Good afternoon. Thank you for attending today's Planet Labs PBC Second Quarter of Fiscal 2024 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Alexis, and I will be your moderator for today's call. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call, with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to pass the conference over to Chris Genualdi, VP of Investor Relations. You may proceed.

Thanks, operator, and hello, everyone. Welcome to Planet's second quarter of 2024 earnings call. Before we begin today's call, we'd like to remind everyone that we may make forward-looking statements related to future events or our financial outlook. We also reference qualified pipeline, which represents potential sales leads that have not yet executed contracts. Any forward-looking statements are based on management's current outlook, plans, estimates, expectations and projections. The inclusion of such forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by Planet, that future plans, estimates or expectations will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, and assumptions as detailed in our SEC filings, which can be found at www.sec.gov. Our actual results or performance may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements and we undertake no responsibility to update such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. During the call, we will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making, and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. We believe that these measures provide useful information about operating results, enhance the overall understanding of past financial performance and future prospects, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making. For more information on the non-GAAP financial measures, please see the reconciliation tables provided in our press release issued earlier this afternoon. Further, throughout this call, we provide a number of key performance indicators used by management and often used by competitors in our industry. These and other key performance indicators are discussed in more detail in our press release. Before we jump in, I'd like to encourage everyone to reference the slides we have posted on our Investor Relations website, which are intended to accompany our prepared remarks. Finally, for each of the customer contracts referenced during this call, please note that the revenue figures we cite will generally be recognized over the term of the contract, which can last multiple years. Further, the terms of these contracts can vary, we may not realize all expected revenue. At this time, I'd now like to turn the call over to Will Marshall, Planet's CEO, Chairperson and Co-founder. Over to you. Will.

Thanks, Chris, and hello, everyone. Thanks for joining the call today. For the second quarter of fiscal year 2024, we generated a record $53.8 million in revenue, representing a 11% year-over-year growth, in line with our expectations. Non-GAAP gross margin came in at 52%, above the high end of our expected range. Our adjusted EBITDA loss for the quarter was $14.5 million, also better than expected, reflecting company-wide focus on operational efficiency. We ended the second quarter with 944 unique customers, spanning across defense, civil government and commercial markets. Today, we'll cover a number of items, including recent organizational changes, M&A, sales wins and product developments. So, let's dive in. Starting with the organizational changes. In Q2, we undertook significant efforts to focus and optimize resources in support of sustainable, long-term growth and profitability. Firstly, on August 1st, we announced a headcount reduction that led to an approximately 10% reduction in force. This was a difficult decision, but one that ultimately better positions Planet to the opportunity ahead of us. Our business has scaled rapidly over the last 18 months and while we see the market for our solutions continuing to expand, an increased breadth of projects and people resulted in increased cost and complexity. We expect this action will support greater focus, agility and operational efficiency across our organization. On product engineering priorities, we are pacing the buildout of our next-generation satellite fleets to optimize our resources and support our one-year payback targets for the satellites. I'll cover recent milestones achieved in our Pelican and Tanager program shortly. And one area we're investing more behind is AI. We are seeing promising signs of commercial opportunity in AI, which I'll cover in a moment. We're also actively strengthening our go-to-market strategy. This itself has three components. One, aligning our teams…

All right, thank you, Will, and thanks everyone for joining today. As Will mentioned, our revenue for the second quarter of fiscal '24 ending July 31st came in at a record $53.8 million, which represents 11% year-over-year growth. Our revenue for Q2 does not include any revenue from the Sinergise acquisition, which closed in August, a little later than we had originally anticipated. On our prior call, we highlighted the record amount of qualified pipeline opportunities generated in Q1, which was more than double the quarterly average of the prior year. We remain pleased with the pace of qualified pipeline generation during the second quarter, reflecting the growing demand we continue to see for our solutions. In particular, civil government pipeline growth has been especially robust, driven by applications such as disaster prevention and emergency response, fueled unfortunately by the climate crisis that continues to unfold around the Planet. In addition to agricultural and land use management and permitting, as Will mentioned earlier, we're also seeing emerging opportunities in civil government for water monitoring and management applications, which our Planetary Variable solutions address directly. We were pleased to see a number of the seven-figure deals in our pipeline closed in Q2 across multiple vertical markets, and the teams continued to make progress against some of the even larger eight-figure opportunities that have emerged both for AI and sustainability related use cases. As of the end of Q2, recurring ACV, or annual contract value, was 92% of our book of business. Over 90% of our book of business consists of annual or multi-year contracts and our average contract length continues to be approximately two years, weighted on an ACV basis. Net dollar retention rate, which we measure relative to the book of business at the beginning of each fiscal year, was…

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Michael Latimore with Northland. You may proceed.

Thanks very much. So on the -- you mentioned the government verticals, maybe, seeing a little delay there, is that more international or US? Can you give some color on that? And if the US government gets back into kind of this continuing resolution pattern, how do you think about that, I guess, affecting the business?

I think it is both. But just one point on that, just typically, government deals do take a little bit longer, because we got so much of our pipeline on the government side, both civil government, which actually is a big factor of it, as well as defense and intelligence. It does take a little bit longer to close, because the nature of those deals and those complex processes. Ashley, anything to add on that about the international versus domestic?

I think we're seeing it on both per Will's point. The budget challenges in DC certainly don't help companies that are selling to the US government. But we still continue to win business there. And by example, we recently did win a deal with the Space Force and another US agency. So, business is continuing and will continue to do so in spite of a continuing resolution, but nonetheless, we do see sales cycles elongating, generally speaking, in the government sector.

Got it. And then, it seems like you're announcing a nice number of seven-figure deals. Do you have the latest stats on the seven-figure deal count now versus a year ago or something like that?

Yeah, actually, I mean, we do have a huge pipeline of qualified opportunities. I can share that we've actually got 70 deals, seven or eight figure, in our qualified pipeline today. And so, we've got a huge opportunity to go after. So that continued to expand that pipeline of opportunity in Q2.

Yeah. And just in general, seven-figure deals in our business have grown year-over-year quite well. So, we'll talk about more of those stats at our Analyst Day.

Okay, pretty good. Okay, thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question. Your next question comes from the line of Jason Gursky with Citigroup. You may proceed.

Hey, good afternoon, everybody. Ashley, a quick one for you. You continue to reiterate the profitability breakeven next fiscal year, by the end of the year there. Can you update us on your assumption related to revenue growth that's tied to that statement?

Well, I'd say we're committed to that regardless of revenue growth for next year. So obviously, getting to operating profitability is an important first step in getting to overall cash profitability. But, in terms of thinking about next year's growth, while we're not giving specific guidance at this point, I'd just remind you that this year, we did have some pretty significant headwinds coming into the year that we talked about from a growth rate perspective, and that included the large legacy contract that was about $12 million last year and contributed very little revenue this year, as well as some of the commercial customer contraction that we talked about, just given the general macroeconomic environment that we saw coming into the year. So, as we continue to build business this year, we'll be overcoming some of those difficult compares year-over-year, as we think about next year and the potential to really see the growth rate reaccelerate. But as I said, we're not relying on growth rate -- significant growth rate acceleration in order to get to that commitment to EBITDA breakeven.

Okay. And then, Will, on Pelican, you described, for lack of a better phrase here I guess, unit one, as a little bit more of the R&D prototype. I mean, that was the word that you used to test out some of the...

Tech demo, yeah.

...similarities, yeah, demo, there we go, that's the word, yeah, so that you can make sure that whatever you've got going on there, it's going to work with Sinergise as well. So, is the expectation here that this initial launch won't have any revenue associated with it, and they are just using it is kind of a test-bed?

I think that's correct. Yeah, I mean these are tech demos. I mean, the way we do we've described before agile aerospace approach, which is one of our core differentiators that enables us to rapidly improve capabilities overtime and respond to demand from the customers both in the sense of improving capabilities and ramping up the number of spacecraft we need for demand and continuity of our spacecraft mission. And always, through the history of developing new spacecraft, especially new spacecraft bus like the Pelican that supports both Pelican and Tanager, those are complicated new spacecrafts. So, the main thing we're doing on our first mission is establishing the spacecraft itself over the aspects of it, the reaction wheel within the solar panels and the radios and the computers and everything, work together. And that's the most important piece is getting data on all of that. And then subsequent ones we will turn into operational spacecraft.

Is it gonna go up with electro-optical sensor on it? You named everything, but the sensor...

No, it's going up with the payload, but just not in the prime mission of the spacecraft to drive that so much as to learn and improve that spacecraft path. And again, it will go up with a Pelican bus -- sorry, payload, i.e. the telescope, the high-resolution telescope. But mainly the bus that will also support the hyperspectral instrument for the Tanager mission that we next year -- I also mentioned that the hyperspectral instrument is nearing readiness now. So we're close on that one too.

I guess the last one for me...

Does that make sense to you? Yeah.

Yeah, it does. Yeah, for sure. I appreciate that. And then last one for me. Just turning quickly to the commercial side of things, we've got some new regulations going into effect in Europe to require companies that are bringing sourcing materials from other parts of the world to kind of prove out their supply chains, and how those impact deforestation that's going on around the world. Just kind of curious as to how do you see Planet playing in this and supporting companies that need to demonstrate to the EU regulators that the materials that they're sourcing are not leading to the deforestation in sensitive areas of the world.

Yeah, I mean, look -- thank you for raising this, because I mean it is -- we're seeing this sort of regulation from the EU, in particular the EUDR, the deforestation regulation that is looking at importing of commodities and ensuring that they don't cause deforestation as well, there's not many ways, at least, at scale that you can do this without our dataset. And our dataset is primed to check whether or not a commodity from a source is causing deforestation or not. So, how we plan to it, to answer your question is really, we have many agricultural companies that we're working to -- with who are trying to address this and how they will meet their regulatory requirements under this Act, which by the way I think comes into force next year. So it's not like -- it's not that far away. And the scale of the proposition, really demands our solution. Also though, we can work with the regulators themselves, which is the other side of that, because of course they want to check that the companies are doing what they say. So, we can play both sides of that.

All right. Okay, great. I'll pass the line. Appreciate the comments.

Thanks, Jason.

Thank you for your question. [Operator Instructions] Our next question will come from the line of Trevor Walsh with JMP Securities. You may proceed.

Great, thanks, team, for taking my questions. Will, maybe for you. From your prepared remarks, you mentioned the unfortunate kind of, I guess, uptick or at least deals coming off of some of the natural disasters that we've seen lately, whether it's fires in Maui or hurricanes and fires in Canada, et cetera. Do you get a sense or feel that those are state and local governments being very reactionary in their kind of use of turning to Planet for the data that you can provide to help with those types of issues? Or do you also see governments taking a more proactive nature to sort of bringing your solution beforehand before the problem actually becomes a problem? Just like to hear your thoughts on kind of if that's more of a kind of a one-off thing or something bad has to happen first for there to be an action taken.

Well, look, governments are beginning to see the value of this to really help them both in the response and prevention. Let me just touch on a tiny bit in the Maui case, I mean, which was just a terrible event. Our maps really helped in practical way. So, the Red Cross was using our data on the ground, in particular the map of all the building damage, as well as Hawaii state officials and even the President had a map with our -- our map in his hands when being briefed on this. So, across the board we're seeing real use of that data. And it's also, by the way, a great example of how AI can play a part, because this is making that data more useful for the people on the ground. It's not just a picture, it is a map of the building with the damage and that can help in quick response and prioritization on the ground. But to your point -- and one more point on that, the Canadian wildfires we're seeing a similar sort of reaction and that's why those -- there were those three customer deals in Canada that I mentioned in my prepared remarks. But to your point about prevention and I think that's a really critical one, we can do work to help civil governments prepare -- prevent and prepare for disasters. In fact, the work with the California -- I mentioned, with California on fires, is actually about for fire prevention by looking for the stocks for future fires that they can then do clearing in. And we are also working with our soil water content on giving pre-warnings of potential drought risk. Also you can help through that to provide flooding risk. And so some of these datasets can enable getting ahead. And as I mentioned, civil governments are spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year with these events. Sadly climate change is causing these extreme weather events to increase. And so that hundreds of billions is only going to go up. And we can help them save billions of dollars getting ahead of that. So, it stands the reason -- I mean, the civil governments are taking a while to pick this step up, but it is -- the pace is increasing and we've had -- we've got a significant fraction of that pipeline that I mentioned of seven- or eight-figure deals is civil government.

The other sector where obviously this data is of interest, especially around soil water content as well as soil temperature, is obviously the insurance sector. And that's both understanding risk models as well as thinking about preparedness for business continuity and business disruption.

Great. Thank you both for that color on that. Super helpful. Maybe just one more from me. With respect to the Sinergise acquisition closing, appreciate the perspective or the additional detail that the revenues might be coming in from that a little bit later than expected. Can you give us a sense of how customer numbers may or may not be adjusted? And I ask, given the fact that you had some nice acceleration in terms of the customer -- new customer adds in the quarter and just curious if that is reflective of the Sinergise acquisition at all or if those numbers are not necessarily included yet and how that might look.

None of the metrics that we provided from Q2 include Sinergise revenue or customer accounts. Obviously, Sinergise has a very large number of users on their Sentinel Hub platform in addition to a number of enterprise customers that will be coming over and government customers. So, we'll be updating those numbers and talking about how we roll those into our metrics at our Analyst Day.

And let me just broaden it out just a tiny bit to say that we are super excited by the acquisition closing. We really think it meaningfully accelerates our data platform strategy. And to my point about small deals in automation and how that's one of the components of speeding up time to value for customers and sales cycles, especially, and it's a way of dealing with smaller deals, enabling our AEs to focus on the big deals, Sinergise really helps with that as well. So it's a product accelerant and it's a sales accelerant.

Great. Thank you both for taking my questions.

No problem.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question. Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum. You may proceed.

Great, thanks. Thanks for taking my questions, guys. A couple. First just on Sinergise, I think the original number was around $7 million was the expectation. I guess it's going to be a little bit lower here, maybe a month lower, but what's the number there now in terms of expectation?

Sorry. I would give a range of about $4 million to $6 million for the year -- for the remainder of the year, sorry.

Okay. And then, just curious kind of the overall progression of the quarter as you move through the three months of the quarter. I mean, obviously, pipeline is massive as you've called out, but cycles seems like they're stretching and stretching. Just talk about kind of how you progressed and how the market felt as you moved through the quarter?

I don't think we can say anything in particular about how it moved through the quarter, but what I'd just highlight is that we are market making here and a lot of these governments have -- that we're bringing in a new capability to them and they've never done this before. And we don't understand that process fully. As we understand that, we are adapting, and that's why we're doing some of those changes to our go-to-market approach. So I just want to emphasize that even civil government, some of which, who have used satellite data before, they're changing the motion here from buying satellites and building satellites, to buying data. And in many cases, it's just a totally unique and new data product. And so, they haven't done this before. So, both we and they are learning through this. So it's more about a few bigger deals taking a bit longer and slipping out of the quarter. And we did have that -- some of that in Q2. Although I'd point out one of the biggest ones that we had that slipped out the quarter subsequently closed in a few weeks afterwards. So, it's still happening. But we are learning and understanding and adapting to those purchases.

And then, I guess as it relates to -- as a follow on to that is, as it relates to the guide, as I look through my numbers, the guide implicit for Q4 for the January '24 quarter is about $10 million, give or take, below me. I was roughly $68 million, it looks like it's roughly $58 million, $59 million at the mid-point, give or take, maybe a smidge lower, but close. Can you talk maybe even just to whatever degree you're willing to put some bands around it? In terms of that, call it, $8 million to $10 million Q4 revenue that went away, what were the drivers? I know you had the mega eight-figure deal that you've talked about that pushed out, presumably that's at play there. But even proportionately, can you talk about what's pushing out of Q4, kind of the breakdown of what's pushing out of Q4?

Yeah, Jeff. Thanks for the question and I tried to give a little bit of this color in my prepared remarks as we thought about guidance for the rest of the year. Obviously, as we get into the back half of the year, the timing of when deals close really impacts how much revenue we see from that business, especially if you factor in ramp time for new customers. So to take this into account and to avoid coming back again in a quarter and having subsequent changes in a similar way. On the low end of our range, we basically just assume very late timing for the closing of new business. So, very minimal revenue impact of these larger deals. And that's why you're seeing so much of an impact on Q4, because obviously, we do have business that we're continuing to progress and if those do close in Q3 or in early Q4, we would see revenue from them. So, really what we're attempting to do is look at what are the major drivers to revenue and how can we take that and -- take further timing changes into consideration, whether that's around very large renewals or very large new business. We've got strong line of sight to renewals and I feel very good about that side of the business, as I mentioned. But the timing of new business just continues to be a source of frustration for us. The teams worked really hard through the end of the quarter to try to bring that business in and subsequently driving at least one of those large deals to conclusion in August and getting it over the goal line. But as we thought about the range for revenue for the remainder of the year, it felt prudent to suggest that some of this business continues to push to the right in the same way even as the teams continue to work hard to close them.

Yeah, let me add. So, we are seeing, as we've discussed, the sales cycle still be long this quarter, mainly a few deals slipping out. And a lot of that sales cycle is to do with civil government and defense and intelligence just being longer. But on the positive side, we've also said last time that we had some impact on the size of deals coming in smaller, whereas actually we've seen that normalize back to what it was before. So that's a little bit of positive signal there.

Got it. Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Jeff.

Thank you for your question. The next question comes from the line of Ryan Koontz with Needham & Company. You may proceed.

Thanks for the question. Circling back to Sinergise, and I can sense the excitement you guys have for that in lowering friction and customer onboarding. Can you maybe give us a perspective of how Sinergise has sold to date and where they are now versus maybe where you want to take them at a high level in the future relative like 12 to 18 months timeframe, medium term? Thanks.

Well, I can start actually at a high level. We do see that their platform being utilized by civil government a fair bit. And we in fact even in our partnership prior to the acquisition, we're working quite regularly with them. I mentioned one other customer that we established this quarter in the UK Rural Payments Agency, and they're another example of using Sinergise together. And so, we were working on that obviously before close that we've seen in a number of deals. But -- so civil government is one area, but I don't know about the historical mixes, and if you want to mention anything about that. They do have a large number of small deals that they've done as a self-serve, thousands and thousands of smaller entities. So that was part of the goal of the Sentinel Hub effort that they have. But I don't know if you've got anything Ashley.

Yeah, what I would highlight is this is a company that really did not have any type of sales or marketing force. So, a lot was done by a handful of key employees in pursuing RFPs and -- on the civil government side, specifically as it related to land monitoring and some of the sustainable agriculture programs in the EU. And we are excited to bring the power of Planet sales force to bear and expanding the reach of those kind of direct sales efforts. Even as also the fact that Sentinel Hub is as popular platform as it is without having had a lot of marketing or any marketing around it. In fact, when we had our Explore Conference earlier in the year and we actually asked how many users in the audience were familiar with it, and a very large number of hands went up. So, it's exciting to us again to bring the power of Planet's platform and sales engine to their capabilities and bringing their capabilities into our customers is very exciting opportunity to grow that business.

Yeah. Their customers kept on wondering our data in their platform. So, here we saw both of those.

Got it. Yeah, I remember that at the conference. On the -- so circling back on the self-service customers, would you say that the vast majority of the revenue is self-service today, and you intend for it to remain that way, or will you build some light touch or some kind of channels to feed that engine? Do you feel like you have work to do on go-to-market for that or you think it's ready to go to plug into your channels?

Yeah. So, we've actually been -- we signed a partnership with them ahead of actually been signing the acquisition agreement. So, our sales team is familiar with the Sinergise products and solutions, and so there's a lot of activity already going on. I'd say from a revenue -- historical revenue perspective, it's been a blend of their larger direct business and then the smaller self-service business. And our intention frankly is to ramp both by bringing some of the business that we have that are smaller deals that are more suited to a light-touch approach like Sinergise has had, but also, like I mentioned, bringing the Sinergise solutions into some of our bigger opportunities both on the civil government side and on the enterprise side.

Super helpful. Thank you.

Great. Thank you, Ryan.

Thank you for your question. [Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Greg Mesniaeff with WestPark Capital. You may proceed.

Yes, thank you for taking my question. In light of the cost cutting measures you've implemented, including the headcount reduction, how have those measures impacted your sales and marketing effort? Have you guys perhaps shifted more of that effort to a third-party reseller model, or are you maintaining the current template with a different number of support staff? Any color would be great. Thanks.

Maybe you can start at a high level. I mean look, in that restructuring, we took a deep look at all of the projects and programs and which ones were the most effective, especially in terms of the growth areas on our go-to-market and same was true in our go-to-market effort. And of course, the decision to make -- do a restructuring and the reduction in force is really hard. But I think it positions the company in the right place going forward. Yeah, on the go-to-market side, it's not a fundamental change in strategy, but it is operational focus on these core vertical markets, on streamlining small deals and other operational efficiencies, which can speed up time to value and speed up sales cycles. Yeah, that's what I would say, at a high level. Ashley anything to add?

Yeah, in terms of your question around, do we see a shift of moving to more of a reseller model, that's not really how I would think about the change in focus. Obviously, relying on our partner ecosystem for solution selling and for some of the smaller deal opportunities and really more leveraging the capabilities of Sinergise and Sentinel Hub is the shift on the small deals side. But on the majority of our business, certainly from an ACV perspective, the direct model continues to be the focus. And really, it's been about narrowing the focus of our teams around those markets that the product market fit and the maturity of those markets as much farther along so that we can see acceleration in the deal cycles, sales cycles, and do that through a focusing of the direct sales efforts. Does that makes sense?

Yes. Got it. Thank you. And just a quick follow-up. You mentioned some slowdown, obviously, in the commercial sector. With that, have you guys changed or shifted any of the contract terms to your customers' future contracts that would perhaps address any potential cherry picking of deliverables or alternatively give some inducements to increase the size of the contract? Thanks.

So, we're definitely -- as part of the efforts that we've been doing in assessing our go-to-market motion, certainly looking at the packaging of our products, to obviously ensure that we continue to drive up average deal sizes. As Will said, we did see average deal sizes tick up again in Q2, so back to kind of what we had seen in our historical averages. But as we continue to focus on those opportunities in those markets where we have proof points and we know we drive value and we can drive value quickly, there's obviously an opportunity in the packaging of our solutions to drive higher overall average deal sizes.

Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Greg.

Thank you for your question. There are currently no further questions at this time. So, I'll now turn the line back to the management team for closing or additional remarks.

Thanks everyone for joining today. As you heard, the opportunity for our business is robust and our team is focused on executing. We are strengthening our go-to-market strategy, and we've increased company-wide focus on operational efficiency. The tailwinds for our business, the sustainability, digital transformation, as well as piece of security are driving demand, and we see AI as a further accelerant. In-all, we are confident in the market opportunity and our team's ability to execute. I look forward to seeing you at our Investor Day on October 10, where we'll share lots of exciting details about our product and business strategy. Thanks for joining today.

That concludes the Planet Labs PBC second quarter of fiscal 2024 earnings conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.