Hello, everyone. Thank you for attending today's Planet Labs PBC Third Quarter of Fiscal 2024 Earnings Call. My name is Sierra and I'll be your moderator today. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call, with an opportunity for questions-and-answers at the end. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to pass the conference over to our host, Chris Genualdi, VP of Investor Relations with Planet Labs PBC, please proceed.

Thanks, operator, and hello, everyone. Welcome to Planet's third quarter of 2024 earnings call. Before we begin today's call, we'd like to remind everyone that we may make forward-looking statements related to future events or our financial outlook. We also reference qualified pipeline which represents potential sales leads that have not yet executed contracts. Any forward-looking statements are based on management's current outlook, plans, estimates, expectations, and projections. The inclusion of such forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by Planet, that future plans, estimates, or expectations will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, and assumptions as detailed in our SEC filings, which can be found at www.sec.gov. Our actual results or performance may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements and we undertake no responsibility to update such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. During the call, we will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. We believe that these measures provide useful information about operating results, enhance the overall understanding of past financial performance and future prospects, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in financial and operational decision-making. For more information on the non-GAAP financial measures, please see the reconciliation tables provided in our press release issued earlier this afternoon. Further, throughout this call, we provide a number of key performance indicators used by management and often used by competitors in our industry. These and other key performance indicators are discussed in more detail in our press release. Before we jump in, I'd like to encourage everyone to reference the slides we have posted on our Investor Relations website, which are intended to accompany our prepared remarks. Finally, for each of the customer contracts referenced during this call, please note that the revenue figures we cite will generally be recognized over the term of the contract, which can last multiple years. Further, the terms of these contracts can vary and we may not realize all expected revenue. At this time, I'd now like to turn the call over to Will Marshall, Planet's CEO, Chairperson and Co-Founder. Over to you, Will.

Thanks, Chris, and hello, everyone. Thanks for joining the call today. For the third quarter of fiscal year 2024, we generated a record $55.4 million in revenue, representing 11% year-on-year growth. Non-GAAP gross margins was 51.5% which is above the midpoint of our expected range. Our adjusted EBITDA loss for the quarter was $12 million, $1 million better than our guidance range driven by cost discipline and reflecting our commitment to reaching adjusted EBITDA profitability by Q4 of next year. Growth in the third quarter was driven by strength in the Civil Government and Defense and Intelligence markets, both of which saw revenue increase more than 20% year-over-year, partially offset by continued macro headwinds in the commercial sector. We've continued to add large seven and eight-figure government opportunities across several government and defense and intelligence markets to our qualified sales pipeline and while they take longer to close, large government contracts can provide a reliable foundation of long-term revenue streams with significant potential for expansion. As our business mix shifts towards government opportunities, our average sales cycles overall have naturally extended. This is just the nature of government procurement processes. In response, we have recently refocused our go-to-market strategy around those large opportunities and made additional improvements to support sales execution. Let's quickly revisit the go-to-market improvements that we're implementing, which align with what we outlined in our prior earnings call and Investor Day. These include; one, focusing on salesforce on our largest opportunities in our core markets. Two, shifting smaller commercial opportunities in other market segments through our partner network and low touch channels, including our newly acquired Sentinel Hub platform. And three, streamlining and simplifying our sales processes. These go-to-market improvements are aimed at supporting faster sales cycles, customer adoption, and expansions over time. Expanding further on our…

Thanks, Will, and thanks everyone for joining today. As Will mentioned, our revenue for the third quarter of fiscal '24 ending October 31 came in at a record $55.4 million, which represents 11% year-over-year growth. This was driven by strength in the civil government and defense and intelligence markets, both of which grew more than 20% year-over-year, partially offset by the continued headwinds we've seen in the commercial market. From a geographic perspective, we continued to see a strong diversification of our customer base. EMEA revenue growth was especially strong in Q3, up almost 70% year-over-year, while revenue in both Asia Pacific and Latin America grew more than 20% year-over-year. North American revenue decreased by 11% on a year-over-year basis, primarily impacted by the discontinuation of the legacy contract we've discussed previously. As Will mentioned, we see multiple significant growth opportunities with various U.S. government entities in the near term and we continue to build out our partner ecosystem to address the longer-term opportunity we see in the commercial markets. As of the end of Q3, our end-of-period customer count was 976. This count does not include customers who are exclusively self-serve users on our Sentinel Hub platform, which we acquired with the Sinergise business. Recurring ACV or annual contract value was 94% of our book of business and over 90% of our ACV book of business consists of annual or multi-year contracts. Our average contract length continues to be approximately two years weighted on an ACV basis. Year-to-date, net dollar retention rate was 104% and net dollar retention rate with win backs was 105%, both up slightly from the prior quarter. Increases in net retention rate are typically driven by the timing of large expansion contracts with existing customers. And as we mentioned on the last call, we've seen…

Absolutely. We will now begin the Q&A session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from Jason Gursky with Citi. Please proceed.

Great. Good afternoon, everybody. I just wanted to dive a little bit more into the go-to-market strategy and have you discuss a little bit about this idea of [indiscernible] and going after really, really large contracts. Just kind of curious if there are any -- you talked about seven-figure potential contracts out there, but are there any eight or nine-figure contracts that you have the opportunity to go after here and maybe just talk a little bit about where you're seeing the greatest opportunities from a geographic perspective. Thank you.

Yeah. Great question. We have a number of eight-figure deals. I think we've previously mentioned that about eight and we've continued to bring in more eight-figure deals and seven-figure deals through the year. What we're mainly seeing them is, in defense and intelligence but also civil government, we've got real opportunities both, and geographically, I would say a lot of it's in the U.S., but we do have a number of these big deals in the rest of the world as well and so it's primarily in those two sectors. Does this answer your question?

Yeah. Sorry, I am at an airport. I'm going to leave it there. I appreciate you guys taking the question.

Okay. No worries.

Our next question comes from Trevor Walsh with JMP Securities. Please proceed.

Hi, team. Thanks for taking my questions and congrats on a solid set of results. Will, I'll start with you if I can. Congrats on the successful launch of Pelican, it sounds like the initial Demo is helping you guys get some good lessons learned. Just curious if, I know in the last earnings call you reiterated or confirmed that there's not necessarily a revenue opportunity kind of driving from this Pelican one satellite, but can you maybe help us understand a little bit better as to what the uplift potential within the current accounts might be from the new set of spacecraft just being that they are, in fact, have just higher res, higher revisit, all the kind of technical abilities that are added are better with Pelican and then also the low cost like just kind of how from a topline perspective that might, how are you guys looking at prices increase potentially there around those capabilities? How will customers kind of feel I guess in terms of what they're paying currently versus later? Thanks.

Yeah. Great question. So firstly, we're very, very happy with the Pelican spacecraft. It's going really well. All of the commissioning is going well and we're learning a huge amount, very, very good so far. And it is a Tech Demo, so yes, this is not going to be revenue producing just to confirm what you said. To the capabilities, yeah, so it's going to be better on multiple axes, high resolution. We talked about 30 centimeters higher revisit rates when we ultimately get our full fleet be higher revisit rates than our present 10 per day going up towards 30 per day. But probably the biggest substantive increase is the fact that as we add satellite-to-satellite communications on these vehicles, it enables us to lower latency. And to your final point, lower latency is something very differentiated and high value, and so you can definitely charge more. So you can charge more for higher resolution, you can charge more for lower latency, and I think that, the lower latency is almost a 10x improvement on our current system, so that is a big deal getting, the sub-hour latency. Does that answer your question or do you have another one?

Yeah, absolutely. I appreciate the color. And then, if I could just do one follow-up maybe for Ashley, although Will feel free to chime in too. Good work on the new customer count accelerating kind of in the quarter, we -- just at least as we look at in our model, it looked like the revenues for average number of customers may have ticked down and just wondering if that's a result of maybe and a larger number of smaller customers kind of entering the cohort this quarter and if that is the right way to look at it is that kind of a signal of some of your go-to-market improvement efforts around whether it's the self-serve platform or some of the partner led motion kind of bearing fruit and bringing some smaller group of -- smaller customers into the mix this quarter? Thanks.

Yeah. Thanks for the questions. I'd have to look a little bit more closely to answer the revenue per customer question more specifically, but I'd say, yes, we do have more customers coming on board through the Sentinel Hub platform, now that the Sinergise acquisition is closed and that is an opportunity for us to really scale up low-touch customer onboarding and also enable partners to create solutions on top of our data more easily through those APIs. So in terms of deal sizes that's actually consistent. So I would suspect if I were to dig into the details behind the average revenue per customer, what we're probably seeing is a little bit of the impact from bringing on the Sinergise customers, but I'd have to get back to you to look into that more specifically.

And if I can just add a tiny thing on the prior question, I forgot to mention, of course, it wasn't just the Pelican that we launched, we also launched 36 SuperDoves, and although, we take that sort of for granted, because that's primarily continuing operations of that daily scan fleet. Firstly, that's our bedrock fleet and gives the daily scan, which is so differentiated, and secondly, yeah, we take for granted being able to rapidly build and launch and operate large numbers of satellites like this, but basically that's one of the very few companies in the world can do that and really that's incredibly a strong differentiator that we sort of take for granted sometimes.

Great. Thank you, both, so much. Appreciate it.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Michael Latimore with Northland. Please proceed.

Great. Yes. Thanks very much. What are you thinking about in terms of the NDR number for the fourth quarter?

Yeah. Obviously, that's driven by the timing of when some of these larger expansions land that will impact where we end up landing on that number for the year. As I said in the prepared remarks, we ticked up quarter-over-quarter and I feel very good about where we are on overall retention rates. It's just a matter of that NDR ultimately depends on some of the larger expansion opportunities and the timing of when they come in.

Okay. And then, you seem positive on the U.S. government opportunities in the pipeline, can you mention a use case or two that might be in the mixer?

Yeah, actually there's several. I mean, so we've got multiple opportunities both on the civil government side expansions and new partnerships there and on the defense and intelligence side and it's also both expansion and new parties. If you get that, the US government is not a monolith. There's really multiple agencies in both sectors that need our data. We also -- and in addition seeing a lot -- so there's a lot of pull from them mainstream -- mainstay products, but we're also seeing a lot of new and heightened interest both in the U.S. government and international governments for AI on top of our PlanetScope Imagery that enables you just search and scan large areas for new threats or emerging changes and that is proving to be a very strong pull as well and that's something that's only be possible very lately because of the large language models on top of PlanetScope imagery, and so that's providing an extra pull as well, but, -- yeah, the use cases vary a lot by the different agencies, I can't speak to all of them right a second, but it's strong pull in both sides.

Okay. Great. Thanks so much.

Your next question comes from Ryan Koontz with Needham and Company. Please proceed.

Thanks for the question. Start with Ashley, can you unpack the kind of step down in commercial we're seeing here? You mentioned the legacy contract churn there, is that the prime reason here behind the step-down? There are other things going on and is this -- does this quarter mark the kind of the end of that impact or is it going to continue to linger on for future quarters on that impact? Thanks.

Yeah. Thanks, Ryan. The primary driver on the revenue year-over-year comparison commercial is that legacy contract that came to an end in Q1 really and that was just a small tail, so really -- as you pointed out, Q4 is the end of that year-over-year compare headwind. We did see softness in some of the renewals a year ago. We talked about in the commercial market, that also was a secondary headwind coming into the year and commercial is continuing to see headwinds in terms of expanding those businesses. So we do anticipate a lot of the growth in the next year coming from the commercial -- government sector. But that said, we still are very big believers in the opportunity in the commercial space and just view it as an opportunity that we will be pursuing with our partner ecosystem.

Got it. That's great. And just a couple of quick product questions for Will on the Forest Carbon product, can you kind of walk us through that business model and how you productize that for these sorts of customers, that will be really helpful? Thanks.

Yeah, absolutely. So that's one of our Planetary Variables for everyone's benefit the -- basically enables us to measure -- I mean, we've been doing deforestation monitoring and helping countries with that for a long time, but this actually gets at quantifying the amount of carbon stock in forest and initially at 30-meter level, and next year, we'll be launching a 3-meter level, which is almost an individual tree level, very excited by that. We've seen a lot of interest. The hope is that this will help underpin carbon markets. We've been very pleasantly surprised by the amount of initial demand amongst both the sort of regulation side of this. So the people that are checking the math, if you like, on everyone's carbon trading as well as the marketplaces that are trying to match-make between buyers and sellers of carbon, which of course both sides want to check the math as well and so on both fronts of that we've seen demand and we were -- of course -- I mentioned in my prepared remarks that our first customer there, BeZero Carbon, which is the marketplace and we are very proud to be seeing that interest so early in that new product. Sorry, BeZero is a carbon rating agency, I should say, it's in the form category.

Got it. Really helpful. Thanks so much. That's all I have.

No problem.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Noah Poponak with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Hello, everyone. With the expanding Defense and Intel and civil government opportunity set that you're referencing, are there contract names you can cite that we can follow or is it some combination of small or classified or extension or reprogrammed dollars or something that we can follow?

I mean, most of them are public procurement mechanisms you can follow. I would just say that it takes a lot to follow. I mean, there's a lot of different agencies that you have to track, but no, mostly public procurement. There is no huge one outstanding to just point out like EOCL is of course our mainstay contract with the NRO and there is opportunities for expansion there and you can watch that, but there's no big other ones to just pull out and identify for you right the second, but we certainly continue to monitor all of those, of course, that's our job.

Will, can you mean the one or two largest even understanding it's maybe a pool of with no single one that's much larger than the others, but whether its size or just what's most exciting to you because of what it means for your future, just something we could track I think would be helpful.

Yeah, I mean, the two biggest ones that we presently have are the NRO's EOCL and there's lots of expansion opportunity there. The relationship is very good and the other is on the civil side with NASA, which is called CSDA, and you can track that and the budgets are very healthy going into that. So those are the two biggest ones that I can name off the cuff. We could try and get back to you if you want further details on that.

Okay. Great. On the commercial side, Ashley, you made a comment about working with your partner network kind of like, while you wait for the end market to come back to you or the set of end markets come back to you or I guess maybe the macro to come back. Can you expand on that like what are you actually doing? Why are the partner networks willing to do that? How does that help you once demand comes back?

I think it's more about the fact that the market on the commercial side is still relatively immature especially when you think about the broader market opportunity and they will require solutions that incorporate our data and extract value from the data for them because they're unlikely, for example, to have geospatial analysts on staff. So really it's about making it easier for our partners to develop those solutions that will effectively drive the value to the end customer. So that's effectively what I meant by really leaning into the partner ecosystem to drive that ultimate value to the end customer in the commercial market to really get that market off the ground.

And if I could just add to keep our sales reps focused on the big deal opportunities, which are primarily right this second in civil government and defense and intelligence. So we see a huge future in commercial. We continue to see that and we continue to do deals. I mentioned a few in my prepared remarks, right, but the biggest ones in defense and intelligence and civil government and so we want to focus our energies on that. So it's both because they need solutions, that Ashley was saying, but also because we want to focus our attention on the pipe of opportunities and progressing them through to close and that's more in civil government and defense and intelligence.

But there are commercial markets that are more advanced and we will obviously continue to sell into them including agriculture and insurance for example.

Okay. Great. Thank you so much. I appreciate it.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Edison Yu with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed.

Thanks for taking our questions. Wanted to ask about the cadence of growth. Since in Q4, the implied is 6% to 11%, do you think that represents perhaps the bottom given that some of the headwinds go away in the first quarter, do we see that sort of a bottom in terms of year-over-year growth?

I think it's important to understand that one of the biggest headwinds that we had. Coming into this year was the legacy contract that came to an end. So Q4 will mark the end of that headwind. We're obviously leaning into a lot of opportunity that we see and especially with large expansions with existing customers leaning into the opportunity in the government sector and the timing of when that business lands. Obviously, will determine ultimately how our growth accelerates going beyond Q4. We remain very optimistic about the ability of our teams to execute in the market that's there for us just based on the continued pull that we feel and we've had challenges this year with timing of bringing that new business in and the longer sales cycles, but still remain very optimistic in our ability to reaccelerate growth. Anything to add there, Will?

Yeah. I mean I would only say, of course, we're not satisfied with that sort of growth rate, we want to continue to drive towards higher growth rates, we think that is possible. I'm firmly convinced that that's possible. And we got a huge pipeline that we're working on. We please tell you that it's progressing in stage, we're moving things along and we are closing some deals, it is still taking a bit too long, and with our job to go close it. You've heard how we are focused. Our efforts are really focused right now to improve that execution, focusing on the big deals, trying to automate the small deals, making it easy to work at Planet, just trying to reduce the time to value for customers so that we can land and expand them. We're very focused on those efforts that the areas are in our control to improve win rates and so on that pipe, but that's where we're heads down and focused. We certainly think it's possible to accelerate growth.

Understood. Longer term question, in terms of the commercial market, do you have a view on when that might kind of turn around? I understand it's probably not anytime in the near term, but is this a couple of years, is this five years? Just when do you think that can kind of reaccelerate meaningfully in the future?

I would say a few things, some of the headwinds we saw are macro driven, like in the agriculture market, which where we saw some headwinds, that is macro-driven, and so, when that ends, but I also think that we are continuing to see deals -- I mentioned some of the deals that we did on the commercial side, and as Ashley mentioned, we have a lot of opportunities to make tooling and simplified ability to access that. We launched the Sentinel Hub, a platform that enables low-touch access, so that people have -- and tools so that they can start building products and services and we're working closely with partners that have good solutions for specific vertical markets. I'll just add finally, that just like in the -- I mentioned earlier in the government sector, AI is a strong tailwind, I think the same is true here, it's going to help a lot, and it's because AI helps skip a bunch of steps in getting to answers. So you can query (ph) getting us closer to the vision that I had launched in TED (ph) Talk in 2018, six years ago -- five or six years ago, which spoke about this queryable (ph) Earth and that's a bit of an ultimate vision here, that any commercial client could ask any question of the data, just like you can now ask questions about text of the internet with ChatGPT 4, that queryable vision is becoming closer to reality with these large language models, and we're really seeing that tick up. You'll note that a number of big companies, from Microsoft to Google to others, are releasing these multimodal large language models, which is a step from them treating just text on the internet to also treating images and videos and audio track and that plays to our strength enormously because we have this massive proprietary archive of imagery data. So as those models get better at dealing with the imagery and understanding the context in those images, the faster we can leverage that to then provide answers to commercial clients who don't have, big geospatial expertise. So we really -- again, believe overall in the long term, in the commercial market, it's a huge opportunity to go after.

Got it. And just one last one for me, housekeeping, can you tell us or remind us what is the contribution from Sinergise in the full year number at this point?

I think last quarter we said we expected it to be somewhere between $4 million and $6 million on the year and I think we're in line with that expectation. It's small enough that we aren't breaking it out, but generally, it's performing in line with our expectations.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum. Please proceed.

Great, thanks. Just a couple remaining here, on the sales changes, any measurable evidence you can share with respect to the sales changes working either, concrete improvements in cycles or other measurable. I know you're focusing on the big deals, automation, and making it easier to work with you, but any -- even if they're green shoots, any concrete evidence that the changes are having positive impact?

Ashley, do you want to speak to that?

Yeah. I'd say, first of all, obviously it's still early days. I'd say, the good news is, we've seen a lot of those metrics really stabilize. We're not seeing sales cycles go longer than what we talked about before, and obviously, we're focused on now bringing them in shorter. Similarly, I talked about the fact that deal sizes have generally stabilized and as we lean into the larger deal opportunities, we would expect those to expand as well. So we're looking at the same types of metrics that you would expect us to be focused on making sure that we close the business that's in front of us, shorten the sales cycles going forward, and as Will said, really make sure we drive that time to value for the customers so that we continue to land and expand so that's where we're focused. We're in a transition, But we feel really good about what we've implemented so far and the early results we're seeing.

Okay. And then one brief one on Sinergise, I know you just touched on the four to six for the year, just curious if you'd expand or there is any other color to provide there, any behavioral clues that have been provided by the existing Sinergise base the way they've reacted thus far, any other indications of either upside or downside to what you thought you bought there.

Overall, we feel very positive about the acquisition and how that team is performing. We do see a lot of opportunities coming in related to the tools that they have there. A lot of it's things like automating the onboarding of those new capabilities so that we can scale to more actors with any given solution, so that's goodness. As far as I'm concerned, because that means there is the demand and pull.

Yeah. I'd say that, very pleased so far. Obviously, it's an incredible talent pool and a great platform. We've moved very quickly on the integration side to enable our customers to leverage those tools and their customers to access Planet data through the platform and now we're continuing that integration process to create a more seamless experience across the user base and to really push the new capabilities through our sales teams.

Okay. Fair enough. Thank you.

Thanks, Jeff.

Our last question for today comes from Chris Quilty with Quilty Space. Please proceed.

Thank you. I just wanted to follow up just a little bit on the Pelican, congrats on that initial launch, and obviously beyond the normal, first light and calibration of the satellite, you've also got a different element to it -- which is the altitude and altitude maintenance. Do you have an idea of how long you expect to go through validation before you can sort of make the decision to pull the trigger on the bigger commitment to the fleet?

Yeah. I mean it takes normally of order months to fully understand these spacecraft in orbit and we're feeling very good about where we're at on that right now as I mentioned earlier. Yeah, and then as you say that helps determine sort of key decision points to then build the rest of the fleet. We are already, by the way, ongoing in building a bunch of those -- the exact timing and we then pull in learnings into that as we build that out, so of course, we don't -- of course, send them to launch site before we've really understood how that first one is working so -- but that construction process is already ongoing for the next set, the first block one, as we call it spacecraft set. Overall, I feel very good about the pace of that program right now.

Got it. Sorry, I think I have a little [Technical Difficulty] problem. Are you still taking in new customers on the early access program and have you seen any growth in that pipeline?

You mean for tonnage (ph), I presume.

Yes.

Do you mean for the hyperspectral mission? Yeah, I think it was a limited cohort. Maybe that's one or two that were added, but we have -- they have been progressing, use cases and showing early demand there are real deals there and, yeah, so we feel good about that program as well and it's great that we've, we had this JPL instrument in the lab and integrated into the spacecraft, it's very exciting to see the developments downstairs as well. So, yeah, feeling good about that program as well.

And did you provide expected CapEx on that program and over what timeframe and looking for first launch?

So that program is categorized as an R&D program because it's the first time we've launched a hyperspectral satellite and that has been in partnership with the team of our Carbon Mapper and NASA JPL, and we have funds that we've received for that program and those get recognized not as revenue, but is actually an offset to that Contra R&D, so you don't really see that show up as CapEx on our balance sheet. And as a company that does agile aerospace, we are very different in that respect from what you might see from others, where you see a lot more CIP sitting on the balance sheet for a program like this. In terms of the overall size of that fleet in that program and the timing, we haven't given a lot of specifics because we are still in the R&D phase as we get closer to the launch of that fleet, we'll share more details.

If I could just add one more thing, just like the Carbon Planetary Variable I mentioned earlier, there is interest on both the regulatory side as well as the users that would use it to stop and get ahead of regulation to the commercial side, if you like. And on that point, we've made a couple of announcements at COP, the meeting is ongoing right now in Dubai relating to this because as we get better measure of all of these emissions and we are getting indirectly right now and helping this organization climate trace, which tracks over 350 million facilities globally, renewable energy facilities, emitters with our visual data, this will then add to that, to be able to have more quantified emission amounts of data, which is all feeds into, if you like, the transparency and accountability. And as we transition to a sustainable economy, it's a massive transition, many, many tens of trillion dollars as we transition to a sustainable economy, but there's no way that it is going to be possible without the careful measurement as we've discussed before, whether that's the Forest Carbon piece or the emission piece that we just talked about here. So we really care about it from a pure sustainability point of view, it fits our mission, but there is a massive market opportunity as well and so we're going after that.

Great. And final question, just you talked about the latency with the RF crosslinks on the Pelican, I think that was announced C-band, SES, but you also had an announcement with Telesat and KA, can you just give any color on how that's proceeding and do you need any specific FCC licenses to operate those crosslinks.

Yeah. We are pursuing two programs there, one with ViaSat, one with Telesat. They're both supported by NASA -- NASA CSP program that helps fund that R&D. They are both proceeding according to plan as far as I'm aware. I think they're more into KA band than the C-Band, but I may stand corrected there, I don't know, we can check for you and confirm the details.

Great. Thanks so much, guys.

Thank you.

Thank you all for your questions. There are no questions waiting at this time, so I'll turn the conference over to Will Marshall, CEO for closing remarks.

Well, look, overall, I feel like we had solid growth in both our civil and defense markets as we've been talking to. We're very focused as a team on the go-to-market execution to close the opportunities in front of us to close faster and make customers successful to land and expand. We feel good about the multiple product milestones we mentioned, including the 37 satellites, the Pelican we've be speaking a fair bit about, Forest Carbon, and getting low-touch access to Planet's data via the Sentinel Hub system, the new platform that we acquired from Sinergise over the summer. We also doing all of this, while keeping a disciplined spending on our path to adjusted EBITDA profitability by Q4 of next year. Overall, I would say our conviction remains high in the opportunity in front of us and so with that we will look forward to seeing you next time.

That will conclude today's conference.