Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Sprouts Farmers Markets Third Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session, and instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the floor over to Susannah Livingston. Please go ahead, ma'am.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. We are pleased you have taken the time to join Sprouts on our third quarter 2017 earnings call. Amin Maredia, Chief Executive Officer; Jim Nielsen, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Brad Lukow, Chief Financial Officer are also on the call with me today. The earnings release announcing our third quarter 2017 results, our 10-Q, and the webcast of this call can be accessed through the Investor Relations section of our website at sprouts.com. During this call, management may make certain forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our future performance and growth, product expansion, new-store openings, and 2017 expectations and guidance. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. For more information, please refer to the risk factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, along with the commentary on forward-looking statements at the end of our earnings release issued today. In addition, our remarks today include references to non-GAAP measures. For a reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures to the GAAP figures, please see the tables in our earnings release. For the third quarter ended October 1, 2017, diluted earnings per share of $0.23 increased 44% from diluted earnings per share of $0.16 in the same period in 2016. With that, let me hand it over to Amin.

Thank you, Susannah. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining our call today. We're extremely pleased to report the continued momentum at Sprouts for the third quarter. I'm very proud of our store, regional distribution center, and support office teams helping us drive health and value to our customers every single day. The strategies we've shared during our previous calls are driving our performance. Given the third quarter performance and continued strength in the business, we are increasing our full-year guidance for 2017, bringing Sprouts back to high-single digits EBITDA growth and EPS in the teens. For the third quarter, sales rose to $1.2 billion, or a 16% increase over the prior year, driven by comp sales growth of 4.6% and strong new-store productivity in the low 80s%. Our business momentum is strong, evidenced by the sequential improvement of our two-year stacked comp of 5.9%, which accelerated throughout the quarter. Sales were strong across all departments, while inflation was muted and ended flat for the third quarter. The momentum in our non-perishable departments continued, and our produce department benefited from a very strong growing season this year. Traffic was positive and cannibalization is now back to our historical range of 125 basis points to 150 basis points. We remain focused on our four strategic priorities that continue to drive results and provide tailwinds to our business. These include an innovative product offering, investments in our team members, connecting with customers inside and outside the store, and investments in infrastructure and technology to drive greater efficiency and lower cost. Let me briefly detail advancements in each of these areas. First, we continue – we remain focused on delighting our customers through the more than 17,000 products with the foundation of health, value, taste, and differentiation. Our private label program, with penetration…

Thank you, Amin. I'll begin by discussing some of the business drivers for the third quarter and then review our updated guidance for 2017. As Amin mentioned, for the third quarter, sales were up 16% with comp sales growth of 4.6%, our strongest comp since the first quarter of 2016, driven by accelerating traffic in basket. This coupled with improved merchandise margins, strong labor management, and sales leverage across the P&L, resulted in EBITDA of $78 million, a 24% increase for the third quarter, and a margin of 6.5% of sales, a 40 basis points improvement. Let me discuss a few of the driving factors around this solid performance. For the third quarter, gross profit increased by 19% to $346 million, and our gross margin rate increased 60 basis points to 28.7%, compared to the same period in 2016. The majority of this increase was due to cycling the heightened promotional environment in the third quarter of last year in addition to sales leverage on other fixed costs. For the third quarter, direct store expense increased 15% to $250 million, an improvement of 20 basis points to 20.7% of sales, compared to the same period last year. Our operating discipline drove productivity in the stores and continued to benefit Sprouts in the third quarter. Leverage on our fixed costs from improved comps, coupled with a focus on operating efficiencies, helped to offset higher benefit costs. SG&A increased 35% to $40 million for the quarter, an increase of 40 basis points to 3.3% of sales, compared to the same period last year. This reflects higher bonus compensation expenses due to improved performance versus the prior year, and a slight increase in other corporate costs. We expect some of this deleverage to reverse next quarter, relating to the timing of the bonus…

Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Mark Carden with UBS. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. Thanks a lot for taking my question. Congrats on a nice quarter.

Thank you.

Could you talk a bit more about any recent changes you've seen in the promotional environment? So, you mentioned that you're planning on implementing targeted price investments in the fourth quarter. Are competitors acting any more aggressively on price, a back of trend to inflation (18:01), or has it been more or less in line with what you've seen historically in these kinds of environments?

Hey, Mark. This is Jim Nielsen. As far as the promotional activity in Q3, on a year-over-year basis, last year was a little bit more aggressive, but sequentially up against Q2 it was in line, and as we mentioned in the Q2 call, we would project the promotional environment to be steady relative to Q3 and Q4. As far as the shelf pricing goes – just a quick follow up – as far as the shelf pricing goes, we are seeing people now start to pass through some cost-based inflation in some key areas, which is obviously benefiting margins as well.

That's really helpful. And then second, wage pressure continues to be a theme across retail, especially with cities and states beginning to pass legislation that calls for boosting minimum wages in various locales. Given your store footprint overlaps a bit more heavily with some of the more aggressive states, are you expecting to see a sustain headwinds in the next few years, or are you guys comfortable with where you're at?

Yeah, Mark, we are right now in the best operational readiness position that we've been in over two years, so our open position rate is at the lowest we've seen in two years. And as far as wages, we made those investments, as we called out in last year's calls, in wages to put ourself in a very competitive position. And I think to-date we're – 92% of our team members are above minimum wage. So we feel like we're in a great position as we look forward to 2018.

Great. Thanks a lot. Congrats again.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Ken Goldman with JPMorgan.

Hi, good morning. I'm sure you don't want to talk in detail about 2018 yet. But as we think about modeling the year out, are there any particular tailwinds and headwinds, obviously other than the comparisons we can all see on a quarter-by-quarter basis, that we should be aware of? Just trying to get a sense of if there's anything unusual you're seeing going into next year that we should be thinking about?

Yeah, Ken, good morning. Thanks for the question. I think the overall – I don't think there are any significant unusual items that I would call out. The thing I would say that is we think we'll strengthen our position going into next year, as is our innovation and our product pipeline in private label, deli food, as well as meat and seafood is continuing to resonate very well. Private label, as you know, has had tailwinds for the last few years. It's continuing to provide strong tailwinds today. And we're starting to see some good step changes in deli food and some of the things we're seeing on the seafood side. So, we feel really good about that. I think the second, I would just say is tailwinds of customer connection with our launch of our new platform that will be the first quarter, sometime in the first quarter. We feel good about that. And I think most important I would call out that would be different is, we've been working on a number of initiatives, such as our labor management system, our fresh audit management project, and our business intelligence project, and those projects are all in-flight and some have now started to launch and some are going to launch into Q1 and Q2. And we're pretty excited about driving both effectiveness, efficiency, as well as customer experience – better customer experience out of those, and we think that those savings either will add to margin or provide us the necessary room to invest in price, if and as necessary. So, those are the three things I would call out.

Thank you for that. I appreciate it. And then my follow-up is I know you are also hesitant to talk about particular regions and how they are doing, but I'll take a stab at it anyway. Obviously, one of your biggest competitors had a very highly-publicized price decrease during your quarter. Do you think that affected you in any way? Were any of your stores that were in particular proximity to that competitor affected? Or was it really more steady-as-she-goes?

Ken, it's Brad. What I would say is, clearly based on the strength of our comp sales performance and our updated guidance and our sequential increase throughout the quarter and our two-year comp, I think it's safe to say that we saw very strong performance across all markets in all regions throughout the quarter.

And we're seeing – the only thing I would add is that in addition to good performance across regions, we're seeing good performance across all departments, so, in many ways we feel like we're hitting on all cylinders in departments and regions. So, feel really good about how we're positioned today.

And, Ken, I hate to be adding on three times, because we always tell ourselves we won't do this three times, but, I think it's critical to remember that our price – we price check against the market-share leaders, and traditionally that's the traditional grocer in that particular geography, which has always been our primary competitor, and that's given us a significant pricing advantage over all specialty retailers within those geographies.

Thank you very much.

And our next question comes from the line of Chris Mandeville with Jefferies.

Hey, good morning, thanks for taking my question. Brad, on the implied guidance for Q4, it looks like the comp's probably going to come in the range of 3% to 5% comp, and based on your commentary around momentum through Q3, I'm just trying to square the actual – the guide itself and how we could potentially see a deceleration on a sequential basis. Then maybe more importantly, when thinking about the margin profile, compares are really quite similar for Q4 versus Q3 of this year, so, can you just speak a little bit more so, around why we should actually be looking for gross margins to potentially be down on the quarter, as well as just EBIT or EBITDA margins?

Okay. So, there's a lot of questions there. I'll try to address them. First of all, where I'd like to point out is in the third quarter, we did have a benefit from a very strong produce growing season that we would not anticipate in the ordinary course to exist in the fourth quarter, which is traditionally a seasonally less robust produce period. Also, we had the benefit in the third quarter of some pretty strong remodels and reloads that we have now lapped coming into the beginning of the fourth quarter. I think I pointed out in my remarks, with regards to the overall comp guidance for the year, the fact that we anticipate landing in the mid-point of the range effectively suggests that we would be expecting to come in around 4% comp for the quarter in the fourth, which, after adjusting for those two positives that we experienced in the third quarter, more or less put us in line Q3 to Q4. Also, our updated guidance improvement in gross margin for the year implies that we will be relatively flat on merch margins for the fourth quarter. We'll continue to see some deleverage relative to the occupancy costs, as I pointed out, with regards to the more prototypical stores that we're opening throughout the year.

Okay. And then just last one for me. In Q3 itself, seeing how you did manage to expand your gross margins 60 basis points, is there any ability to parse out what the offset was there with price investments? And lastly, how did tonnage actually progress sequentially versus the flat performance in Q2? Thanks.

Yeah, I think, again, we point out that if you look at the third quarter of last year, that was the most emotionally intense period of time, and much of the 60 basis points improvement relates to the fact that we were lapping that very deep promotional environment. Things did start to improve for us in the fourth quarter of last year, and so that we would be looking for more or less a flat performance on merch margins for the quarter.

And with regard to tonnage, we did see a positive increase in Q4 and it was driven – we've got a nice balance in all departments on that tonnage contribution. Or Q3, sorry.

Next question.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Rupesh Parikh with Oppenheimer. Erica Eiler - Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.: Good morning, this is actually Erica Eiler on for Rupesh. Thanks for taking our questions. So, I was hoping you could remind us of how you are thinking about the customer overlap with the Whole Foods customer historically, based on some of your studies?

I think historically what we've seen is where we're positioned is we're generally, from a demographic perspective, less regional, is one thing I would say. The second thing I would say is we're probably more in the broader demographic, more towards the median income, median age, median education level. So, all of our demographics, as we think about it, would lean to, I would say 30% of median demographic of an area to 70% to 80%. So, we tend to be more middle-class or a broader demographic would be how we're positioned to them. Erica Eiler - Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.: Okay. Great. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Chuck Cerankosky with Northcoast Research.

Good morning, everyone. Great quarter. Congratulations. If we look at the sales mix in the quarter, you talked a little bit about private label, and that's increasing. I'd like you to talk a little bit about private label fresh products? And the fresh categories overall, how much bigger they were in the mix of sales, including prepared foods. Thank you.

Yeah, so, Chuck, this is Jim Nielsen. With regards to private label, again another fantastic quarter for us, top-line close to 30% (28:59) and comps in double-digit range. So, great performance. Speaking to the specific fresh departments and the success, we're getting fantastic marks back from our customers around better-for-you ingredients, freshness, and the eating experience, which just came back from some of our consumer insight studies. But overall, it's been a great balance from the non-perishable side to the fresh side with regards to private label. And we're seeing it in more baskets and the most fascinating and positive thing that we can see from the private label perspective is the basket size for a customer who has a private label item in it, is 50% higher than our reported basket size for our enterprise.

You said 50%, 5-0%?

Yes.

That's impressive. And then in prepared foods, how much of that is specifically branded, whether it's the packaging or the signage that's branded around the Sprouts banner?

Yeah, we're continuing to expand that, so, under the Sprouts banner we now have Sprouts' Market Corner Deli, The Fish Market At Sprouts, The Butcher Shop at Sprouts, and in the Market Corner Deli, we're continuing to evolve our HMR case to better-for-you ingredients, as Jim just talked about. I think our merchandising, or packaging has – is more consistent today across the platform and is starting to resonate really well. And we just introduced a number of new lines of sandwiches, paninis, wraps, salads, as well as home meal replacement in our HMR case and in our wall deli, as well as we continue to evolve our 8-food deli case (30:47), which has proteins and size (30:50) in it, which are resonating really well. And in my prepared remarks, I talked about how much this is, especially in new stores, impacting, positively impacting tripe (31:00) as well as making Sprouts more relevant for 12:00, 5:00. And we're pretty excited about that, and certainly some of our new-store productivities is attributed to that.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Vincent Sinisi with Morgan Stanley. Vincent J. Sinisi - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks very much, and congrats on a nice quarter. Just wanted to ask about – you mentioned about the enhanced digital platform kind of coming on board in 2018. Can you just give us a sense for kind of where you are in the process, maybe some of the enhancements that will be there, and how we should think about the rollout? And then maybe just a quick follow up to that: can you just give us a quick update where you guys are with the Amazon partnership? Thanks very much.

Yeah, I think on the first piece on the platform, enhancing our platform, we really need to step back and look to see how we can take our brand strength as well as our uniqueness in the space and health, as well as attribute-driven work, and how we can create better content, more personalized content offers for the customer, and allow them to see the breadth of offering at Sprouts. So we're going with a new provider and are completely changing our mobile web platform to start bringing in much more customer knowledge and more interaction with respect to how the customer can shop when they're coming in the store. So we're going to go in waves. The first wave is going to really focus on product, product content, and then we're going to continue to add functionality to that to make the shopping experience easier when the customer's in the store. So I'll kind of pause at that. And in terms of the Amazon partnership, we know that our customers love the convenience and speed of home delivery from Sprouts. We continue to offer home delivery in eight cities, and we look for more opportunities in the home delivery space to give customers option to shop for fresh, natural and organic products from Sprouts. So and from a partnership perspective, I can't comment on the details of the partnership, but we know we want to continue to expand to more cities and states in the coming year. Vincent J. Sinisi - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Okay. Great. Thanks a lot, Amin.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Karen Short with Barclays.

Hey, thanks. I had one clarification and then a question. So just to clarify, in terms of the comp overall, was there a storm benefit? And then the second clarification point is on traffic within the comp, can you give us the exact split? And then can you just give some color on how traffic trended in the third quarter, and how it's trending into the fourth?

Hi, Karen. With regards to the hurricane, as we have previously indicated, there was only 14 stores that were impacted, and there was zero, positive or negative, impact with regards to the sales. The only impact we had was a hit of $700,000 to EBITDA in the quarter related to inventory losses. With regards to the performance in Q3, as Jim said, we're very pleased with the mix of growth in customer transaction count and basket. We're not going to provide specific numbers, but sequentially improved nicely from a customer-count perspective. And we're seeing a continuation of the third quarter's strong performance into the fourth quarter to-date.

Okay. So my bigger-picture question is just there's some retailers in the last several weeks, I guess, have given some color on what a customer's spend does when they go from being an in-store customer to being an online customer as well. I know it's still early stages for you, but any way you could give some frame of reference on what the spends, what happens on that particular customer's spend when they become more of an omni channel customer?

Yeah, Karen, good question. I think that customers, as a practical matter, when they see that they're having to pay for home delivery, they tend to consolidate their trips. So what we see in the data is we do see bigger baskets. And from the early data, it suggests to us that there is some level of consolidation of trips. So I don't believe, there's a lot of reports out there that home delivery is 30%, 40%, 50% higher baskets. That's true, but in end-state, when everybody's doing home delivery, America is not eating 30%, 40% more food. So I think there's consolidation going on. What is key, though, for Sprouts is that compared to the conventionals, what we've seen is our trade area extends nicely. We don't see a lot of cannibalization in our stores, because we're seeing a lot of shopping from extended trade areas. And for a specialty retailers, like a Sprouts or a Costco, we think that's an added benefit because it's extending the trade area for people who may not make that frequent trip otherwise to the store. So we see it as a great business opportunity going forward.

Great. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Kelly Bania with BMO Capital Markets.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Just wanted to clarify the message on expectation for the fourth quarter gross margin to be kind of flattish, because you're still cycling some big declines from 4Q last year, and through the first half of next year. So was it really just a good produce quarter that drove some of the upside here relative to your expectation? Or is there some cushion in the fourth quarter to make some incremental price investments?

Yeah, as I said in the third quarter, we definitely had a nice benefit from a comp perspective relative to produce, and the benefit of the very strong remodel in the comp. But as it relates to the margin, again, we were cycling a very, very deep promotional environment that drove the 60 basis points year-over-year improvement. With regards to the fourth quarter, again, we did see sequentially last year a nice improvement in merch margin rate, so I think we would be looking to match that and be equal to last year in the fourth quarter on merch margin.

Kelly, This is Amin. Let me add here. It seems like this question has come up a couple of times. If I put it in context, gross margin was down 80 basis points third quarter last year, and plus 60 this year. So if you combine the two, it's a negative 20 for the two years combined. And if you look at fourth quarter last year, it was a negative 50. And we had some benefits of some adjustments in the quarter that were worth about 30 basis points last year. So when we look at it on a combined basis, they look relatively – on a two-year basis, if you will – they look relatively consistent. So we're not seeing, at this point, any additional price investments, if you will. As always, we will hold some dollars for price investments, just to be prudent, but we don't see this as a backwards quarter from going from Q3 to Q4.

Great, thank you. This is very helpful. And then just also wanted to ask about click-and-collect. You have Walmart and Kroger and others investing pretty heavily in that, and just wondering if that's something that Sprouts is considering, and why or why not?

Yeah. And that's a great question. We always put all of our priorities and opportunities on the board, and we've focused, and what we've learned from a lot of data from consumer insight, from data from other combined retailer data is for somebody like Sprouts, home delivery extends the trade area, and we've seen positive benefit of that. So our goal is to focus on that and execute that very well, and get the in-stock conditions and high SLAs into the customer's home executed well. We believe from a click-and-collect standpoint, Sprouts – when somebody comes up to the Sprouts parking lot, they can get in and out of Sprouts fairly quickly, but we know that there will be certainly some percentage of customers that might still find it beneficial. So we'll test it, but we're prioritizing, and what we found as a company, instead of having 20 priorities, picking five or seven really robust ones and executing them well has served us well, and frankly, separated us from other. So we're likely to test it. I won't comment as to the timing, but we know we'll test it at some point and look for the customer signal.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Ben Bienvenu with Stephens.

Yeah, good morning, this is Daniel Imbro on for Ben. Thanks for taking our question. So, you guys have been opportunistic with acquisitions in the past. Given the headwinds facing the industry, are you seeing more acquisition opportunities popping up to potentially augment unit growth over the coming quarters and kind of into 2018?

We won't speak specific to M&A at this point in time, but what we are starting to see is, and I think M&A has been happening in this industry for the past three to five years. However, what we're starting to see is some retailers, regional retailers who are struggling, are not getting bought out. We're seeing an increased number of bankruptcies or split of assets with some assets going away. So, that's a trend which we do think that that's going to bring more dollars back to the market, which we think that's going to benefit the industry and Sprouts, as well. In terms of Sprouts, we're always looking, but nothing too particularly interesting or announced at this point.

Thanks, and congratulations.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Renato Basanta with Susquehanna.

Good morning, guys. I guess my first question, could you just give us a little bit more color in terms of what you are seeing in inflation by department? And then maybe give us a better sense of how that's translating into pricing, again, by department?

Yeah, Renato, this is Jim Nielsen. Just a quick step-back to Q3, and Brad called this out on the call. Q3 was flat, which was in line with my projections that we had in Q2 on the Q2 call, and it was primarily driven by produce being deflationary, some specifics broad areas. We hate to get into too many specific details, but I did call out cherries in the Q2 quarter, so cherries, berries, and some tropical items drove down some deflation within the quarter. And then dairy, on the light side, and then bulk and meat slightly offset the deflation, so going back to flat. Looking forward, we would still expect Q4 to be flat with the data we have in front of us today ending the year to flat-to-slightly negative. Not to get too specific, I would only tell you that from a broad perspective that produce and meat, we would anticipate being flat on a year-over-year basis.

All right. Thanks. And then just a follow-up. Amin, can you just talk a little bit about how you view store density, particularly in the context of ecommerce growth? You know, you've sort of been the suburban model, so, how does that play? How does that suburban model play in an environment where the reach of a store can increase into both denser and more sparsely populated areas, vis-a-vis home delivery? And, I guess related to that, the incrementality of ecommerce today, what type of competitor do you think you are gaining share from? Is it specialty, conventional? Is it a mix? Thanks.

I think from a market share standpoint, it's hard to pinpoint, except to say that I think the market share primarily comes from weaker operators. We see this, particularly when we go into new markets and we walk the stores. Before our opening and after, and we tend to see more impact on weaker competitors in the marketplace or in the trade area. With respect to store placement, actually – I actually think that Sprouts sets up really well for home delivery networks, because we're not located every two, three – two miles apart. We have less cannibalization on home delivery. And as it stands – as it sits from a suburban versus urban model, what's interesting is the drive times tend to be similar, except in suburban environments you can go a long distance in the same amount of time, so, the delivery patch works pretty well. And I think Sprouts today is, with our increase in deli and some of our fresh and prepared and to-go programs, we also have more and more stores in a lot of our cities in what I call semi-urban spots. And as you work towards the center of town, and we're opening two, three, four stores on – call it the four edges as you work to the middle, and as we open those stores, it actually allows us to home deliver to the center of town and cover a lot of ground in urban centers without paying the high rent and putting stores in urban areas, which we've historically not done. So, I think we're – we feel like we're – that's going to benefit us over time.

And the only thing that I would add is the home delivery from the grocery space is giving us a good competitive advantage over fast-casual, just because the retail price-points are better than you would see in fast-casual restaurants. So, you could anticipate the industry potentially growing as the fast-casual side of the business starts to erode.

Helpful. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Chuck Grom with Gordon Haskett.

Thanks. Good morning. Just a couple quick ones on the enhanced deli offering in the 130 stores. Ultimately where do you think you could grow that to? And what's been the comp lift thus far? And then on stores, new-store productivity was once again very strong. Can you just remind us on what you see as the long-term store opportunity? And then also how the performances in the Southeast, particularly in Florida?

A number of questions. Let me start with the new-store productivity and then we'll take the others. So, I think on the new-store productivity, I think there's multiple factors. As we've gotten larger in our overall pool of stores, 285 stores, our data is getting better and better. So, our site collection process is better. Our construction team is doing a great job of delivering a quality store. And certainly our operations and training program up front ahead of the store is better than ever. And lastly, in new markets we've really seen a step change, especially when we entered Florida, in our grassroots marketing and our community engagement to where the customers really know Sprouts, even before we opened the store. So, it's a combination of site selection, operations, being in the community, all of those things are helping new-store productivity. And the last comment on new-store productivity is the deli shift that we're seeing. The date – from the data, we can tell that when you have a new store opening with a deli, a customer walks in the first time, they see all these options and they know Sprouts for those options day one. When you don't have those day one, it takes longer to get the customer oriented and to attract new customers into the store for the 12:00, 5:00. So, we're going to continue to roll out – we'll talk about it on the year-end call how many we'll do next year, but we'll continue to roll-out on a methodical basis in our portfolio backwards until we see sort of returns flattening – or when I say flattening, not being as productive, so, we'll continue to go. And as far as new stores, most of the new stores are going to have this offering in it. So, long answer, but I just wanted to cover – I think I covered all three pieces. I'll let Jim add.

Yeah, Chuck, just the only part on the deli in terms of 130 was called out on the script. So, that's 45% of our – roughly 45% of our stores. We projected over the next three years we would be at roughly closer to 65% of our total population of stores would have the deli elements in it. Again, there's some potential upside to that number, just based on performance.

Okay. Helpful. Good luck, guys. Thanks.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Alvin Concepcion with Citi. Please go ahead, sir.

Great. Thanks for taking my question. You guys talked about many tools for next year, like labor management, the business intelligence program to reduce shrink, should we see margins expand next year, or are there some investment costs offsetting some of the benefits from those initiatives? Should it be incremental is what I'm asking, really?

Thanks, Alvin. It's Brad. We're very excited about the opportunities that are before us that we're engaged in as we speak with regards to enhancing performance at store, improving shrink, driving incremental sales through these new automation tools. I think our perspective on it is that will absolutely create a margin opportunity for us, and we'll be diligent in the determination of how much, when, and where we believe it is necessary to reinvest any portion of those benefits to ensure that we maintain a very strong competitive value proposition in the market.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Shane Higgins with Deutsche Bank.

Hey, good morning, thanks for taking the questions. Just on the labor scheduling. I know as you guys continue to roll that out and gain other efficiencies, do you guys see an opportunity to bring your comp lever-point down a little bit, maybe to 3%? I believe you guys have said historically, it was somewhere closer to 3.5% to 4%.

Yeah, I think we definitely see an opportunity to reduce the point at which we lever. We'll be implementing these systems throughout 2018, so we'll have some benefit in 2018, but a real full-year benefit as we get into 2019.

And Brad, do you see that as the biggest opportunity in terms of driving efficiencies and improving on that comp lever point?

We do, but we're also very excited about the connected customer program in terms of the updated mobile and web applications that we'll be rolling out in terms of driving incrementality, stronger loyalty, larger total share of wallet for the company.

The only other thing I would mention is on our fresh item management program is the opportunities in improved in-stock position for better sales, and as well as a better shrink management through proper tools, and yet having all the products on the shelves, especially in the fresh department, throughout the day where the customer is seeing low out of stocks, I think, is super important when we think about customer experience. So I think that the fresh item management program is going to help on both sales and margins.

Okay. And actually, as a follow-up, Amin, to that, I did notice your inventory per store levels have been coming down pretty nicely. Can you just talk about what some of the initiatives that you have in place that are kind of driving that, and how that is helping shrink? And do you expect those trends and improvements to continue?

Yeah, I think that some of the processes that we need to develop for the fresh item management tool and the fresh item management system, I'll call it, some of those learnings early on, in specing those systems, we're starting to deploy those processes in the store so that when the FIM tool is put in place, the stores can adopt to it quickly. And so as we've been implementing some of these processes into the store, that's certainly having benefits on in-stock position, and better ordering, and better in-stock. I do think that as a company overall, we have pretty significant opportunities in shrink over the next couple of years as we really get into our fresh item management system to allow our team members to order better, in a more automated way in the fresh departments.

Great, thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Scott Mushkin with Wolfe Research.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. So I've got a housekeeping question, and then a question question. So my housekeeping question is the CapEx spending. I know you guided up for the year, and I was just wondering what was driving that? And then my question question is just on the competitive environment. And I think the fear and obviously the equity performance has kind of lagged with the turnaround you guys have seen this year. And I think what we hear from people is just competition, you guys are going to start bumping into the other farmers' markets soon, like Luckys and Fresh Thyme, and of course Lidl, you're going to be bumping into them. And then you have Amazon Whole Foods, obviously, and the Amazon team made comments about bringing now Fresh and Whole Foods together, but also ramping up their store growth. So just wondering – like as you see the competitive environment – I know, Amin, you made some comments about some closures. Obviously there's been a few, but it usually takes forever to get some of these assets closed. So I think there's a lot of fear around the competitive environment. So I wanted you to address that. So those are my two questions.

Sure, Scott. I'll just clear up the housekeeping question, first of all. The slight increase in CapEx is related to some timing of store construction that, relative to the timing of new stores opening in 2018 early, as well as just some additional upfront work with regards to our strategic projects that we spoke about on the call.

Yeah, particularly some of the systems that on the fresh item management, and BI, and labor management systems, and deal management systems that we alluded to. And on your question around competition, we actually monitor competitive intrusions and intrusion reports very, very closely. We have an intrusion report, an early intrusion report, an early, early report. And we've actually seen intrusion impact to Sprouts continue to come down, which has been good – continuing to come down over the past 12 months. And going into 2018, looking at the number of openings, we see that relatively flat year-over-year, so we don't believe that in 2018 – 2019 is kind of early to call, because visibility gets better 12 months out. We don't see intrusion and competition looking, from the visibility we have today, getting any worse. I think also having a balanced approach, we're in 15 states today. We'll be in 18 states next year. And having a very balanced on openings in a lot of different regions allows us to flex where we see the greatest opportunities in any given two, three, four-year cycle. So, for the next two, three years of visibility, we feel pretty good about our pipeline and direction of growth and flexibility of growth. And there's not a lot of bumping today. I can't speak to the Whole Foods comment you made. Don't know their plans there, but on the other competitors you spoke about, there's not a lot of bumping there today. I think we know how well they operate. They know how well Sprouts operates. So we feel pretty good about the situation there.

Hey, Scott, just a quick add-on. In terms of new-store growth, obviously, we're very responsible as we look at new-store growth and looking at the competitors in market and how we're positioned, so, we're mindful of that as we grow. But, as it relates to intrusion, what we've also done, as Amin said, the number of units is going to be relatively flat, but the team here has done a nice job of putting together some really strong competitive intrusion plans for those competitors that get within a certain distance and drive time. And the early indications are it's definitely improving our competitive position as we see those retailers come into our competitive marketplace.

So, it's safe to say, maybe the fears are – at least the next couple of years, that you don't see them materializing, and then after that, we'll have to see what happens? Is that maybe a good summary?

Yeah, I think the fears are people feel that one or multiple people are going to bring prices down pretty significantly in the industry. And I think from what we're seeing is people have been fairly responsible in managing the business. And we're also sort of, as deflation is dissipating, we're seeing a lot more discipline from the retailers who are doing well around pricing. Certainly when somebody gets upside-down and starts running negative traffic, or deep negative traffic, they may be irresponsible for some period of time, but that tends to be short-lived and doesn't work. And that's been proven in 2016, as we know through the summer, those retailers aren't doing that well today.

All right. Perfect. Thanks, guys. Really appreciate all your comments.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Robby Ohmes with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Oh, thanks for taking my question. Maybe just a quick follow-up on that. You guys did mention earlier, I think, about seeing some cost pass-through. Can you give us a little more color on – is it – you're seeing it at the discounters or the independents, or deep discounters or large conventionals, maybe just a little more for us on what you are seeing? Thanks.

Yeah. And just a reminder, as we said, the promotional environment continues to be very aggressive. But at the shelf, we're just looking – I'm going to only speak to the market share leader within each geography we have, and you can triangulate that. And it's very stable, and as the prices have started to come up, costs have started to come up. We've just seen people acting a little bit more fiscally responsible in late 2017 as opposed to 2016.

And maybe just one follow-up: just egg prices – any color on what you're seeing most recently there?

Yeah, that's a little bit different. Obviously, we've seen the cost go up on the PPI side, and the CPI side there's definitely a bit of a short squeeze there. But that's relative to conventional eggs. That's not the breadth and depth of what we sell. So as it relates specialty eggs, it's been fairly neutral, and the outlook is fairly flat to neutral on a cost basis.

Terrific, thanks so much.

Yep.

Thank you. And that concludes our question-and-answer session for today. I'd like to turn the floor back over to Amin for any closing comments.

I want to thank, everybody, for joining the call today, and hopefully we talk about – clearly, the strategies we talk about early in the year tend to be – they are working, and we're looking forward to continuing the momentum into 2018. We'll see you – speak to many of you soon. Thank you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program, and you may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.