Welcome to the Equinox Gold First Quarter 2025 Results and Corporate Update. As a reminder, all participants are in listen only mode and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. I would now like to turn the conference over to Rhylin Bailie, Vice President, Investor Relations for Equinox Gold.

Thank you, operator. Thank you, everybody, for joining us this morning. We will, of course, be making a number of forward looking statements today, so please do visit our website, SEDAR and EDGAR, to learn more about our continuous disclosure documents. I will now turn the call over to our President and CEO, Greg Smith.

Thanks, Rhylin. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining the call today. On the line with me is our COO, Doug Reddy, our CFO, Peter Hardie, our EVP of Exploration, Scott Heffernan and our VP of Investor Relations, Rhylin Bailie. Again, today we’re discussing Equinox Gold’s 2025 first quarter financial and operating results. For those of you who are new to the company, Equinox Gold is a fast growing America’s focused gold producer with mines across Canada, United States, Mexico and Brazil. I’m going start with a broad overview of the first quarter and then I’ll turn the call over to Pete and Doug for more details. Starting with safety, our safety performance this quarter was good. Our twelve month rolling total recordable injury frequency rate across the entire company improved from last quarter to one point nine five per million hours worked. For the quarter, our total recordable injury frequency rate was one point zero seven with two lost time injuries across all our operations. We also had no significant environmental incidents in Q1, maintaining our excellent significant environmental incident frequency rate of zero for the rolling 12 month period. During the first quarter, we produced just over 145,000 ounces of gold and sold approximately 148,000 ounces. These results represent the highest first quarter production in the company’s history and as in prior years, we expect quarterly production to increase over the course of the year. Including production and costs from Los Filos, cash cost was $17.69 dollars per ounce and all in sustaining cost was $2,065 per ounce. Those results include Los Filos. We did not include any production from the Los Filos mine in our guidance for 2025 due to the need to establish new long term agreements with local communities to continue operations. So excluding production…

Thanks, Greg. We’re now on slide 6 of the presentation. In addition to this being Equinox’s best production for Q1, it’s also our third straight quarter with more than $400 million in revenue. With respect to the operations, Greenstone unit costs were higher in the quarter compared to Q4. We had planned for Q1 to be our lowest production quarter. During Q1, we added four haul trucks to the fleet and incurred the related costs with operating them. There are no further haul truck additions planned for the year. In addition, we performed plant maintenance during Q1 to remediate items that we had noted were impeding the ramp up. We’ve seen the benefits of that maintenance by way of increasing throughput through March and April. We expect Greenstone’s unit cost to decline throughout the year with increasing gold production. Included in the quarter’s results are $65 million of nonrecurring charges. We had an accounting adjustment for depreciation of $25 million at RDM and Santa Luz that is nonrecurring. In addition, for Los Filos, we had a $29 million inventory net realizable value adjustment resulting from moving leach pad inventory from current to long term and using long term instead of short term gold prices to value that inventory. And that’s as a result of the suspension of the operations. In addition, there are $10 million of Los Filos mine suspension charges recorded as care and maintenance. Further, for Q2, at Los Filos, we expect approximately $35 million in mine suspension and care and maintenance charges. For the second half of 2025, we expect carrying costs at Los Filos to be about $2.5 million to $3 million per month, and we’ll look to reduce those monthly carrying charges as we work our way through the year. With commercial production achieved at…

Thanks, Pete. We’re now on slide 9 of the presentation. At Greenstone in Q1, the mine and mill performed well through the first full winter producing 44,449 ounces. Ramp up continued with an average of 137,000 tonnes a day moved in the quarter and that continued to increase in April and averaged 165,000 tonnes per day coming into May. Some loading unit challenges impacted availability, but the disruptions were generally short term. And the fleet was expanded with the addition of the four CAT 793s bringing it to a total of 29 trucks. As noted in the last quarterly call, we are adding an additional PC5500 shovel that will arrive in June and be operational by July 1. The mining team is also focused on additional RC grade control drilling, blast movement optimization, doing larger blasts, are now hitting over 1 million tons per blast and doing fletch mining, which helps with selectivity. Our mining flexibility has improved with the pit enlargement now that we removed the central area that was impeded while we moved some contaminated soil. So we’re getting the whole pit to one level, which is good for flexibility in mining. On the process plant side, we averaged over 18,600 tonnes per day on the crushing and over 18,400 tonnes per day on the milling in the quarter and continued ramping up into April. Milling is now over 23,400 tonnes a day or 87% of design capacity. Downtime was reduced and CIP tank modifications were completed through numerous changes in the mill, which we have said in advance that we were going to do in Q1. And overall, we’ve seen the mill stability improve and the maintenance intervals continue to lengthen, which further boosts our overall efficiency. At the Mesquite Mine, gold production was 12,271 ounces. That…

Thanks, Doug. We’ll move on to Q&A in just a second here. I’ll just conclude by saying we’re very pleased to have received the support of our shareholders for our transaction with Caliber Mining, and we look forward to getting the deal done this close or getting the deal closed this quarter. On our next call, we’ll be reporting as a combined company. And as Greenstone continues to ramp up and Ballantyne commences production later this year, we’ll start to see the substantial benefit of having these two low cost long life mines in one company. I think now, Rhylin, let’s move to Q&A.

Sure. Operator, can you please remind people how to ask their questions?

Certainly. [Operator Instructions]

While we’re waiting, we’ll take some of the questions that we’ve got online. So we do have a few questions about Greenstone. I’ll try to combine them into one. When do you expect Greenstone to be operating at capacity? And will that bring your costs down closer to your target?

Sure. I can take that, Rylin. Yes, Greenstone is continuing to ramp up over the course of the year. Design capacity of the plant is 27,000 tonnes per day. And we expect to be in and around that range as we move into the second half of the year here. In April, the mine or sorry, the plant was producing at 87% of design capacity. Some of the work we did in Q1 on the plant is actually really starting to pay dividends here as we move into April and into May. So very happy with the way the plant is progressing at Greenstone. On the mining side, that’s probably an area where we’ve had more challenges in Q1. We did increase the size of the fleet by four haul trucks, which was great. But we did have some issues with availability of our PC5500 Komatsu motors. And that is probably the biggest single issue in terms of moving tons in the first quarter. As Doug mentioned, we do have an additional incremental shovel arriving in June. It will be operating in July. And that combined with the increase in the fleet should result in an ability to move a lot more tons. And we’re already seeing availabilities improve on our existing fleet and mining rates have increased a fair bit in April ’60 on average and one sixty five. One 60 five. So we’re continuing to see increase in mining rates as well. And I think that will only continue to improve as we get into the warmer weather and in particular when we get the additional shovel on-site.

One other question that came in. How many downtimes did you see during the quarter? You mentioned that those are improving.

Yes. We had total of ten down days on in the plant. But we were able to because we have crushed ore dome and emergency stockpile, we were able to limit the number of days that affected the milling circuit. So about 10 in total, but we were doing things that we said we were going to do, fixing downcomers that were causing some short circuiting in our tanks and modifying valves that allowed for some leakage as well as changing slurry pumps, screen decks and some springs on the screens that were requiring frequent change outs. So all of those have been rectified. We’re getting much longer periods between having to do shutdowns. So we’re pleased with the progress. It obviously impacted the quarter, but we’re seeing the benefits coming into April and May.

Perfect. Thank you. Operator, can we take some questions from the phone please?

The first question comes from Wayne Lam with TD Securities.

I guess first question, maybe just wondering on the balance sheet with the revolver nearly drawn down now. Just wondering how you’re thinking about flexibility in the event of a more drawn out ramp up at Greenstone? And would you be looking to refinance shortly maybe after the close of the transaction? And then just curious on the capacity to fund two new mine ramp ups here and how you’re thinking about any contingency plans?

Yes. So with respect to our liquidity, available liquidity, we do have a planned refinancing of our revolving credit facility. I want to emphasize that was planned for this quarter. But that said, Wayne, if we’re we’ve seen great improvement in April with performance at Greenstone and assuming that continues and we hit our targets throughout the year, we don’t believe any further draws are required and we’re actually very much looking forward to starting to pay down debt in the second half of the year.

I guess I’d just add Wayne that Caliber also released their results and confirmed they’re fully funded to get Valentine into production here. And so between the two companies, I don’t see a liquidity issue coming up here. In particular, in the second half of the year, production increases, costs come down, Ballantyne comes online, Greenstone’s ramped up.

Okay, understood. And then maybe just a follow-up to the prior question on the Greenstone ramp up. Maybe if you could give us a bit more detail on some of the changes at the mill and what you might need for improved availability to get closer to nameplate capacity? And then just curious on maybe on the cost side, if you’re seeing any pressures on things like labor and if you’re still confident in getting to the full year cost guidance given the challenges in the quarter?

So in the mill, we had said in at the end of last year that in Q1, we were going to be making changes on slurry pumps and also modifications in our tanks, specifically in valves and downcomers. All of that’s been done. At the same time, we made a lot more modifications in other areas when we had the downtime happening. And it’s all been driven towards, well, obviously, stopping short circuiting the tanks, which will improve our recovery long term, but also to be able to extend the periods between downtime. So just, for example, changing the springs out and related to our screen decks has enabled us to be able to push out the periods between downtime. The reduced downtime that we see in April and May is testament to one of the aspects of being able to bring the tons per day up to 87% of capacity.

And then on the cost side, it’s Peter. And as I was saying in my comments, Greenstone has been scaled up from a cost structure perspective to what’s required to achieve its goals for the year. And it being a low production quarter in Q1 as was part of the plan, understandably the cost per unit there are higher than prior quarter or in Q3 while it was still in commissioning prior to commercial production. We do believe, again, if we’re on track with respect to continuing progress, that we’re seeing that we’re on track overall for our guidance for the year.

Okay, great. And then, maybe just last one at Los Filos. Are there still ongoing negotiations or discussions being had there that leave you constructive on getting a deal done or things that more of an impasse with the third community? And then maybe if you could provide a bit more clarity on approximate care and maintenance costs there?

Sure, Wayne. It’s Greg speaking. I’ll start. I think the best way to describe it is the way you just did, impasse. We spent a year, more than a year negotiating with all three communities. The government was involved. A number of stakeholders were involved. We came to terms with all three communities, signed a, call it, a heads of agreement document on that basis, executed the two agreements with well executed long term new agreements with two of the communities. The third community elected not to sign a new long term agreement. The existing agreement expired and so we suspended operations. And the reality is that the terms we negotiated with the three agreements are really the best we can We need to maintain the economic integrity and the investability of that asset of Los Filos. It has the potential to be a great mine, but it does require a substantial amount of investment. And it’s critical that you have agreements in place to support that investment. And so at this stage, not a lot happening on that basis. And of course, we’re always open to dialogue. But at this point, I would not expect anything to move on that basis at Los Filos in the near term. I think it’s fair to say, you don’t expect any production from Los Filos for the rest of this year.

Okay. And sorry, just one follow-up. But in terms of your comment on the economics there, like that stance wouldn’t change with the gold price move that we’ve seen?

Well, I guess one way to put it is, our stance evolved over the course of the negotiating period. So, prices go up, gold prices go down, but you have inflation to take into account as well, costs, etcetera. And so again, there’s only so much you can do when you’re planning for the long term. And obviously, gold prices are helpful to the economics of any mine. But again, without getting into the details of how these negotiations played out, at this stage, no, it doesn’t have an effect on our position.

And your next question comes from Anita Soni with CIBC World Market

Good morning, Greg, Doug and Peter. Thanks for taking my questions. I just wanted to drill a little bit down into sort of the way grades and tonnages, the way you see them evolving at Greenstone over the next three or four quarters. So I think you said the lower grades were a result of mine sequencing, but it sounds like you also had some challenges with the equipment in the pit. How long do you think you would be in when will you be accessing higher grade areas in the pit? And then like how do you think the plant is going to how do you think the mine is going to keep up with the plant over the course of the year?

Think we’ll refer to what we said in the last call as well was we were expecting to be about at this grade for Q1. We see it ramping up during the course of the year and getting to 1.5, one point six by the in the latter part of the year. So grade wise, it’s evolving the way we expected. We are a bit slower on the mining, yes. We’re of that and that pushes things out a little bit. So at the back end of the year, we may end up with not as much not getting the higher grade as quickly as we anticipated in the original plan for the year, but overall it should evolve that way. And that goes to the tons per day being moved. I mean, in Q1, the average is 137,000 tons a day, but we had peaks at over 193,000 tons a day. As we came into April and May, the 165,000 tonnes a day is average. And so that’s good. We’re getting peaks where we’re doing over 200,000 tonnes a day. So it’s definitely picked up the pace as we came through the winter months through the challenges that we had with loading units, a little bit of absenteeism, but we’re good now and the team is doing really well.

I think I just added -- Go ahead, Anita. Sorry. Go ahead.

What’s the direct what’s the actual grade that’s being mined right now, the direct ore feed grade rather than what was processed?

Well, we get a lot of material that goes to the stockpile. So average grade being mined ranges from 0.6 to 1.2, anywhere in there. I’d say we’re typically just under one gram. So we’re using a bit of the stockpile and getting it to 1.1 on the feed.

Sorry, Greg, you were going to say something?

I was just going to say that, kind of as mentioned earlier, the challenge we really had was around availability of the large shovels. And that really did cause us some issues in January and February. As that availability increases, we were able to see the tonnage increase substantially. But as Doug said, are behind on the mining and the key for us is to start working on catching that up. This additional shovel will help with that. We are bang on pretty much our feed grade for Q1, our expected feed grade. And so good from that perspective, but definitely need to catch up on the mining through the year. We’re seeing that start to happen now and keen to get that additional shovel into the fleet.

And sorry, just could you tell me how many sorry, how many I’m not trying to say the word trucks. How many trucks did you have the first quarter? Sorry, tires.

We went from 25. We brought four more online and this is always planned and we got we’re now at 29 trucks.

Okay. So you went from 21 to 25 during the quarter?

No. We went from 25 to 29 in the quarter.

Okay. All right. Thank you. And then last question, a little bit more bigger picture and related to the deal. You just go through Greg, can you go through what you view as core assets and non-core assets? There’s been a lot of talk about asset sales post the merger and then focusing management time and resources on some of the bigger assets. But which where would you see shutting assets if you were to do that?

Sure. I think the easy comment to make is that Greenstone and Ballantyne form foundation of the company. And both in Canada, long life, both with a lot of exploration potential. So obviously those are core. We have the development project down in California, Castle Mountain. We are making substantial progress under the new administration in terms of permitting. And so that is becoming much more, I think, relevant to the future growth plans of the company in the near term here. So Castle Mountain, that’s another 200,000 ounces per year long life mine in The Americas and The United States, clearly a core asset for us. And then we’ve got a fairly large portfolio of other assets. We’ve got obviously operating scale in Brazil. We’ve got some operating scale in Nicaragua. And then Filos, the Nevada assets and Mesquite. So, Anita, I never want to isolate individual assets as being core or non-core at this stage. We’re going to close this transaction. The management team will do a full review. It’s a pretty good market for thinking about divestments of assets or some M&A around gold assets. So it’s definitely top of mind for us. It is something that we’re going to focus on. But big picture, comment is Valentine, Castle and Greenstone, of course, as the major core of the company and then focusing on the other assets here over the next year and then determining what we’re going to do. It’s obviously there are some just the scale of the company, are some that are going to be non-core. And we’ve had a fairly robust amount of interest in various assets in the portfolio. And again, we’ll kind of consolidate all of that and as we close the transaction and then go from there.

And your next question comes from Jeremy Hoy with Canaccord Genuity.

Thanks for taking my questions. Picking at some of the details here and going back to Greenstone, recovery was relatively in line with where it was at Q4. You’ve seen spikes up to 90% range. At a high level, can you just walk us through the ins and outs of what it takes to get grade up to design?

Yes, I mean higher grade, higher recoveries. So with the lower grade coming in this quarter, we didn’t know it would be lower. We knew we’d be doing plant modifications to rectify some short circuiting solutions. So the solutions are that’s Preg Solutions. So we’re losing solutions to tails in a couple of areas due to a short circuiting the tanks and a valve design that was not working properly. So we’ve made those modifications. So we anticipate as we go forward that we will see an improvement in grades overall.

Recoveries overall, okay.

Recoveries overall.

Yes, sorry. That must be my influence. Okay. Just one more from me on Los Filos. In the disclosure, you mentioned that you started layoffs. If the community were to come back and sign an agreement today, how long would it take to restart that operation?

Well, I think the question would be whether it makes sense to start the operation right away. I mean, the path to prosperity at most fields really is through the construction of a new CIL plant 10,000 ton per day CIL plant. And to do that we need to continue with some engineering. We need to get some permitting done on-site and obviously advanced toward construction decision then build it. To go back into production on heap leach only basis immediately after having wound the operation down economically might not make the most sense. Now never say never, we’d have to assess in the context of those discussions and determine what the best path is. But I think at this stage again, we’re not in a position where we see a resolution in the near term. And so our expectation is that Filos would remain suspended for the remainder of this year certainly. And we’ll assess it as we go.

Thanks. Okay. Lots of questions online. I’m trying to combine them. Lots of questions about cost at the mines. How did these Q1 results compare to what you had budgeted for the year? And what’s your target ASIC for the year end?

So other than Greenstone, where costs on a per ounce basis, they are a little higher than budget. But overall, as we’ve been saying, we believe we’re still very much on plan for the year. For the rest of the mines, they actually performed within what we expect. Q1 is very typically for the company, the lightest production quarter every year. And as Greg mentioned, this is a it’s a record for us for Q1. So we’re happy with overall with where we’re headed. And as a company as a whole, believe we’re on track with our overall cost guidance.

I mean, I guess part of the challenge we have at Equinox is typically Q1 is our lowest production quarter and we have increasing production quarter over quarter. As you increase your production, the denominator goes up and your average cost per ounce goes down and that results in your average for the year. So we typically have a higher cost quarter in Q1 and then see those cost per ounce come down over the course of the year as production increases. This this happens at Equinox pretty much every year. It’s based on seasonality typically and it’s the same this year.

Thank you. We’ve had some questions about the finance costs and other nonrecurring costs that occurred during the quarter and how we have record production and record gold prices that’s still booked to net loss. So can you explain that from an accounting perspective?

Yes. So I’ll refer to it. So there’s two major contributors there or three. There’s those Filo suspension, which creates noise in the income statement, as there’s a lot of non-normal costs associated with spending operations, principally severance for employees that are being laid off. We did have the accounting adjustments that I mentioned non cash and those won’t recur. And finally with the very fortunate completion of Greenstone commercial production last quarter, we had the opportunity, I suppose you could describe it to capitalize costs related to Greenstone construction and pre commercial production. But with completion of that, those charges even they were being incurred on a cash basis, they weren’t going through our earnings statement, but now do. So those are the three primary components of the loss for the year. And then reflecting Greg’s comments just now, as we see our production increase throughout the year, we’ll see the earnings increasing throughout the year. And then again as we delever and reduce the obligation side of the balance sheet, of course, the finance charges, with respect to those charges decrease and you wind up with this virtual cycle of having more cash available to deploy to pay down obligations, while also reducing the cost of those obligations overall on your earnings.

Okay, perfect. It looks like Jeremy did not come back into the queue. We did have a lot of questions coming online. I think most of them were addressed during the call or during the Q&A. If I missed your questions, my apologies. I’ll get back to you by email today or you’re welcome to give me a call. Greg, did you have any wrap up statements?

No. I just, again, appreciate everyone for joining the call today. Appreciate your support. And you know where to find us. All of our contact information is on the website. You can reach out to Rhylin or me anytime.

Perfect. Thank you. Operator, you can now conclude the call.

This brings to a close today’s conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.