Good afternoon, and welcome to the PennantPark Investment Corporation's Second Fiscal Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode. The call open will be open for a question-and-answer session following the speakers’ remarks. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Mr. Art Penn, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PennantPark Investment Corporation. Mr. Penn, you may begin your conference.

Good afternoon, everyone. I'd like to welcome you to PennantPark Investment Corporation's second fiscal quarter 2022 earnings conference call. I'm pleased and I am joined today by Richard Cheung, our Chief Financial Officer. Richard, please start off by disclosing some general conference call information and include a discussion of our forward-looking statements.

Thank you, Art. I'd like to remind everyone that today's call is being recorded. Please note that this call is the property of PennantPark Investment Corporation, and any unauthorized broadcast of this call in any form is strictly prohibited. Audio replay of the call will be available by using the telephone numbers and PIN provided in our earnings press release as well as on our website. I'd also like to call your attention to the customary safe harbor disclosure in our press release regarding forward-looking information. Today's conference call may also include forward-looking statements and projections and we ask that you refer to our most recent filings with the SEC for important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these projections. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements unless required by law. To obtain copies of our latest SEC filings, please visit our website at pennantpark.com or call us at (212) 905-1000. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Art Penn.

Thanks, Richard. I'm going to spend a few minutes discussing how we served in the quarter ending March 31st, how the portfolio is positioned for the upcoming quarters, our capital structure and liquidity, the financials then open up for Q&A. From an overall perspective in this era of inflation, rising interest rates and geopolitical risk, we believe we are well positioned as a lender focused on the United States where the floating rates on our loans can protect against rising rates in inflation. We are pleased to be lending into the core middle market where we are important strategic capital to our borrowers and are . We believe we are additionally well positioned as a company that has a clear game plan for growth of net investment income and dividends. The highlight of the quarter ending March 31st was the sale of Pivot Physical Therapy, which generated cash proceeds of $232 million, our second lien position, which had a cost of $49 million exceeded for cash proceeds of $78 million resulting in an IRR of 14.3% and a multiple on invested capital of 1.6x. Our common and preferred stock investment, which had a cost of $35 million was exited for $164 million resulting in a 40% IRR and a multiple on invested capital of 3.3x. Due primarily to this successful exit of Pivot, we have made progress on our three-part plan to increase long-term shareholder value. Number one, last quarter we increased our quarterly dividend to $0.14 per share, up from $0.12. We're announcing another increase this quarter to $0.145 per share. Number two, we made progress on our $25 million stock buyback program by purchasing 913,000 shares for $7 million. Number three, we completed a CLO securitization financing and our PSLF JV with Pantheon, which gives the JV ammunition…

Thank you, Art. For the quarter ended March 31, net investment income totaled $0.18 per share, including $0.04 per share of other income. Looking at some of the expense categories, base management fee totaled $5 million. Taxes, general and administrative expenses totaled 1.2 million and interest expense totaled 6.5 million. Net realized and unrealized change on investments, net of any associated tax provision was a loss of 8.7 million or $0.13 per share. We redeemed a portion of our SBA debenture, which resulted in a realized loss from debt extinguishment of 1.1 million or $0.02 per share. Change in the value of our credit facility increased our NAV by $0.02 per share. Our net investment income was in excess of our dividend by $0.04 per share. We repurchased about 900,000 shares this quarter for under NAV, adding $0.03 per share. Consequently, NAV per share went from $10.11 per share to $10.05 per share, down 0.6% from the prior quarter. As a reminder, our entire portfolio and credit facility are marked to market on ASC 820 and 825. Board of Directors each quarter using the exit price provided by independent valuation firms, security exchanges, independent broker dealer quotes when active markets are available. In cases where broker dealer quotes are inactive, we use independent valuation firms to value their investments. Our GAAP debt to equity ratio, net of cash was 0.8 times. Our overall debt portfolio has a weighted average yield of 8.4%. On March 31, our portfolio consisted of 113 companies across 30 different industries. The portfolio was invested in 55% in first lien secured debt, 11% in second lien secured debt, 9% in subordinated debt, including 6% in PSLF and 25% in preferred and common equity, including 4% and PSLF. 99% of the debt portfolio has floating rate, all of which has a LIBOR floor, average LIBOR floor is 1%. Now let me turn the call back to Art.

Thanks, Richard. To conclude we want to reiterate our mission. Our goal is to generate attractive risk adjusted returns through income, coupled with long-term preservation of capital. Everything we do is aligned to that goal. We try to find less risky middle-market companies that have high free cash flow conversion and we capture that free cash flow primarily in debt instruments and pay out those contractual cash flows in the form of dividends to our shareholders. In closing, I'd like to thank our extremely talented team of professionals for their commitment and dedication. Thank you all for your time today and for your continued investment and confidence in us. That concludes our remarks. At this time, I would like to open up the call to questions.

Thank you. And we'll take our first question from Paul Johnson with KBW.

Hi, good morning guys or good afternoon. Hi, thanks for taking my call. Thanks for taking my questions. I'd just like to ask about the joint venture and just the decision to put a little bit more capital into the JV this quarter. I'm assuming that obviously came out of the proceeds from the large exits this quarter and maybe just also talk a little bit about the deal opportunity set between the JV versus what goes on to the balance sheet, any differences in those two and if you're seeing one market more attractive than the other.

Yes. So, thanks Paul and good afternoon. So our deal flow does generally get allocated. The JV is a mechanism for us to enhance ROE through kind of leverage. So it's obviously mostly senior first lien loans that go into that vehicle. Equity co-invest does not go into that vehicle, so the equity co-invest stays with PNNT. So the joint venture with Pantheon takes just the first lien deals, very diversified. As we said, we did a CLO securitization financing in the joint venture this past quarter, which is really attractive long-term efficient financing and allows us to leverage – leverage the junior capital really nicely and in a safe way. So, kind of the goal there is to take the joint venture up to about $750 million of total assets, which should be a nice enhancer to the NII of PNNT, given that it – it's a little bit more levered than what we're doing over at the BDC itself. And of course the, the co-invest stick with the BDC. So, a nice tool for us, helps us write bigger checks to these companies, so that we can fuel their growth, and can be very efficiently financed. Track record so far has been very good. We're pleased with – and I think Pantheon is pleased otherwise they wouldn't have been willing to put additional capital in. So again, PNNT is about 60% of the capital and Pantheon is about 40% of the capital. And they're pleased so far with the performance and they're willing to continue to invest in it.

Thanks for that. Yes, that's been a great investment for your guys and I think a pretty good way to deploy at the moment. So I appreciate that. My other question I'm hoping that you can maybe just quickly go over the non-co-investment this quarter JF Holdings, I believe that's MidOcean. What exactly is that business? And I guess what's kind of going on there? Any sort of update.

Yes. So the non-accrual is a company called Cascade Environmental, which does environmental drilling of soil, did get impacted by COVID as drilling crews couldn't do their work and governmental entities who are a big chunk of their customers push things off. So there was work to do there. It just got delayed and deferred and Omicron did not help that that company either. So there is a refinancing going on to refinance that capital structure. Our security is a – has become a junior capital security more of a preferred stock. The idea is to set the company up with a capital structure, so that it can now kind of grow reasonably well post-COVID. And of course we hope to – and the sponsor hopes to look for an exit, hopefully in the next year or two. So it's been about 18 months since we had a non-accrual. So it's the first one we've had in a while. Obviously, we're not thrilled with it, but we are optimistic that over time the – we can get an exit.

Got it, appreciate that and I also appreciate that your credit performance has been pretty good and there has not been many non-accruals in the recent past. Just a few more if I can as far as write downs in this quarter just the net depreciation, how much of that reflected just kind of marking to market on loan prices during the quarter to more just sort idiosyncratic write down this quarter?

Yes. So there was a little bit of dimunition in overall pricing for loans, of course, and the independent valuation firms certainly take overall market choppiness into account and then they layer that on top of the idiosyncratic, individual name by name performance, and come up with a blend of the two. We had a substantial mark up in RAM Energy, PT wasn't fully marked, Pivot Physical Therapy was not fully marked the last time. So we had additional mark up there as that worked towards exit. And then the markdowns to were Cascade, Jones & Frank, which you just alluded to. And , of course is a public stock and that's been volatile. So those were the big movers both plus and minus, in the portfolio from last quarter.

Got it, appreciate that. Last question, kind of a technical one, but in the filing you give some of the abbreviated financials for RAM Energy. And I know that investment had a pretty nice markup this quarter. But I'm curious, I believe, you gave the first quarter financials. What is the reason for the company being, I guess, profit negative this year, whereas, I think, if the understand performance has been pretty good through last year seems to be things going pretty well this year, so far. So what is the reason for just the negative profitability in this quarter?

Well, I think, certainly drilling is an expense, is the biggest expense. So as we drilled two Wells. So you put let's say, hypothetically you put $20 million into drilling, into the ground, and then you hope, and I think, the numbers are painting out. You hope for good cash flow back from that. So just the nature of the business you put something out and you make your wells and then you hopefully get the cash back in a lot more. So wells seem to be in reasonable shape, they seem to be kind of in line with the general performance of the rest of the geography. We’re more encouraged early days about the performance well as well.

Got it. Great. That's really good to hear on an investment that's obviously a big piece of your portfolio. So appreciate those are all my questions this morning.

Thank you, Paul.

And our next question will come from Robert Dodd with Raymond James.

Hi. Nice simple one for you. To considerable proceeds, obviously from the very successful pivot, leverage went down, you have a lot of excess liquidity. How long do you think it's going to take you to get back closer to where you were on leverage previously? Obviously this time it would be with income producing assets, which could have a significant benefit on NII quite apart from the whole . So just what's – I was kidding with an easy question, .

Because Robert, you know exactly our origination flow into the future. It's a science. I'm only kidding. Look, part of, it's going to be kind of this market that we have in 2022, like, are we, I mean, we could in some sense, get lucky by this might sound weird, but if our capital becomes more dear to companies, we might be able to deploy quicker at better risk adjusted returns in a choppy market, right? So we might have been lucky rather than smart to be super liquid today and have the market come our direction and have higher yields and lower risk in which case we could deploy sooner. So far we're not seeing that, but we're only a couple, few weeks into this kind of choppier market. So in a more normal basis, I'd say kind, I don't know, six to twelve months kind of ramping several hundred million dollars would be a six to twelve month kind of thing. And of course, we're getting repayments along the way too. And that's what happens when you pick good credits, which we never complain about. So I'd say in a normal basis, six months, maybe a little bit more might be nine, twelve months depends. Is deal flow, going to slow up because of the choppiness, or are we just going to get a lot of deal flow at better risk adjusted returns? We don't really know the answers to these questions yet. It certainly feels good to be liquid right now in an environment that looks different than it was three or six months ago. But as always, it's deal by deal, name by name, good deal comes, a good pitch comes across the play we're going to swing. And that's how you develop these portfolios. It's hard for us to make really macro projections.

I understand. I appreciate that. I mean, just sort of related. I mean, on the deal flow that maybe deal memos that coming across the desk, et cetera. I mean, it's unfair to compare, to date to three months, well, like three months ago, was in 2022, but to the end of 2021 there was obviously three points. That was a crazy period. But I mean, is the – are the number of new memos coming to you depressed? Or has there been or were they depressed and they're starting to ramp back up? I mean, anything on that?

Yes. Yes. So 2021 was crazy, particularly the end of 2021 was crazy. I think everyone in our business was exhausted and burnt out in some ways, thankfully the first quarter was light. And I think it's normalizing right now. So we are – I'd say we're kind of looking at a 2019 type pace pre-COVID for our business. We have invested in our origination platform, we have five offices across the United States. We keep investing in the team. So today we're now covering actively over 600 middle market financial sponsors. That's probably up 200 or 300 over the pre-COVID period. So we've invested in that team, in those offices and in relationships, so that we can get more looks, the idea is to get the looks and then you have to figure out like what you're seeing or not, but I'd say as a firm, we're getting more looks our origination platforms broader and deeper. We were deeper in the regions where we have the five offices and elsewhere. So the platform feels like it's good. And it feels like chief, we really wanted to ramp, we can do that. Of course, we need to make sure we ramp in a way where the quality is high. And that's the key and the trick in our business is to make sure the quality is high as you're ramping.

Understood. I appreciate and again congratulations on the quarter and the shape of the business and being liquid right now.

Thank you, Robert.

And our next question will come from Mickey Schleien with Ladenburg.

Yes, good afternoon, Art and Richard. Just a couple questions for me. Art, we've talked about RAM Energy, obviously a lot in the past. So my question today is simply what do you think it's going take for M&A in the oil and gas sector to pick up and potentially more positively impact RAM's valuation? Is it a situation where folks are just gun shy and they don't believe these prices are sustainable or what's holding things back?

It's a great question. We are – right now there is not an M&A – middle market M&A way for oil and gas. We are starting to see some small trades, not too far from our geography, which is promising. So that's point number one. Point number two is you're still in a timeframe where if you're a seller, you still are modeling a $100 oil and $7 or $8 gas. And if you're a buyer, you're thinking you should be buying off $70 oil and $4 or $5 gas, right? So, there's still a gap over time. That'll collapse and will be an equilibrium. And I want to be clear here at PennantPark, we're not holding out for the last Nick nuclear dime to sell Ram. We would want an efficient process, a process that's – that is a good process that gets fair value. So, we're – as soon as it makes sense. And as soon as there is a bit of an M&A activity where buyers and sellers are coming together in a reasonable timeframe. We will kind of just start to assess options. We're not quite there yet. In the meantime, we're heads down focused on completing these wells and optimizing the output and getting ourselves organized and getting the numbers put together and getting the engineering reports and setting ourselves up to have hopefully interesting conversations in the not too distant future. So, we'd still look to, to get out in a reasonable timeframe at a fair price. And in the meantime, as long as you can make good investments kind of in wells and get good returns, that's not a bad backup strategy, not our top strategy, but not a bad backup strategy if things don't go the way we'd like.

Thanks Art. That's really helpful. In the past, you've talked about the Ram has a loan from the federal government. I think it was under the main street lending program. And there's a potential, I guess to refinance that and maybe liberate some cash up to pennant. Is that still on, in the cards or given where the markets are, that's completely off the table?

That's possible. I mean, I think again, we want to kind of execute on these wells, get the cash flow, and it's possible that towards the end of the year, we might be able to take it out. Again, all these processes may come together where we're evaluating strategic options, we're evaluating our financing options. And we hope to have enough cash kind of in the till towards that end of the year to potentially refinance that take it out. And yes, that would be one avenue for liberating as you say liberating cash for PNNT shareholders.

Okay. That would be great. Just last question, sort of housekeeping, maybe for Richard, where does the pivot exit leave the fund in terms of undistributed net capital gains if any on a tax basis?

We don't – we're in a net capital law situation from a tax basis even with the pivot transaction. So what expect to just NII? We do have $0.52 for share of .

Did you say 52?

52, correct.

Okay. Thank you for that. That's it for me. Thank you.

Thank you.

And our next question will come from Melissa Wedel with JPMorgan.

Good afternoon. Appreciate you taking my questions today. You've actually answered a lot of mine already, but I was hoping to just get your thoughts at a high level about the volatility that we've seen in the forward curve, and how you're thinking about both your portfolio investments, but also the broader market and what trade offs there might be between sort of higher investment income from those floating rates moving higher and what offset there could be on the credit side of things, and company's ability to really digest those borrowing costs.

Great question. And it's something we all need to be modeling in even more so in the coming environment, company's ability to weather, higher interest rates. As I said, the average EBITDA to interest ratio we have today is 3.1 times at PNNT. So I think we feel pretty good that even if rates go up at PNNT, we've got substantial cushion that says your point's an excellent one. I think we have to take it even more seriously into modeling and projecting going forward in our cases and investment committee memos higher interest rates. It would lead you to, it could lead you to which I think we've always had this discipline of keeping, our leverage levels reasonable, here in this portfolio, we're about 5.1 times debt to EBITDA. We – that's a comfortable zone for us. We don't like high debt EBITDA multiples because it's just more burden that the company has to bear. So we are still oriented to cash flow. We're still oriented to free cash flow and getting paid down. I mean, there's a lot of other people who are doing, deals based on recurring revenues where there's not EBITDA and those have worked so far. But we are certainly in a choppier waters and we need to maintain our prudency and maybe even double down on that in this choppier environment.

Art, do you think that that could impact the opportunity set for you too? Is there a – I know the portfolio is almost essentially nearly entirely floating rate if there's demand from companies to lock in some financing costs at fixed rate, but perhaps at better spread. Is that something that your team would be thinking about?

Sure. I mean, look, we like to think we're economically rationale as we like to think. I believe we are the vast majority of the time, but yes, if there's a like when we started out 15 years ago, Melissa, we did a lot of mezzanine debt, which was, and still is not that there's a lot of it going on, fixed rate kind of teens type of capital. So for the right credits, for the right structure, the right call protection, the right co-invest package, the right covenant package, we should be willing to trade that off. We don't come out it with an absolute view that we don't do fixed rate with the right set of circumstances I think we we'd be open to that.

Are, are you seeing demand from that from borrowers yet?

Not yet. I mean, there might be a dealer two kind of in our pipeline that's that looks like that kind of what we would call traditional mez. But it could come back you're right in this environment, there might be more demand for kind of back to the future kind of structures, we've had a good – we know what we're doing in that world and got a good track record. So again, opportunistically and in PNNT this would be the place to do that versus PSLT opportunistically for the right kind of teens return. You We would be open to that.

Thanks Art.

Thank you.

And that does conclude the question-and-answer session, and now turn the conference back over to Mr. Art Penn.

Thanks everybody for listening in today. We appreciate your focus on us. Our next quarterly earnings will be in early August, and we look forward to speaking with you then. Thank you. And that does conclude today's conference. We do thank you for your participation. Have an excellent day.