quarters. So is this the new norm? And do you expect to shift strategy based on this new customer behavior?

Yes, Robert. Thanks for the question. Yeah. This is really an aspect of what's going on in the global economy with capital markets with high interest rates, holding working capital, etcetera, through the channel and on the farm is something that is just not favorable for folks to do. So as long as interest rates are where they are and product availability is high across the board, we don't anticipate that the just-in-time behavior changes. It's a behavioral shift due to the economy and the way things are, so we're prepared for it as we move forward.

Our next question comes from the line of Edlain Rodriguez from Mizuho. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thank you, everyone. So in the fourth quarter, you talked about competitive pressure in seed that you're seeing in Latin America. Do you expect this to continue going forward? And what's really driving that? So why is it so competitive? And you're seeing price decline as a result of that?

So, Edlain, thank you for the question. Maybe a couple of things. One, as we went into the fourth quarter and seed, we had a healthy supply position from competitors in the marketplace. We see that settling out. To some degree, particularly with safrinha acres increasing. And then as we go into the second half, which is the most important time of the year for us with our seed business in Latin America. Excuse me. Second part of that question was will it continue? As we go into 2025, as I mentioned earlier, one, good news. Our COGS position gets materially stronger, and we're excited about that. Number two, we have pricing built into our plan. We've taken that pricing forward and feel good about where we are with the opportunity to price in Brazil. In 2025. New products, better technology, bringing more value for growers, and we expect to be able to price for that.

Yeah. Edlain, maybe just a few other thoughts here. So Brazil's always been competitive. There's no change here. Right? It's a big diverse market as we've already talked about. But Brazilian farmers through many, many years have also showed that they will pay for differentiation in yield. And we have some of the best technology when it comes to seed in Latin America. In many markets, we are the leader and farmers will pay if they're gonna get a few extra bushels per acre or I think the issue that you're seeing reflected in price in our financials was the poor yields and the quality back in 2023. And our deliberate decision to make sure that we clear the decks so that we've got a much healthier business going into the 2025 year. And now you look at is what Judd has referred to is we're expecting a pretty significant increase in safrinha acres. So the market is fundamentally hasn't changed when it comes to seed and how it values seed. And it's growing. And now that we've got a better inventory cost position, I think we like where we're sitting here early in 2025.

Our next question comes from the line of Frank Mitsch from Fermium Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you. David, a question on working capital. Obviously, a very strong part in 2024. I was curious, on the inventory side, typically, you see a build for Corteva, Inc. Q4 versus Q3. That didn't happen this year. Actually, it went the other way. So did you talk about that? And can you talk about the expectations in 2025? I know that you say that you expect it to normalize. Any sort of metrics around that? Thank you.

Yeah. Sure. No problem. When you look at our total free cash flow, this year, the $1.7 billion, and if you look at what I would consider core working capital. So receivables, inventory, and payables. Now that was a tailwind of about $300 million. A lot of that was in inventory, and a lot of that inventory was because of the fact that the year before, we kinda entered the year with more inventory than we wanted to. Primarily in CP. I think the Q4 dynamics would probably be the fact that we had this seed inventory that we wanted to clear the decks like Chuck had mentioned. And the fact that our volumes were up quite a bit in Q4, so there's a little bit of a dynamic there. When you look into 2025, we do expect those kind of core working capital elements to be a slight headwind. I would say somewhere in the $100 million range, but I would say that would be back to more normal levels.

Our next question comes from the line of Aleksey Yefremov from KeyBank. Please go ahead.

And good morning. This is Ryan on for Aleksey. I mean, I understand you guys didn't bake in anything to the guidance just based on kind of what's been going on with tariffs. But you I wanted to get a better understanding of raw material sourcing and you know, what percentage of raw materials would be at risk kind of to the potential tariffs in Canada and Mexico and then obviously the recent addition China. Thank you.

Yep. Good morning, Ryan. So this is a complicated question. I'll tell you that right up front. The situation is changing almost daily. And so we have a task team that's working and running models and simulations on what could happen with the different scenarios. Let me start by just saying a couple of things upfront. So our two this is really a CP issue for us. Right? Because it's a global supply chain. Corn is a little different. It's essentially grown and sold in the same region. So this for us is a CP issue. And our two biggest franchise businesses enlist in Spinozan's they are manufactured exclusively in the United States. So that sets up Corteva, Inc. to be basically a net exporter as a company. Now to give you a view on CP, and we'll just use China as an example, it's about 2% of our COGS come from China. And about 80% of that 2%, we have multi-sourced. So the simulation, the models that we've run, and who knows exactly what will eventually happen, but the scenarios that we've run, we think that most of these but you were right to call out we have put none of this in our guide because we just don't have enough confidence on what it may or may not be. So the scenarios that are being discussed right now, we think are completely manageable. And the data point I would draw you to for China is it's about 2% of our COGS and 80% of that is multi-source.

Our next question comes from the line of Richard Coty Torena from Wells Fargo.

Alright. Thank you. Chuck, you talked about a very encouraging start to the year for ag fundamentals. Just looking at crop protection in North America, it looks like volumes and price were flat in the fourth quarter. So I was wondering, you just give us some color in terms of how you think North America is shaping up for crop protection? You know, we've heard from some of your peers that there might be some cautious buyer patterns from retailers or growers. So just wondering your thoughts on that. Thank you.

Yeah. It's probably best that Robert comments on that since he's in the market every day, but the backdrop, I think, right now is you've got as we said, we think there's gonna be a lot of corn acres planted the year of corn. Which helps Corteva, Inc. on many fronts. We do think that farmer margins are improving. Crop prices are up. Inventories are tight. So all this usually drives to sort of an overall positive sentiment. No. It's early, and we have to get through a couple more weeks of winter. We also need a wide-open planting season, hopefully, but so far so good. And then when it comes to specifics in terms of CP inventory, and what the retailers are thinking about for the season, Robert, why don't you comment on that?

Yeah. I'll just add a little bit of color to it, specifically North America. It's our largest crop protection market, obviously. And things continue to improve there around, you know, the farmers and everything going on commodity prices. So channel inventories are imbalanced. We had a good fourth quarter not unusually high nor low. Products continue to move in preparation for the North America season. And we're continuing to see that as we move into the first quarter here. We're expecting that our products continue to move. In looking at all of our channel partners, etcetera, we set in a really good place on a year-over-year basis. And we, you know, we're expecting that our new products continue to see growth there. Biological is something that is moving into the market in our new partnerships that we've got set up there, we're really excited about. So everything is in the direction of goodness, especially when it comes to inventories in the channel and demand for the technology that we bring to market.

Next question will be from Kristen Owen from Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. Thank you for taking the question. Just given the FX swing factor on the year, can you just remind us hedging practices, how far out you hedge on certain currencies and how that might move through the year.

Yes, Kristen. This is David. I'll take that question. Typically, what we do is we hedge our currencies in the year for the year. So we might have a little bit of hedges in place going into the year, but our primary objective is to have some consistency between the quarters within a year. So really, when you look at a year-over-year basis, you know, sometimes that's a benefit, and sometimes it's not. So in this particular case, BRL for us is probably our largest exposure, somewhere around 40% of our total impact in 2025 is BRL. Currently, we have that in at a six or so rate. I will remind everyone that our exposures are more back half loaded into the year, so we'll see where that rate ends up at that point in time. Right now, the rates are a little bit above that rate. We'll see how it goes. But again, I just wanna remind everyone, it is really within the year for the year.

Our next question comes from the line of Arun Viswanathan from RBC Capital Markets.

Great. Thanks for taking my question. I guess, just clarification on that last point. So the exchange gains and losses line, the EGL line, Legacy kind of DuPont line. But just curious, if that would be kind of similar to what you saw in 2024 or maybe more so in the $300 to $350 million range. And then along those lines, is there I guess, would that impact your cash? I mean, is there any room to maybe increase the buyback or you're just kind of planning for that billion ratably through the year?

Okay. Fantastic. There's two questions in there. I would say that on the EGL, I would say it'd be proportionate to probably our EBITDA number if you look at that over time. So you would expect it to be a little bit higher in 2025 versus 2024. Regarding our capital deployment, as we sit today, we do plan on the $1 billion of buybacks somewhat even through the year. Which would be similar to what we did in the prior year. So if you add that along with our dividends, it'll be another year of $1.5 billion back to shareholders. On a roughly $1.6 billion of free cash flow. The difference being, you know, we will plan on continuing to invest in our catalyst program. And then the opportunities in M&A. And then we also ended the year a little bit higher in cash than we typically do at $3.1 billion. So we have a little bit more room there for any kind of tuck-in acquisition.

Our last question comes from the line of Ben Theurer from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Good morning. All questions have been asked. Thank you.

Okay. Great. So that will be that will conclude our call today. We thank you for joining, and for your interest in Corteva, Inc., and we hope you have a safe and wonderful day.

That concludes our conference call. Thank you for joining today. You may now disconnect.