Greetings. Welcome to the RF Industries Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Donni Case, Investor Relations. You may begin.

Well, thank you, and good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to RF Industries Fiscal Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2025 Earnings Conference Call. With me today are RFI's Chief Executive Officer, Robert Dawson, President and COO, Ray Bibisi, and CFO, Peter Yin. We issued our press release after market today, and that release is available on our website at rfindustries.com. I want to remind everyone that during today's call, management will make forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please note that information on the call today may constitute forward-looking statements under the Securities Exchange laws. When used, the words anticipate, believe, expect, intend, future, and other similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect management's current views with respect to future events and financial performance and are subject to risk and actual results may differ materially from the outcomes contained in any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause these forward-looking statements to differ from actual results include the risks and uncertainties discussed in the company's reports on Form 10-Ks and 10-Q and other filings with the SEC. RF Industries undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Additionally, throughout this call, we will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures. Today's earnings release and related current report on Form 8-Ks describe the differences between our GAAP and non-GAAP reporting. With that, I'll now turn the conference call over to Robert Dawson, Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead, Robert.

Thank you, Donni, and welcome, everyone, to our fourth quarter and fiscal year-end 2025 conference call. I'll start with our fourth quarter highlights and observations of what our team achieved in fiscal '25. Ray will then provide a progress update on our go-to-market strategy and Peter will cover our financial results before opening the call to your questions. In the fourth quarter, our team kept building on the momentum we delivered throughout the year. Net sales grew 23% year over year to $22.7 million. Over the past several quarters, I highlighted how our strategic transformation was driving profitable growth. And the operating leverage from executing our plan really showed in Q4. Gross profit margin of 37% exceeded our 30% target. And adjusted EBITDA was 11.5% of net sales, above our stated goal of 10%. We controlled our fixed costs while driving strong sales growth, and that execution delivered a significant increase in profitability. As I mentioned, our results steadily accelerated throughout the year and for the full fiscal year, net sales were $80.6 million, an increase of 24% compared to fiscal 2024. Gross profit margin for the year was 33% compared to 29% in the prior year. And we delivered adjusted EBITDA of $6.1 million, a huge increase compared to $838,000 in adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2024. From both the top line and bottom line perspective, fiscal '25 felt like a breakout year for RFI. And going forward, our goal is to prove what our operating model is capable of producing. While the general overall environment continues to have its share of uncertainty and increased costs, our team will continue to execute our long-term strategic plan. To further transform RFI from a product seller to a technology solutions provider. In fiscal '26, we remain intensely focused on diversifying end markets,…

Thank you, Robert, and good afternoon, everyone. Across our business, Q4 reinforces the progress we've made throughout fiscal 2025. What stands out most is not just where we're seeing growth, but the consistency and discipline behind our execution. Across our targeted end markets, demand remains supported by long-term infrastructure and connectivity investments. In large infrastructure markets, including stadiums, venues, and transportation, activity remains strong throughout the year. We supported more than 130 projects across these categories delivering a meaningful contribution to revenue compared to prior years. More importantly, this work strengthened our credibility and visibility positioning us for future multiyear opportunities including major global events such as the LA Olympics, and the US World Cup. As well as continued airport modernization programs. Our pipeline continues to provide strong visibility across a wide range of infrastructure-related opportunities reinforcing our confidence in demand stability. The aerospace and defense market also remained solid. Performance here continues to be driven by close collaboration between engineering operation, and customers to deliver solutions that meet stringent performance quality, and compliance requirements. In telecommunications and broadband, investment remains focused on densification, coverage expansion, and network reliability. Our small cell, direct air cooling, and RF passive solutions continue to see consistent traction across both OEM and carrier-driven programs. Across all these markets, our distribution channels continue to perform well, delivering consistent contributions based on improved product availability, strong partner engagement, and more disciplined commercial cadence. From an operational standpoint, Q4 reflected continued progress towards more predictable execution and tighter operational controls across inventory, cost, and delivery. Inventory actions were focused on aligning the supply chain with demand while managing tariff and supply chain uncertainty. And our cost reduction initiatives continue to deliver tangible benefits. Process and IT improvements are strengthening forecast accuracy, visibility, and scalability across the organization. From an engineering perspective, our focus continues to be innovation aligned with market demand. A more disciplined stage-gate process, and cross-functional prioritization are improving on how we allocate resources to the highest value opportunities. Customers are increasingly engaging with us early in their design cycle. Reflecting our evolution from a component supplier to a problem-solving partner. As Robert noted, RF Industries looks very different today than it did a few years ago. That change reflects clearer accountability, stronger cross-functional alignment, and a more disciplined operating rhythm. Looking ahead to 2026, our priorities are to build on this foundation. Executing reliably, advancing our product roadmap, strengthening leadership, and improving predictability across the business. There are plenty of external variables we continue to manage. But our strong pipeline, disciplined operations, and aligned teams position us well moving forward. What gives me confidence today is the progress we've made in building a more predictable and scalable business. With stronger execution, better visibility, and clear accountability. RF Industries is well-positioned to carry momentum into 2026 and continue creating value for our customers and shareholders. Now I will turn the call over to Peter.

Thank you, Ray, and good afternoon, everyone. As Robert mentioned, we're pleased with our fourth quarter and full-year results. Starting with our fourth quarter, sales increased 23% to $22.7 million year over year and 15% on a sequential basis. Gross profit margin increased to 37% from 31% year over year. That is an improvement of approximately 600 basis points that was driven by both higher sales and a more favorable product mix. Fourth quarter operating income was $903,000, a considerable improvement from the operating income of $96,000 we reported last year. Consolidated net income was $174,000, or 2¢ per diluted share and our non-GAAP net income was $2.1 million or 20¢ per diluted share. Compared to a consolidated net loss of $238,000 or 2¢ per diluted share year over year and non-GAAP net income of $394,000 or 4¢ per diluted share for Q4 2024. Fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA was $2.6 million compared to adjusted EBITDA of $908,000 for Q4 2024. Turning to fiscal year 2025 results. Full-year revenue increased 24% to $80.6 million year over year. This included finishing the year strong, with shipments from our custom cabling offering to a leading aerospace company. Full-year gross profit margin increased to 33% from 29% year over year. That is an improvement of approximately 400 basis points which was primarily driven by both higher sales and a more favorable product mix. Full-year operating income was $1.8 million, a significant improvement from an operating loss of $2.8 million in fiscal 2024. Full-year consolidated net income was $75,000 or 1¢ per diluted share, and our non-GAAP net income was $4.4 million or 40¢ per diluted share compared to a consolidated net loss of $6.6 million or 63¢ per diluted share year over year and a non-GAAP net loss of $990,000 or 9¢ per diluted…

Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. Once again, please press 1 if you have a question or a comment. First question comes from Josh Nichols with B. Riley. Please proceed.

Hi. This is Matthew Maus on for Josh. Thanks for taking my questions and great quarter. Guess, let's start off. Yeah, I guess to start off, I mean, fiscal 2025 came in above our expectations. You had strong momentum exiting the year. I'm just wondering how we should think about the growth trajectory for fiscal '26, especially now that we're almost through the '6. So I'm just wondering how things are tracking.

Yeah. Appreciate that. Thanks for the question and the comment. So I think as I said in my commentary, our expectation for '26 is another year of growth. I think the trajectory of how we get there is gonna look similar to what it was in '25. You know, the joy of having a first quarter that includes November, December, and January means you're always gonna have seasonality almost regardless of what industries you're selling into. So we expect our first quarter probably to be our platform to start from as our lowest quarter of the year. Again, if you look at what we did in 2025, you can see how quickly that accelerates and how the profitability really ratchets up. So while we're not giving specific guidance, I think if you look at our normal sort of our normal quarterly quarter-over-quarter growth that we see in a given year, we expect something similar in 2026.

Got it. And, yeah, I mean, this fourth fiscal fourth quarter was really strong, and you had gross margins that expanded to 37%. So I'm just wondering, like, can you break down how much of that was mix versus operating leverage or pricing?

Yeah. I think it's really a nice combination of product and solution mix, which we're starting to see a solid impact and contribution from some of the higher margin product lines that we sell. But I can't really understate the strength of a sales number that starts to get up above $20 million a quarter. I mean that's a we really saw it in Q4, and that's not something that we've been able to even model perfectly and say, hey. What's this gonna look like if our mix does what we think it's gonna do and sales go above a certain level? You know, once we fully absorb our fixed overhead and our labor we start to throw a lot of cash to the bottom line. And so I think that was as much the story in Q4 as anything else was our sales came in a little higher than even what we expected. We had some orders that were requested to be moved in a little bit, which was great. So we benefited from that. But, certainly, you can really see what happens when sales creep up above $19-20 million bucks. How much of that becomes a bottom line impact.

Yeah. Actually, expanding on that bottom line impact, I mean, similarly, EBITDA margin was, you know, like, 11.5%, and that was above your 10% target. Is there sort of, like, a new target that you think you can hit? I mean, you're expected to grow this fiscal 2026, so I'd only imagine that as you continue pushing past $20 million, it'll continue to be above that 10% target on a strong quarter.

Yeah. I appreciate that. I think, I mean, one, I wanna celebrate how great the team was to get us there in Q4. We put a goal out there of getting 10% EBITDA as 10% as a percentage of sales. We put that out not long ago and said, yeah. We see an opportunity to get there. We've got to really work hard to do it both on the cost and operational excellence side, but also on the sales side. And everything kinda came together in Q4. I think the expectation for us is we got to find ways to keep it above that 10% number. That's not an easy feat. I mean, if sales are up, that's great. But we're also up against, you know, continued cost increases and other things that are being thrown at us. So not putting out a specific different goal than what we already have. Our job is really to keep the profitability as high a level as we can. Again, looking at it over the long term. I mean, if you look at what we did in Q1 through '4 in 2025, you saw that number adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of sales start to crank up each quarter. Even as sales didn't grow a ton until you really saw in Q4 with a higher sales number. So I anticipate sort of a similar approach to 2026. And how that's gonna go. I mean, the quarters are hard for us to dictate specifically based on customer demand and timing of shipments around projects. Specifically, But I think, we just wanna celebrate that we exceeded that 10% a little while before we get into what are we gonna do next.

Got it. Thank you. And last one for me. It'd be helpful if you could expand on those cost increases you mentioned. And how much of those increases do you think can be mitigated with the new products and solutions you're looking to launch this year?

Yeah. So I think, I mean, look. It's nominal increases. It's the things that everyone's up against. We do have a lot of people building products in The United States. We've got a healthy production team that's north of 200 folks. Building things in multiple locations. We're proud of that. And because of that, we need to keep those folks, you know, wages keeping up with the world and with great benefits. For a company our size, we provide what we believe are really strong health care and 401(k) match and other things like that that in a lot of cases, are better than companies much larger than we are. So those are the things that we see increases on sort of annually. And the team's done a good job of managing those. We go in eyes wide open every year knowing that there's these annual renewals of certain things. And we have to do our best to mitigate that where we can. Some of that can be done with pricing, but to your point, some of that can be overcome with just a slightly better sales number with a solid product and solution mix. And so we, you know, we attack an annual budget with that idea that we have some increases, and we expect that we have to overcome them because that's what we're supposed to do. So it's the normal thing that you would see and then throw in just the general global chaos of things can change with one quick text message or tweet at this point. And so have to always be on our toes and ready for changes to things like logistics costs and other product costs that might be unexpected at this point.

Got it. Thank you. And actually, just a quick follow-up on that. Can you maybe give us I guess, in terms of those new products and solutions, like, maybe a couple that you think are gonna be the most impactful this year?

Yeah. Look. We continue to feel really good about our integrated systems product line stack and small cell are both things we've talked about for a long time. That we're having minimal impact on our sales and have started to really contribute more. We also still feel really good about our legacy product lines. I mean, our custom cabling business is strong and performing extremely well in things like the defense market and other, you know, industrial and OEM kind of markets. We're seeing nice steady growth there and some great customer wins that, you know, in some cases, we're putting out news on when those things come in. In the aerospace and defense market. So I think, you know, those three areas are probably items that are more project-centric and can be kind of a meatier piece of our total sales. The everything else, which has in many cases, you know, a distribution flavor to it as well. We expect those to continue growing and being a nice workhorse in the background putting up solid growth and profitability there. So it really has become for us sort of the combination of firing on all these different pistons not expecting every single product line to be perfect every quarter. But expecting a nice balance from them. And when there's contribution from multiple product and solution areas that are, you know, project-centric and less seasonal that starts to give us some predictability and smooth things out where it can.

Got it. Thanks for taking my questions. I'll hop back into the queue.

Thanks, Matthew.

Next question is from Howard Root, Private Investor. Howard, please proceed.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions and congratulations. Not just on the quarter, but really the transformation you've done over the last couple of years here with RF Industries. It's really a great job. Thank you. First, I got a couple of questions for Peter. The income taxes and the noncash onetime charges, can you kind of give a quick explanation of what those were in the fourth quarter?

Sure. I'll tackle the tax first. Tax relates to a valuation allowance. There. So not sure if that answers your question or you want me to get into a little more detail here in our footnotes to the K. There we kind of have a tax provision footnote that kind of highlights that in a little more detail.

I'm just kinda looking going forward. The $478,000, obviously, a huge number for the income taxes. But what is that, you know, if you strip out the unusual stuff, what's your tax rate going forward?

So tax rate going forward, it's kind of hard to predict. They're probably in the mid-twenties if that's kind of standard corporate tax rate, from state and federal. There, but we have some nuances with valuation allowance items kicking in, for us.

Okay. And then the noncash, is that part of that was on the taxes side too, or is that something else?

No. The noncash items are not part of the valuation allowance or the tax provision. So those items are kind of pointed out there. The $855 you're seeing there, we talked a little bit about it's related to an accrual for a settlement.

Okay. And then the interest rate, what do you see as a decline in your interest rate kinda going forward from this new rework plan of credit?

Yeah. So we're, you know, obviously, the refinance we've disclosed there, so it's drop. But from a cash perspective or interest, savings, we're expecting kind of at least a quarter million in interest savings. For the next year.

Okay. Great. So then more for Robert on the, you know, the just diversification that you've gone through. It's amazing. And it could you put some numbers kind of around on what percentage of your revenue and just really ballpark, Robert, is coming from, you know, transportation, aerospace, you know, stadium, data centers, can you tell us in terms of where you are and types of the revenue growth from there? And getting away from your base telecommunications business?

Yeah. I appreciate the question. I think it's hard to slice that up simply because the numbers get they share a lot of information. I think for a company our size, trying to slice into the various details. What I can tell you is, you know, on prior years where we had major growth happening, we were seeing the, you know, wireless and telecom market in the 70% range of total sales. We're now seeing that more like 50%, about of our sales are coming from things that I would call telecom and wireless. The remaining half is coming from, you know, in many cases, similar applications maybe, but transportation, aerospace, and defense, industrial, and other OEM, public safety, things like that. So I think the way that we disclose those results is a slightly higher level than maybe what you're asking, but, hopefully, that gives you some color around just the way we've seen the overall impact and contribution from those different markets.

Great. Yes. And then in the backlog, just to kind of explain, I mean, what part of that is seasonal? I mean, both the bookings and the backlog took a pretty big drop from Q3 to Q4. And I understand being a shareholder for a bunch of years, is that part of that is seasonal. But what part of that is seasonal? What part of that might be from the transformation of the business changes, how long you have backlog or what your overall level of backlog would be and when your bookings are coming in. What can you say about that in terms of what that means for your business?

Yeah. Great question on backlog. I think it's, you know, for us, it's a as we've said for years, it's, you know, it's a good health indicator that we have a backlog, and we've got stuff coming in there. I think we also disclose it deeper than most companies where we talk about, you know, end of quarter and based on the bookings that we had, what got us to that number, and then we give an update at the time of our call to make sure people are clear to elaborate a little bit on how the business does work. And you're right. With the way you're thinking about it is, you know, seasonally, we expect to have a solid booking quarter in our fiscal fourth quarter. Just around the seasonality of sort of the way we also expect to start eating through some of that backlog in our Q1. most markets work. We also are trying to get better at moving our backlog out the door. You know, it doesn't hurt us to have long-standing backlog, but it also, at times, some of that backlog can get old and tired. We wanna keep that moving similar to the way we've managed our inventory by bringing it down to a, you know, a more manageable, healthier level and being faster with replenishing when we need to. Our expectation on backlog is that it sort of hits a low point in our first quarter and then starts to work its way back up as we see the project-based work on the calendar year start to kick in when people's budgets get finalized and everyone gets settled back into their seats. This was a, you know, I think everyone probably felt that this was a strange holiday season because you had Christmas and New Year both falling on a Thursday. Which means you basically had two dead weeks from a people coming to work and everyone being engaged perspective. We're finally seeing the world get back to a little more normalcy. Our expectation is that that backlog will, you know, start to move back up as it normally does this time of year. But at the same time, you can see that we've been moving some of that out the door to get to a fresher level as well.

Right. And then bookings, the $18.5 million in bookings for Q4, was that kind of according to your plan? Was that ahead of your plan or a little under your plan? How did that fit with your expectations?

Yeah. I would say it's around our plan-ish. I think it's hard to Q4 is a tough one because of where our, you know, October year-end doesn't really align with other people's budgets. So we generally see a larger booking level happen in our third quarter. It's kinda just seasonally. That's what we've historically seen. It's starting to smooth out a bit. But the, you know, October, November, December, January time frame is always any order that we expected in any of those months could be in another one. And that's just that's just how it falls around the year-end and the year beginning. So it was fine. I think we were happy with that number, and, you know, and the thing that we're even happier about, though, is we've got in our pipeline that still looks super healthy. Ray talked some about that. The different application areas and the different customer areas where we're seeing, you know, growth in the last couple of years, we've still got a really solid pipeline of opportunities that aren't going away. While those move around in those various months, as I just said, we only see us adding to that pipeline of opportunity and feel really good about it.

Great. Well, I appreciate all the extra color there. And again, congratulations to you and the whole team on outstanding performance from where you were four years ago to where you are today. Thanks a lot.

Great. Thank you, Howard.

Once again, if you have a question or a comment, please indicate so by The next question comes from Steve Cole with Bantgrove. Please proceed.

Hey, good morning, guys. And too would like to reiterate that it's congrats on a great performance. I'm sure I agree that you should at least savor the victory at least for a day or two, maybe even a week before we start looking at the next set of targets. But wanted to talk about a couple of things. One thing on the balance sheet, I noticed if I'm doing my math right, we're down to $3 million in net debt, which has probably been the best we've been in quite a while. How has that changed our priorities on capital allocation? Do we see we haven't done any acquisitions in a while? Do we look at share buybacks, acquisitions, dividend? Has the thought changed at all on that or what is the thinking today on capital allocation?

Yes. Steve, thanks for the question. I think at the moment, our priority is the same as it has been. You know, we wanna get that net debt as low as we can. Obviously, the performance of the business helps. But at the same time, every time the board meets, we talk about, you know, best shareholder value. And at the moment, we think the best thing for us short of having a strategic opportunity in front of us that makes sense, we wanna continue paying down that debt. That is job one. Now we're also always looking at other opportunities to drive shareholder value and give a nice return. So all of the items that you brought up are up for discussion. Every time the board meets, we talk about those. We haven't done an acquisition in a few years that's been on purpose, and some of that the market, and some of it was us getting to a point where we could actually, you know, finish the integration, of the ones that we had done. We finally got a chance to do a lot of that work, which is showing through now in our operating leverage and, you know, getting our costs as low as we can. So I think if there were an opportunity that presented itself, from an M&A perspective, we might alter those priorities. But at the moment, our priority continues to be debt service and getting that to a, as low a point as we can.

Right. And if I one follow-up just on margin for a sec. So I know obviously margin is doing very well. I guess I'm curious we look across the base, how much of the improvement in margins coming on the book to inside versus just volume running through the plant? I know you've keyed in on, again, today kind of on a I know it depends on mix. And we get to a certain level, a lot comes to the bottom line. But are we seeing is that split fifty if you look at it, I know how to phrase the question, but are we seeing a better book? Because I presume as you're getting aerospace defense stuff, you're getting better booked in margins there. I would think. But can you put some color around that or some granularity?

Yeah. I think the best I can do there is, you know, look. Having a better product mix and solution mix with some of our newer higher high-value much more technology-centric product areas. Really helps. I mean, that mix just as those areas perform better, Matt will tell you that that'll start to drag your gross margins up. Once we cross, you know, $18-19, $20 million in sales, now you start to see the impact of, you know, you fully absorb all the labor, much of which for us hits above that gross profit line. So the better we perform top-line wise, almost regardless of product line, and the mix, you're gonna see more profitability, which for us, we live and die by the gross profit line. You know, we manage our really well below the line. It is a function of those things. Can we sell more valuable products? And solutions to our customers and can we get that high as possible? Because when we do, you really see the impact of it. So it's, yeah. As it's hard for you to ask the question, it's hard for me to give a specific answer on which percentage causes which. I can tell you that it's both those things help. Although, you know, we would see a solid margin improvement just with a higher sales number and a similar product mix than what we've had historically. Wouldn't be as high as 37%, but it certainly would be better.

And last question, just touching on you alluded to DAC and small cell. Obviously, it's taken a little while for them to get some traction. But talking about public safety for a minute and density, I know for a long time we're talking about, you know, these buildings and venues, you know, and even elevate people had coverage. Are we seeing is the regulatory landscape there changed? Is it still a local thing? Or is there anything from a bigger picture? Is that market becoming more lucrative and getting more traction as people have put requirements on the books that they're actually enforceable?

Yeah. We like the public safety market. I mean, we have a great product offering, not just with our RF passives and some RF active gear that, you know, we have under the Microlab brand. But also our kinda core connectivity product line fits in there as well with fiber and coax. So we like it. We've sold to it for years. Most of that gets serviced through the distribution channel. Which, again, we appreciate those partnerships and getting to markets like that. I think how those decisions are made and who really dictates what, though, it's still really fragmented. You've got localized ordinances that sometimes are hard to enforce. There's certain cities in the country that have mandated public safety coverage inside buildings, and that mandate is hard to force people to do when they're unwilling to find these building owners to make it happen. It just becomes a really challenging sort of environment. That's not new. We take part in public safety forums all year long. All the time, and have conversations about it real-time. It's similar to kind of bead funding, the federal government says, hey. We need this. And then it gets left up to states and local governments, and then it just becomes a revolving door of people making decisions. And it's been challenging to pin down, you know, sort of a final addressable market there short of saying, for us, it falls into our in-building coverage, our distributed antenna system product areas and those the way we service those applications. So I think it'll continue to get better. New buildings being built tend to have an opportunity to put in some better public safety-based, you know, RF solutions, and we're right in the middle of many conversations around that. And I think our offer is really strong there. So we expect that to be an opportunity for us going forward, but it continues to be extremely fragmented from an ordinance and decision-making perspective.

Thank you guys very much.

Thanks, Steve.

We have no further questions in the queue. I will now turn the call back over to Robert Dawson for closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, and thanks, everyone, for participating in today's call. We truly appreciate your support and look forward to reporting on our progress throughout fiscal 2026. Have a great day.

This concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.