Good morning. And thank you for joining us. This is Kevin Miller, Chief Financial Officer of RCM Technologies. I am joined today by Brad Vizi, RCM's Executive Chairman. Our presentation in this call will contain forward-looking statements. The information contained in the forward-looking statements is based on our beliefs, estimates, assumptions, and information currently available to us. And these matters may materially change in the future. Many of these beliefs estimates and assumptions are subject to rapid changes. For more information on our forward-looking statements, and the risks, uncertainties and other factors to which they are subject, please see the periodic reports on forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K that we filed with the SEC, as well as our press releases that we issue from time-to-time. I will now turn over the call to Brad Vizi. Executive Chairman to provide an overview of RCM's operating performance during the quarter.

Thanks, Kevin. Good morning, everyone. Consistent with our prior update, the business cadence continues to accelerate as we move through the year. As such, the fourth quarter will be our strongest, and we expect to exhibit EBITDA growth year-over-year. Also of note, the outlook for 2024 and beyond is bright. Our ability to parlay our high-value capabilities into long-term partnerships, where we continue to deliver increased value into strategic accounts has take hold. We believe our collection of high value capabilities is unique to the marketplace, serving as a key differentiator for which to land and expand. Internally, we continue to build on our unique structure that fosters innovation and increased depth of penetration, within each of our end markets, while increasingly strengthening points of collaboration between groups. Our ability to continue to execute this strategy will increase - with increasing success will further fuel growth future growth into our secular end markets for years to come. Since we last spoke, progress has been made across each of our divisions, that I am excited to discuss in more detail, starting with our Healthcare division. The school year is off to a strong start for our Healthcare team. Notably, we continue to add new school accounts, while growing our presence within our existing client base. We attribute ongoing success to the goodwill we continue to build upon in this end market underpinned by our commitment to supplying highly qualified healthcare professionals to education institutions and other healthcare facilities nationwide. Behavioral health continues to drive our business at an increasing rate, and we believe, we are in the early innings of this much-needed upgrade to our nation's social infrastructure. Also, with increased demand for behavioral health services, comes the opportunity to further service our clients with other critical healthcare needs, cementing our…

Thank you, Brad. Regarding our consolidated results, gross profit for the third quarter was essentially flat year-over-year was 17.3 million in Q3 2023 versus 17.4 million in Q3 2022. Healthcare gross profit in Q3 2023 was 7.5 million versus 9.0 million in Q3 2022. There were primarily two reasons for the quarterly decline in healthcare gross profit. First, we believe that Q3 2023 was our first quarter where we derived zero COVID related revenue. To give this perspective, if we remove the estimated impact of COVID, we saw our school revenue grow by approximately 25% in September 2023 compared to September 2022. We experienced similar results in October 2023. COVID also impacts our non-school revenue comp. Second, we deliberately called the services provided to a multi-location continuing care client in the five boroughs of New York City and Long Island. At the beginning of COVID, we acted as an emergency VMS to this client as the gross margins from the non-direct revenue shrunk post-COVID, we decided that the contribution margin on that revenue was insufficient for our return model. On a year-over-year basis, our quarterly revenue decreased by 2.1 million from this client. If we compare Q3 2023 to Q2 2023, this client decreased by one million sequentially. The decrease in this low margin business helped us grow sequential gross margin to 30% in Q3 2023 versus 27.6% in Q2 2023. We grew engineering gross profit in Q3 2023 by 5.2% over Q3 2022. The growth and gross profit was primarily driven by increased project debt activity in our Energy Services group and getting our engineering gross margin closer to target levels. Our gross margin in Q3 2023 was 25.0%, a significant sequential improvement from Q2 2023 gross margin of 22.9%. We continue to see outstanding results from our Life…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question is going to come from Alex Rygiel with B. Riley. Your line is open.

Thank you, gentlemen. Very nice quarter and appreciate the added guidance there. Super helpful. Couple of quick questions for you here. First, as it relates to Healthcare, what was your revenue from schools in the third quarter?

The schools was $17.4 million.

Thank you. And then your balance sheet is incredibly strong. And you talked a bit about expanding into new staffing markets. So maybe, Brad, you could go a little bit deeper on that.

Look, as alluded to in the prepared remarks and been pretty consistent with our dialogue over the last couple of years. We have these businesses at a point where we have a lot of confidence in a number of places in the portfolio. So we are in a position to be opportunistic with respect to deployment of capital and expansion into new adjacencies. We are not looking to go Greenfield into any new areas per se, simply because there is plenty of opportunity, to build on the core of what we do. So, naturally or first inclination is to do it organically by bolting on talent. And to the extent that there is opportunity in organically with respect to M&A, we are going to react opportunistically and would anticipate it being more of a Bolton than any type of a major transformational platform type acquisition. So I don't know if that answers your question sufficiently.

Definitely does. And then as it relates to the engineering segment, can you talk a bit about the backlog there and the outlook for 2024?

Yes, we feel pretty good about what is going on in engineering. It like we have increasing momentum with respect to the metric that we track. It is almost like a hybrid pipeline and backlog metric given that we feel is appropriate given the mix of our business, it continues to grow. So we are anticipating good things. But engineering inevitably given the nature of the project work, it could certainly deviate, but do not expect anything substantial. It is a question in our minds as to whether or not it is going to be a pretty good year to a very nice increase year-over-year.

And then lastly, as we think about the first quarter of 2023, you mentioned that there were 55 school days, and then you mentioned that in the third quarter there were 27 and you had no sort of COVID related revenue. I guess my question here is, as we think about the fourth quarter being 51 days, and that is down 7% from the first quarter. In the first quarter, was there any COVID related kind of legacy revenue in that first quarter?

Yes, certainly. But I think, we gave pretty good guidance for Q4, right. So we do not expect any COVID related revenue inQ4. And so far, what we have seen at least in October, is if we look at our schools, okay, which is our core business in healthcare. Obviously we do a lot of work outside of schools, but at the end of the day, we are a healthcare school business, that is our core business in healthcare. That grew 25% in September, and it grew 25% in October. And we really think we can build from there.

Our next question is going to come from Ben Andrews from Andrews Capital Management. Your line is open.

Couple of balance sheet type questions, if I may. Understanding the transit account, I always thought it was subcontractor related, is that have a specific industry or segment flare, is that your engineering segment or primarily what does that tie to?

You got it right. It is tied to engineering and mostly to EPC contracts. So we have several large EPC contracts where we do the E and the P, but we don't do the C. We don't take inventory of the equipment. The equipment we purchase the equipment, but it goes straight from the OEM to the client. So, we never take inventory of that equipment. And so a lot of that is advanced payments for equipment and construction.

And so what this ballpark is the revenue stream going to those subcontractors?

Well, in terms of the - it is pretty significant, right. So we have - but it is all pass through.

So that doesn't show up your income statement, but then their liabilities or their equipment will show up on your balance sheet?

No, not the equipment. The equipment never hits our balance sheet. Essentially, because we never take inventory It is never our equipment. At all stages, it is owned by our client. So, we are basically moving the equipment and paying for the equipment, but we don't own it. So the equipment itself never hits our balance sheet. So, we get a payment in from the client. And then, we get like milestone payments essentially, and we certainly manage those contracts so that we are paid upfront. So we are not putting out huge sums of money for equipment and construction. So the money comes in, we order the equipment, we do the work, and then eventually we pay for it. And then more money comes in because these are typically multi-year contracts, they go from anywhere from two to five years.

So a liability then would already be revenue earned by that subcontractor?

Not necessarily. Some of it may be earned, but some of it may not be.

So you can book out further than 12-months.

Yes. Obviously, we are not booking any revenue until we actually earn it. Based on the progress of the contract and based on the amount of engineering that is been done. So, we do make a small percentage on the equipment and the construction as well. And that also hits our income statement as revenue.

Regarding share issuance, it looks like there was a fairly large share issuance in the quarter maybe 10% of the market cap. And it was clearly larger than any vesting schedule of what was already out there in your queues, what went on in the quarter?

Yes, I don't have the exact share numbers in front of me then, but I believe that we had about a 100,000 shares issued to probably 20 employees under long-term time-based restricted share awards.

Yes, maybe I read it wrong then, because I thought it was 800,000 shares.

No, definitely not.

Because you finished last quarter a little under eight million shares and I thought I saw 8.8 million shares out right now.

No, it is 7.8, Ben.

I'm sorry. I misread it.

No problem. I have the queue in front of me. As of yesterday, we had seven million 8.32, 3.93 outstanding for all your hard work.

Our next question is going to come from Bill Sutherland with Benchmark. Your line is open.

Following up on Ben's question on the shares. Is that still at the top of the capital deployment list for you guys going forward?

Look, I mean, we always pretty much anticipate having some form of a buyback in. Naturally, as we take in shares and volume decreases, the magnitude of buyback is inevitably going to wane. However, as you see, we continue to be active. We continue to be quite optimistic about our ability to deliver value, at the company. And so, it is safe to assume we are very much committed to deploying capital through that medium.

It is certainly been very effective. Fred zooming out a little bit on Engineering and thinking about aerospace getting back on its feet and the opportunities, particularly as you brought it out, into defense. But the other areas as well, I mean, how should we think about the kind of intermediate growth for that group overall Engineering?

We are quite optimistic about the future of Engineering and you almost look at all three segments, or all three units. And with respect Energy Services, we continue to gain traction. We have a number of very large long-term partners as we continue to build confidence project-after-project. In some instances, it is a matter of how much we can take on. So really going back to the core of that strategy, leading with technical capabilities that we think are very much differentiated in the marketplace, with respect to kind of our track record and the talent that we have assembled. And from there, naturally, as you become a preferred partner, the attachment of incremental work is, it can be very substantial. So what you are really seeing there in the case of our Energy Services group is really years of comp. We are at a bit of a tipping point with respect to compounding of years of goodwill and kind of earning that trust. So we actually have very high expectations going forward for that business. With respect to Aerospace, again, a very strong growth orientation to it. We had a bit of a setback, very late last year, last two weeks or so of the of the year. We are very happy with how the team, dealt with it and rebounded adding incremental clients, several of which are very significant and present, meaningful opportunity to expand within those accounts. So, again, in terms of the upside in that business, we are quite optimistic in 2024 and beyond. And then finally, with respect to process, again, a very, very strong technical capabilities and team. We have clearly invested in that business making sure they have all the tools that they need to continue to build on their reputation and ultimately the financial performance of that business. Inevitably, there will always be an element of lumpiness there. That will be difficult to forecast. However, it is a very IP intensive part of our portfolio and we get paid for that intellectual property. And so, it is a economically very attractive model. So with respect to saying, this quarter is going to be an excellent quarter versus call it Q3 or Q4, that one's probably the most challenging. However, the returns are very robust. The team is as strong as it is been. There presentation is very much intact. And we believe we continue to build on that. And so we are optimistic for its performance as well. But very specifically we think that that group has troughed having finished up a couple of large projects and activity is starting to go in the right direction.

So is that the thinking as you look at your fourth quarter range, likely range for revenue and looks like you are quarter-on-quarter flat to maybe off a little bit. So is that just the completion phase and your new work starts to ramp in the first quarter of next year?

Yes, no question. There is a little bit of that, but Kevin, do you want to go into very specifically the breakdown within engineering and how we are thinking about that sequential cadence?

Sure. I mean, it is difficult to project as Brad said, but we believe what we will see in engineering next year, is a slow sequential uptick as we move throughout the year, right. So we would expect Q1 revenue to be higher than Q4, Q2 to be higher than Q1 and so forth. I'm not sitting here projecting any big giant jumps in any particular quarter, but what I would like to see is single digit sequential growth each quarter with obviously there being some upside depending on what happens with all the different irons we have fire. As you have been covering us a long time, Bill, so you have seen how engineering can really jump in a quarter and stay up for a while depending on what project we have. But in terms of expectations and what we expect to happen I would expect to see a sequential uptake each quarter, and then obviously hope to see if we can really boost that with a couple of big projects.

Got it. Okay. Makes total sense. So what is the other thing I was going to ask you?

And we need to continue to work on our margins, because it is not just about adding revenue, right. It is about adding quality revenue and gross profit that gross profit dollars that are driving our return model.

Back to healthcare just for a second. I was thinking about the comments Brad you made about behavioral health, really taking off is it - I mean, where are you in terms of its importance to you? In other words, is it becoming a meaningful percentage of revenue yet or you are still just starting that process?

I think, it is the majority of the business at this point. And frankly, we anticipate seeing it accelerate. As we have been pretty excited about the story and positioned ourselves for it accordingly. The last couple of years. I wouldn't call it on the come, there is certainly a bit of an increasing drum beat. But I think, you call it nine, 12-months, I think you are seeing a meaningful increase, and we anticipate that that activity continuing to go in the right direction. I think naturally you think about some of the drivers of this from a macro perspective oftentimes investment behind these type of social infrastructure initiatives are going to come on a lag. And we think that is exactly what we are seeing. So, very exciting part of the portfolio, no question about it. We think that there is plenty of upside there. And we are certainly willing to keep everybody posted as that continues to crystallize.

And I would add to that Bill that, three years ago our behavioral health revenue three, four years ago was primarily coming from two clients. So today, we have well over 30 that we are providing behavioral health services to. And as when I look at this behavioral health market for RCM, we are still in the first inning second at best, right. So, we just think there is amazing potential there. We just think there is so much growth out there. Now, obviously, there is a lot of competition, there is a lot of other companies that are going after this business, but there is just, there is a lot of business out there for us to grab and we think our team is stellar. And we are really excited to grab it. There is only so much you can grab in one school year, because once the contracts are set for that school year that you are not going to typically add like a $5 million client in the middle of school year. But we have a lot of potential to build with the 30 schools that approximately 30 schools that we are providing behavioral health. And then hopefully when we get the next school year, we will add another 20, another 30. We will see - it is a really exciting business to be in and we will bump about it.

Roughly how many schools are you in now total year?

Probably about 70. Where we are active, roughly.

[Operator Instructions] It looks like we have a question from [Frank Kelly] (Ph). Your line is open.

In particular, life science is heading to 40% phenomenal, absolutely outstanding. And love to see top line growth there and that unit take over. Switching over to the balance sheet on actual trade accounts receivable, what can you shed some light on there? It just seems to see that we are losing significant traction since our last call and since year end 12/31/22.

Sure. I can speak about that, Frank. We talked a little bit on the last call. So the receivables relative to where the revenue right now are just too high, the treasury receivables period. And we are doing a lot of different things to get them down and get our DSOs to a better level. But as I think you - because you have fought these battles before in your career, that when you get into Q3, because our revenue is somewhat back loaded into September, because of the schools being closed in June July, we are always going to have sort of a wacky-looking receivable/DSO in Q3 because of the cadence of how the revenue hits the income statement. Obviously, you are not going to have any receivables to collect in October relative to September, or at least very little. So that is one factor in Q3. If you compare Q3 to Q4, to be really frank with you, we had a little bit of a different revenue composition, where we had some clients that just paid a lot faster than we do today, particularly when you start talking about some of the COVID-related revenue, that money was just coming in very, very fast. So the DSOs in Q4 are historically low for us. Certainly a goal for us to get back to those levels where we were in Q4 and we are working like how to get there. But those numbers are historically low. And then if you look at the receivables today and the DSOs today, we have a couple of clients that are really good clients, high-margin clients, particularly in the Life Sciences space that just pay a little like that industry, it is not uncommon to get contracts where these big companies say, payment terms are 90-days, take it or leave it. If you want the business, you got to wait 90-days. And we have a few clients like that, that are fantastic clients, very profitable, even with the high DSOs, they fit our return models very, very well. So that is one aspect that is contributing to the higher DSOs. Then when you flip over to the EPC clients, a lot of the EPC clients and some of the utilities are also slow payers. But the overall cash flow effect of those engagements are excellent. It is just that when you look at the trade DSOs, you just see they don't look great. But the overall cash economics for those clients are outstanding. So you have got a couple of factors going on. But I can assure you that, we are working very hard to get DSOs at a much lower level where they were in Q2 and Q3. Stay tuned.

Kevin, do we have as you are talking about DSO numbers. So you know where they are. Where were they in Q2 and Q3?

Obviously people calculate DSOs differently, right. But you know how I calculate them. They were 84 in Q2. They were 90 in Q3. They were 79 in Q1, and they were at an all time low in Q4 of '66. So we need to get, some way, somehow we need to get them a lot closer to testing.

Right. Because I think if we look on the flip side of that on expending capital against debt, there could be a pickup of as much as over a $1 million, $1.2 million EBITDA, if we collect those and turn them down into against the line. Right.

Well, it is not going to impact EBITDA. It is really a matter of impacting our interest costs….

Well - interest costs, right or including EBITDA right. Am I staying corrector no?

Yes, no earnings before interest. So, no, it doesn't impact interest, but your point is a good one. We are very, very focused on cash flow, and the most important measure that we look at this company is return on equity. Like that's the most important thing and we pride ourselves in having a very high return on equity and this is an important component to it.

And it looks like though Bill Sutherland had a follow-up question.

Yes, I was curious, Kevin, about the tax rate in the quarter and what to think about for the year.

Yes, we had a one-time discreet tax benefit in Q3 that helped us out. But it is just a Q3 thing. I think when you start looking at Q4, you are probably looking at consolidated taxes 28% to 29% roughly. Because I think we are going to have a discreet item that's going to work the other way. It is going to bump it up a little bit in Q4. Long term, I think 28% is a pretty good rate for you to use in your model.

[Operator Instructions] Doesn't look like we have any more questions, so I'll turn it back over to you for any closing remarks.

Okay. Thank you for attending RCM Third