I don't like the second question. But the first question, let me address the first question. So yes, of course, no, we're looking for movement of contingent resource into reserves. And clearly, as you see what we're trying to do in Equatorial Guinea, I get to the slide that we put on Equatorial Guinea, to gross position of 23 million to 24 million barrels of contingent resource now, that particular position to reserves we need to get the POD approval from the MMH. And whilst we won't be able to secure all of those as reserves, we'll certainly be able to secure a large proportion of that 2C position into 1P crude. But not for SEC purposes. When we look at and that's a key message I think for Equatorial Guinea, because this can be achieved without the drill bit because a wells are already been drilled. Now, when we look at Etame and then the key area there is twofold. One is looking at where opportunities for contingent resources exist in our existing drilling program. And the majority of a drilling program at the moment is converting 2P into 1P. We have some opportunities to do some pilot positions and perhaps something a little slightly different within the subsequent two to three wells that we still have to drill that may give rise to proving off some of that contingent resource. But the majority of the contingent resource that resides around the time it will fall into our Phase3 drilling program in 2023. On the second question, of course, we continue to look for accretive opportunities that makes and fit to our strategic vision of how we can be more meaningful within West Africa, our focused area of operation, anyone who is disposing of assets in West Africa, and in the press has been quite speculative about the assets that are available and who's looking at them and who's going to be successful in getting them, we have to be realistic, and the price point that we're willing to look at assets, and the price point of which the existing owners are looking to exit. And I think in reality, holders of assets who are looking to divest, take a reasonably pragmatic view, they're not looking at the top of the curve, because the top of the curve for selling an asset is never achievable. Similarly, as a buyer or a potential buyer, no one buys at the top of the curve. So there's always a meeting point where we run our economics and we run a reasonableness check as to where we would find value. And we, again, we kind of guide a little bit to where our thinking is. And when we look at the indicative numbers, we put in a slide deck around bout the $75.50 to $75 level you can see where we run our numbers and where we sell check the positions.