Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Equinox Gold Corp. Fourth Quarter 2024 Results and corporate update. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To join the question queue, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. Pressing star then zero. If you are participating in the webcast, you can submit a question in writing by using the checkbox in the lower left corner of the webcast frame. I would now like to turn the conference over to Rhylin Bailie, Vice President, Investor Relations for Equinox Gold Corp. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and thank you everybody for joining us today. We will, of course, be making a number of forward-looking statements, so please do visit our website, Cedar, and Edgar, to learn more about the company. I will now turn the call over to our President and CEO, Greg Smith.

Thanks, Rhylin. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining the call today. On the line with me is our COO, Doug Reddy, our CFO, Peter Hardie, our EVP of exploration, Scott Heffernan, and our VP of Investor Relations, Rhylin Bailie. Again, today we are discussing Equinox Gold Corp. 2024 fourth quarter and full-year financial and operating results. For those of you that are new to the company, Equinox Gold Corp. is a fast-growing, Americas-focused gold producer. We have producing mines across Canada, the United States, Mexico, and Brazil, as well as several mine expansion development opportunities. Our production is supported by a large gold endowment, including 20 million ounces in reserves, and an additional 18 million ounces in measured and indicated resources across our portfolio of gold deposits. I am going to start first with a broad overview of the fourth quarter and the year, and then I will turn the call over to Peter and Doug for more details. We once again had a strong finish to the year with fourth-quarter production of approximately 214,000 ounces and sales of approximately 218,000 ounces. That's the highest quarterly gold production in the company's history. Cash cost per ounce sold in the quarter was $1,458 per ounce, our lowest quarterly cash cost this year, with all-in sustaining cost per ounce sold of $1,652. We also finished 2024 with record annual gold production of approximately 622,000 ounces and sales of 623,000 ounces at a cash cost of $1,598 per ounce and all-in sustaining cost of $1,870 per ounce. Our safety performance this year was good. Four of our sites had no lost time injuries in 2024, with a total recordable injury frequency rate across the company of 2.21, beating our target for the year. These are good results. However, we have also acknowledged…

Thanks, Greg. We are now on Slide eight in the presentation. First, a little housekeeping while we are reporting today on the Q4 and annual 2024 operating and financial results, I will note that the company's financial results are unaudited and subject to change, pending release of the audited financials, which we expect to publish around mid-March. Now let's get back to talking about the quarterly results. Equinox Gold Corp. had a great operating and financial quarter that saw improvements in almost all operating and financial metrics compared to Q3 this year and Q4 last year. For the 218,000 ounces of gold we sold, we realized a price of $2,636 per ounce for revenues of $575 million. The increase in revenues over prior quarters is driven by the higher realized price and by an increase in ounces sold, with the increase in gold ounces sold attributable primarily to Greenstone coming online and achieving commercial production in Q4. In addition, Los Filos and RDM had record quarters, and Fazenda had its second-highest quarter for gold sales since Equinox Gold Corp. acquired them in early 2020. For the quarter, income from mine operations was $170 million. That's an increase of $69 million from Q3's income from mine operations, and it's $131 million more compared to Q4 2023. The increase in income from mine operations compared to previous quarters is driven by the increase in revenue. Our cash cost per ounce of $1,458 for the quarter decreased compared to Q3's $1,720 per ounce but increased compared to Q4 2023's all-in sustaining cost per ounce for Q4 was $1,652, compared to Q3's $1,994 per ounce, but is on par with 2023's $1,657 per ounce. Our EBITDA in Q4 2024 was $185 million or $218 million on an adjusted basis, which is a significant improvement…

Thanks, Peter. We are now on Slide eleven of the presentation. We had a great end to 2024, with 34% of our gold production coming in the quarter. At Greenstone, the mine produced 53,022 ounces with an all-in sustaining cost of $1,141 an ounce. We declared commercial production on November 6, and in December, the plant throughput was at 77% of capacity. Recoveries for the quarter were 82%, and contrary to what I put in the presentation, I am told that we were just under 86% for December, so good progress there. The teams have been resolving issues that were identified at the end of Q3, start of Q4 on wet screens, pumps, and conveyors. Our CIP tanks, including valve calibrations and replacement, have largely been done on the calibrations in Q4, and we will be doing the valve replacements coming into Q1 of 2025. Feed grade was 1.26 grams, which is in line with the long-term average grade. The plant had a record for daily crushed tons at over 34,400 tons and also for milled tons of a record day at 28,800 tons. On the mining front, the fleet now has 25 CAT 793 haul trucks in operation. We will be adding four more during this quarter too. Two have just come online, and two more are in assembly. There are four PC5500 shovels in operation. We will add one more later this year. By the end of 2024, 33.6 million tons have been moved, and 3.9 million tons of ore were stockpiled. The strip ratio for the quarter was 2.93, with 3.1 million tons of ore being moved and 9.2 million tons of waste mined. Mining costs were $2.66 per ton mined in the quarter, and as we are now done with mining through an area of contaminated…

Thanks, Doug. I'll just sum up quickly before we move on to Q&A. On our last few quarterly calls, I've noted that we were at an inflection point at Equinox Gold Corp. with Greenstone coming online. We only just had commercial production at Greenstone in November, and we're still ramping up, but you can see the quarter-over-quarter impact that Greenstone is having. We had record gold sales for our third quarter in 2024, and then again in the fourth quarter. With strong gold prices, we also had the all-time highest revenue and adjusted EBITDA and adjusted operating cash flow in Q3 and then once again in Q4. In short, we have excellent leverage to the gold price, and at these prices, 2025 will be a great year for us as we continue to reduce our debt as well as investing in our portfolio of mines for the long term. I'm going to wrap up there and turn it back over to Rhylin for Q&A.

Operator, can you please remind people how to ask a question?

Certainly. Once again, to join the question queue, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. You will hear a tone acknowledging your request. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. You can also submit a question in writing by using the text box in the lower left corner of the webcast frame. We will pause momentarily for callers to join the queue.

Thank you very much. I'll take a couple of questions from online. This is for Peter. If gold prices remain, what are you going to do with the extra free cash flow?

Oh, yeah. Great question. First, we love this gold price environment. You can see the impact that the higher gold price has throughout our financials. As I mentioned several times, a number of our metrics are, you know, the best we've had for a quarter, and that's primarily driven by the top line, which is revenue. Obviously, in 2025 with our guidance, we're looking to expand production, sell more gold, and selling it into this environment at higher prices will enable more free cash flow. If you look in the press release, we're showing mine site free cash flow for Q4 of $184 million, and we would look to expand that as we move forward. As I mentioned as well during my comments, our focus, and I think we've been saying it for a couple of quarters now, our focus going forward, not just 2025, is deleveraging. So any cash we generate that's excess outside of what's needed by the business is going to go to strengthen the balance sheet.

Perfect. Thank you. Operator, can you please take a couple of questions from the phone?

Certainly. The next question will come from Anita Soni with CIBC World Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, Greg and team. So a couple of questions. Firstly, on Greenstone, could you give us some idea about the grades, tons, and recoveries you're looking for for the year on average?

Hi, Anita. Sure. Our budget mine plan has us around a gram in the first quarter, but we ramp up to about 1.6 to 1.7 grams towards the end of the year.

Okay. 1.6 to 1.7. And I'm assuming that's because the mining rate picks up, and then you'll be able to sort of be more selective about the mining. But at the beginning, you're more sort of hand to mouth on that.

Yeah. Well, you know, and you've seen the pit. It was all about opening up that pit, getting the bigger blasts enabled, and getting rid of the contaminated soil from the center area of the pit, which was unfortunate. It took so long. It was so finicky to have to remove that. But, yeah, that combined with adding the additional four trucks, you know, we stepwise will increase our tons per day being moved to ex-pit during the course of the year.

Okay. And then just another question on the unit cost. This might be more financially driven. So there's two questions that I have. The first is the difference between the ASIC and the total cash cost guidance. I'm coming up to about $255 per ounce between the two guidance ranges. But if I take your sustaining capital and I divide it by the number, the midpoint of the guidance, I get to about $350 per ounce differential. So I'm trying to understand the discrepancy there between the ASIC and the total cash cost and what the sustaining capital that you have.

You know what, Anita? I will take that question, and we'll take it away and we'll get back to you. I don't think we're going to be able to do the math here in real-time on the call. If that's alright.

No. That's fine. And then just a second question. This one is more along the lines of, I guess, in the fourth quarter, you mined, in terms of ore, you mined sort of double what you actually put through the mill. So those costs are, you know, the cost associated with the ore and the waste that would have been associated with that. Are they being inventoried? Are they going into working capital? And then going forward in 2025, where does that kind of appear? Does it appear in the CapEx, or is that somehow embedded in the unit cost? I'm just trying to understand the cost guidance.

Sure. And sorry. Are you referring to Greenstone in particular or just generally?

Yeah. Greenstone agrees with us.

Right. So the approach we take is generally speaking, and I'll speak generally and then Greenstone. So generally, we obviously look at our strip ratio. Well, first, when opening up a pit, we determine how much of it is considered development. And then at a certain point, obviously, it becomes operational. So development would fall into sustaining and not appear in the metric. And then with respect to once we're in operation, all of the movement will fall into either OpEx depending on strip ratio or sustaining capital. Again, depending on strip ratio, but all of that cost, if you're just looking at the all-in sustaining metric, will be captured in the all-in sustaining metric.

Okay. It's just that in 2025, I don't see any in your sustaining capital. When you say what's included in sustaining capital, I don't see any classification for stripping. So did you call it something else?

No. I think it's probably because we're right around the strip ratio, and so it's all going into OpEx. It won't show up in sustaining.

Fourth quarter was 2.93. Below. So it will all be in the cash cost, Anita.

Okay. I think we might have to take them offline. And then lastly on Los Filos, so I appreciate you're not giving any guidance, and this one might also be one that you take offline, given sensitivities. But I was just wondering if you do decide to proceed with Los Filos, what does the sustaining capital look like going forward for the next couple of years? I know that you have been not investing in that mine over the last couple of years given the community challenges. And I'm trying to understand if you pick back up, what would that look like? But at the very least, I was hoping that you could tell us what standby costs are as well on a suspension.

Yeah. So as to standby, as we get clarity on, and as Greg mentioned, it's very near term. So as we get clarity on what the near term, and it's very binary, as you can appreciate and as you mentioned, highly sensitive. But as we get clarity near term on which path we will be going down, we will provide, you know, obviously, more on what that given path looks like. If you want to approximate for now, that's what you're hoping to do. When the mine was on care and maintenance during the blockades previously, we incurred about $3 to $4 million in standby charges per month. We would expect to be significantly lower than that on an indefinite suspension. We would pare down quite a bit more. But we will again, we'll provide clarity on that as we move forward.

Okay. That's it for my questions, and congratulations on commercial production at Greenstone and delivering good free cash flow in Q4.

Thank you. The next question is from Wayne Lam with TD Securities. Please go ahead.

Yeah, just wondering at Los Filos, just wondering if you might be able to provide a bit of color on the parameters of the agreement in terms of the length or term of that arrangement. Is that a shorter-term agreement, like the three years outlined in the letter, or would it be a longer-term agreement? And then kind of similar to Anita's question, but just wondering if you got a deal in place, is there a catch-up in capital that would be required? Or what would be the quantum of that kind of capital for things like the underground development?

Yeah. I'll take this one, Wayne. This is Greg speaking. And apologies, I'm mildly under the weather. Listen, we're not going to give any terms of an active discussion on the call. It's fair to say that the agreements that we're talking about are long-term. And when we talk about long-term, we're talking about, you know, encompassing an entire mine life plus. So, no, nothing like three years would work for us when you're talking about an investment in the construction of a new CIL plant. In terms of where we are at with the mine, just because of the situation, we have slowed down mining, particularly in the open pit and particularly around pre-stripping. So any kind of ramp back up would require that pre-stripping in 2024. Again, we're not providing any guidance at this time, and that would only come if that's a path that we're able to take. And of course, it's a path we'd like to take. Nobody wants to see the mine shut down. But as we stated in the press release, if we're not able to get agreements with all three communities, then we're not going to be able to continue operating the mine.

Okay. Great. Thanks. And then maybe just wondering on the underground development at Aurizona, is there going to be an update on economics before moving ahead with that? It just seems like that's been accelerated a bit. And just wondering if that's a function of being a bit more constrained on additional open pit material even with the Piaba pit reopened. And what kind of capital that might entail versus the 2021 study?

So for us, the portal and ramp is similar to doing an exploration program. We need to be able to get this done so we can confirm mineability, access, get in touch with the ore, drill from underground, do all the things necessary that you'd normally do as part of a feasibility study. We're dimensioning it so we can go right into production, but we feel that it's prudent to do all of this before we commit to everything else. But it is all part of a larger plan to be able to roll right onwards.

Wayne, this is Greg. So we can actually, we're not accelerating it. We would have preferred to have started earlier. We pushed it off because of the geotech issue we were dealing with in 2024. So, you know, we're actually quite anxious to get underground. It's not because of open pit constraints. It's because we see a very robust body underground that we think is going to drive production in Aurizona for many, many, many years. Our goal here is to get underground, get our hands on that ore body, do some additional work. And, you know, at this point, it's kind of a more organic expansion, I would say, of the mine. But as we proceed and as we get more data and we get underground, then, of course, we'll come to the market and give more details on the longer-term plan there. Okay. I mean, right now, in terms of quantum, I think we have a $20 million budget that would be spread across the back end of 2025 and into 2026.

Okay. Thanks for that color. And then just wondering if Mesquite, do you see additional opportunities to extend the mine life there with the higher gold price, or do you become ore constrained pretty shortly absent the ability to move the highway?

For Mesquite, obviously, with Ginger, it gave us the lifespan to be able to evaluate those other pits that I mentioned, the Brownie Four, Rainbow North, and Big Chief Eight. At the same time, we continue with evaluating other opportunities, and it's probably best for Scott to address that. So I'll hand it to him.

We do have a budget for this year. We are focused on these near-term opportunities within the fence, as we like to refer to it, Rainbow North, Big Chief Eight. We did drill and expand Ginger last year, and Ginger remains open to the northwest. This would be our highest priority and highest potential target. And then, of course, as you mentioned, there is still potential to the southeast across the highway. That's just a bit more of a permitting challenge to work through, and we are affording that now.

Okay, great. And then maybe just last one, just on the renewal of that base, does that include an ATM component?

It gives us the ability to do ATMs, but no, we did not include an ATM on the renewal.

Okay. Yeah. And I'll just add to that if I can, Greg, that we don't currently have plans to renew or put in place an ATM.

Okay. Sounds good. Alright. Thank you for taking my questions.

Thanks, Wayne.

Thank you.

The next question comes from John Tumazos with John Tumazos Very Independent Research. Please go ahead.

Thank you for taking my questions. Concerning the $200 million highest minimum debt repayment goal for the year, we had $206 million fall in that debt in the fourth quarter alone. Could you explain the gold price you're using for this calculation? Any other factors you mentioned to convert didn't include the $267 million in deferred revenue and derivatives that are current liabilities. Presumably, that has to be paid.

Yeah. So just on the gold prepay, those will basically on a straight-line basis, be repaid starting March through September of this year, through September of 2026. So they're not all current, but mostly. And yes, I didn't mention those, but those will simply roll off straight-line based as we deliver the ounces and retire them. And that will go towards strengthening our balance sheet as we eliminate those obligations moving forward. So good point. With respect to gold price on deleveraging, we use the mid-$2,000 gold price, so just a little under $2,500 in calculating that figure. That's about as simple as that, John.

So I don't want to get you in hot water with your attorneys, but if we take the $200 million, you forecast $140 million if convert converts. And then $267 million for the other liabilities. And then mark up the gold price without even having a favorable outcome in Los Filos, it could be almost $600 million of liabilities addressed this year. If the current gold price were to hold. Now if you pay down debt successfully for one or two years at that rate, at what point do you pivot to capex? And if Los Filos or Castle Mountain are not ready for capex, what would you pivot your cash flow to? Conceivably, you could have almost enough money to finance both of those in one year.

Hey, John. It's Greg. Would you like to deal with all the good money? Yeah. Yeah. I mean, listen, we're all loving these gold prices. And we do have a number of development projects in our pipeline. Both Los Filos and Castle are subject to, you know, certainly, we've talked about with Los Filos this call, but Castle is also subject to getting a permit. And at the time, we have a permit based on the economic conditions of that time and the detailed engineering we're done, we'll make a construction decision in that context. Yeah, we had a, you know, a robust discussion with this actually at our board meeting yesterday around the 2024 results, and it's the first time in a long time that we were broaching the idea of share buybacks and dividends and what is the timing where we could implement a dividend. So as we reduce leverage, and that is the current priority, some of these other opportunities for capital allocation will start to become more relevant, and those, you know, in that context again, where can we get the best return for our shareholders? Investing in our assets, paying out dividends, doing share buybacks, I think it's fair to say we would like to get to a normal course dividend at some point. And so that's something that's on our radar and something we'll be working toward here. And, again, the gold price is sold at this level, that's something that could come sooner than later.

Thank you. I'm very happy to be a shareholder.

Thanks, John. Appreciate it.

Thanks, John. I've got lots of questions online. We'll start with exploration. The main presentation talks about the upside potential at Greenstone. Underground, near mine. When are you going to start to look at those?

We are efforting that now. Sort of break that down. We do have significant exploration potential within the pit. There's significant inferred resources within the design pit. That's obviously some low-hanging fruit that we will look to drill off as just a function of drill density. We'll start that a little bit this year. And that's really a focus for 2026 in my mind at this point. The next phase would be the underground. So this year, it's desktop, internally looking at it geologically, also the engineering side of things, really understanding and starting to work out a plan, how and when would be optimal to bring the underground into the operation. Further afield, there's significant exploration potential in the district, but it's a substantive district, 100-plus kilometers in length. We've got work underway already. Need to do again, similar to the underground, is our homework. Geologically, engineering-wise, looking at Brookbank, for example, the past producers that are east or west of that Leach Sand River in the Beardmore area. Looking at that from a geological perspective, doing the compilation target generation. What's the real potential, the engineering side looking at how if and how those would be bolt-on or accretive to Greenstone itself or whether they represent another standalone opportunity. These are all things that are going to take some time. And then in conjunction with that, we also have to work through the process with our partners, First Nations and communities, to develop those agreements for long-term stability in those areas. It's going to be two-plus years, I'd imagine, in this homework phase before we're seeing any significant exploration regionally.

Okay. Thank you. Lots of questions about the Bahia complex. So you talked about the synergies between those two projects, does that include potential blending ore to help with the Santa Luz recovery?

Well, I'll start and maybe I'll turn it over to Doug here. For those that have been there, well, I guess for those that have not been there, both of these mines are, as the crow flies, maybe 50 miles, 60 miles from each other, the plants. We have all the concessions between them, contiguous concessions, and we've got a fair amount of prospectivity across that overall portfolio. So when we looked at the two mines, we looked at what we could do, you know, obviously, to make it more efficient and in terms of management, administration costs, tax, etc. And really what this is, it's a corporate amalgamation down in Brazil and then an administrative amalgamation in terms of how we run the two mines together. There's a number of benefits, supply chain, working capital, etc. You know, I'll pass over to Doug and Scott here more on the ability to triage material between the two plants. You know, suffice to say that we do have a fairly large land package there. It is very prospective. We are very active on it. And so that opportunity certainly exists. It's just a matter again of time and probably putting words in Scott's mouth, but I'll hand it over to him.

Well, I'll go first, Scott. I mean, obviously, with having two plants, different in nature, but Santa Luz can process high total organic carbon or low total organic carbon material. It's quite flexible with the resin. It means that we would just be adding less kerosene to the process to suppress the activity of the carbon. But it gives us flexibility to send ore either direction. We've got lots of targets, which Scott can talk about in a moment, but that is part of Santa Luz is constantly looking for opportunities to blend down the TOC levels. And I will note that even it's the same greenstone belt. There's many similarities in the overall rock package. Even at Fazenda, we blend down a small amount of total organic carbon that's in some of the bodies. Just that we operate with a standard carbon plant there, and we don't have to use resin to be able to keep our recoveries around the 90% level. If you want to talk about deposits, I'll pass it back to Scott.

Sure. Fazenda has been the focus of committed exploration now for three years. In the immediate Fazenda area, you saw the results of that in the updated technical report with substantive mine life growth. Those efforts will continue. Which is exciting there because it does give us the opportunity that resources are based to contemplate mine expansion opportunities at Fazenda itself. But regionally, the focus for the last few years has been to maintain our mineral rights, trying to take moving around to small resources to be able to support Brazilian regulatory reporting requirements to maintain these mineral rights. We've been very successful at that, and now with a whole bunch of regional targets identified, just still to the north and south of Santa Luz, you know, right across the whole length of the 75-plus kilometer belt, we will now look to go back and flesh out our understanding of that again to really map out the full potential. The medium term is where it gets interesting because that's where we start to contemplate ores of different types and natures that might be blended or more optimal from one or the other and these sorts of opportunities. But that's kind of a medium-term approach.

Perfect. Thank you. I've got lots of online questions that I think have already been answered during the presentation, so I will get back to all of you by email if you've got any follow-up questions. But we've got a whole bunch about Los Filos, so I'll do one Los Filos wrap-up question. So can you just provide a bit more clarity on what you mean that you've reached an agreement with all three communities, but only two have signed?

Well, we've had a dialogue with three communities. We've always agreed with the communities that we talk to them altogether. We work through key terms and ultimately had an agreement on the key terms. But when it came to signing a final document that laid out those key terms, we got two groups that signed and the third one who has not. So essentially, we need an overall final agreement with all three communities to be able to move forward.

Okay. That's everything. Greg, do you have any wrap-up comments?

I only have to say I appreciate everyone joining the call today, and of course, if you have any other questions, you can always reach out to Rhylin or me or anyone here at Equinox Gold Corp. We're always happy to respond.

Perfect. Thank you very much. Thank you, everybody, for joining us. Operator, you can now conclude the call.

Thank you, Rhylin. This brings to a close today's conference call. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.