Thank you for holding and welcome to Rockwell Automation’s Quarterly Conference Call. I need to remind everyone that today’s conference call is being recorded. Later in the call, we will open up the line for questions. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I’d like to turn the call over to Aijana Zellner, Head of Investor Relations. Ms. Zellner, please go ahead.

Thank you, Julianne. Good morning. Thank you for joining us for Rockwell Automation’s Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2022 Earnings Release Conference Call. With me today is Blake Moret, our Chairman and CEO; and Nick Gangestad, our CFO. Our results were released earlier this morning and the press release and charts have been posted to our website. Both the press release and charts include in our call today will reference non-GAAP measures. Both the press release and charts include reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures. A webcast of this call will be available on our website for replay for the next 30 days. For your convenience, a transcript of our prepared remarks will also be available on our website at the conclusion of today’s call. Before we get started, I need to remind you that our comments will include statements related to the expected future results of our company and are, therefore, forward-looking statements. Our actual results may differ materially from our projections due to a wide range of risks and uncertainties and that are described in our earnings release and detailed in all our SEC filings. So with that, I’ll hand it over to Blake.

Thanks, Aijana, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. Let’s turn to our fourth quarter results on Slide 3. We had a great finish to the fiscal year and delivered very strong operating performance. I’m proud of how our teams navigated this challenging year with continued supply chain volatility, significant inflation and currency headwinds. Our Q4 results were in line with our expectations with organic sales and earnings, both growing double-digits year-over-year and sequentially. Orders came in as expected in the quarter. Our record backlog, along with very low order cancellation rates reflect the continued solid underlying demand from our customers across many industries and regions. Total revenue of over $2.1 billion was up 17.6% year-over-year. Organic sales grew 20.5% versus prior year in line with our expectations. Acquisitions contributed almost two points of growth this quarter. Currency translation reduced sales by about 5%, driven by continued strengthening of the U.S. dollar. As expected, we continue to see a gradual stabilization of global supply chain. Similar to last quarter, the split of Q4 shipments by business segment and region was driven by access to specific electronic components. In the Intelligent Devices business segment, organic sales grew over 16% versus prior year with growth in all regions. While growth in this segment for the quarter was once again disproportionately impacted by component availability, we were able to mitigate these supply issues with the benefits from our resiliency actions. We see continued market need for our intelligent devices from PowerFlex drives to our motion technology to our best-in-class safety solutions. Our independent cart technology business had a record year with both orders and sales growing over 35% year-over-year. Software & Control organic sales growth of over 32% versus prior year was above expectations. Strong double-digit growth in View and…

Thank you, Blake, and good morning, everyone. I’ll start on Slide 9, fourth quarter key financial information. Fourth quarter reported sales were up 17.6% over last year. Q4 organic sales were up 20.5% and acquisitions contributed 1.9 points to total growth. Currency translation decreased sales by 4.8 points. Segment operating margin expanded to 23.3% and was in line with our expectations. The 540 basis point increase was driven by higher sales and positive price costs, partially offset by the negative impact from currency. Corporate and other expense was $35 million and in line with the prior year. Adjusted EPS of $3.04 was in line with our guidance and grew 30% versus the prior year. I’ll cover a year-over-year adjusted EPS bridge on a later slide. The adjusted effective tax rate for the fourth quarter was 17.8%. The year-over-year increase was related to the cumulative impact of several onetime discrete items recognized in the prior year. Free cash flow was $359 million and was up $200 million over the prior year, driven by higher pretax income. Working capital on a currency-neutral basis grew 10% sequentially versus our plans for a 10% decline. Our planned inventory reductions did not materialize in the quarter due to the continued build of raw material and work in process waiting on critical components. The actions we put in place to rightsize inventory are taking longer to implement in the current supply chain environment. Our inventory days on hand at the end of the current year were close to 130 days versus a pre-pandemic average of 90 to 100 days. One additional item not shown on the slide. We repurchased approximately 300,000 shares in the quarter at a cost of $76 million. For the full year, our share repurchases totaled $301 million, in line with our July…

Thanks, Nick. As we look to 2023, we are confident in our ability to execute our strategy. Our record backlog, underlying customer demand, and a more resilient operating model set the stage for a year of double-digit sales and earnings growth. As you heard today, we are continuing to invest for our future, including investing in attracting and retaining key talent. I would like to thank our people for their relentless commitment to solving the immediate needs of our customers while focusing on continued innovation and investment for the future. We are excited to share some of these innovations with you at our Investor Day in Chicago during Automation Fair later this month. We will be introducing an industry-first, cloud-native programming application for Logix, a new operator interface package, new I/O for process industries, on-machine motor control, and a host of other differentiated offerings that make this time a historic moment in Rockwell’s journey. Aijana will now begin the Q&A session.

We would like to get to as many of you as possible, so please limit yourself to one question and a quick follow up. Thank you. Julianne, let’s take our first question.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Scott Davis from Melius Research. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, guys, Blake, Nick, Aijana.

Hey, good morning.

Good morning.

Thanks for the detail. But can you give us a sense of inflection points and end markets, things that you’re expecting to get perhaps meaningfully better or meaningfully worse in your 2023 guide?

So Scott, just working through the different industry segments, we talk about continued investment within the discrete industry segment in EV and battery. I mentioned the Hyundai wind, great wind force for with the greenfield, and we continue to see both the established brand owners as well as the startups increase capacity in their EV fleets because they have to, otherwise they’re going to lose share and they’re not going to be ready to meet growing consumer demand there. So we see that continuing. We continue to see a semiconductor moving forward. And even with a decrease in demand in the consumer markets, the trends remain that people are going to try to make every product that they produce smarter and there’s going to continue to be growth in semiconductor, in consumer and certainly in the industrial markets that we participate in and automotive and so on. So we see continued investment there. And as we talked about a little bit, we’re playing an expanded role in semiconductor production most specifically referenced by that material handling that way for handling wind that we talked about on the call. We see warehouse automation continuing. I don’t see an immediate reacceleration in e-commerce, but for retailers wanting to be more efficient in back of store and in their own warehouses, we continue to see good business there going forward into fiscal 2023. In the Hybrid Industry segment, food and beverage continues a lot of that activity apart from a few of the green fields that we’re participating in is actually productivity and resilience plays within existing facilities. So this is one of the best areas for our cyber security offerings. The services that we’re providing in assessing and remediating and monitoring these facilities is particularly attractive to a lot of these food and beverage and consumer packaged goods companies. Pharmaceuticals, we continue to see the trends towards personalized medicine continuing on and within the Hybrid Industry segment, eco industrial with renewables and energy management water treatment that continues to be strong I think with good secular tailwinds. And then in process oil and gas, we continue to see double-digit growth ahead for the Sensia joint venture. Obviously, there’s a lot of interest in the U.S. expanding our ability to provide energy both for our own domestic needs as well as potentially more export and along with traditional fossil fuels and helping them with their energy transition plans. And all of them of course have those plans. Renewables as well, and we’ve talked before about customers like for solar that are continuing to build out their capabilities in renewables, and we’re playing a strong role in that. So when we look at these verticals, we continue to see strength even in the face of what are certainly some macroeconomic headwinds.

Good answer, Blake, or good thorough answer. When you get into the detail of auto. When you think about the spend – higher spend in EV and batteries, is there a certain negative offset in ice [ph] or is there some pent-up demand? I suppose just from the COVID lockdowns and such in that part of the world where there still needs to be some money spent, some color there would be helpful. Thanks.

Yes, Scott, I think the brand owners are going to continue to focus on their profit makers, right? They’ve got their own sources of profit that are funding these new ventures. And so when you think of the trucks and the bigger vehicles, the luxury vehicles that are providing an outsized percentage of the profit, they’re going to be working to keep those areas strong through this. They’re probably going to be very judicious when it comes to model changeovers and things like that, but in terms of keeping those plants up and running that’s a good read for us with all the installed base that we have.

Okay. I’ll pass it on. Thank you and best of luck.

Yes. Thanks, Scott.

Our next question comes from Andrew Obin from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi. Can you hear me?

We can.

Yes, Andrew.

Excellent. Just, can you just talk about maybe any one time items that you got to ship a third quarter that you’re not getting to ship in the first quarter? Other than normal seasonality, a price cost, but any specific market or geography that was particularly strong in the quarter, that sort of leading to very conservative forecast on mix and revenue in Q1? Thank you.

Yes, the biggest swing we’re going to see Andrew is in our Software & Control segment. Our fourth quarter, we saw good availability of components that we’re benefiting our results in the fourth quarter. As we work with our suppliers there, we are seeing a decline in our Software & Control in the first quarter as we work specific – there’s specific components that we – that will be during part of the first quarter that will be an even shorter supply. And that’s part of what we’re causing – what we’re guiding in our statements about first quarter. This is really coming from our increase – as you can imagine, Andrew, throughout the year, it become even tighter engaged with our component suppliers to make sure we are making the right plans and making the right promises to our customers. And with this, we could see that there’s a couple components that are going to be impacting us in partway through first quarter.

Yes. Nick, just to add to that, Andrew, the granularity of our analysis and out of our key suppliers, I should add continues to improve. And we think that had a bearing on Q3 and Q4 coming in as we expected in terms of the component supply. Working with these suppliers, we did identify a constraint in chip supply that will disproportionately affect offering control for a portion of Q1. The suppliers that we’re working with have a high say/do ratio. They have characterized the issue. We understand it. We’re working closely with them. But that’s embedded in the Q1 implied guide.

Got you. And just to understand in terms of your backlog and as you look into 2023, what percent of your revenue is underwritten at this point by the existing backlog? And how does it compare to sort of a normal year end? Thanks so much.

Yes. So, Nick will add some additional details to this. But we have about 60% of the full year in backlog. Typically, we have about a month. Most of our products are delivered off of a distributor shelf or very quickly from one of our factories either drop ship or through the distributor. And so having well over half the year of our shipments in the guidance in backlog is absolutely unprecedented. And you see the slide that we posted to kind of show the development of that across all three of our business segments.

Right. Sorry, Nick. Yes?

Yes, Andrew, I don’t really have anything to add to that, that those comments about less than a month and greater than half a year, that’s really focused on our Software & Control and Intelligent Devices. I would call our Lifecycle Services a more normal. It’s slightly elevated backlog, but that’s a more normal type backlog. It’s the other two segments that have the extended amounts of backlog.

So it’s just a real ability to ship as the gating factor.

That is correct.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Jeff Sprague from Vertical Research. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hey, thank you. Good morning, everyone.

Hey, Jeff.

Hey, I just wanted to try to deconstruct the grid – I’m sorry, the bridge a little bit more if we could. In particular, just thinking about price cost, right, I think you talked about a 100 basis point tailwind there. And Nick, I guess the math that I’m doing here is 4% price is kind of like over $300 million, right. So that’s like $2 a share. So to get price/cost down to, call it, roughly $1 that we’d be talking about cost being about half of what price is. So that gets me to like $150 million benefit on price/cost or maybe 200 basis points. I don’t know if you agree with that math, but I just love some more color on what’s going on in price/cost and mix and just how to really frame that number up a little bit more precisely.

Yes. Most of your math make sense and aligns with how we’re thinking about it. We are expecting input cost inflation to continue in 2023, and that’s reflected. And again, about half of what we’re seeing at price, that’s accurate REIT that you’re making, Jeff. As far as the – where that inflation that we’re expecting, we’re expecting all or virtually all of it in electronic components, where we’ve been seeing that continue to go up, and we’re projecting that to continue to go up in fiscal year 2023. Things like logistics, we’ve seen some benefits more recently but we’re calling that closer to flat for next year because while we’re seeing some rate decreases, we’re also anticipating some extra fuel costs that will largely offset that on the logistics side. So in terms of the math on it, I think the only thing I’d point out is that price not only affects the numerator in that equation. It also affects the denominator as well. So adjusting both your – the income benefit but also the impact it has on revenue. That’s what I – that’s where I get to the 100 basis point impact on margin.

Great. Thanks for that. And then just a little bit more on Q1, pretty clear on the answer to Andrew’s question about supply availability but maybe just give us a little color on the cadence of investment spending. It always seems to be a bit of a parlor game every year figuring out how that’s progressing over the year. It sounds like it’s heavier in Q1 and then tapers off, but can you give us a little bit more color on how to think about that.

No. Our investment spend now – and you got to realize, Jeff, this is coming off a year where we increased our investment spend by 10% or a little over that. And now we’re planning in our plans this year about a 5% increase on top of that. So that brings us to the cadence throughout the year. I don’t see any big significant change in the cadence. When I was talking about the movement of spend, that’s really more a statement on Q1 of last year to Q1 of fiscal year 2023 that will be going up. Sequentially from Q4 to Q1, I don’t see our investment spend changing very much. That will stay at a pretty consistent level.

Great, thanks. I’ll pass it on.

Our next question comes from Josh Pokrzywinski from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning.

Hi, Josh.

I guess, first question on backlog conversion. You sort of touched on a little bit of it, but any sort of explicit view on whether or not you guys will be working down backlog or any view on how order rates kind of progress throughout the year like is that something that you’re planning on dipping into as part of that volume growth? Or is the expectation – that order rates kind of stay in the ZIP code and you kind of end up kind of flattish on the backlog situation. I know it’s not normal guidance item, but we’re kind of at an unusual point in time.

Yes, for sure. Let me just start by saying even with orders and shipments converging a bit in Q4, we still built backlog in Q4. And so we continue to expect significant backlog as we exit fiscal year 2023. We’re going to continue to provide orders information through the year. We think it’s an important point. But as we’ve been saying and as we’re now seeing as lead times in certain areas become – start coming down and our levels of customer service are increasing, we’ll see those orders and those shipments converge, but they remained well above pre-pandemic order rates. Nick?

Yes. I don’t think I have much to add to what Blake said there. We – I think, particularly in the second half of the year, if we started to see some reduction in the backlog driven by reductions in our lead times, we would see that as healthy.

Got it. That’s helpful. And then just on the incremental margins. I think longer term targeting something a little bit higher and sort of a reference point last year. Do you expect those to accelerate? I guess, sort of the input cost environment and some of the 1Q noise around supply chain. But on the investment side, I guess, what changed or what are you guys seeing to accelerate that a little further here? Like is there a specific market or channel shortfall? Or what exactly should we kind of anchor to as the driver of maybe that slightly higher number?

The 5% increase that we’re talking about in fiscal 2023, I just want to make sure I’m answering the right question.

Yes. Or I guess more broadly, what’s driving the incrementals apart from the things that are kind of beyond your control?

Well, first, on the investment spend, that’s – that I would put in a very normal range of growth for us from a historic perspective. And it’s the typical things that we’ve been investing in. We’re investing in product development. We’re investing in our SaaS capabilities, some of our enterprise digitization. We continue to invest in our sales force and as well as we’ve been doing some investment in plant capacity expansion and we see that continuing to go. We’re also investing in our own talent and the compensation that we are providing for the talent. That’s all part of that roughly 5% increase in 2023. Now one of the big things we have – I said earlier that we have a core conversion that in the 30% to 35% range, that’s in line with our financial framework that we’ve laid out. One of the bigger moving items in that is just the restoration of our bonus that, that we had a noticeably less-than-planned bonus in fiscal year 2022. In this guide, we’re planning for that to go back to our 100% level. And our core conversion if we were to normalize for that would be at 40%.

Yes. Just to add a little bit more. I touched on some of the new product introductions that we’re going to be bringing out and that really are creating new streams of value for customers and investors for that matter. At Automation Fair, we’re going to be introducing a cloud-native programming package for Logic. This is going to be an industry first for a major programmable controller line. It’s a big deal. It went general availability, it went GA a few days ago. And this is the start of a whole new level of value for our customers for many, many years to come. A new operator interface package that came to us began really with our acquisition of ASEM, it was an extra benefit in addition to the hardware that we have from ASEM. That’s going to be at Automation Fair. A brand-new line of process IO, specifically for process industries, a major step in the areas that we’ve been talking about for a while now to add new process functionality to Logix control systems. On machine motion control with kinetics and PowerFlex, so these are things that customers have been asking for, for years. And we’re coming out now with these items and at the beginning of these new revenue streams. In areas like cloud native software, one of the most important things you get is continued innovation and releases to the market. With on-prem software, you’re often bound by annual or semiannual releases. And while we’ll continue to do that with our strong on-prem offering, continuing to innovate at a faster pace with these new cloud-native offerings is a whole new source value for us. And so some of that is embedded with those investment spending increases, along with the go-to-market to make sure that we’re getting the word out, and we’re in front of the customers we need to be.

Got it. That’s helpful. Thanks, guys.

Our next question comes from Julian Mitchell from Barclays. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, Good morning. And I just wanted to circle back maybe just some of the comments on the first fiscal quarter. So I think you talked about 15% segment margins down from, I guess, 23% sequentially in Q4. And you mentioned mix a couple of times. So is the point there that the Software & Control margins are down very heavily versus that kind of 8-point firm-wide average. And then are we right in thinking it’s around sort of $1.80, $1.90 of EPS in fiscal Q1? There’s nothing odd happening below the line or anything like that? Just wanted to clarify that a little bit on mix and the EPS.

Yes, Julian. The biggest thing I’m talking about when I talk about mix is exactly what you referenced of our Software & Control. It was a noticeable help to us in Q4 with the 30%-plus growth there, and it will become a headwind to us in the first quarter because we expect it to be growing below the rest of the company average. So that swing there will be part of what’s happening. In terms of other things, like things with corporate, other, with tax rate, I don’t see anything out of the norm impacting us in Q1 disproportionately one way or the other versus the full year.

Got it. So that sort of $1.80, $1.90 isn’t a bad sort of starting point, if you’re down from the $2.10 a year ago of EPS.

Julian, you’re asking me to start to guide quarterly EPS guidance. I’m trying to give as much color as I can, but I haven’t pegged a exact range for EPS for Q1. We tend to guide for the full year what we expect for EPS.

Understood. And then just – thank you, Nick. Just my quick follow-up would be around the order intake. I think Blake, you made some very positive comments around the overall environment. I guess ABB had talked about kind of a normalization of discrete automation orders by their customers as supply chains are easing and maybe slightly extended kind of times for the customers to place orders because of the macro. So kind of two different drivers maybe weighing on orders a little bit. I just wondered if Rockwell had seen either of those points affecting the order intake at all.

Yes. I think in the first, with – as lead times come in a bit, and we’re seeing that with certain of our product lines, you need less coverage, particularly if you’re a machine builder, you don’t need as many months of coverage of the products to complete your equipment. And so that’s going to reduce the size and maybe the frequency of those orders. And I think that is a positive trend because it means customer service is coming back to where we expected to be. And graphically, you see a bit of that on some of the charts that we showed. In terms of customers with your second point, customers saying, no, we don’t really need it now, not seeing much of that. I can tell you that the calls I’m having with customers frequently are that they want their stuff. And so we’re not seeing much at all in the way of customers saying, ship it when you can. That stuff I ordered a few weeks ago. Don’t worry. I’m not getting those calls. So that would be my characterization of what we’re seeing.

Great. Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Julian.

Our next question comes from Brendan Luecke from Bernstein. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Good morning, all. Thanks for taking my questions.

Good morning.

So I just wanted to double click on the cancellation trends. They’ve ticked up a little bit over the last couple of quarters. I guess two questions here. One, is there a root cause? Or is this just noise in the numbers? And then two, just a point of clarification. The 1%, 2%, 3%, are these quarterly cancellation rates? Or is that an annualized rate?

Yes, those are quarterly rates and I’d put them more in the noise category. I mean, these are rates that are low single digits and they’re well within the range of what we’ve seen historically.

Okay. Excellent. Thank you.

Yes.

Our next question comes from Steve Tusa from JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Good morning.

Good morning, Steve.

On the end markets, can you give us a little bit of color around very strong sales growth orders a bit less of growth. Maybe just give us a little bit of color on the orders to the extent, you know, were there any end markets that were actually down? Or are they all up on orders?

Yes. So we don’t provide specific information on incoming orders by industry. But based on the line of sight that we have with customers in these areas where we’re working specifically with them on projects, whether it’s in pharmaceutical for getting new medicines to market or it’s new plants for EV like the Hyundai win or oil and gas wins that we see through Sensia. We’ve got pretty good line of sight to that incoming activity, and it remains robust. I mean, again, while the order rates have moderated a bit, they’re still well above pre-pandemic levels in the verticals that I talked about during my tour in answer to Scott’s question.

Got it. And then just on this – on the S&C margin, it’s just a little bit like more lumpy than what we’ve heard from others. Is there anything in the rev rec, revenue recognition around the software businesses that’s kind of moving these margins around at all that we have to consider for a business like this going forward that may have an influence on 4Q to 1Q, it’s just the seasonality here for that business? And also, why wouldn’t these supply constraints impact intelligent devices more if they were kind of based on more of the products?

Sure. Let me start with that and then Nick may have additional comment. The Software & Control story is really around reduced volume. There’s nothing in there with software rev rec, Plex continues to perform well. We didn’t talk as much about it on the call, but we’re very happy with the development of Plex, with the strategic value, the industrial logic as well as the financial performance of Plex, and we will talk more about that during Investor Day in a few weeks. So there’s nothing there that’s causing margins to be affected. It’s more about the volume. And the issue that I talked a little bit about is with a specific components that are disproportionately used in Software & Control, there’s a reduced supply for a portion of Q1 that picks back up. And so really, that’s – we’re giving a little bit more insight there. But that’s what’s causing the reduction after an over 30% year-over-year growth rate in the fourth quarter with Software & Control. And as we’ve talked about often, all of our products are very highly impacted, positively by increasing growth. We saw that manifested in Q4 with Software & Control, and we’re seeing that moderate in Q1 and then with sequential growth from there through the balance of the year.

Yes, Steve, one way, we are still seeing, from a macro standpoint, general stabilization occurring from a supply chain perspective. What I’m pointing out what we’re seeing with Software & Control is some particular isolated incidences where we have this visibility of what’s coming at us during the current quarter, and we just wanted to highlight that to you. It’s not a general trend. It’s something very specific and very short term.

Right. But not software, not related to software rev rec? Yes. Okay. Okay. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Andy Kaplowitz from Citi. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Good morning, everyone.

Hey, Andy.

Blake, there’s obviously concern out there regarding a slower global economy, but your orders, as you’ve talked about have remained strong. Can you give more color into what your customers are telling you about their CapEx plans? We’ve already talked about some of your more cyclical end markets outperforming the semis and autos. But how much do you think reshoring is helping you at this point? And where do you think we are and let’s call it the reshowing cycle, if you may?

Yes. I like talking about shoring rather than reshoring because it’s really more about the U.S. being an outsized beneficiary of new CapEx as opposed to shuttering plants in China and other parts of Asia and bringing it back to the U.S. It’s really about new lines of business, new capacity, filling out a little more of a local-for-local strategy, got a lot of manufacturers are providing, and I don’t see anything with the current economic headwinds that would cause people to say just kidding. Let’s go back to pushing manufacturing to other parts of the world and chase lower labor rates. I see, if anything, the U.S. continuing to be a beneficiary as people are trying to add redundant lines as people are trying to get closer to their consumers so that they’re not having to rely on 10,000-mile supply chains. We’re going to continue. And one of the things I look at is our own plans as a manufacturer. What is Rockwell doing? And we look at our CapEx that Nick talked about, which is up year-over-year for things that we feel like we need to do for the near-term in office to sustain share gains going forward and the continued investment in the U.S. We have a very important manufacturing that we’re going to continue in the U.S. because it’s our biggest market. And we continue to support manufacturing close to consumer here just as we do in Europe and in Asia and in Latin America.

Very helpful, Blake. And then can you give us a little more color to what you’re seeing in process automation markets? It seems like you’re forecasting a bit of an uptick in mining related growth for 2023? You’re still forecasting double-digit chemicals-related growth despite chemical-related companies having more difficult time lately. So what are your customers telling you there? And then given the later cycle nature of Lifecycle solutions, should we expect a bigger margin tick up in that business in 2023 versus the other segments?

So process, we’re expecting good things in fiscal year 2023. And this is an area where even apart from the recent activity, the recent dynamics backlog is very meaningful. And so when we look at backlog, for instance, in Sensia, it’s very strong. It’s an even higher number in terms of the percentage of revenue that’s in backlog for fiscal 2023 than the Rockwell company average. And that’s typical because it’s engineered solutions that take longer to plan and stage and design, commission and so on. So we see that as a good read for oil and gas. There’s activity in mining, and we’ve had some decent wins. I wouldn’t call mining back at a torrid pace there. Metal is pretty good. And we don’t talk as much about metals, but metals continues to be a big automation market and especially with the release of some of the new high-performance drives, we’ve got better capacity, better capabilities than we’ve had in years for addressing that market. There’s still some activity in forest products and chemicals, and we talked about the win with Bora LyondellBasell, where our offerings, our continued enhancement of offerings with Logix Space control systems is going to help us in chemical, the new IO that we’re going to be introducing an automation fair is going to be a major step for chemical as well. So those are some of the things going on there. And then in life science, as you mentioned that, really strong growth in the fourth quarter. We’ve talked about how life sciences is not as affected by the component shortages because so much of our business in life sciences is actually based on software and high-value services. And from a macro standpoint, people want to live longer, healthier lives and personalized medicine is a way to help that objective, and that’s something that we’re particularly strong in.

Appreciate the color.

Julianne, we will take one more question.

Thank you. Our last question will come from Phil Buller from Berenberg. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for the questions. I’m keen to hear what level of safety buffer you’ve baked into this organic growth guide for the year. There was a bit of an overshoot this time last year. I appreciate that there’s 60% of the year already in the backlog, but I guess I’m surprised to see an 11% midpoint given the macro. So anything you can share in terms of overall confidence levels or safety buffer would be great and where that might reside be that on the top line assumptions or perhaps it’s more in the margin side, which collectively give you the right confidence levels for the earnings for the year.

Sure. Well, let me start by saying that the overarching driver is what we have in backlog, over $5 billion in backlog is unprecedented. And with continued strong order entry and with continued very low cancellation rates, that’s the primary story. Now in terms of the tone, I did mention during my prepared remarks that we feel like a conservative approach is appropriate. I’m not going to dimension that or quantify that, but that was a deliberate comment in the prepared remarks.

Got it. Thanks. And just as a bit of a follow-up or a slight adjacency really is the company’s appetite for M&A at this point, be that large or small, I’m thinking more in the context of peers. We’ve now got Emerson, who are going to have a lot of firepower. Schneider, who are looking to acquire the rest of Aviva. So does M&A need to move higher on Rockwell’s agenda from a competitive dynamics standpoint? Or has your thinking evolved in terms of the need to participate more strongly in M&A? Thanks.

Well, we’re very happy at the increased participation in M&A that we’ve demonstrated over the last few years and more importantly, the way that it’s helped add new value for customers as well as investors. And we’ll go into this in a little more detail in a couple of weeks at Investor Day. But first, looking at the strategic fit with some well-defined priorities that we’ve talked about and then the financial framework. We’re very happy with the way that our M&A that we’ve already completed, most recently with the CUBIC acquisition and that we have in the funnel will continue to strengthen us as a pure-play automation provider. It’s one of our strengths, and the market access that we have to provide new value from M&A immediately into all of the industry segments of discrete and hybrid and process is second to none. So I’m happy with the way that we’re positioned with M&A. We’re going to keep doing it. We have a strong balance sheet, and we’ve got a great track record of turning these acquisitions into real value.

Great. Thanks.

We are out of time for questions today. I’d like to turn the call back over to Ms. Zellner for closing remarks.

Thank you. That concludes today’s call. Thank you for joining us.

This concludes today’s conference call. At this time, you may disconnect. Thank you.