Good morning, and welcome, everyone, to Granite Ridge Resources' Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to James Masters, Investor Relations representative for Granite Ridge.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate your interest in Granite Ridge Resources. We will begin our call with comments from Tyler Farquharson, our President and Chief Executive Officer, who will review the quarter's results and company strategy. We will then turn the call over to Kim Weimer, our Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, who will review our financial results in greater detail. Tyler will then return to provide closing comments before we open the call for questions. Today's conference call contains certain projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied. We ask that you review the cautionary statement in our earnings release. Granite Ridge disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these statements. These and other risks are described in yesterday's press release and our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This call also includes references to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Information reconciling these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is available in our earnings release on our website. Finally, this call is being recorded, and a replay and transcript will be available on our website following today's call. With that, I'll turn the call over to Tyler.

Thank you, James, and good morning, everyone. I'm excited to address you today as Granite Ridge's new CEO. Before diving into our second quarter results, I want to acknowledge the leadership transition that occurred during the quarter. Luke Brandenberg stepped down as CEO, and I'm honored to have been appointed to lead the company forward. Luke played a pivotal role in shaping Granite Ridge into the successful business it is today. And on behalf of the team, I want to express our gratitude for his significant contributions. We wish him all the best in his next chapter. Turning to our Q2 performance. Our quarterly results continue to validate our business model with production and cash flow once again exceeding expectations. In the second quarter, we turned 4.9 net wells to sales and increased production by 37% year-over- year to 31,576 barrels of oil equivalent per day, driven by a 46% rise in oil production and a 28% rise in natural gas production. This growth reflects the strength of our diversified portfolio of oil and natural gas assets and our disciplined approach to capital allocation, which prioritizes the highest risk-adjusted returns. Our operated partnership and traditional non-op investment strategies remain the driver of this success. We've partnered with 4 top- tier operators to unlock substantial value in the Permian Basin and are thrilled with the progress achieved to date. Meanwhile, our traditional non-op strategy continues to deliver consistent results with wells coming online ahead of schedule in the Permian and wells outperforming forecast in the Utica. On the capital front, we spent approximately $77 million on development and $10 million on acquisitions for a total CapEx spend of $87 million. Year-to-date, we have invested approximately $149 million of capital on development activities, which is higher than forecast based on the accelerated…

Thank you, Tyler, and good morning, everyone. I'll provide a detailed overview of our Q2 2025 financial results, which highlights our operational strength and disciplined financial management. In Q2, we generated total oil and gas sales revenue of $109.2 million, an increase of 20% compared to Q2 2024. This growth was driven by a 37% increase in production to 31,576 BOE per day. Oil revenues rose by $12 million, reflecting a 46% jump in oil production to 16,009 barrels per day, though partially offset by a 21% decline in realized prices from $77.84 per barrel in the prior year period to $61.41 this quarter. Natural gas revenues increased by $6.6 million supported by a 28% rise in production to 93,404 Mcf per day and a 17% incline in realized prices from $1.98 per Mcf to $2.32 per Mcf. Net income for the quarter was $25.1 million or $0.19 per share, reflecting our strong operational performance. Operating cash flow before working capital changes was $69.5 million, providing robust liquidity to fund our capital program and dividends. For the first half of 2025, net cash from operating activities totaled $154.1 million, up from $132.8 million in the prior year. On the cost side, lease operating expenses were $20.1 million or $7 per BOE compared to $13.7 million or $6.50 per BOE in Q2 2024. The increase reflects elevated service costs and higher saltwater disposal costs as the percentage of our production from the Delaware Basin has increased. So we continue to optimize efficiency as we scale. General and administrative expenses rose by $1.9 million year-over-year to $8.5 million or $2.96 per BOE, driven by certain nonrecurring general and administrative expenses, including $1.7 million in severance expense tied to the leadership transition and $1.1 million related to capital markets activities. Excluding these nonrecurring…

Thank you, Kim. In closing, I want to thank our team for their hard work and dedication, which has been critical to delivering these strong results. I also appreciate the continued support of our shareholders. As we move forward, I'm confident that Granite Ridge is well positioned to navigate market volatility and create long-term value. Our strategy is proven, our assets are exceptional, and our team is best in class. We remain committed to executing our plan, driving growth and returning capital to shareholders. With that, operator, please open the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Phillips Johnston with Capital One.

I appreciate the color on the quarterly cadence in production. It sounds like up a little bit and then the significant growth really occurs in Q4. If you look at your guidance, it implies the oil mix is going to tick up around 53% in the back half of the year versus around 51% in the first half of the year. So I just kind of wanted to get a sense of what's driving that oil mix higher.

Yes. Thanks, Phillips. On oil cut, we actually were -- we think we'll be more like 52%. So we're slightly lower than what you have. So we are seeing some gas acceleration on some new projects from folks that are Haynesville that [indiscernible] focused. But predominantly where the growth is coming from is in the Permian, which is obviously an oilier mix than the existing asset.

Okay. That makes sense. And then the company's net debt increased to $270 million from around $195 million at the end of 2024. The updated guidance suggests that the outspend of cash flow this year is going to be a little bit wider than it would have been based on prior guidance. You have a strong balance sheet. You mentioned the leverage ratio is solid at 0.8x. You've got plenty of liquidity. So I guess with that backdrop, I just wanted to get a sense of the Board's appetite to continue adding to the net debt balance as we sort of look out beyond this year into 2026 and beyond.

Yes. So nothing's changed there on that front. So we've repeatedly said that we're comfortable in a 1 to 1.25x band. We ended the quarter 2Q at 0.8x. So we still have some capacity there. With what we're seeing in the acquisition market right now, we're really focused on leaning in on adding inventory, adding duration to the business. We think that's a really attractive investment at this point. So I think you'll continue to see us outspend cash flow until we get to where we're comfortable with leverage. And I think you could see us outspend again next year, particularly in an acquisition environment such as we're in now.

And your next question comes from the line of John Annis with Texas Capital.

For my first one, I just wanted to get your thoughts on what you're seeing that has given you the confidence to lean into growth and acquisitions at this time, whether it's the macro current dynamics with PE funding that you highlighted in the slides or something else? Just some more color on that would be great.

Sure. Yes. Great question. So this is the most constructive environment that we've seen on the A&D front in quite some time. And I think a big component of that is just the lack of private equity capital in the space and the private equity capital that is left in the space is focused on much larger format transactions. So that's really left a pretty attractive space for us that fits our model well where we're able to just continue to aggregate smaller transactions at really attractive prices. The other thing that's helping us now is we're adding operated partner teams. So we have 4 teams now that tremendously expands our opportunity set, our deal flow. This year, we're seeing A&D activity that we've evaluated up 15% versus where we were last year. So I think this setup really fits our model well. And then I think from a macro perspective, with the weakness on oil prices recently, we've seen a lot of the larger operators looking to rationalize their development capital spend, and that really leaves us an opportunity to help folks solve those issues that they have on CapEx efficiency.

Makes sense. And for my follow-up, maybe for you, Tyler, I wanted to get your views on how you see balancing adding inventory, adding growth and managing leverage. You've clearly been successful balancing the 3, but I just wanted to get a sense of how you're viewing these priorities in your new role.

Yes. That's exactly what we're thinking about every day, those 3 things. So I think right now, we're leaning into growth. We're leaning into scale. We think that added duration to our inventory is going to pay dividends down the road. And we're finding that A&D market very attractive right now to allow us to do that. So since the balance sheet is still in great shape right now, we're choosing to lean in there. That comes at the expense of free cash flow. But we believe over time, we'll get to a point where we will be more free cash flow neutral. But this market environment is really conducive to us adding scale and increasing our inventory.

And your next question comes from the line of Michael Scialla with Stephens.

Tyler, you mentioned you could outspend again next year. It sounds like you probably will. If you get all the acreage you anticipate with these acquisitions and the macro holds together, I guess trying to get your sense of where the '26 program could go with the operated partnerships. Would the 4 rigs be possible? Or what are you thinking at this point?

Absolutely. Yes, 4 rigs. We're running 3 now. I could see a scenario definitely where we're with a fourth rig. We just added 2 new partners. They're aggregating inventory now. That will take them a little bit of time. But at some point in 2026, I do expect that we'd be running at least 1 rig on one of those 2 new partners that we added. So from a phasing standpoint, from an outlook standpoint, I think that CapEx spend in 2026 will look pretty similar, if not more, compared to what we're doing this year, especially if the A&D environment remains strong.

And would the mix change if you go to at least 4 rigs, kind of 65% operated, 35% nonoperated, do you see that operated piece going higher next year?

Yes, it might tick up, but we're still seeing a ton of opportunity on the non-op front, particularly in Appalachia. Most of the non-op deals that we've done this year have been in the Utica windows. So we still expect to see a pretty good clip of non-op opportunities even as we move into '27 and '28. So yes, I think that the percent of capital going to operator partners might tick up, but we'll still have a pretty healthy component from non-op.

And your next question comes from the line of Noah Hungness with Bank of America.

For my first question here, you guys are growing over 24% this year. I mean how can we think about the growth trajectory of the company moving forward? Is that a level that you like -- a level of growth that you'd like to see? Or would you maybe want to moderate that kind of back to the original plan of what was mid-teens growth?

Yes. So production growth isn't a target. We don't set a target and then try to achieve the target. Again, it's driven by where we are on leverage, where we are on scale, what free cash flow look like. So I think right now, given this environment and where the balance sheet is, I would expect quite a bit of growth into 2026. It's a bit early for us to talk about what that looks like. But I think it might not be as strong as this year, but would be mid-teens type growth given what we're buying now. A lot of that inventory is '26, '27. So right now, we're prioritizing growth. I would expect that to continue with where we are with our balance sheet.

That's helpful. And then for my second question here, you guys mentioned exploring the credit markets or looking to explore the credit markets in fall of '25. How can we -- could you just add some color around what you're thinking there is? Are you thinking about increasing your RBL size, potentially going to the high-yield market to term out some debt? Just thoughts there.

Yes. It's kind of all of the above, right? So the -- we increased the RBL by $50 million in the spring. Given this level of activity here in 2025, I'd expect us to be able to get a pretty healthy increase again in the fall. So that's certainly on the table and something that we're pursuing now. And then yes, I think we're also looking at options that would help us term out some of that RBL balance. So that could either be traditional high-yield market or some sort of private credit option as well. So those are all on the table, and those are things that we'll evaluate here as we head into the fall.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Phillips Johnston with Capital One.

Sorry for the follow-up. Just wanted to ask if these partnerships are structured like earn-outs to where your working interest is reduced after certain payout targets are met? Or are they generally more of like a heads-up type of arrangement?

So there is a -- after a return hurdle is achieved, there is a reversion of some of our interest to the operator partnership teams. There is no upfront promote in any way. So there's nothing on the front end, but there is after the return thresholds are met, a back-end part of our interest.

And there are no further questions at this time. Thank you all for attending. This does conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.