Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Home Bancorp's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Home Bancorp's Chairman, President and CEO, John Bordelon; and Chief Financial Officer, David Kirkley. Please go ahead, Mr. Kirkley.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to Home Bank's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. Our earnings release and investor presentation are available on our website. I'd ask that everyone please refer to the disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements in the investor presentation and our SEC filings. Now I'll hand it over to John to make a few comments about the quarter and the year. John?

Thank you, David. Good morning, and thank you for joining our earnings call today. We appreciate your interest in Home Bank as we discuss our results, our expectations for the future and our approach to creating long-term shareholder value. We're proud of everything we accomplished in 2025 and believe we are well positioned to continue the outstanding performance you've come to the expect from Home Bank. Yesterday afternoon, we reported fourth quarter net income of $11.4 million or $1.46 per share. For the full year 2025, net income was $46 million or $5.87 per share which is a record for Home Bank and 29% higher than our 2024 earnings per share. Fourth quarter net interest margin was 4.06% and the ROA was 1.29%, which was sharply higher than the fourth quarter of 2024, and that NIM was 3.82% and an ROA of 1.12. Loans grew by $38 million in the fourth quarter or 6% annualized as strong December originations exceeded still elevated payoffs and pay downs. Our pipeline is building and paydowns appear to be slowing, so we expect growth in 2026 to be in the mid-single digits. While loan growth in 2025 was not up to our historical trends, Deposits grew by 7% or $192 million with strong growth in demand deposits and relatively low-cost money market accounts. As a result of our success attracting deposits, we were able to reduce our loan-to-deposit ratio to 92% in the fourth quarter from 98% a year ago. We intend to continue to focus on deposits, which will build franchise value and position us for increased profitability when we return to our historical rate of loan growth. We continue to have success with our Texas franchise, which is now in its fourth year of operation. We now have 15 commercial bankers in 5 branches and 1 loan production office in the Houston market and expect to open a new full-service branch and close the loan production office in the first quarter. We expect the lending team we hired in late 2023 will be even more productive than they have been. Since entering the Texas market in 2022, loans have grown at a 15% annual rate and now represent 20% of our loan portfolio. Nonperforming loans increased in 2025, but our charge-offs remain very low, and we don't expect that to change due to our conservative underwriting standards and proactive credit management. As you can see on Slide 16, our net charge-offs have averaged about 6 basis points over the last 6 years. We continue to perform at a level above our peer banks and expect this trend to continue. We are confident in Home Bank's future and our ability to meet our higher standards in all economic climates. With that, I'll turn it back over to David, our Chief Financial Officer.

Thanks, John. Slide 5 in our investor presentation has a summary of the last 6 quarters. As John mentioned, fourth quarter net income totaled $11.4 million, an 8% decrease from the prior quarter but a 21% increase from a year ago. The decline in net income was primarily due to an increase in provision expense related to loan growth during the quarter. Net interest income was stable when compared to third quarter, decreasing $58,000 while NIM decreased 4 basis points to 4.06%. Year-over-year, 2025 NIM increased 32 basis points to 4.03%, while ROA increased 25 basis points to 1.33%. Yield on loans decreased 9 basis points quarter-over-quarter due to repricing of variable rate loans after the three Fed rate cuts in September. The contractual rate on new loan originations during the quarter was 7%. Despite recent rate cuts, our yield on interest earning assets increased 14 basis points to 5.88% in 2025. Slides 14 and 17 provide additional details on cash flows from our loan and investment securities portfolio that should support NIM expansion in 2026. Excluding floating rate loans repricing in the next 3 months, 41% of loans with a blended rate of 5.7% are expected to reprice or refinance over the next 3 years. Over that same time period, half of our investment portfolio is expected to mature with a roll-off yield of 2.56%, which is well below current available yields. Slides 15 and 16 of our investor presentation provides some additional detail on credit. We had $165,000 in net charge-offs in the fourth quarter and $908,000 of net charge-offs in 2025 which was only 3 basis points of total loans and $128,000 less than 2024. Fourth quarter nonperforming assets increased $5.2 million to $36.1 million or 1.03% of total assets. The increase was primarily due to the…

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Feddie Strickland at Hovde Group.

I just wanted to start on the credit side. I hear you on the limited loss history here and the fact that charge-offs really haven't been that high the last couple of quarters or for a while here. But when do you think we might see a shift in the trajectory of the Class 5 and NPAs as you work through some of these credits?

Yes. It's hardening a little bit that sometimes it takes a little bit longer, especially those credits in Louisiana and Mississippi. Texas products typically move a little bit faster, we're finding out a more closer date, there is usually about 60 days or less. So we are working through a lot of these. A couple of the newer ones we had were not on our radar and then they just kind of popped up a little bit. So we do believe that the two subdivision properties in Texas, we should be getting back out of foreclosure or they should be sold by February 3. We think there's a lot of equity still in that property, very good locations. We had another facility in Texas that the tenant moved out and the landlord is looking to sell the property. He has some interested parties just hasn't gotten there yet. So he's actually waiting -- he filed some lawsuits to be able to get back rent that the tenants had, and we'll see about that. But the most part, it's a good facility that should not have trouble selling. But once again, it just takes a little bit of time. So we had a lot of one-off circumstances. We don't see this as an economic-driven downturn. And we just see different scenarios where people are able to maintain the rental property or in the case of the two subdivisions, the person never started the development of those subdivisions.

One of the properties that John was talking about in February, that's about $5.5 million that once again, will either be paid off, refinanced out or will foreclose on and move to sell quickly.

Got it. So all I'll see -- what we can see NPAs come down about $5.5 million if nothing else comes on. Is that a fair assumption?

We hope so. We think the property is if we do take them back should be able to sell relatively quickly, it does take a little bit of time in Texas to get permits and things of that nature. That would be the only thing that would slow it up, we think.

Okay. And shifting gears to the loan pipeline, does the makeup look any meaningfully different from what's on the books today? Or I guess, in other words, do you expect any sort of longer-term shift in the portfolio? I know in the past, you talked about more C&I.

All of '25, we had some payoffs versus second quarter, they weren't as large as they were in the third quarter, but we did have payoffs and pay downs throughout our portfolio. So I think it's just maybe because of higher rates are people selling their businesses to profits and such and the loans get paid off, but we're not -- we didn't have much of that at all a little bit but not much in fourth quarter. We're thinking hopefully, we have less of that in 2026. So the loan growth is there if we don't have the payoffs.

And just a last question, just update on what you're hearing from customers throughout different parts of the footprint, how are things in New Orleans versus Houston? Just curious where you might see a little bit more versus a little bit less growth incrementally?

We're not hearing anything negative in any of our markets, especially with rates coming down, yield curve coming down a little bit. So I think it's probably leaning a little more towards the positive side. Obviously, the national scene is always a concern what happens with interest rates, what happens with the economy and such. But for the most part, we have not heard any negative comments.

The next question comes from Joe Yanchunis at Raymond James.

So I was hoping you could talk a little about the SBA business as we enter into 2026. Yes, as it currently stands, do you think the business will be a driver of growth? Or will it take some more investments to really grow the business?

That's a great question. We got into the SBA business after the Texan Bank acquisition, and we kind of have been slow to develop it. But as rates went up, the request were much smaller and few and far between. So we do anticipate that with the lower interest rates, that should pick up. I don't think we're low enough yet to where it's going to be tremendous, but it should be much better than it has been in the last two years.

Got it. And just a quick clarification. All my questions are great questions. So capital levels continue to build. You throttle down the buyback with current levels where the stock price is. Would you characterize M&A as one of the top capital deployment priorities? And if that's the case, can you talk about how the pace of conversations changed in recent months?

Well, a couple of important factors, I think, Dave and I have been speaking to people opportunities that have been out there for the last 3 years, of course, with the high interest rates and some of the balance sheet being a little upside down, it was not very attractive. The other important component there was we did not have a commodity that we felt we could use. So we looked at smaller deals that we could pay cash for. So now that our stock price is getting closer to a [ 140 ] of tangible or so, we feel as though we have the power to go out and maybe look for a little bit larger banks that we feel very comfortable with. So we're very optimistic about 2026 M&A.

And what would the larger deal look like just in terms of size or if you want to talk some geography as well?

Yes. I mean we're probably not looking at anything over $1.5 billion, I mean, half our size or less.

I appreciate that. And kind of last one for me here. In the back half of '25, you purchased nearly $20 million of securities. How should we think about the size of the bond portfolio as you move throughout '26?

I think it's going to be relatively in the same percentage of assets to 11% to 12%. We expect loan growth, we expect our balance sheet to increase a little bit. So I expect the investment portfolio to increase book basis -- excuse me, on a par basis by about $15 million to $20 million and then whatever happens on AOCI as it comes back.

The next question comes from Stephen Scouten at Piper Sandler.

I appreciate the time. I'm curious, John, I heard you say you feel pretty good about that team you have in Texas from 2023. Do you feel like there's opportunities with all the M&A we've seen in that environment to continue to add to that team? Or is there kind of plenty of capacity there now to grow at the pace you want to grow?

Well, we never lost anybody in the Texan acquisition, and we added about 3 other people to that. And then we did a pull out 2 years ago, I guess, it is now a 3-person team -- actually a 4-person team with 3 relationship managers. So that's the -- that's where we're building a new branch in Northwest Houston, and that's going to give them full branch capabilities. It's been very difficult as a loan production office for the last 2 years for them to grow as much, especially on the deposit side. So we're very excited about that team and hope to continue to grow in that market. Absolutely.

Okay. Got it. And then when you think about the kind of overall loan growth capacity for the franchise as we look at '26. Is kind of -- is mid-single digit the right way to think about it? Or do you have aspirations for more given what you're seeing in the Houston MSA?

I think the only thing that's going to push it past mid-single digits is potentially lower interest rates that may spur the economy a little bit more. I don't know if we're going to see that until maybe midyear or second half of the year, it's anybody's guess, right, where interest rates go. But it looks like the long end staying up a little bit. So potentially, it may be better in the second half of the year than the first half of the year. But I still think based upon the pipeline that we had in fourth quarter, I think first half of the year is still going to be mid-single digits.

Okay. Great. And then just maybe last thing for me. Kind of thinking about the trajectory of the NIM and David, I heard you obviously say you think there's some expansion opportunities there. I guess, kind of two parts to that. What do you think the scale of that potential upside could be? And then two, can you kind of help me reconcile the -- obviously, on page, was it, 21 of your presentation. What would show is kind of a liability sensitive -- I mean, excuse me, like an asset-sensitive appearance on the balance sheet versus what we've kind of seen in practice and kind of how I think about your balance sheet and the upside from lower rates?

Yes. So we had 3 rate cuts since mid-September. And so that impacts the loan portfolio immediately, and you saw that as a 9 basis point decline in loan yields. We have a very short deposit portfolio, but it does take a couple of months to realize the impact of rate cuts through CD repricing. Our NIM in December was 4.08% and that's reflective -- that's due to seeing our deposit cuts actually playing out on the income statement. And you're going to see more of that come through in Q1 as a lot of the CDs are repricing. So we took the impact of the rate cuts and that reduced our loan portfolio by 9 basis points. We've been originating in the 7% range, and we have roll off yields, a pretty healthy roll-off yield. So in the base case scenario, we see NIM ticking back up to 4.1% and 4.15% throughout the year. So that answers one of your questions, I believe. As far as rate sensitivity goes, change in net interest income, you got to remember that this projection is based off of the next 12 months. It's not saying, "Oh, my NIM was 4.05% and then down 100 basis points, I'm going to lose 4.1% of my NIM. It's -- my NIM is projected to increase in the base case to 4.1%, 4.15% in the base case, not from the 4.04% we just -- I mean, 4.06% we just reported, it's a 4.1% or a live asset-sensitive bank from that base case. And so even if we go down 100 basis points in yields, we still think that our NIM is going to be relatively stable to what we just reported.

I think the biggest headwinds we have right now in regards to NIM or some outliers on the deposit side, throwing some really high CD rates out there. So we're having to compete a little bit for that. That hasn't been the issue. Pretty much a lot of banks were all in the same general vicinity rate-wise, but there are some outliers in the 4.25% range.

But generally, I guess this is kind of a shock scenario, but it sounds like you have a lag that's actually beneficial as those CDs repriced over time from each subsequent cut. So theoretically, it could impact the NIM negatively for the first 30 days, but then probably there's some strength after the fact as deposits reprice. Is that maybe the best way to think about it?

Yes, that does, yes. But I'm glad John did bring that up. We are seeing more -- a much wider range of deposit pricing in some of our markets than we had over the last, I guess, probably 1.5 years with the spread between the high and the average.

Yes. Makes sense. People have seeing loans out there that they want to fund up. So yes, I would imagine it all gets a little bit more competitive. But to your point, hopefully, that means we got better economic strength. So we shall see. I appreciate all the color.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to John for any closing remarks.

Thank you. And once again, thank you all for joining us today, and we look forward to speaking to many of you in the coming days and weeks, and thank you for your interest in Home Bancorp. Have a great day.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.