Greetings, and welcome to Leggett & Platt First Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I’ll now – it is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Susan McCoy, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you, and over to you, ma’am.

Good morning, and thank you for taking part in Leggett & Platt’s first quarter conference call. On the call today are Mitch Dolloff, President and CEO; Jeff Tate, Executive Vice President and CFO; Steve Henderson, Executive Vice President and President of the Specialized Products and Furniture, Flooring and Textile Products segments; Tyson Hagale, Senior Vice President and President of the Bedding Products segment; and Cassie Branscum, Senior Director of IR. The agenda for our call this morning is as follows. Mitch will start with a summary of the main points we made in yesterday’s press release and discuss operating results and demand trends. Jeff will cover financial details and address our outlook for 2022. And Mitch will conclude the call with some comments on our recently issued sustainability report. This conference call is being recorded for Leggett & Platt and is copyrighted material. This call may not be transcribed, recorded or broadcast without our express permission. A replay is available from the IR portion of Leggett’s website. We posted to the IR portion of the website yesterday’s press release and a set of PowerPoint slides that contain summary financial information along with segment details. Those documents supplement the information we discuss on this call, including non-GAAP reconciliations. I need to remind you that remarks today concerning future expectations, events, objectives, strategies, trends or results constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results or events may differ materially due to a number of risks and uncertainties, and the company undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements. For a summary of these risk factors and additional information, please refer to yesterday’s press release in the sections in our most recent 10-K entitled Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements. I’ll now turn the call over to Mitch.

Good morning, and thank you all for participating in our first quarter call. Yesterday, we reported first quarter results largely in line with our expectations. Sales from continuing operations were $1.32 billion, EBIT was $138 million and earnings per share was $0.66. Sales in the quarter were up 15% versus first quarter 2021 reflecting our successful pass through of significant inflation over the past several quarters partially offset by lower volume. EBIT increased 8% primarily from expanded metal margins in our steel rod business and pricing discipline in our Furniture Flooring & Textile segment partially offset by lower volume and higher raw material and transportation cost in Automotive, generally and production inefficiencies and related premium freight cost in a North American Automotive facility. EPS of $0.66 was a 3% increase versus $0.64 cents in first quarter of 2021. Our full year guidance remained unchanged as we balance strong first quarter results with continuing macro market uncertainties, including supply chain constraints, inflation, tighter monetary policy, the invasion of Ukraine and COVID lockdowns in China. While our direct business exposure to Ukraine and Russia is minor. Our thoughts, concern, and hope go out to those impacted by the ongoing conflict. Moving on to the segments. Sales in our Bedding Products segment were up 19% versus first quarter of 2021, primarily from raw material selling price increases and the Kayfoam acquisition in Europe. Volume was down primarily due to softness as expected in U.S. and European market demand. Market demand remains soft in the first quarter due to reduced consumer activity and elevated inventory levels across the industry. Raw material, transportation and labor costs continue to increase and we are carefully managing the impact and passing along cost as necessary. Supply chain constraints have generally improved across the bedding businesses. We are making…

Thank you, Mitch, and good morning, everyone. In first quarter, we generated cash from operations of $39 million, up $50 million versus an $11 million use of cash in 2021. First quarter is normally our lowest cash flow quarter of the year with increased working capital driven by the normal cadence of our business. Working capital increased significantly last year due to restocking efforts, following inventory depletion in 2020, but increased to a lesser extent this year, as we began to return to more normal levels of inventory. We continued to expect cash from operations of approximately $600 million in 2022, as last year’s significant and inflationary impacts are not anticipated to recur and we continue to balance inventory levels. We ended the first quarter with adjusted working capital as a percentage of annualized sales of 15.2%. Our priorities for use of cash are unchanged. They include an order priority funding organic growth, paying dividends, funding strategic acquisitions and share repurchases with available cash. Total capital expenditures in the first quarter were $19 million. In February, our Board of Directors declared a $0.42 first quarter dividend, $0.02 or 5% higher than last year’s first quarter dividend, at an annual indicated dividend of a $1.68, the yield is 4.7% based upon Friday’s closing price of $35.63, one of the highest among the dividend kings. During the quarter, we divested a small South Africa spring operation, formally a part of International Bedding with annual sales of approximately $8 million. With the deleveraging, we accomplished over the past few years, share repurchases have returned as one of our priorities for use of cash. The level of repurchases will vary depending on various considerations, including alternative uses of cash and opportunities to repurchase shares at an attractive price. We took advantage of the decline…

Thanks, Jeff. In mid-April, we issued our second sustainability report. We’re committed to enhancing lives through our people, our products and our processes by finding new ways to care for the health and wellness of our employees and their families, attract and retain talent, develop our employees to their fullest potential and advance our inclusion, diversity and equity efforts by striving to advance innovative sustainable solutions for our customers and the end consumer by continuing to aggressively pursue resource efficiency and conservation practices and by ensuring a culture of good governance and high ethical standards within our businesses. In 2022, our key ESG initiatives include conducting a materiality assessment to further define the ESG opportunities that provide the greatest value to our stakeholders and are the most meaningful to our company, measuring and reporting our greenhouse gas emissions data, advancing our inclusion, diversity and equity efforts, evaluating opportunities for establishing key management systems to improve data collection and contribute to broader company-wide sustainability advancement and enhancing our supplier assessment process, including a heightened emphasis on labor and social standards and cybersecurity controls. We are pleased with the progress we made in 2021 and look forward to sharing the progress we make in 2022 as we continue to build and improve upon our ESG practices and processes. With those comments, I’ll turn the call over to Susan.

That concludes our prepared remarks. We thank you for your attention, and we’ll be glad to answer your questions. Mitch, will direct our question-and-answer session and the group will answer your questions. Vikram, we’re ready to begin the Q&A.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and congrats on a good quarter. My first question is, focusing on bedding, you’ve obviously, steel volumes down 13% this quarter in spring. And in U.S. Spring and 20% in the Specialty Foams business, appreciating the commentary that you gave on the call, Mitch. But can you talk a little bit more about the demand and how the inventories within the channel are moving through and just how you’re thinking about the upcoming quarters and production rates there?

Yes. Good morning, Susan. Thanks. It’s a great question and something we’ve been talking a lot about on our side. I think it’s interesting to look sort of that what happened in over the time period of last year and what we expect to happen in the first and second half of this year. But Tyson, I’ll turn that over to you for the detail.

Sure. Good morning, Susan. You recall when we talked about the results in the fourth quarter that we shared our thoughts about coming slow down in the bedding market. And at the time, it was our thought that our position in the value chain with inventories that had been built up that we were filling them packs first and largely because of continued inflation and also the breakout of Omicron. And we expected the start of the year to be slower and then to improve as we move through the year. And we started off the first quarter pretty much in line with expectations. Things were slow, but at a really consistent and stable level. But once we saw the invasion of the Ukraine in late February, early March, we did see some further slow down. It was our thought that the additional shock of energy costs and also just general consumer sentiment led to some lower demand levels. But our expectation is once that shock kind of moves through the system that we will return to some more reasonable levels of demand as we move through the year and probably getting closer to what we’ve seen more in historical seasonality. And we kind of add all that up and we feel like the – as we go through the year, probably ending up down for the total market somewhere in the mid-single-digit range.

Okay. That’s very helpful. Thank you. And I guess, staying in that segment, the margin there was really impressive, despite all these headwinds and moving parts that you faced in the quarter, it was basically flat year-over-year. Can you talk a little bit about what drove those margins? And I guess with that too, I know you mentioned in your comments that you completed the reheat furnace replacement. And so I think that especially impressive when you think about that thrown in there as well. And so just any commentary on those margin drivers and where we are? It sounds like the reheat furnace is done and behind you, but any color there as well.

Yes, sure. Tyson, I’ll turn this over to you. But I think that, first off, it shows the diversity – the benefits of the diversity of our business overall, but even within bedding, right, that we were able to be helped by the strong spread at the rod mill. And I just want to say thanks to the team that did the work to – do complete the reheat furnace replacement. They did a great job there really anticipating many problems that might occur and we’re very thoughtful and careful about that. And it’s great to have that back up and running. But, Tyson, I’ll let you add on.

Yes. I think that’s exactly right, Mitch. The diversity of our businesses, even within bedding really does help and we’ve been able to maintain overall EBIT margin year-over-year. A big part of that is the metal margin and think it’s worth pointing out that just strong overall demand in the steel market has allowed us to sell some of our excess capacity of production into the market outside of the bedding market. At the same time that’s helping us offset some weakness and demand in our innerspring and mattress business. But also because we saw some signs of demand flowing the fourth quarter, we started taking some actions then to slow our production rates. And although, we had what I would call a reasonable amount of cushion in our inventory, we did want to go ahead and start bringing that down to some more manageable levels as we got through the first part of this year. So that also did impact our overhead recovery as well. And so you kind of add all that up and that’s how we kind of be able to manage keeping margins in that same kind of range.

Yes. Tyson, maybe one more thing, do you think that also, as we’ve gone through the surge in the decline, and we’re a little bit more stable that we’ve been able to improve our production efficiency?

Yes, it’s a good point, Mitch. I mean, also as we’ve seen the slow down demand, it has given us an opportunity to – it really across all of our business groups to get a handle on both labor retrain employees, we’ve added some capacity and get to a place where we are producing more efficiently.

Okay. That’s great. And I’m going to squeeze one more in here, because it didn’t get past me that you did do some share buybacks this quarter, finally, above just what was issued as part of your employee plant. And so I guess, can you talk a little bit about the decision to get into the market here. With that, any thoughts on how you’re thinking about capital structure, targeted debt levels, as you’ve obviously worked really hard to get that deleveraging through in the last couple years and now sit in a much better position overall.

Yes. Thanks, Susan. And Jeff, I’ll let you take that one. But I would just say, it’s great to be in a position to having done such great work on the deleveraging to be able to restart the share buybacks. But Jeff, I’ll let you chime in with more detail.

Great. Thank, Mitch, and good morning, Susan. Appreciate the question. Yes. From our perspective, as you mentioned, the deleveraging efforts over the past couple of years have really positioned us well in terms of having better financial flexibility to execute on our capital allocation priorities, which you are very familiar with in terms of funding our organic growth, continuing to being committed to our dividend growth, and then looking at strategic acquisitions. Now that we’re in a better leveraging space and looking at that target leverage range that we’ve been working on here, we felt like going through the first quarter, there were some opportunities to take advantage of the decline in our share price that we saw in recent months, which allowed us to get into the market and buy those shares that you mentioned. We’re going to continue to execute on our capital allocation priorities as we go through the year, while we’re heavily focusing on our cash flow generation and we’ve guided to a $600 million range at this point. And as we continue to assess that and evaluate that versus our other alternative uses of cash, if it makes sense from a value creation perspective to go out and purchase additional shares beyond our issuances, then we’ll look at that. But at this point, we’re still guiding to share repurchases basically being neutral to share issuances for the year.

Okay. Thank you for that. I’ll turn it over here and good luck with everything.

Thank you, Susan.

Thank you. We have next question from the line of Keith Hughes with Truist. Please go ahead.

If you just talk about…

I’m sorry. Could you please repeat the question again, Keith? Thank you.

Yes. The question is on metal margins. I know it was a big help in the quarter. I just want to talk about your expectations on that here in the near-term. It does look like some version prices and steel are lightening up here in the last week or two. Is that the trend you expect to continue and will it have an impact.

Yes. Good morning, Keith. Thanks for the question. Tyson, you want to take that one? I think we’ve been [indiscernible] long-term what’s going to happen there, but I think that what we’ve been seeing is pretty helpful.

Yes. Good morning, Keith. And Mitch is right. As we started the year, we expected metal margins overall to start tapering sometime in the second quarter, but it’s been a pretty dynamic market. I mentioned that there has been relatively strong demand across steel product, outside of bedding of late. And part of that’s demand driven. And I think also continued inflation and conversion costs has also driven some of the pricing in rod and wire. And then on top of that, this was also another factor coming from the Ukrainian invasion, but run up in scrap costs. So that’s also driven more run up in overall metal margin and rod pricing. And so as we kind of added up all those things, as we moved through the first quarter, where we initially thought that margin would start tapering in the second quarter. We think that’s likely going to take some time for all that to unwind. And so more likely it’s going to stay kind of where it is or at least an extended period back into the later part of the third quarter and into the fourth quarter. So at least as we can see things now, like I said, it’s pretty dynamic, but that’s how we feel about the expectations.

And so we said this, I think at the first quarter – or the fourth quarter call, but that we would still expected the spread overall on average for the year to be up over last year. We’d still say that’s the case. Yes, that’s right. And those impacts too on the impacts broader steel market of the invasion of Ukraine. In fact, not only our rod business, but also flat steel, right. That applies to different parts of our business.

Okay. Thank you. And then final question still got a pretty wide guidance range here. What would be the top one or two variables that between you to the high end or swing you to the low end?

I’ll there’s so many. I’ll throw it…

Which one do you think is the most, the ones that could change the world?

Well, I mean, I think the question is really what happens to the consumer demand, right? It’s been, despite all of these challenges has been holding up pretty well. So I think that’s one that’s out there and does tightening monetary policy hit the right line and be able to help sort of level off and taper inflation without destroying that consumer demand. But I think that’s probably the biggest one out there. I mean, there’s certainly the Ukraine invasion, the COVID lockdown is China. All things are potentially are disruptive and impactful. But I think over the last couple years, we’ve found a way to serve as the consumer, not always neatly, but to be able to do it despite those sorts of challenges. So we’ll see. I don’t know, Jeff, Susan, is there any others that you would add in there or that you would place higher?

No, Mitch, I think those are some of the key drivers that we would see that could really swing the range. As we look at our guidance for the remainder of the year, I think if we were to make it more specific to our business units, based on that consumer sentiment, it would be some of the things I think we called out in our prepared remarks around what happens with volumes in automotive as we go through the remainder of the year and then looking at the metal margins, which we just finished talking about.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Yes. Thank you, Keith.

Thank you. We have next question from the line of Bobby Griffin with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Good morning, buddy. Thanks for taking the questions. I guess, Mitch, first, I wanted to look at specialized, obviously, a lot going on there between supply chain, higher shipping, raw materials, but trailing 12-month margin in that business on EBIT is probably around 10%. Pre-COVID was around 16%. So can we just maybe unpack a little bit the size of the headwinds you’re facing and then kind of talk about if we get back to “normal”, do you – can you recapture that loss 600 basis points of margin. Or is some of it probably going to be more structural now where the margin profile of that segment could be a little different going forward? Just any further detail around that?

Yes. Good morning, Bobby. That’s a great question. Glad that you asked it. I’ll take a shot and then Steve chime in as well. But I think a couple of things, Bobby, certainly it’s hard the dynamic of when the pandemic hit in 2020, certainly had a big impact on all of our businesses in that segment. So we had significant volume impacts in automotive, aerospace held up for a little bit, but then went down in PHC as well. So the good news is I think that we see the outlook for volumes increasing across all three of those businesses. In automotive, we can dig into that in more detail if you like, but more of a second half environment. So we had – while they’re not as big aerospace and hydraulic cylinders were pretty decent size drag, right, on the EBIT margins there. And then as we got into the sort of back half of last year, we started to see some inflationary impact on raw materials and transportation costs in automotive, but it wasn’t as significant towards the end of last year, but has been increasing as we go into this year. And we also, we mentioned had a struggle with some operational difficulties in one of our North American operations. And we’re making sequential improvement in that, but that has been pretty impactful as well on margins. And the team there has really stepped up and people from all around the world really have gone to help us turn that operation around and we’re making good progress. And we expect to see sequential improvement, particularly as we go into Q2 and the rest of the year there. So all that being said, it has been impactful negative on our margins there, but I’m very optimistic and I think reasonably optimistic that we will return to the – closer to those historical margins that you quoted.

Okay. Thank you. That’s helpful. I guess, two quick ones then. One, just inventories up pretty high versus sales. I think up 30% year-over-year, while sales is up closer to 15%. Is that just the extra rod inventory and wire inventory that was built with the steel plant furnace changes you were doing? Or is there anything else there to unpack?

Yes. Bobby, Tyson chime in here, but I think it is the extra broad build of inventory that we have is safety stock there, which will work down pretty quickly in the second quarter. And then I think the impacts of inflation as well still hit us there.

Yes. That’s right, Mitch. I think the only other spots would be just where we’ve had some areas where we have really long supply chains and we’ve had some extra stock that we’ve been keeping in place just so we can ensure that we can comfortably support our customers, but we expect those we kind of work their way out through the course of the year.

Yes. That’s a really good point. I mean, I think we mentioned it in the opening remarks, but you and that team have taken a really balanced approach to say, hey, let’s invest a little bit in labor. Let’s hold on to inventory to make sure we can service our customers. But overall, let’s say generally or inventory is in pretty good shape, right from a U.S. Spring perspective.

Yes. Overall, I’d say we’re in a pretty good place other than just what we’re making, what we think are reason investments.

Yes. Okay.

Yes, that’s very helpful. And then lastly, Mitch, I mean, there was just a modest trim on the volume guidance and you guys mentioned the quarter came in pretty in line with expectations. So I just want to make sure I understand kind of what changed for the volume guidance. Is it just what you saw late in the quarter with some of the uncertainty or you just factoring in that there should be a little bit more weakness going forward, given what’s taking place in the world with new shutdowns and things like that. It’s just trying to understand, has it been what you’ve seen over March or April that surprised you or is it just expectations going forward?

I think it’s both probably right. I mean we saw lower demand starting to materialize the Tyson commented on the in bedding overall. So that was part of the driver there. And then – but then we’ve seen increased volumes and work furniture optimistic about what we’ll see in as we talked about in specialized throughout the year, particularly the second half of the year there. So I think it reflects the benefits of the diversity of our business, right. We saw some things go a little bit more negative and some things go a little bit more positive, which was allowed us to hold the guidance overall, but make appropriate shifts.

Okay. I appreciate the details, best of luck here.

Okay. Thanks, Bobby.

Thank you. We have next question from the line of Peter Keith with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Hi, yes, thanks. Good morning, everyone. Hope you’re doing well. Yes, maybe just a follow-up on the last part around specialized. I was curious around the volume growth guidance that you’re baking in on the specialized segment for mid to high single digit growth. And presumably that would bake in automotive getting quite a bit better since that’s by far the largest business within specialized. So maybe just help frame that up a little bit more. It does seem like the demand backdrop for automotive is falling off. I understand there’s supply chain issues and restocking, but what’s really embedded in there for automotive as you look towards the back half of the year. And what are the drivers to get it better?

Yes, sure, Peter, thanks. And I don’t see the part of the consumer demand falling off think inventories are at all time lows, not only in the U.S. but around the world. So I think there’s still a big backlog of consumer demand. We got aging vehicles. So it’s going to take some time to work through that, which and as well as restock inventory. So I think that is a longer-term tailwind for the automotive sector. So I think that, that, that outlook just have a different viewpoint on in terms of how we see the year playing now really I think that if we look at the major markets vehicle production was down about 5% in the first quarter, of course we were just down one. So forecasted to be about flat in Q2 and then significantly improved about 20%, 21% in the third quarter and 6% or 7% in the fourth quarter. And that just kind of relates back to last year was stronger in the first half. And then Q3 of last year was the low point versus some recovery in this point. So overall for the major markets the full year is up about 4.8% in terms of production, so that get you to the mid single digits right there. Also benefit in that North America is up the most about 13% and Asia’s been pretty strong. As we mentioned the year has been the most impacted with the Ukraine invasion. But our mix is the smallest in Europe, about 17% and about 35% or so in North American and about a little less than 50% in Asia. So that favorable regional mix helps us. And we also think we’ll have some incremental awards that’ll help us, hopefully move beyond that mid-single digit points there. And then we also talked about the volume gains pretty significant in aerospace and PHC. And so while they’re smaller businesses – our hydraulic cylinders business, while they’re smaller, that’s helpful as well. So we feel like that mid to high single digit range, there is quite reasonable.

Okay. That’s very helpful detail. Separately, it did note that the EBITDA margin for the Furniture Flooring and Textile segment was up rather substantially about 230 basis points. Could you just walk us through the drivers to that and is that type of improvement sustainable?

Yes. It’s just a great job by our team there really glad to see that. But Steve, do you want to jump in on that one?

Yes. Good morning, Peter. Yes. Every business in this segment was extremely disciplined in their approach to understanding their costs and using pricing to offset inflation for not just raw materials, but labor and freight throughout the quarter and to this border. So that’s the primary actions on top of the – as Mitch mentioned the volume growth in work furniture offsetting some of the slowdowns and the other behaves, but it’s really the pricing discipline to those businesses.

Okay. Great. Maybe I’ll sneak in just one last one. So understand everything that’s going on with the bedding market and the recent slowdown in demand. You’re not the only firm that’s expecting more stability in the back half. But I want to dig in more into the specialty foam because the volumes there were down 20% and it just doesn’t feel like the market is nearly down that much. So is there some share loss going on with specialty foam? What’s really happening with that segment, particularly in light of recent anti-dumping duties, that seems like they should be shifting production back to the U.S.?

Tyson, I’ll let you take that one. I know you’ve been working on that.

Sure. Good morning, Peter. Yes. I understand the question. And we do feel like there are some additional headwinds in that part of our business, just with the customer base that we served there has been a bit more challenging of late. I’ve heard others talk about this and we agree the cost of acquisition where we typically service a lot of customers in the e-commerce channel has gone up. And that seems to have been more challenged of late than even the more traditional channels. So that’s certainly been a factor. Do feel like we’re still working through some of the issues that we faced last year when we had shortages of chemicals and foam and had to fortunately place our customers on allocations and so still working our way through that part of it as well. Our team’s been working really hard to pivot and diversify our customer base as well. As our chemicals have become more stable, we’ve also been returning to sell more products outside even bedding into furniture products, also working with our customers on expanding their channel reach and some new products that help us there as well. So doing what we can, but that is an area where we have faced some additional headwinds of late.

Okay. Very helpful. Thanks a lot guys. And good luck.

Thanks, Peter.

Thank you, Peter.

Thank you. We have next question from the line of Susan Maklari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Thank you. I just have a couple of follow-ups for you. One I guess is, across the call, you’ve definitely given some commentary on demand trends, and what you’re seeing across various end markets and channels in the business. But when you sort of take a step back and you think about the consumer overall, because I think that there is a lot of concern about their health and their ability to continue to spend at the levels that we’ve seen more recently. What are you seeing in the business? How are you thinking about the overall health of the consumer? And I guess then on the other side as well, it seems like from your commentary that the industrial side of your business has definitely strengthened and are seeing some healthier levels of demand. And so I guess, one, is that right? And how are you thinking about those trends and maybe what is coming through there? And I guess, also any commentary on Aerospace and any moves in the quarter in terms of those end markets?

Okay. Thanks, Susan. There’s a lot to look at. On the consumer trends, I mean, that’s the big question out there, right, for everybody. And we watch it closely. It’s particularly impactful to us in Bedding and in Home Furniture, and as you said, some of those more consumer-facing businesses. But we are concerned about the impact of inflation. And as Tyson mentioned, that is holding pretty steady, and then with the sort of shock in gas prices in the U.S. and North America, I would say, and then the conflict overall, the impact on Europe, right, that we did see some softening there. But we’ll see what’s happened -- what will happen, I think, that if inflation starts to stabilize and maybe come down a little bit, people have still been spending. I mean, we saw it even in this last quarter, with GDP down, when you go through the details, consumer spending was still pretty decent level. So it is a big question. I think we are, I guess, optimistic that while it might soften a little bit, that it doesn’t just fall apart. So, I think that’s reflected in our guidance. I think we have a very realistic outlook for how we put those numbers together. I think you’re also right that the industrial side of the business is picking up, and it’s great to see that. We saw a very strong demand in Aerospace. We’ve seen improved demand in Hydraulic Cylinders for some time and optimistic about what we see happening in Automotive. And while, I guess, not directly industrial, even improvement in the contract side of our Work Furniture business. But Steve, do you want to add some more detail or color around Aerospace or Hydraulic Cylinders?

Sure. Our customers are continuing to project demand increase through 2022, as Mitch said, [indiscernible] our assembly business is operating at historical levels and the tubing business is recovering, still lower than normal, but we’re now having that manpower to fill that demand, so that feels good. There is a little uncertainty with the Ukraine invasion. But with that being said, the Steel Group, which is the industry expert, expects overall market increase of 22% this year, and aircraft backlogs remain high. So, I think as the industry works through the recovery, we’re going to see that continued improvement there. From a Hydraulics perspective, our OEM forecasts are really strong for the rest of the year, but we’re seeing short-term volatility due to all the reasons that we talked about, such as raw material availability, transportation, and labor, but we did see production kick up pretty significantly in March, which is encouraging. We’re not sure how sustainable that is in the face of the challenges, but the backlog has been above historical levels for 17 consecutive months. And it really is – it’s sitting at 16 months of backlog right now. That will take several quarters to work down minimally if they’re able to maintain the March levels of production. So like there’s some stability through this year anyway.

Okay. That’s very helpful. And I guess, just following up on that a bit, when you look at the pricing power, I mean, you’re continuing to see some really exceptional levels of pricing across the business, and especially coming up against some really tough comps in there, which I think really speaks to your ability to realize that and be able to offset the inflation in there. But as you look out, how do you think about the puts and takes of that? Meaning, is there any sort of kind of negative mix shift that you’re seeing? Or how do you think about sustaining volume versus prices we do go forward? And anything that could come through from that perspective?

Yes, it’s a great question. I’d take a couple of things, and Tyson, I’ll let you chime in on this. We talked about it the other day. But no, we’re not seeing negative mix shift at this point, but there are opportunities, right? If increased inflation does start restricting consumer demand that we can work with our customers to improve some of that. But I would say the baseline increases in raw materials and labor costs and transportation costs are so extreme and have been over the last couple of years that it’s not a situation where you’re fighting with your customer to say, well, you should absorb them because it’s just too much. And so I think across about all of the end markets that has been passed through like really, I’ve never seen it before, because it’s big enough that it has to be. But Tyson, I’ll let you add to that.

Yes. No, Mitch, I totally agree. I mean it’s been a global event and at levels that can’t be simply absorbed. And I think the industry, all the way through the value chain, has done a good job recognizing the magnitude of the impacts and passing it through. But it’s definitely something that we’re watching. We know our customers are watching it as well. And I do think that’s part of our value proposition with our customers. We’ve always worked with them to understand substitute product options and also value engineering options to help them work through other material efficiency options to help offset some of this as well. I mean, that’s something we’ve done for a long time and are doing it right now, frankly. And that’s something that we definitely have to bring to the table for our customers as part of the advantage that we have.

Go ahead. I’m sorry.

I was just going to say it helps our customers and helps us as well, making sure volume is stable.

Yes, absolutely and I appreciate all that color and so I’ll end it there. That was very helpful though.

All right, thank you Susan.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. And I’d like to turn the floor back to Susan McCoy for closing comments. Over to you.

Susan, are you there?

Susan, over to you for closing comments.

I’m sorry I did that again this quarter. I’m sorry. Thank you for joining us today. We’ll speak to you again on August 2 after we report our second quarter results. If you have questions in the meantime, please contact us using the information in yesterday’s press release. Thank you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.