Good day, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to Virtu Financial Conference Call announcing 2015 Third Quarter Results. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Mr. Andrew Smith, Head of Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin.

Thank you, operator. Good morning. As you now, our third quarter results were released this morning and are available on our website. Today's call may include forward-looking statements which represent Virtu's current belief regarding future events and are therefore subject to risks, assumptions, uncertainties which may be outside the company's control. And our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from what is indicated in these forward-looking statements. It's important to note that any forward-looking statements made on this call are based upon information presently available to the company and we do not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements as new information becomes available. We refer you to the disclaimers in our press release, and encourage you to review the description of risk factors contained in our final S-1 registration statement and other filings with Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition to GAAP results, we may refer to certain non-GAAP measures including adjusted net trading income, adjusted net income, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA margin. We believe these non-GAAP measures are more reflective of our operations and core business performance. You'll find a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to GAAP terms included in the earnings materials with an explanation of why we deem this information to be meaningful, as well as how management uses these measures. When used on this call, adjusted net trading income refers to our trading income net of all interest and dividend income and/or expenses, and all brokerage clearing exchange rebates and/or fees. Speaking and answering your questions this morning are Mr. Douglas Cifu, our Chief Executive Officer; and Mr. Joseph Molluso, our Chief Financial Officer. They will begin with prepared remarks and then take your questions. Now I'd now like to turn the call over to Doug.

Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining our call this morning to discuss Virtu Financial's third quarter results. I am pleased to announce the third quarter was one of the strongest in our history in terms of revenue and profit. During the third quarter, we saw in an increase demand for our market making services in many markets in which provide liquidity and particularly within our global equities categories. As a result of this increase demand for our market making services, we generated $138.6 million of adjusted net trading income during the quarter. As was noted - noted in our press release form earlier today, we saw a significant increase demand for our prices as global equity markets became more volatile in late August 2015. In short, the third quarter demonstrated again the benefit of our broadly scaled diversified market making business. During the third quarter, we continue to maintain discipline around expenses. Our stable cost platform allowed us to generate a 71.3% adjusted EBITDA margin during the third quarter and an adjusted EPS of $0.40 per share. As we have noted in the past, one of the key attributes of our business model is that our fixed cost plan provide significant business scale and periods of increased volumes and volatility, as is evidence in the third quarter margins and resulting adjusted EPS for the period. Before I turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Joe Molluso, let me focus the bulk of my remarks here on the diversification and durability of our model and how it responded to the conditions in the third quarter and then make some general comments and remarks on recent regulatory initiatives. As we have consistently noted, market volumes are the primary driver of our revenue. Q3 saw volume increases across most…

I'll review a summary of our results and point out some financial highlights before we open it up to questions. Our GAAP net income for this quarter before attribution to non-controlling interest was $69.5 million, which equates to $0.35 per share of diluted GAAP EPS. Consistent with the financial presentation in our S-1 registration statement and recent quarterly results, we provide non-GAAP financial information to supplement our presentation. On a non-GAAP basis, our adjusted net income, excluding mainly the impact of stock based compensation, investing stock based awards granted at the IPO was $76.2 million for the third quarter. Assuming a normalized tax rate and 138.9 million fully converted shares outstanding this equated to $0.40 per share in adjusted EPS. Our adjusted EBITDA, which again excludes the impact of stock based compensation was $100.7 million for the quarter with a corresponding margin of 71.3% Now let’s turn to adjusted net trading income and the various categories. With regard to the third quarter results, our total adjusted net trading income was $138.6 million, up versus the third quarter of 2014 by 34.3% and up year-to-date 29.4%. Adjusted net trading income was up in all categories versus the third quarter of 2014 except global currencies. Year-to-date, adjusted net trading income was up in call categories except the only options fixed income and other. On a daily basis, adjusted net trading income was $2.166 million per day, up 34% from the same period one year ago. Year-to-date, we are running at $2.09 million per day through September 30, a 29.3% increase from $1.6 million per day at this point last year. In reviewing FX performance, we also turn to broader volume benchmarks as performance indicators and reviewing volumes on select FX platforms such as Hotspot, Reuters and EBS the volumes are more inline…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first is from Rick Repetto from Sandler O'Neill. Your line is now open.

Yes. Good morning, Doug, good morning, Joe. And congrats on a strong quarter here. So my question I think everybody is going to ask this is, you know, would sustainability, so you've had these quarters that you have, the $138 million in net trading income, then you sort of have the base, you've had three of four quarters of the 105 or 100 to 105 or so? I guess the question is, is there anything from this quarter that you can take that is sustainable that provide you sort of a lift off going forward, the sort of up that base when you don’t have the high volatile quarters like we had in 3Q?

Yes, thanks. And good question, Rick. I think there is a couple notable takeaways from the quarter, which were – and obviously as you point out, our Americas equity segment was up significantly and that’s - obviously a large portion of that is relates to the events in late August, where there is excessive volume and volatility and we captured a lot of that. But you focused really on really what we've accomplished in Europe and Asia, I think in the equity segment, I think that’s significant and it also is not reflective truly of volumes. So if you look at European equities during from the second quarter to the third quarter they were down quarter-over-quarter and our adjusted net trading income was up. If you look the Tokyo Stock Exchange volumes from second to third quarter, they were up around 3.5%, but our adjusted net trading income was up over 32%. So some of that clearly relates to the volatility and uncertainty coming out of china, which rippled through global markets towards the end of August 2015, but I think you are seeing qualitative growth in our business and that’s something we always strive for. I talked about this for the last couple of years and particularly in a road show and on the last call. But we look at our business model, over the long-term we've historically grown at high single digit growth rate. If you look at adjusted net trading income to '12 to '13 to '14 it from around $366 million in '12 to 414 in '13 to 435ish in 2014 Rich, that’s like a 9% growth rate, not this I am not going to project through the end of '15, but we're at 393ish through the end of third quarter. So you can put into your model and kind of extend that growth rate if you will. So this is a firm that I've encouraged people to look at over the long period of time. Our job and my job as a CEO of this firm to go from the bottom left to the upper right quadrant and grow the firm on a steady state single digit basis or double-digit basis and we ca do that, and I think we've accomplished that. So there is going to periods and events like the end of August, which this firm is build to capture. But I think if you look at the firm over the long period of time and our long term investors I think get this, this is a firm that is consistently and steadily found ways to grow.

Got it. Very helpful, Doug. And then I guess one follow up question, would be the Asia Pac equities had a record quarter and I am sure that was driven by the volatility overall in China and Asia. But I guess the - an update on that number, that number for the quarter and then the growth initiatives in China specifically?

Sure. So I was just mentioning, people focus on August - the even of last of August as if it was only a US equities event and it only happened on August 24. And clearly there was some severe market disruptions and volatility in August 24. But that day in the period really commenced on August 23 New York time at of the news of the about the growth rates in China, right. And so our firm is truly a global firm. We feel the impact of those types of events locally in our Singapore office and its manifesting what we do in Japanese equities and in lot of others countries Korea, Hong Kong, Thailand where we are a very significant market maker and cash equities, in Australia. And so when you have events like that, they are very, very beneficial to that segment and I do want to reiterate I think we've grown nicely in Japanese equities in other market segments. We trade a lot of futures out there as well. And so it’s an area of growth, we've only been there a couple of years. And so I think there is more we can do in that segment. With regards to china, I talked about it in other calls. Obviously there is a lot of uncertainty around the regulatory regime. We've dipped our toe into the water. The results are positive, but very immaterial for what we're doing. So we're really in a test phase there trading only futures and being very cautious and careful as to how the regulatory regime evolves out there.

Got it. Thanks. And congrats on the great quarter.

Thanks, Rich.

Thank you. And our next question is from Alex Kramm with UBS. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, everyone. I think Joe when you were going through the review, you gave a third quarter to date [ph] number. I didn’t catch it completely. So maybe you can just repeat it. But more importantly around that, can you give us little bit more color what you're seeing so far this quarter and what areas are doing well and what areas we should be focusing on where maybe volume is not a good predictor so far this quarter, but maybe something else has changed and evolved to really side to, to really pay attention to? Thanks.

Are you - the first part of your question Alex referred to year-to-date?

No, no, quarter to date, your October updates?

Okay, for October. Look, we haven’t seen any as August 24th like event yet right in fourth quarter. But we've seen solid performance across our businesses. Obviously it remains early in a quarter and I think as Doug said, we look at this over the long-term. We're not - we've grown historically high single digits in periods where there is not a lot of volume volatility. So again that’s what we look at over extended periods of time.

Okay. And then I guess, secondly, maybe just shifting to the expenses for a second here. I think the comps are probably going to be one that promotes volatile first quarter, you've started pretty big, you over accrued then you kind of held back a little bit. Third quarter seems to be kind of normalize rate, but depending on what happens in the fourth quarter can you give us any sort of advance [ph] in terms of any sort of net trading income numbers in terms of how much would you need to still accrue if you have another lower fourth quarter or is actually things stayed kind of like they looking right now. So maybe just a little bit of a advance, so we see the variability there?

Yes, I'll let you answer that question, but I want to just want to make general comment about competition and Joe can give you the percentage of net income range that we look at. But you have to remember that we view Virtu, this is not a trading firm, it doesn’t have trading firm compensation model. It’s not a star culture. We don’t have guarantees. We don’t groups. We don’t have parts [ph] We don’t have people like a 40% trading results. It’s never been the construction of this firm. This is an all for one, one for all culture. Obviously we like to reward our folks very well. 75 of our 150 employees were pre IPO partners in the firm, everybody receive stock options when we went public. So it’s a very cohesive and properly incentivize firm. But this is not a firm where if you see result double, you're going to see compensation double. This is much of a more of, I guess I would call a technology firm model of compensation. So I know that makes it a little more difficult to model actually. But I think at the end of the day or Alex, excuse me, I think I want to make the point that, although we obviously are a trading we don’t view our compensation in a way that is similar other trading firms, Joe you want be a little more precise?

Yes, sure. I mean Alex, you've got exactly right, that the comp to net revenue in the first quarter was on a high side 17.6%. In the second quarter we dialed it down to 14%. So through Q2 was around 16%. This quarter it was around 17.2 and last year, year-to-date it was 19.5%. So I would expect that given that the – the fact that we're through nine months of the year that year-to-date figure is going to be within the range of what we would expect for the fourth quarter. So that kind of year- to-date our percentage should flow through.

All right, very helpful. Thank you.

Thanks, Alex.

Thank you. Next question is from Ken Worthington with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. You mentioned MISD2 and I wanted to see how you thought about fragmentation in the derivative markets from MISD2. And if you think there might be the same sort of fragmentation that results in the derivative markets that happened after MISD1 in equities and if so where do you think there maybe particular opportunities for Virtu?

Yes. Thank you. That’s a great question, I hadn’t focused on it my remarks. I mean, its - candidly it’s something that we modeled out. I mean there is obviously a number of very, very embedded incumbent future exchanges in Europe, which are in active participant on. I said many times publicly and privately that we very strongly must believe in competition, I don’t want to say fragmentation because then you get into debate, well how many exchanges or how many venues is too much and you go through periods of fragmentation and consolidation. But at the end of the day it would be good thing for our equities franchise in Europe if there were multiple and competitive future exchanges that lifted large index products, that’s point on a surprise. In terms of handicapping that, I am really not very good at that. So I would think it’s a possibility, I am not counting on it and certainly we haven’t modeled that tending to our results. But it would be a good thing for Virtu because someone there needs harmonize the prices, which you know futures exchanges and more importantly we believe the competition tends to drive down trading cost which ultimately is good thing for our business because it’s always reflected in the bid offer spread. So I am not sure I answered you question particularly well, but that’s probably the best I can say right now.

Okay. I think it’s a fair response. Maybe turning to the FX business, FX had a good quarter, but it doesn’t seem to be seeing the benefit of higher volatility this year versus the really the lower levels, particularly in the middle and early part of last year. So maybe you can give us some more granularity on the environment this quarter and why the higher [indiscernible] year-over-year doesn’t seem to having a pronounced impact. And then I guess the second part of that is, is therefore momentum in VFX and if so how and where should we see it?

Yes, thank you. Good question. I mean, this is one segment where we've struggled as I think everybody struggles to find a single repository if you will that really will reflect what volumes and volatility are like. Everybody knows it’s a very fragmented market. There’s a future, there is spot. There is forwards and swaps. And so there is not particularly great real time repository of market data, volume information that we could all point to and say this is how we're performing. What we rely on obviously we look what the team is doing, but that’s a very small portion I think of the overall market and it doesn’t capture a lot of peers where we do particularly well and peers where we don’t particularly well. So it’s not a great index. I mean, the one place and I'll give props to my good friend Chris Concannon and the folks at Hotspot. If you look at their website, they have started to try to put more consolidated industries views, what volumes were like. And again I am just going on what Chris and the guys have reported. But if you look at Q3 versus Q2 '15 it reports Hotspot, EBS, where its FX are in the overall market, in general it was down about 4.5% and obviously CME futures were down were about 3.7%. So you had volumes during the quarter that are probably a pretty good indication that global FX volumes were down during the third quarter. So the volatility that we experienced in the summer was terrific for our global equities business and I think the FX business performed fine given the opportunity set, but we certainly didn’t experience the up tick in volumes and in volatility in that segment as we did in our global equity segment. VFX as a method of distributing our prices continues to be a significant portion of what we do. We've added counterparties during the quarter, significantly counterparties, particularly in Europe and Asia where we enhanced our profile and frankly going public I think has been very helpful to having counterparties understand who you are and to be accepting of our prices. So I continue to be a big - we continue to be believers that that will be a driver of that segment going forward. And it also helps us expand out the menu if you will of currency payers that we trade, we now offer over 890 currency payers and in different market place there will be different needs or smaller payers or cross payers that aren’t as active on your EBS, you’re Hotspot and your Hotspot type of venues. And as well, we've seen growth in proliferation of NDF which we can markets on – and through some of our business partners particularly in Asia. So we're excited about that as a growth area, Ken.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question is from Alex Blostein with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Great. Hi, good morning guys. Question for you on just the competitive dynamics and the electronic market making space, Doug you highlighted some of the rules coming out of the ETFs, the environment up until August has been particularly times I think to the space of the whole. So just thinking through what it means from a competitive dynamics for your business, does it create any M&A opportunities for you guys and just to give us a sense kind of how you would have thought about it year or two ago just trying to get sense of is more consolidation reasonable or more reasonable less pay versus few years ago?

Yes. Thank you, Alex for the question. It’s a good question. I mean, first of all let me just address the regulatory environment what it means to Virtu and we've always said and people sometime scratch their head about this, that view it as a tailwind and a not a headwind. And I am talking about Dodd-Frank and Basel III and what that means to the banks, I am really talking about focusing on our industry proprietary training firma and forcing them to become direct member and direct regulated registered members. That’s always been business model since we started Virtu. We go to a country we want to be a direct member, we want to be registered, we want to have direct market access to a marketplace. An so when we go to Europe, we go to the regulators and say please regulators as a proprietary market marking firm, you may not have a category for that, but we want to regulated and registered because know that’s where the wave of regulation is going. And so in Europe when MISD2 into effect where the Germans enact their quote unquote high frequency provision bill if you will. It requires firms to become registered members, that’s a significantly business advantage to us because we've been registered and regulated and in good standing in Ireland for a long period of time. So we can pass forward into each of these EU countries and on day one MISD2 won't have an impact. MISD2 also requires firms that are proprietary trading firms that satisfy market making standards, that right now we have had, that’s what we want and the CFPC is saying the same thing, if you want direct market access to our markets much like a sponsored access rules that the SEC put in…

Got it. Thanks. And then my second question just around cash, clearly the operating environment was a probably little bit better so far this year than what we would thought during the time deal and probably what you guys. So when it comes use to cash, the quarterly dividend obviously provides a nice support, but how do guys think about the need for excess cash in the business thoughts about catch up dividends or variable dividends once kind of CME model, just updated thoughts on that be helpful? Thanks.

Sure. So from a dividends standpoint, again we look at the payout ratio over a long period of time, right, so obviously the payout ratio this quarter compared to the $0.40 of adjusted EPS was a little lower. The second quarter it was a little bit higher, so we'll let several quarters develop before we revisit that make sure it’s calibrated the right way. I think the policy to return 100% of free cash flow. We have adequate capital to run the business. We've got access to capital if we needed, we've got as a result of the IPO an unsecured revolver. We have secured line. So we feel like we have enough capital to run the business prudently with a proper cushion. And then if when Alex we begin to accumulate excess cash flow over a few quarters then we revisit the question of whether it makes more sense to wave the quarterly dividends or do a CME style fixed dividends. I think we got vies and when we get there in terms of what would more of impact, I think the quarterly dividends we feel like is a good and generous to steady. We probably lean towards doing something more CME] style, but we want a few quarters to develop and look at the payout ratio over a longer period of time before our board decided, we'd recommend to our board to do that.

Makes sense. Thanks very much.

Thank you. Our next question is from Chris Allen with Evercore. Your line is open.

Morning, guys, just wanted to follow up a little bit on the FX markets, doing some channel checks, it sounds like risk appetite is particularly at the banks [indiscernible] materially since Swiss franc events really in the year, I mean, theoretically that created a little bit opportunities for the FX, I am wondering if you saw any of this anything kind underneath the surface within the banks that you're kind of seeing where did that play through in the FX role?

Yes. Good question. Thanks, Chris. I think that point a new phenomenon if you will banks reducing their appetite for risk and not wanting to put large positions on their balance sheet and hold inventories and obviously there is a lot of regulatory and compliance an other issues that have impacted their appetite for that type business. You're right obviously there is some well publicized losses and experience as to result of January 15. So we continue to see up tick in the opportunities and VFX let me be very clear about it, clearly we're not going to on our own replace the balance sheet even with some of our competitors replace the balance sheet of these very, very large banks. So I think the whole category if you will, the whole segment is going through this somewhat seismic changes to how prices are made and people are getting filled and what not and we are important part of that ecosystem. Our VFX segment is a lot correlated with what's going on the CME, obviously we're not trading futures there. So its probably lot more dependent upon better proxy Chris [ph] would be as I said before the folks at Hotspot publish in terms of their own volumes and what EBS and Reuters and FX, some of the other big platform published. And if you look, if you believe the hotspot website and what [indiscernible] which I do, unfortunately the overall market was down almost 4.5%, 5% and Hotspot was down quarter-over-quarter and things like that and obviously they are doing the best increase their volumes. But I just think overall quarter-to-quarter there was decrease demand for pricing in the FX market and certainly that was reflective in what you saw in our performance.

Got it. That’s it’s from me guys, thanks.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is from Bill Katz with Citigroup. Your line is open.

Morning guys. It’s actually Jack Hua [ph] flowing in for Bill. I guess, my first question is just back to August 24, understand obviously high end volumes are good for you guys, but particularly with the ETF restructuring, what kind of happens to your capture rate and environment like that, just to size how much that was compared to the rest of the quarter?

Yes, I mean, August 24 was global and it wasn’t just one day, that entire week and then frankly all of August. So a very nice volume up tick, and then September kinds of get little bit lost in the leaves, but the average volumes in September were over 7 billion shares about 7.3 billion shares per day which is pretty significantly as well. So it wasn’t just one off event, it was quarter increase volumes of volatility. We said before and I'll reiterate it times of volatility our capture rate will increase because there widening bit of spread in market as natural buyers and sellers are more willing to or less patent I guess as part of way to describe it to get in that position. So no, we didn’t make all of money there was dislocation for five or 10 minutes on the New York Stock exchange an other exchanges that 9:30 in the morning on August 24, nothing as simple as that. This was pronounced period of volume and volatility with a firm because of our technology and our risk controls and our ability to manage that risk and offer immediately to natural buyers and sellers was able to provide we think a very good service during that period.

Got it. Thanks. Then I guess my follow up you've mentioned china little bit and Europe more thing coming on exchange, but where else you see the best opportunities for growth you guys going forward?

Yes, I mean, I think Asia overall and you saw at this quarter continues to be an area where we're growing and lot of marketplaces out there, where we really expect the service. Obviously there are smaller markets what China and India would be if you guys can look at the volumes an make those determination. We continue to be excited about what's happening in the fixed income market, again its immaterial to our results right now, which I view as a good thing. I think you will see and NASDAQ has started this with e-speed platform where they are going to sub tick marketplace that’s called [indiscernible] We're going to be an active market maker on that. So those are good market structure evolutions for us, where our market places are evolving and where we've been invited to the party interest rate swaps those are marketplaces where Virtu can provide two sided liquidity and we think we can grow. Our fixed income business right now is de minimis part of what we do overall, when you see platform like e-speed [ph] up with new products, new ideas and trying to evolve their market, frankly the health firms like ours, provide that liquidity and make markets more efficient that’s good thing. One to things that we emphasize on a road show and continue to emphasize in all the conferences and other call that I do is that Virtu makes money not because of inefficiencies in market places, we make more as market place become more efficient. And so that always people scratch their head when they hear me say that, but it’s very, very much very true. As the FX market continue to evolve from a broker control market place to more competitive marketplace where non-traditional market markers can arrive that’s a good thing for our business. So the pie is going to grow, the addressable pie that firms like Virtu have access to is going to grow. So even our market share doesn’t grow or goes down some what, we're going to see an increase in our overall net trading income. You will see that happen in the fixed income market. Now I am going to sit here and say six months form now or 12 months form now the interest rates market is going to be 50% electronic that be foolish to say that. And the number of staff that have, that were members cooperative with a number them see your names and some of them and we believe that market place will continue to grow. It’s a product where firm like our commoditize product where firms like our can provide we think valuable two sided liquidity provision. We'll see how that happens and how it evolves, but that’s a segment we're excited about.

Good thanks.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is from Ashley Serrao with Credit Suisse. Your line is open.

Good morning. On MISD2 just to clarify, you expect non-commendable cost from the current proposals as you been a leader on the regulatory front and then can you also just about the time line realization of the revenue opportunities you spoke about?

Sure. Yes, I mean, we are registered, we've been registered in with the Central Bank Of Ireland since 2012. We've got compliance folks. We deal with all of the reporting requirement of the central bank. Frankly after three years of working with them, we've established a nice working relationship and good reporting relationship. Joe Molluso our CFO meets with them at least two to three times in a year and I go for once a year, as well we've been examine by them. And so it’s up and running and so there will be zero incremental cost to us as a result of MISD2. What I am excited about is a couple of thing about MISD2. Number one, the market making requirement, right now we have what we do provide two sided liquidity. Add to insight continuously and a broad number of European equity securities adds to that and we've got capital supporting. Those are the three or four tenants that what a market marker should do. We've said that publicly over and over again we're very, very encouraged that will be a final part of the proposal. The thing that from a business perspective is very helpful to us is European EPP products or ETF. So if you look and you guys probably a lot a better statistics than I do and I would frankly just be quoting what self side analyst has said in terms of what percentage of ETF market in Europe right now is trading in OTC environment and what percentage of that mark place is transacted in the fully transparent electronic where Virtu to be very competitive. So 3 years ago we had de minimis and non-existing ETF business today we have a very nice profitability successful ETF business and you see that as part…

Thanks for all the color there and then just follow up on some questions that have been asked today, just maybe just tell us how much money do you make on your profitability trading days this quarter?

Actually we've got away from the headlines and histrionics if you will around daily event. So we certainly are happy to publish and we do publish what our average adjusted net trading income is, but I am going to address what we make on a particular basis, not productive and really not part of what the long-term business of Virtu is all about. Its make nice headlines, but truly not what this firm is all about.

Okay. Thanks for taking questions.

Thank you. And our last question is from Alex Kramm with UBS. Your line is open.

Yes, hi. Hello, again come back to follow up of two rather first on the commodities business I don’t think you talk about this much its actually the only area you kind of missed my expectation a little bit so maybe just little bit more color what the biggest segment are that we should paying more attention your natural gas versus oil power some of those thing so we can model that in the future? Thanks.

Yes, it’s a good question. Thank you. I mean, I thin you hit it right on the head, which if you look at natural gas very significantly market maker natural gas, it is not a business segment that - frankly natural gas prices have been depressed I don’t want to talk about why or how its really not my business to do, and frankly I am not really good at it. But if you look at quarter-over-quarter what the implied volatility was in both crude and natural gas they were both down significantly during the quarter. So crude volatility was down by about 14% and natural gas volatility was down about 18% .The volumes in natural gas were down somewhat, but – I am sorry, its realized volatile [indiscernible] Thank you. That will have an impact on how we do. Certainly volumes our P&L will track more linearly to volumes, but volatility is generally our friend in particularly in commodities markets where natural producers or hedges are more willing to pay bid offer spread to get out along the curve, that’s where our strategies will do very well. So when you have a period where natural gas is hovering in the $2 range it doesn’t really – they earn a lot of price level transitions during the day, there is less opportunities for us to provide bid offer market making services in that particularly product. So I would encourage you to look at some of the volatility numbers. We're happy to share those we get from public sources as well, but that and leading indicator if you will or significantly indicator how we're going to quarter-over-quarter in that segment.

Okay. Great and then just my last one maybe a little bit big picture, but obviously in some markets you connect directly in other markets you obviously seen partners, brokers banks. So just wondering with some of the regulatory changes that you discussed earlier in particular some of the capital requirements going higher for some of the partners you have the banks, the brokers are getting squeezed more and more are you seeing any sort of things getting passed through are – your funding cost anything increasing and does that impact your NPI or you haven’t seen any changes and don’t really expect anything?

Yes it’s a very good question and obviously look the business is not getting cheaper and you are right, there are firms that are either getting out of the business or more importantly I think you talk to some of the big prime brokers, I don’t want name, they are producing the number of clients they have and really focusing on how your value clients that provides more repeatable business. And that’s frankly another benefit of our scope and scale. So we partner with large prime brokers like ABN, JPMorgan, Citibank, Goldman Sachs the CIBC UBS and I am probably missing a few. But the common theme is large international money center bank that have made a strategic decisions that they want to be in the prime brokerage business and are financially stable, I don’t - and those banks see us a very good partner because we're global and we're very active. So we have relationships with all of the aforementioned in everyone of regions around the world. And so we'll provide them with volume in Japan, but we can also provide with volume in Brazil and in United States and in the European counties and these guys very much want market share volume and what not. And so at the end of the day we are viewed as very, very good customers because were high volume with low touch, we've in business with them for a long time, they understand our risk we're very transparent with them [indiscernible] that we're now public reporting company and we have publicly available financial. So their risk folks are comfortable with us.0 So at the en do day I wouldn’t suspect that our commissions expense line if you will is going to down, its certainly not. I mean, the cost of trading. But I think as a larger firm that has global scale that can offer these folks market share and volume and therefore revenue across the globe I think assuming they are not going to get out of the business I don’t think they will we'll continue to be valid customers these firms going forward.

All right…

Operator, I am sorry vetted out?

That’s it’s. Thanks very much with the color. Thank you very much. Well, I think we're done. So I appreciated everybody the taking the time this morning to listen and to ask great questions. We continue to be available to answer any questions if folks have and we look forward to talking to you when we're done with our fourth quarter. Thanks very much.

Ladies and gentlemen thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.