Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the DiamondRock Hospitality fourth-quarter 2023 earnings conference call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Briony Quinn, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to DiamondRock's fourth-quarter 2023 earnings call and webcast. Before we get started, let me remind everyone that many of our comments today are not historical facts and are considered to be forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. As described in our filings with the SEC, these statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed in our comments today. In addition, on today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial information. A reconciliation of this information to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure can be found in our earnings press release. With that, I'm pleased to turn the call over to Mark Brugger, our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you for joining us today for our earnings call and our outlook for 2024. We are pleased that we will be reintroducing guidance on this call. Let's jump in. 2023 was another successful year for DiamondRock across several fronts. The company generated total shareholder returns of just over 16%, as our portfolio of high-quality hotels and resorts achieved total revenue of $1.1 billion, a new record for DiamondRock. As a testament to the success of our investment strategy, total comparable revenue was 11.3% higher than 2019, among the best of any full-service lodging REIT. And full-year hotel adjusted EBITDA was $19 million higher than 2019. Solid results from the DiamondRock portfolio led to full-year 2023 comparable revenues increasing 4%, adjusted EBITDA of $271.7 million, and adjusted FFO per share of $0.93. In the fourth quarter, adjusted EBITDA was $57.3 million and adjusted FFO per share was $0.18. All these results are in line or ahead of management's expectations provided in our last earnings call in November, where we said we were comfortable with consensus estimates. I'll briefly provide some highlights from the fourth quarter so we could see more time to discuss our outlook and allow time for your questions. In the fourth quarter, there were a few notable trends. First, resorts, which have been the biggest winners in travel since the pandemic, had some pullback earlier in 2023 as they settled into the new normal. Resorts found some firmer footing in the fourth quarter, and we believe resorts still have the best long-term setup. Let's look at some encouraging resort trends. Quarterly RevPAR at our resorts troughed at 87% of 2022 peak RevPAR in the second quarter, improved to 92% in the third quarter, and improved even more to finish the fourth quarter at 96% of 2022 comparable…

Thanks, Mark. Recall that in our third-quarter earnings commentary and follow-up, we felt RevPAR would be in a range of flat to down 100 basis points. And we were comfortable with the then full-year consensus estimates of $270 million of adjusted EBITDA and $0.93 per share of funds from operations. Operating and financial results were in line or slightly ahead of our expectation. In the quarter, comparable RevPAR contracted 60 basis points from the prior period and total RevPAR increased 30 basis points, both in line with our expectation. Moreover, full-year adjusted EBITDA was $272 million, and FFO was $0.93 per share. The 30 basis points of total RevPAR growth in the quarter stems from a 2.4% decline in our resorts portfolio and 1.8% growth in our urban portfolio. It is important to highlight the steady improvement you saw in our resorts. Comparable total revenues at the resorts declined 8% in the second quarter of 2023, 4.6% in the third quarter, and just a 2% decline in the fourth quarter. We are optimistic we can continue this improving trend and pivot to growth in 2024. Moving on to profits. Comparable gross operating profit, or GOP, was $94 million, or a 36% margin on $261 million of comparable total revenue. This means our asset managers were able to keep same-store controllable operating expenses to just 3% growth despite 110 basis points of higher occupancy from the prior period. In fact, the growth in controllable operating expenses over the past three quarters has averaged just 3% despite a 150-basis-point average rise in occupancy. Hotel adjusted EBITDA was $65 million with a 24.7% margin, and corporate adjusted EBITDA was a little over $57 million. Hotel adjusted EBITDA margins were 500 basis points lower than Q4 2022 for a few reasons we discussed on…

Thanks, Jeff. We believe DiamondRock is well positioned for the future with a high-quality portfolio that aligns with some of the best long-term trends in travel. Our portfolio, the least encumbered of any full-service public lodging REIT, commands a net asset value premium. We also have a fortress balance sheet that gives us significant dry powder to take advantage of acquisition opportunities that should emerge this cycle. Even better, one of the things that I think is a little bit of DiamondRock's secret sauce for superior future performance is our extensive list of ROI projects. While there's a fuller list in our investor presentation available on our website, I'll just hit a few. The Dagny Boston, converted only six months ago from a $30 million investment, should outperform for the next several years as it ramps to its full potential. The Hilton Burlington will [indiscernible] this year to a lifestyle resort named The Champlain with a specialty restaurant led by a James Beard-nominated chef. We are excited about this one. In the Florida Keys, we are in the final permitting process to build a high-ROI marina. And in 2025, we plan to expand our Lake Tahoe resort by adding 20% more rooms and building new group meeting space. And finally, our most exciting project, we are working diligently to transform the 77-room Orchards Inn into the Cliffs at L'Auberge de Sedona with a new mountain-side pool and restaurant with some the best use of the Red Rocks in all of Sedona. This should allow us to double the property's revenue, and it will become one of the true gems in our portfolio. To wrap up, these continue to be exciting times at the rock. And while we believe that this will be a good year for the travel industry, we are encouraged with the setup for 2025 and 2026 as the economy is likely to reaccelerate against a backdrop of exceptionally low hotel supply. Our well-balanced portfolio is ideally suited for the most dynamic trends in travel over the next decade. And we are happy to lean into our strategy focused on the data that supports that traveler preferences will make hotels in markets like ours, Vail, Boston, New York City, Sedona, and Marathon Key, a smart capital allocation for long-term outperformance and NAV growth. At this time, we would like to open up the call for any of your questions.

[Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from the line of Dori Kesten from Wells Fargo Securities.

Thanks. Good morning. Can you talk about the quantity of assets you deem of interest in a relatively small experiential that are in your pipeline today? And just given your comfort in providing guidance, is it fair to say that you may be more acquisitive this year with, perhaps, fewer uncertain variables?

Good morning, Dory. It's Mark. Good questions. I think the acquisition pipeline and our acquisition team led by Troy Furbay here, they're always looking at deals. We have focused on off-market transactions, as you know, over the last several years. But those transactions go on their own timeline based on the individual owners' circumstances. So we continue to maintain an active pipeline of those deals. Given our cost of capital and the discount to NAV of our stock, they have to be exceptional deals and continue to need to be exceptional deals to be able to do them. We are actively looking at things now, but we need to be sensitive to our cost of capital. We certainly have the dry powder and the balance sheet to do interesting deals, and we would hope to find one or two transactions this year.

Okay. We've talked in the past about your likelihood of selling a large urban box. Do you think the pricing you've received today would be fair? And is there enough, I guess, capital out there interested in acquiring upwards of $100 million?

Yeah. So we've seen some bigger trades, the [indiscernible] and some other big trades over the last six months. I think our opinion is the debt markets continue to improve and that rates will be much lower next year than they are this year or the end of this year so that you're likely to get someone to stretch and pay a bigger number for a bigger asset if you have a little bit of patience. So our overall view is, while it may test the market, more likely that those transactions will occur either at the end this year or sometime in 2025.

Okay. And Jeff or Briony, where are your NOLs today? And should we expect dividends to return -- I guess what pace should we expect dividends to return over the medium term? Your earnings outlook for this year looks pretty similar to when you were paying out $0.50 annually.

Yeah, I'll take the NOL piece, and I can defer to Mark on the dividend. That's something that we discuss with our Board. But on the NOLs, there's about $140 million of NOLs remaining at this point in time.

On our dividend policy, we actually have a Board meeting next week, and we review the dividend regularly with them. I think where we are now and looking at other alternatives of capital while we think about modestly, potentially, increasing the dividend, the focus really is on other uses of the capital that might drive the stock price.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Smedes Rose from Citi.

Hi, thanks. I guess just following up on some of your last comments, Mark, about uses of capital. You mentioned your perception that the stock is below NAV and stuff like that. So why not have a more robust share repurchase program at this point?

No, it's a great question, Smedes, and it's something we're actively talking to the Board about what the right level of that is. We wanted to make sure we have plenty of balance sheet capacity for all maturities for the next couple of years. But as the debt markets have opened up and gotten much better and rates seemed like they're going to head south, we're more comfortable using that balance sheet capacity. So that will be something we have a conversation with on the Board meeting next week.

Okay. And then I just wanted to follow up. When you talked about The Dagny gaining, I guess, relative market share -- and you mentioned some of the RevPAR index gains. Is that on the same competitive set from when it was a Hilton? Or when it goes independent, do they change the set that you're competing against?

That's a relatively consistent set. I mean, there's always renovations going on at pure hotels. So there's a little bit of noise in that. I should mention that we did take what we felt was a risk mitigation strategy at the hotel to put some group in there -- I mean, some contract business in there, which will benefit us more in the winter months which is the lower demand season. And that was something we wanted to do consciously, as we ramped up from the brand conversion. So we would not expect to command a premium for the full year 2024 versus our time at a Hilton. We think that that will take a couple of years to close that gap, and that's really the upside performance of and asset as well.

Okay. And then just final question. It sounds like you're building maybe 15 rooms or so at the Lake Tahoe asset. What are you thinking about in terms of the costs per key there?

Jeff, do you want to go and take that one?

Yeah, we think we're probably all in about a key for the 14 incremental, where we are utilizing an existing building that has been out of service for some time and then building six of those in a new purpose-built building in addition to adding some meeting space.

Okay. So pretty small overall capital to that.

About a $7 million project.

Yeah, it's a small project.

Large, relative to scale the resort, but small in the aggregate.

Right. Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Smedes.

Your next question comes from the line of Austin Wurschmidt from KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Thanks. Good morning, everybody. Just wanted to start off with the group pace of plus 21%. I'm curious, first of, how much is on the books today versus this time last year? And what does your guidance assume for RevPAR growth for that segment as you see that ratchet down through the year on the pace front?

Jeff, do you want to take that?

Yeah, happy to. So as we sit here today, I think we're sitting with about group rooms versus last year. So we're sitting at a significantly increased position on a relative basis. We obviously think that's going to tail off in the year -- for the year, just given space availability concerns. But I think the goal is for us to shift segmentation about two points into the group categories. So it was about 28% for us last year, where we ended at about 30%. And I think what we consider to be equal, if not more significant, is that we're seeing that pace increase spread throughout the portfolio. So it's not just driven by good years in our big group boxes. Our resort portfolio that makes up a much smaller piece of the segmentation is also up about 20%, as we've really leaned in to reorienting our sales teams and trying to drive some incremental demand into those resorts as we saw leisure demand tail off a bit last year.

And then what are you assuming within the RevPAR guide before for the group segment for growth this year?

Probably -- at the top end, it probably ends up being about two-thirds of the growth.

Got it. And then last quarter, you guys had highlighted about a $4 million lift you expected from The Dagny. Did I hear you correctly that you expect other disruption this year to fully offset that amount? Or are those apples-to-apples comparisons? Just wanted to clarify.

Yeah, you heard that correctly, Austin. I would say typically, every year, we have about $3 million to $4 million of disruption and displacement. But you're right, we do expect to get a lift at The Dagny. But as we always are looking at ROI projects in the portfolio, there's always some noise that comes up, and it's the assets that I mentioned that will be in the first quarter and third quarter. Last year. The Dagny was predominately affected in third-quarter impact.

Got it. So I guess between -- I guess, The Dagny offsets a little bit. But with group then, does that imply that RevPAR growth for the leisure BT-type segments, you're in the low single-digit range for the full year? Am I thinking about that correctly?

Yeah, leisure is on the lower end; the group's on the high end. But it's what you think about the revenue breakdown for the year. So the group is clearly going to carry the RevPAR growth there and carry the weight of it in 2024.

Great. Thanks for the detail.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Mike Bellisario from Baird.

Good morning, everyone. A question on the South Florida performance and commentary that you guys gave. What was the driver of that improvement? Was it just comparison to last year? Did you actually see a sequential acceleration in demand and/or pricing in that market?

All of those, really. I mean, the comparisons got easier. South Florida peaked first and most robust. So that -- just think about the lapping effects helping that. But demand was better than we anticipated and, certainly, in the keys as we move through the fourth quarter. So we were very encouraged about the performance. At the Westin, we did layer in some group there. But I think the Florida Key story is a very encouraging one.

Got it. Okay. And then a follow-up just on inbound international travel to your major markets. I mean, where do you think that's at for your portfolio today versus pre-pandemic levels? And what are you seeing in the booking curve that would suggest improvement in '24? Could you quantify that improvement based on the bookings you're seeing? Thanks.

Yeah. Mike, it's hard to give the specific data because we don't track it for the individuals. We just see on the macro data. We believe that last year, we probably under-indexed, particularly in the high-end traveler that went to Italy. And this year, at places like Sedona, we would expect to benefit from as much international coming in, which is really coastal positive, but more of the domestic travelers, particularly the well-heeled domestic travelers deciding to vacation in the United States versus their revenge trip to Europe.

And Mike, I would just add on. I think, pre-pandemic, if you just did a market-by-market analysis for us, we were mid-single-digit exposure. It's not a guest-by-guest analysis, but just exposure to geography, I think, were mid-single-digit exposure or demand from international sources.

Got it. Understood. And then maybe just zoom in there on the group bookings. Can you tell if you're seeing more demand from international groups coming to your gateway markets? Presumably, you can track that much easier than the transient traveler? And that's all for me. Thank you.

Yeah. I mean, I think we don't necessarily see a lot of groups that are completely international. You have attendees that are coming in from international destinations for domestic, group-oriented business. So it's not necessarily a stat that we honestly parse through. When we get rooming less from groups, it typically doesn't have a destination for the consumer. So hard for us to quantify, honestly.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Duane Pfennigwerth from Evercore ISI.

Thank you. For the resort markets in your portfolio, where would you expect the highest growth rates to be this year? I mean, you clearly sound a little bit more upbeat on Florida. But as you look across the portfolio, what do you think would outperform and what would you expect to lag on the resort side?

Yes, sure. So I think in our prepared remarks, we talked about South Florida. We were encouraged on have markets like Charleston, which have been terrific. We would expect that to pull back a little bit this year. I'm trying to think of what other markets have go through -- wine country, Sonoma, we're seeing some pullback continue there. So we expect those to be on the lower end of the growth scale to give a barbell on the resort portfolio.

Okay. Thanks. And then just on the -- just to follow up on the prior questions on acquisitions. Should we assume that a big disposition would need to happen first? And if you get that done, how would you be looking to shape the portfolio? Where do you feel that you're under-indexed?

Great question. So Jeff went through our balance sheet, our capacity. We feel like we have excess dry powder right now, so that's not the hesitation. It's not a dry powder issue. We have a very attractive balance sheet and we're sitting on cash and a completely undrawn revolver, and our metrics are excellent. So it's not a capacity issue; it's really an opportunity issue. And then when you think about what kind of opportunities, given that we think we trade at a significant discount to NAV, would be accretive to shareholders at this point, it's going to be more of the kind of things that we think are our core capacity. So we're looking at things where we think we can put in our [indiscernible] best practices or it might be an owner operator who hasn't kept up with the market on moving rates or may not be efficient in labor practices and other things that we can bring to the table. Those are the inefficiencies. We're unlikely to buy a luxury asset that's well run in a competitive process. That's just not going to be accretive for our shareholders. So we think the best acquisition opportunities and the best accretive opportunities remain the kind of assets [indiscernible] buying, which are these really experiential, differentiated assets -- generally, markets that are incredibly hard for new supply to enter. And we think that the consumer and the traveler today and over the next decade, where the outsized growth is going to be, is where you can provide something that's really a unique and differentiated experience for that traveler.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Chris Woronka from Deutsche Bank.

Hey. Good morning, guys. So Mark, appreciate all the color so far. Can you maybe talk a little bit about how you're thinking about summer this year? You kind of hit on it a few minutes ago. But last year, I think there was a little bit surprise at how much domestic travel went outbound. And maybe the expectation is you're going to get more inbound this year or maybe you think folks are going to stay home. Just any -- is there any kind of confidence you can give us, any bookings you have right now for summer that make you feel better?

Yeah. I mean, I think the fundamental thing that makes me feel better is that it's going to be our strongest group quarter. So unlike last summer, what we've done this year is to really take the group and not rely on the short-term [indiscernible] showing up. So to the extent we can put a group in there, we're putting a group in there. And then if you -- as we talked about in the prepared remarks, a lot of the strength -- and certainly, our strongest quarter based on the current bookings is going to be Q3. So we feel good about our positioning, but we are taking a little bit of a defensive position in that we're trying to group up where it makes sense to group up and not be reliant, like we were last summer, on a lot of that short term, both leisure and corporate travel.

Okay, great. And then obviously, a strong, strong job on the cost front '23. And it sounds pretty benign for '24. You did mention labor. I guess, do you have any labor situations, any union markets, even though you wouldn't be union? Any markets later in the year that you're keeping an eye on for a reset next year?

I mean, we're always looking at the market to make sure that our wages are staying competitive with the set, whether they're union or non-union hotels. Last year, the story was really the LA story. But there are -- so Chicago got -- that was a relatively mutually win-win agreement, I'll call it, their negotiation. And we're optimistic that we have that in Boston as well coming up. But there's nothing that's on the radar now that we think we'll be talking a lot about as we move through the year or that makes us particularly nervous on the expense side in 2024.

Okay. Appreciate that. This last one is just kind of on the acquisition disposition. I hear you on expectations of lower rates. That may be up for debate a little bit. But I guess the question would be -- we're also hearing about more distressed or semi-distressed stuff hitting the market. I mean, I assume that's a good thing if you're a buyer, but you mentioned some non-core sales. Maybe not necessarily the best thing if you're a seller. Any thoughts on how it could play out?

Yeah. I mean, I think what we're seeing in the marketplace generally is the stuff that's of quality is getting pushed another year. The lenders are working with folks, I think, the consensus view. Again, I could be wrong. But between both lenders and owners is -- if you have a quality asset, you're more likely to get a higher price in the market the end of this year or next year. And I think people are working towards that timeline versus bringing things to market now. There's not a lot on the market now. Worst is first is certainly a motto for now. The stuff that is coming and, I would say, the distress that's in the market are really pretty terrible hotels that have things that are unfixable, generally. We're not seeing quality assets come to market right now that are distressed. We're seeing people that they'd be motivated if they can get a decent price, but we're not seeing the kind of assets that we own. We're not seeing those come to market under distressed terms right now.

Okay. Very, very good. Thanks, Mark.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Floris van Dijkum from Compass Point.

Hey. Morning, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Just as I -- Mark, as I listened to you and Jeff talk a little bit about the attractiveness of your shares -- and obviously, you haven't bought back stock unlike some of your peers -- but also weighing some opportunities on the investment side. Maybe if you could talk about your leverage ratio and how comfortable would you be to see that leverage ratio trend a little bit higher. You're pretty modestly levered today. I think it was at 3.9 times or somewhere around that level. Would you be comfortable operating up to 5 times and then -- with the eye of reducing that with asset sales or potential equity down the road?

Well, Jeff, why don't you start off just talking a little bit about capacity? And then I can chime in maybe at the end?

Yeah. Yeah. Floris, right now, we're about 3.9 times debt to EBITDA. We have about $525 million of liquidity, including our revolver. We certainly do look at share repurchases, as you suggested. It is a leveraging event. And so we just try to be mindful about striking that balance between getting a good return on investment, but, at the same time, recognizing that it does push up your leverage. And historically, that can weigh on your valuation over time. It's one thing, I think, we try to put a lot of effort into and something that we regularly discuss with our Board is where's that appropriate ceiling on leverage. And Mark can speak to this, too. But I would say that historically, the lending community, in trying to maintain a good relationship with them, I think there's comfort that you're going up to around the level that you spoke to, around 5 times, because you could probably go through a pretty severe downturn and still not run afoul of your credit agreements. And that I guess is how would you think about that. I think we do have capacity, but it's also balancing against the opportunities that we like to believe are coming down the road, either in ROI opportunities in our portfolio or potential acquisitions.

Yeah. I would just add that Jeff did excellent job describing that. But yeah, 5 times is probably the high end of where we'd be comfortable going. Again, if you've modeled down the great financial crisis, you'd still be okay in that situation. We do have dry powder. We think having low leverage is a core strategic move. But if you never use your dry powder, it's not really that valuable. So yes, we would -- if we found great acquisitions, we'd be willing to lever up a little bit. Hopefully, cash flows -- we're optimistic that cash flows in '25 and '26 are pretty good. And that growth alone would deleverage the company. But right now, we continue to maintain a fairly conservative, prudent capital allocation strategy. The debt metrics are getting better. That does make us a little bit more aggressive. And if we find great opportunities that we think create value for shareholders, we're going to do those deals. We're just not seeing a ton of those at the moment, but we continue to work hard to try to uncover them.

Thanks. And maybe my follow-up for you guys -- obviously, you've done a bit of investing in your portfolio. And The Cliffs at Sedona, I think, are going to be on my bucket list, it sounds like, once you guys are done there as well. Can you just remind us what percentage of your EBITDA has been touched since 2019?

2019?

I know. I was thinking about because we've probably touched probably 15 assets in terms of our brandings and just even types -- different types of renovation projects. I'm estimating here. I'd say it probably is about 30% to 40% of our EBITDA that has had some work done at the -- if I can circle back to you, Floris, on that just so I'm not just shooting from the hip.

I would guess in the last six years, we put about $0.5 billion into our portfolio, something like that. So we've invested fairly significantly both to maintain our assets at first class of status, but also to make sure we're maintaining them, too, [indiscernible] and assets that customers want to return to again and again. So we look for ROI opportunities. We've done a number. The nature of our assets lend themselves to do that. So whether that's taking the JW Marriott in Cherry Creek and converting that to The Clio Luxury Collection or taking a Marriott in Vail and making it a Hythe Luxury Hotel, that's the nature of having these experiential hotels. It gives you more of those kind of opportunities. So probably have touched more than a number of our peers just because there's more ROI opportunities to reposition these kind of assets. Because they are not standard boxes often in our portfolio.

Thanks, guys.

Your next question comes from the line of Anthony Powell from Barclays.

Hi. Good morning. We haven't talked a lot about corporate transient on call yet. So maybe you could tell us where it ended up as a mix of your revenues in 2023, where that was versus '19, and where you're seeing that business going forward?

Yeah. The corporate transient, it's a tricky one. It's obviously the one that's been the hardest, we'll call it, post-pandemic new normal. It's probably down about 20% from where we were at a pre-pandemic level. On the positive side, special corporate rate negotiations have been up year over year. And the small corporates, so-called non-special corporates, corporate travelers, that's actually trading at above 100% of what it did in 2019. But the big special corporate, a lot of the big consulting companies and the ones that generate hundreds of thousands of room nights a year, a lot of those are down 30%, 40%, 50% from where they were in a pre-pandemic world. And we're seeing that heal gradually and slowly. And what's built into our guidance is that it continues to get a little better every quarter, but not a big upshift in the level that we're at today.

What markets does that decline in the consulting and whatnot? Where did that hit you the most?

It's broad-based. I mean, in New York City, we benefited from supply contraction and some other things that have offset it. But especially corporate, it permeates the entire United States. Obviously, the top 25 markets are probably more attuned to the big special corporates. But whether you're in Boston, Chicago, Miami, it's going to impact all the major markets in the United States. I think the good news is that the small business traveler is really -- the overall economy is $3 trillion bigger than it was in 2019. And business travel, generally, on historic terms, has correlated with the growth of the overall economy. So we saw that correlation happen with the small business traveler, which is great. But there's been fundamental changes in the way that big special corporates travel, the number of days of travel, whether travel on Mondays and Fridays. So some of that's going to be a lasting impact. And as the business travel evolves -- and it always evolves -- and the general economy gets bigger and bigger, yeah, we'll probably get back to '19 levels, but not on an inflation-adjusted basis.

Got it. And maybe one more for me on some of the deals you've done. I know, at Lake Austin and the Kimpton Fort Lauderdale, there are some, I guess, issues at acquisition with managers or whatnot. Can you talk about how those have progressed and maybe talk about how Chico Hot Spring has done relative to your expectations?

Yeah. So Chico's our most recent acquisition. We closed that in August of last year. It came -- we also bought the adjacent ranch. So if you just take the Chico Hot Springs, we bought on . I think this year, our budget for just the Hot Springs Resort, it's about an eight cap. So we feel great about the acquisition. We're excited to figure out what we can do with the extra 600 acres of land that we have. So that continues to be a very interesting asset for us. On some of the other ones, Fort Lauderdale, the Kimpton we have there, we redid the roof and added, we'll call it, roofed hotspot. So that took a lot of last year and that transition. So it continues to ramp up this year. We think we'll see significant growth. It is a little under our rating. And then Lake Austin, we think, is the -- it's the only hotel that will ever be on Lake Austin. So we think it's a truly a once-in-a-career opportunity to own something in that location. But there was some transition as new systems got implemented, which we talked about on prior calls, but we remain optimistic about the performance of that asset over the next couple of years. But there's been -- it will be a longer ramp than we originally underwrote.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Bill Crow from Raymond James.

Hey, good morning. Thanks. Mark, I'm curious. The TSA screening growth year over year has been running about twice the growth or maybe more than twice the growth of hotel demand. And I'm wondering how much of that we should attribute to business travel shifting from a four- or five-day-a-week travel environment to on, two, or three days a week. Is that the primary driver? Is that still outbound, international? Or how should we think about that relationship?

That's an Interesting question. To tell you the truth, we haven't really contemplated it that much. I mean, we're looking at the demand generators that are coming into our individual hotels and tracking those patterns. And we look at enplanements and -- yeah, which obviously, TSA throughput tracks as well. We're seeing the enplanements and the passenger loads up some, but not corresponding to the demand that the hotels -- I have to noodle through that one and look a little deeper and get back to you.

Right. Fair enough. Appreciate it. Thanks.

Thank you. And I'm not showing any further questions in the queue. I would now like to turn it back over to Mark Brugger for any closing remarks.

Thank you. Well, first, before we conclude, let me just shout out that its National Hospitality Workers Day. So we extend our appreciation to everyone that works in the hospitality industry for taking care of the customers and making it such a great industry. We appreciate our investors and analysts for tuning in today in today's call, and we look forward to updating you next quarter. Take care. Have a great day.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.