Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Home Bancorp's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Home Bancorp's Chairman, President and CEO, John Bordelon and Chief Financial Officer, David Kirkley. Please go ahead, Mr. Kirkley.

Thank you, Konstantin. Good morning, and welcome to Home Bank's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. Our earnings release and investor presentation are available on our website. I'd ask that everyone please refer to the disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements in our investor presentation and our SEC filings. Now I'll hand it over to John to make a few comments about the quarter. John?

Thanks, David. Good morning, and thank you for joining our earnings call today. We appreciate your interest in Home Bank as we discuss our results, expectations for the future and our approach to creating long-term shareholder value. Yesterday afternoon, we reported third quarter net income of $12.4 million or $1.59 per share, up $0.14 per share from the second quarter and $0.41 from a year ago. Net interest margin expanded for the sixth consecutive quarter to 4.10% and our return on assets increased by 10 basis points to 1.41%. Home Bank's efficiency ratio also improved in the third quarter and is now back down below 60%. We've been able to grow revenue significantly faster than expenses over the last couple of years with revenues increasing twice as fast as expenses. Loans decreased by $58 million in the third quarter as we saw payoffs and paydowns that were $52 million higher than average paydowns over the last 6 quarters. This was driven by a number of long-term customers selling their businesses or property. I think it's worth mentioning that we're not losing them to other banks. 8 customers alone that sold their businesses or property in the third quarter made up $45 million of the decline. In almost every case, Home Bank remains these customers' primary banking relationship, which bodes well for the future, but challenges our near-term growth. Customers are always waiting for lower rates before they move ahead with their projects that require financing. We have a lot of great conversations going on but the media coverage over the last 10 months has convinced many that big rate cuts are coming. So people are choosing to remain on the sidelines until there is more clarity on rates. While we are hopeful that we'd see 4% to 6% loan growth…

Thanks, John. Slide 5 in our investor presentation has a summary of the last 6 quarters. Net income totaled $12.4 million, a 9% increase from the prior quarter and a 31% increase from a year ago. Net interest income increased $754,000 quarter-over-quarter as NIM increased 6 basis points to 4.10%. Yield on loans increased 3 basis points quarter-over-quarter as a contractual rate on new loan originations was 7.35%, which continues to support an expanding NIM as lower yielding loans reprice. Slides 14 and 17 provide additional details on cash flows from our loan and investment securities portfolio, and we think we can continue to increase asset yields even if there are rate cuts. Excluding floating rate loans repricing in the next 3 months, 41% of loans with a blended rate of 5.7% are expected to reprice or refinance over the next 3 years. Over that same time period, half of our investment portfolio is projected to be paid off with a roll-off yield of 2.56%, which is well below current available yields of approximately 4%. Slides 15 and 16 of our investor presentation provides some additional detail on credit. We had $376,000 in net charge-offs in the quarter related to smaller C&I loans. Year-to-date, our net charge-offs totaled $743,000, which is a very low 4 basis points to total loans and $58,000 less than our prior year. Third quarter nonperforming assets increased $5.5 million to $30.9 million or 88 basis points of total assets. The increase was primarily due to the downgrade of 5 relationships and partially offset by paydowns. The largest was a $5.1 million relationship with 2 separate land development loans in Houston. We feel between the loan to value on these properties and the guarantor strength that there will be no material losses on this relationship. The…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Joe Yanchunis from Raymond James.

So I thought we could start with the NIM here. So how should we think about the NIM trajectory, particularly as we think about the board curve and your increased asset sensitivity? And at what point do you think the NIM peaks?

All right. So the increased asset sensitivity is more so due to the cash on hand on our balance sheet. So that's increasing the sensitivity as cash reprices daily. I would say as far as NIM, I think we have a great opportunity to keep NIM at least flat and grow a couple of basis points quarter-over-quarter. We have highlighted that we have a lot of loans within investment securities repricing, and we still think we have room to reprice upwards. And also with Fed rate cuts, we did lower some of our deposit rates. And we think we -- as the Fed continues to cut, we have the opportunity to lower deposit rates even further. And that has the ability to offset the reduction in loan yield due to Fed rate cuts as adjustable rate loans reprice downward. So I think we're really well positioned to continue to keep NIM at least flat to increase a couple of basis points.

I appreciate that. And your updated 2025 loan growth guide implies a pretty big step-up in 4Q loan growth. What levels of payoffs and paydowns are implied in this guide? And how does the loan pipeline currently compare to recent history? Just to probably get a sense on the jumping off point as we get into 2026.

Sure. Third quarter was beginning of the decline of new loan originations. We see a little healthier portfolio coming forth in the fourth quarter. Maybe not all of that gets closed in the fourth quarter, but -- so it is a little healthier than what we had in third quarter originations. So those numbers were down probably about -- the exact amount, but probably about $30-something million in the quarter from prior quarters. So we do think we'll see some pick up. Hopefully, we can pick up all that $36 million and be more normalized in the fourth quarter. But I think definitely, if we get a couple more rate cuts, first quarter should be very strong.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Feddie Strickland from Hovde Group.

I appreciate the commentary in the release that you don't expect losses on the credits that migrated to nonaccrual this quarter. You gave some more color on the call. So it sounds like we shouldn't necessarily see charge-offs from that. But I'm just curious, as you work through some of these credits, could we start to see the direction of nonperformers reverse and maybe start to see those come down some?

Yes. I think if you -- as we look at it, there's no, I guess, similarity in what's starting to have problems. It's just some one-offs here or there. We have one of our classified that called us this week and said they're going to be paying us off by the end of the month. So we would hope, but the worst part about NPAs is sometimes it takes them a little bit longer to fix themselves. What we're happy about is we're not seeing a lot of them going in the bankruptcy, which really takes anywhere a little bit faster in Texas, but slower in Louisiana in some cases up to a year to be able to move on that. So we're working through them. One of our problem assets that we had from a couple of years ago, we finally are getting out of bankruptcy, and we'll be able to take those properties back and begin the process of selling them. So it's kind of a longer-term situation when you have the bankruptcies. But fortunately, most of ours are not in bankruptcy. So hopefully, they can either sell or upgrade their business and be able to start paying as agreed.

Appreciate that. And just shifting gears to deposits. Can you talk about the level of deposit competition you're seeing today versus maybe a quarter ago? And how are you thinking about deposit betas on the way down if we do get rate cuts?

So our deposit betas are going to be a little bit, I would say, less than peers. We will continue to see our deposit betas increase from where they are over time. And I think they're going to be a little bit less than peers is because we didn't raise our deposit rates as much as some of our competitors didn't have overall lower cost of funds to start off with. So that's going to give us less room to go down, but we still have room to adjust as yields come down. As far as competition goes, I would say there are a couple, count on one hand, banks that are kind of out of the norm of our peer grouping. They pop up here and there. And I would say mostly in the Texas market, 1 or 2 banks in Louisiana have some outlying pricing. But overall, we're able to retain most customers, we are able to offer competitive rates, and I don't feel like the pricing is as fierce as it has been in the past. I feel like banks are -- some of our competitors in the market, they are very quick to lower their deposit costs and looking to lower their liability cost, and that bodes well for us given our NIM position and our desire to continue to increase our liquidity.

Also adding to that with the 91% loan-to-deposit ratio, it should be a little bit easier for us to lower our deposit costs. We were -- when we were at 98%, we were very much kind of in the lead as far as the price of CDs and such. So I think a little bit of that pressure will be taken off.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to John for closing remarks. Sir, please go ahead.

Thank you. Once again, thank you all today for joining us. We look forward to speaking to you in many days and weeks ahead. Thank you for your interest in Home Bancorp. Have a great day.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.