Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the O-I Glass Third Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Chris Manuel, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.

Thank you, Laurence, and welcome, everyone, to the O-I Glass third quarter conference call. Our discussion today will be led by Andres Lopez, our CEO; and John Haudrich, our CFO. Today, we will discuss key business developments and review our financial results. Following prepared remarks, we will host a Q&A session. Presentation materials for this call are available on the company's website. Please review the safe harbor comments and disclosure of our use of non-GAAP financial measures included in those materials. I'd now like to turn the call over to Andres, who will start on Slide 3.

Good morning, everyone. I appreciate your interest in O-I Glass. We are pleased to report third quarter adjusted earnings of $0.58 per share. Despite a number of macro challenges, O-I is once again delivering on its commitments as earnings exceeded our guidance range. Demand for glass containers is strong, yet our shipments were down about 1% in the quarter due to choppy demand patterns, they’re stemming from low inventory levels and ongoing global supply chain issues. On the other hand, production levels rebounded nicely from the prior year, which was impacted by the final stages of mandatory curtailments at the onset of the pandemic. Also, higher selling prices and the benefits of our revenue optimization initiative fully offset elevated cost inflation. Overall, better-than-expected results primarily reflected the strong operating performance and cost management, enabled by our margin expansion initiatives. As we will discuss shortly, we're making great progress on our 2021 priorities, including today's announcement of intent to sell our Le Parfait brand and business at an attractive valuation as part of our Portfolio Optimization program. We are also accelerating O-I's transformation as we shared at our Investor Day last month. The combination of favorable market conditions for glass containers, O-I's ongoing transformation and the introduction of MAGMA is building the path to Yes. Yes, to an agile and resilient company. Yes, to a new paradigm for glass. And Yes to profitable growth. We are confident this plan will enhance value for all our stakeholders and ensure sustainable prosperity for O-I. If you haven't already, we encourage you to view our Investor Day presentation, which can be found on our website. Reflecting good momentum, we are increasing our full year earnings outlook. We now anticipate 2021 adjusted earnings will range between $1.77 and $1.82 per share, and we expect at…

Thanks, Andres, and good morning, everyone. I plan to cover a few topics today, including recent performance, progress on our capital structure, as well as our current 2021 business outlook. I'll start with a review of our third quarter performance on Page 6. O-I reported adjusted earnings of $0.58 per share. As noted during our Investor Day, we expected results would be at the high end or slightly exceed our guidance of $0.47 to $0.52. Stronger results reflected good operating momentum as we exited the quarter. Segment operating profit was $243 million, which significantly exceeded prior year. Higher selling prices fully offset elevated cost inflation linked to higher energy and freight costs. While demand remains strong, sales volumes dipped 1% due to choppy demand and ongoing chain challenges in several markets we serve. Likewise, favorable cost performance was driven by an 8% improvement in production levels as the prior year was impacted by force curtailment due to lockdown measures. Cost performance also reflected continued good operating performance and benefits from our margin expansion initiatives. The slide includes additional details of non-operating items. Overall, we are pleased with favorable performance trends. Moving to Page 7. We have provided more informant by segment. In the Americas segment, profit was $133 million, up from $113 million last year. Despite significant cost inflation pressures, favorable net price reflected timely pass-through on costs and the benefits of our revenue optimization initiatives. Sales volume was down 3%. In particular, we have seen some food categories rebalance as on-premise reopens, but food volume still remains above pre-pandemic levels. Likewise, we have intentionally mixed managed certain low-value categories given tight inventory conditions and ongoing supply chain challenges. On the other hand, production rebounded 9% and earnings benefited from good ongoing operating performance as well as our margin expansion…

Thanks, John. Let me wrap up with a few comments on Slide 10. Overall, we are pleased with our performance during the third quarter. Importantly, O-I continues to achieve its commitments despite a number of macro challenges and uncertainties. I believe this represents a step change improvement in our ability to consistently perform and deliver. At the same time, we continue to advance our key priorities for 2021. Our multi-year margin expansion initiatives are gaining steam, MAGMA is advancing and we continue to improve our structure. We are now a much more agile and resilient organization that is well-positioned to accelerate our transformation. Finally, we're building the path to Yes, that we outlined last month at our Investor Day. Thank you for your interest in O-I, and we welcome your questions.

Laurence, we're ready.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of George Staphos from Bank of America.

My questions will be around pricing related to the choppy volume environment as you termed it. So you gave us a little bit of color, but could you dig a bit more deeply in terms of what is, in fact, happening in terms of the supply chain and what it's doing to your volume? What amount of earnings might you have lost because of the choppy patterns? And then as we look to '22 as you're trying to recover inflation through your pricing, what are the risks that this volume environment prevents you from doing that? Particularly as regards to Europe, what's the setup on European pricing?

Yes, George. So the -- looking at the supply chain issues, we have external factors and we have internal factors, too. In the external factors, as an example, when customers are facing inputs issues, they don't get their inputs on time, they tend to reduce our orders or delay our orders. The -- when they're facing truck availability is the same thing or labor issues. Internally, we are limited by inventories in several markets. As you know, Andy has been running tight. Brazil too, Mexico is the same. In some cases, depending on the mix in North America is also the case. Important to highlight that the food category has been rebasing as we have been going through the shift from off-premise to on-premise. Now it's also important to highlight that for that one, we're seeing the category retaining the gain versus pre-pandemic levels. And as we mentioned in the opening remarks, we're also taking action, mix managing some business, giving priority to margin and return. The -- as we go into 2022, we've been very active managing to be able to offset inflation. We're doing it in several fronts, in the procurement side that we're doing it in the commercial side. From a procurement perspective, we have very solid policies in place and actions to mitigate and we are executing on them. From a commercial perspective, we already have our plans for price increases going into the following year. We see a constructive environment for prices in 2022, and we expect to fully recover inflation.

George, I would add one other thing you had asked, what's the impact on the third quarter of these supply chain impacts and things like that. We had expected going into the quarter that volumes would be flat to up 2%. They were down 1%. So I think you can attribute that difference of say, 2% or 3% differential, mostly to the supply chain-related issues in one format or another. So it's having a marginal impact, but it's noticeable.

Yes. And going into '22, the -- just to complement, George, the demand fundamentals are very solid. And just referring to Europe, which you asked for, the demand in champagne and Bordeaux wine is very strong. Demand for Prosecco and Italian wine is also very strong. We're seeing a very good recovery of mineral water as the on-premise channel resume activity. And beer is growing quite well in key markets for us in Western Europe. So we're seeing high single-digit growth for beer in glass in Italy, France and the U.K., which are a very relevant market for us. So with those solid fundamentals, we don't see any issue for our price increases. We're very confident we're going to fully recover inflation going into 2022.

Your next question comes from the line of Ghansham Panjabi from Baird.

This is actually Matt Krueger sitting in for Ghansham. How are you doing this morning?

Matt, Thank you.

Great. So there's been some recent conversation about magnesium limitations causing supply shortages in aluminum, which is obviously a substrate that you compete with directly on several levels. If these shortages were indeed to come to fruition, how quick is O-I specifically to handle any potential volume that might flow into glass that's now being serviced by aluminum cans? And have you guys thought about what the potential benefit could be from that angle? Any details or thoughts there as far as capacity availability would really help?

Yes. So at this point in time, we are operating at high utilization levels, and that's why during Investor Day, we laid out a 3-year plan for capacity expansions. So we believe those expansions are timely. The markets that we are addressing through the expansions are quite strong. And through that plan, we expect to address the issue that you highlighted.

Your next question comes from the line of Anthony Pettinari from Citi.

It's actually Bryan Burgmeier sitting in for Anthony. On the price cost recovery in 2022, how much of what you're assuming is already secured via contracts in place and it's just a matter of timing getting caught up? And how much needs to be recovered in contracts yet to be negotiated?

Yes. I would say -- this is John. Between 55% and 60% of our business across the globe is covered under some form of long-term agreement, and those long-term agreements include price adjustment formulas. So that part of it is established going into the next year. The other, call it, 40% to 45% is open market that tends to get renegotiated on an annual basis. The most obvious example of that is about 70% of the business in Europe is renegotiated on an annual basis, generally speaking, in the very early part of the year here. So that's the area that's a primary focus on price movement going into the new year in addition to the PAS.

Got it. That's very helpful. And on 4Q, can you parse out the drivers behind the negative price cost between energy, labor, freight, and raw materials? And then based on your contract structure, which of those buckets is going to be easiest and most difficult to recover next year?

So I would say that the -- clearly, the biggest issues that you're seeing is on the fuel side followed probably by the freight side. In that regard too, electricity comes through also, but it's a little bit more modulated. And then if you take a look at, in particular, the fuel side, which is the biggest driver of that, in North America, that is pretty much passed through on a monthly or quarterly basis. One of the reasons we've been able to keep up pretty well with price cost spread year-to-date is because in particular, in North America, you're able to have those quick timely pass-throughs. And in the Latin American markets, you generally see a pretty good timely pass-through inflation overall. I would say all of these inputs that we're seeing are ones that are broad-based across the market, where I think the -- as you can see, the supply chain is organizing around globally to pass-through those cost inflationaries. Again, very much square in the price adjustment formulas that we have for our business and obviously, a focus of the negotiations going forward.

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Wilde from Bank of Montreal.

I wonder, just going back to this European energy issue. If you can talk about what type of mechanisms you have in place to mitigate the impact of that on the European operations? Because it seems like it's -- Europe has really been the epicenter for the energy issue? And also whether those issues are having any impact on your ability to operate? In other words, if you can't get natural gas?

Yes. So the -- as I mentioned before, from a procurement standpoint, we have policies in place to mitigate this kind of price increases. I think we are in a good position as a result of that. We've been taking very effective actions. And we don't expect any issue because of that move and our commercial position going forward for which we have a very clear plan. When it comes to supply, it's very difficult to know what the winter is going to. Now if it is -- let's assume that it is a normal winter with nothing out of the normal pattern, the -- when we consider the markets in which we are present, the suppliers we have and the contracts we have in place, we see very little risk for us to have a supply issue going through the winter. If things go stream, then we'll see what that is, and we'll adjust accordingly. But at this point in time, we don't expect for our operations based on our location and as I mentioned, suppliers and contracts to have a high risk or any risk really at this point for supply.

Okay. That's helpful. And Andres, if I could just one other one. We're hearing these stories on the public press about the shortage of glass bottles here in North America. Can you just unpack that for us a little bit and sort of how we've come to this point? Because it wasn't very long ago people across the industry, we're closing glass plants. And so I'm just curious, how much of this do you think is kind of trade and logistics issues? How much of this is the -- some of the duties on imported glass? What the -- all of the issues are? And then what you can do to kind of capitalize on the situation in the near term?

Yes. So the -- well, demand for glass is strong, and it has been increasing continuously increasing. In some cases, it comes in peaks that are difficult to serve. Now our inventories are tight. So that's compounding with that. The imported glass, in particular from China, has been coming down. So that adds to the problem. So now at this point, we are utilizing our capacity the best we can. As we mentioned before, mismanagement is important in these circumstances. So we can support margins and return. And then we're doing everything we can to improve productivity to be able to support this. And as you know, we also have establish a supply network across the Americas. And in some cases, we support the United States out of Mexico or even the Andean country, depending on seasonality and all that. So all of that is in place to take advantage of the situation as we can. Now from a customer perspective, we've been very actively working with the customers, collaborating with them well to minimize these issues. And we're confident that as we go into '22, we're going to be in a better position because our inventories are better established to be able to support them through their peaks.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Leithead from Barclays.

First, I wanted to follow up on the supply chain side of things and particularly on the external factors of your customers that Andres, I think, you laid out well like labor, trucking or other material shortages. Have your customers given you a sense? Or do they even have visibility, frankly, on how those factors should trend into the fourth quarter or '22? I'm just trying to get a sense of whether they're easing or staying the same as we sit here today?

Yes. So the -- these supply chain issues are widespread, they're across industries and they're impacting everyone. I think what is good in our case is our relationships with customers are in a very good place and our coordination is very strong. So that gives us the ability to respond better. And as I mentioned before, because of that work, we expect that we will be able to better manage through these situations going into 2022. Also knowing their actual needs based on the growing demand, we can also plan better for this supply across the Americas network, which we are leveraging to the best we can to support the supply for our customers.

Great. That's super helpful. And maybe as a follow-up for John. Looking at the '22 outline, and I appreciate it's still early and there's a ton of moving parts. But I wanted to ask about the free cash flow conversion. I guess, should we still think about that kind of 20% to 25% of conversion rate from EBITDA before the step-up in growth CapEx? Just how should we think about that flow through next year?

Yes. I think, Telly, we're introducing a new measure we call adjusted free cash flow. And so that takes -- it looks just at the maintenance capital. I think when you take a look at that adjusted free cash flow as a percent of EBITDA, you're actually looking at a number higher than that because it's just the maintenance capital component of it, is something probably north of 30% on adjusted free cash flow conversion.

Your next question comes from the line of Kyle White from Deutsche Bank.

I think you mentioned about headwinds in regards to your volumes on food, specifically in the United States as at-home consumption wanes. Do you have a sense of how much incremental food volumes you gained throughout the pandemic, that could potentially pose a headwind going forward as at-home consumption wanes?

So food went up during the pandemic double digits, right? It was a very strong peak because of that at-home consumption. What we're seeing right now is that, that peak obviously came back down because on-premise channel is already open. However, we're keeping important gains versus pre-pandemic level. So at this point, we're seeing between 3% and 4% incremental volume versus those layers. So premium is -- excuse me, food is quite healthy because of the focus of the consumers on premium products, and this is happening across all categories.

Yes. And the studies we've looked at and reviewed indicate that, that is a longer-term trend is that some level of premiumization continued at-home living focus is going to be there. So most project some form of continuation of that type of demand structure.

Your next question comes from the line of Salvator Tiano from Seaport Research.

Firstly, can you provide in the Americas refiner print on your shipments by region, by more specific regions? And also why despite that shortfall, what data points give you confidence that demand is actually very even though shipments were down 2%?

Yes. So the -- in the U.S., I'll give you a few data points. When we look at both channels on-premise and off-premise through Nielsen data and CGA, the statistics, we're seeing interesting performance, for example, in beer, which is up like 2%, spirits is up like 13% and premium wine around 10%. So what that means is, even with the channel rebalancing, the demand for those products is quite good, and those products are very well aligned with glass. Domestic beer decline has improved. We are at half the rate we used to be out of a small base. So the impact is going down in our system, and international beer brands and premium beer are mostly offsetting that decline. Now we continue to diversify away from domestic beer, and we've been successful doing that. That's why we're seeing the growth in food, as an example. And as I mentioned before, the imports from China are lower than before. So that's also increasing local supply. When I look at the Andean countries, Mexico, Brazil. In the 3 of those -- in the 3 of them, there is very solid performance across all categories. Mexico, in particular, strong local demand for food and NABs. But then exports for beer, tequila and NABs out of Mexico are quite strong. In the Andean, beer performance is strong due to premium beer and global beer brands and one-way glass is growing. Also food is strong out of the Andean countries driven by exports. In the case of Brazil, we're seeing a good performance of returnable glass is back to pre-pandemic levels, is 40% of the total beer category. And we're seeing new products in returnable glass in Brazil, which is a very good indication of how premium products are important for these markets. One-way glass is up at 9% of a -- share compared to 6% or 7% before, so it's increasing. And premium products are 22% higher than pre-pandemic levels. So those markets are doing really well. We are limited by capacity, but as we explained before, as part of the 3-year plan, we are adding capacity to all those markets to take advantage of these opportunities.

Okay. Great. And my second question is on your CapEx plan. I thought that your strategic investments would be more geared towards 2023 and '24. And in terms of your strategic CapEx number, almost $300 million is 40% of strategic CapEx, you said you would spend over the 3-year period. So did something change? Did you decide to spend more capital upfront because you're seeing opportunities?

No. This is very much in line with, I believe, what we laid out during Investor Day. What we're going to do is we're going to see CapEx ramp up here in 2022, kind of peak in 2023 and ebb off in 2024 on the strategic capital side. I think what we're referring to is the sales volumes that we're realizing are going to ramp up ratably -- I mean, more back-end loaded as the capacity comes online, in the 2023 and 2024 window. So this is all consistent with the planning, nothing has changed. And the thing I would add too is that, I guess, also consistent with what we said in I-Day is that the portfolio optimization activities also be front-end loaded here so that we anticipate having the cash in-house on those transactions before the cash goes out for the CapEx that we spend on the strategic capital side.

Your next question comes from the line of Alton Stump from Loop Capital.

I just wanted to ask, it was pretty clear from your press release and also comments this morning that you had to walk away from some lower margin business here in the U.S. during the third quarter. Is that a short-term impact? Or how much longer do you think that can last where you're not going to be able to satisfy a portion of your customer base?

Yes. So the margin management that we did was primarily due to inventory -- spots and inventory shortfalls that we had or things are getting a little bit low because supply chain issues and the strong ramp-up after the markets opened up again. And what we're seeing is that, in certain categories, in certain parts of the geographies, we just don't have the inventories that we would ideally have for that original mix of business. So what we're doing is we're managing the mix of our business to be able to take advantage of the inventories that are in the system and be able to capitalize on the strong demand for glass. This is a transitory issue, but it's not something that goes away in one quarter, for example.

Your next question comes from the line of Arun Viswanathan from RBC Capital.

Hello?

Laurence, let's move to the next one.

Your next question comes from the line of Adam Josephson from KeyBanc.

One on -- just one on earnings and then one on your cash flow outlook. On the earnings, John, just a month ago, you talked about earnings being at the high end or slightly higher than the $0.47 to $0.52. It turned out to be a fair bit higher than that. I assume it was not because of volume, inflation is obviously not getting any better. So can you just help me understand what led to the pretty sizable beat relative to what you would seem to indicate a month ago, but wasn't on the volume side?

Yes, yes, sure. Yes, exactly. The numbers proved out to be better than we were anticipating that this pointed to September being a good strong month for the business. In particular, what we saw very good labor efficiency. The quality performance of the business was very, very good and a number of asset projects that we had underway actually wrapped up a little bit earlier and a lower cost at the end of the day than we originally intended. So very good operating performance across those major levers towards the end of the quarter.

Got it. And just on free cash flow. If I try to do a free cash flow bridge. So this year, you're thinking $260-plus million maybe, call it, $280-ish million. CapEx plus working capital, I would think, would be about a $300 million drag year-over-year, such that if earnings are up a bit, you're talking about flattish or basically negligible free cash. Correct me if I'm wrong there. And then in the subsequent 2 years, CapEx will step down a bit, but it will still be, call it, $640 million. So I'm just wondering can you help me with what you're thinking free cash -- not adjusted for cash flow, but actual free cash flow over the next 3 years or so? Am I thinking about it the right way? Or am I missing something?

Well, for one thing, we're not going to -- we're not a today getting into specific numbers on 2022 and 2023 and beyond. But I think what we're saying here is that the reported free cash flow will dip some here in the next couple of years. We expect it to remain positive, okay, but it will dip some because of the strategic capital and then ramp up. But to the previous conversations we've had is that we do think that, that additional strategic capital that's in there is fully funded by the portfolio optimization actions that we're doing, such as like the sale of the Le Parfait business that we announced today. we think the net effect of those actions is about $50 million to $60 million of additional EBIT run rate as we get the improved margin management as a result of those businesses as we ramp up to something where it's more self-sustaining going forward on incremental growth driven by MAGMA over the longer term.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Roxland from Truist Securities.

Just quickly on the revenue optimization initiatives you mentioned and how that is impacting pass-throughs. Obviously, the company has done a lot of work around upgrading its sales, marketing and innovation capabilities. The company is obviously going through analyzing each account to make sure it receives the profit value for the Ford products. So just wondering, can you talk about what you've done specifically in the quarter and how the revenue authorization missions actually benefited the pass-through?

Yes. So as you mentioned, the -- this is one of the margin expansion initiatives. It is really about leveraging the capabilities we built over the last few years to improve our top line. So what happens in the top quarter is really the product of the work that we've done over the quarters. And frankly, over time, setting up things to be able to capitalize better on the top line opportunities. We have quite sophisticated tools in place. At this point, we have processes that are also very well established. So there is lots of rigor and discipline around the top line. And that's what helped us with Q4.

Yes, I would just -- just for good…

Q3, sorry about that.

Just a good clarity. I mean, our revenue -- I mean, our margin expansion initiatives has 3 major projects, revenue optimization, which we're discussing here. in the quarter, there is probably between $5 million and $10 million of benefits associated that helped through the spread and it's consistently been performing very well. We also have, on the cost side, our factory performance as well as our cost transformation, which is more on the SG&A side. All of those added incremental benefits to. But then, of course, we net those things that are working against us. For example, freight was about a $10 million headwind in the quarter. So we had about $10 million of net margin expansion initiatives out of those 3 buckets when you net it off against that incremental freight costs. So we want to make sure that we're looking at something that's a net benefit to the organization.

Got it. And then just one quick question on the mix management. Obviously, given -- John, you mentioned the inventory tightness and something that you expect this inventory -- this mix management is ultimately correct. Is it also a matter of fact that maybe given the supply chain, given your inventory as you look at all the accounts, your customer accounts, are you walking away from certain businesses that just aren't profitable at this point? Given your customers on your products, maybe they need to pay you for it. And at this point, given the inventory tightness you're saying, you know what, you're not giving us appropriate value. We don't need your business. We're going to go elsewhere. And maybe this is a permanent shift in your business to more higher quality mix than you than you had historically?

Yes. So yes, that's the focus. So we're giving priority to margin and return. And as we navigate through all these various challenges, that is a very important criteria we're using to define what is a priority for us.

Yes. I think you got all of the above going on. There are some places where you're looking at the inventories, right, and saying, "Hey, I don't have that specific inventory and I'm going to shift away to this other category because you do have the inventory and some that are permanent changes in mix." I mean in North America, commented over the time, we've actually transitioned about 35% of our beer capacity to other categories over the last several years of spirits to wines, to food categories and things like that. And that is always ongoing to make sure that we can continue to shift our capacity to better margin business.

Your next question comes from the line of Gabe Hajde from Wells Fargo.

I wanted to comment the inflation question, I guess, from a couple of different angles. The first is I'm assuming the answer is yes, but have you guys kind of gone through sort of the total cost of ownership calculations kind of taking into account a new baseline of where raw materials are today? I'm kind of thinking about, obviously, aluminum that's almost doubled when we include aluminum premiums, warehousing, et cetera. And then again, I'm kind of asking in the context of these dual control policies that China might be putting into place that could imply kind of structurally higher aluminum costs go forward. So to the extent that it makes glass packaging a more cost-competitive alternative then is that something you guys have been looking at? And I guess, corollary to that, MAGMA in theory should improve that even more. What does initial customer response been since you guys kind of announced this aggressive expansion?

Yes. So let me just give you one perspective on that and John can complement to. One of the advantages of glass is that the supply chain for glass is mostly local. And that has 2 very important impacts. One is cost, the other one is environment. So when you look at the dynamics that you described, they're related to global supply chains that are very large in nature, that support those substrates that are demanded from multiple places and are creating those pressures. But that's not the case of glass. As you know, we melt glass in the same facility in which we converted to containers. So our supply chain is very integrated with very important implications on cost and very important implications of sustainability.

Yes. As far as…

Go ahead, John.

I was just going to add -- just going to add one point there, Gabe, to your original question is that how do we go in price? How do we look at the opportunities in the marketplace? We clearly price based upon market. We are not a cost-plus producer. So clearly, we look at the competitive landscape across opportunities to make sure that we price accordingly to get value relative to the competing opportunities. And then the other question you had was what has been the initial customer reaction been on MAGMA. And I would say it's been very good. With the intent to expand our business, I think that's been very well received by customers in many markets we've talked about for some time is we run against capacity constraints. So everybody is very, very encouraged that we're working with that there's new opportunities coming around the corner. And I think they responded very well to the capabilities that we're laying out on the table with MAGMA because it just fits so well with the market realities that all of our customers are facing in today's world.

And then one more aspect on MAGMA. MAGMA will help glass production and supply to become even more local because we can co-locate or near locate. And we can also scale down that capacity to be able to follow growth but at the same time, protect the economies of scale, which is a significant change for the industry.

I think this will be the last question, Laurence?

Yes sir, we have a follow-up question from Ghansham Panjabi from Baird.

Thanks a lot for letting me hop back in the queue. This is Matt Krueger again on Ghansham. Understanding that the tight capacity situation can mitigate the opportunity here a little bit. But I wanted to touch on what you're seeing in the hard seltzer market. We're starting to see some marketing campaigns and advertising come out with glass as a packaging substrate in that market. And obviously, there's been a lot made about the slowdown there on the can side of things. Can you just talk about what your penetration level is in the hard seltzer ready-to-drink market and maybe what you see the opportunity being moving forward across your business?

Yes. So the hard seltzer category is only an upside for glass. So our current share is very, very small. However, the attributes of glass, which makes it very good for branding, is a perfect fit for what is going on in that category, which there is a significant proliferation of presentation confusing the consumer. So that's one of the things that we're seeing the customer doing and that's why they need products. Now the category is slowing down. Obviously, that's lower demand than previously expected by the suppliers that are supplying currently that category for the most part. Now when it comes to where the capacity of cans go and the capacity of Glasgow, it's very important to highlight what we brought up during I-Day. Glass and aluminum cans play in different lanes of product categories. And the products that are driving the demand of aluminum cans are products in which we are not present. So if anything, our upside for us if we get into them, but there are several other categories that are really driving the demand for glass, and in particular, they move towards premium in all those categories.

All right. Thanks. That concludes our earnings call. Please note that our fourth quarter and year-end call is currently scheduled for February 2, 2022. And remember, join team glass by making a memorable moment in choosing safe, sustainable glass. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.